From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Scott Xe
Sent: 18 January 2009 02:58
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
This EuP regulation implementation regarding standby power has legal effect in
Woodgate
Sent: 2009?~1??14?? 5:53
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
In message <003801c975c4$ff12c5f0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Tue,
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell writes:
>So the document called "COMMISSION
I saw written...
"Considering the fact that if device is used in heated location than
reducing its power (active and stand-by) saves no energy I came to:
Let's start from reducing outdoor devices stand-by mode ? ;-)
Piotr Galka "
On that basis, we should also consider reducing the power (active
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Gremmen"
> I believe *your* focus should be directed towards:
> "can my design be used in such amounts that
> a considerable amount of otherwise spoiled energy
> can be saved, and can a small effort on our companies
> side contribute to the energy wealth
In message ,
dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009, "James, Chris" writes:
>Slightly out of date but this subset web of AeA is good for EuP ref:
>http://tinyurl.com/82tqsb
>
>
>Market Transformation Programme
>http://www.mtprog.com/cms/
>
>AEA
>http://www.aeat.co.uk/cms/
For factual stuff, the site appears
09 21:22
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
So the document called "COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1275/2008
of 17 December 2008" is not the EuP Directive but references it,
and is intended to revise the EuP Directive ?
And the
In message <003801c975c4$ff12c5f0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Tue,
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell writes:
>So the document called "COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1275/2008 of 17
>December 2008" is not the EuP Directive but references it,
Yes.
> and is intended to revise the EuP Directive ?
uP, and contains the 'Annex
V' to which the former is refering to ?
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:49 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regar
In message
<72b8947772cf0948adaa9853631663fb28537c8...@pbi-namsg-02.mgdpbi.global.pv
t>, dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jim Hulbert writes:
>Article 4 refers to the "management system set out in Annex V".
I don't see any problem. Article 4 says:
The procedure for assessing conformity referred to in
Article 4 refers to the "management system set out in Annex V".
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:54 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation
c-p...@ieee.org] Namens Kunde, Brian
Verzonden: dinsdag 13 januari 2009 18:31
Aan: John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org
Onderwerp: RE: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby
power
This reminds of a situation that occurred many years ago where the US
Air Force had a contract with a compute
ironment before printing this
e-mail.
John Woodgate
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org
01/13/2009 12:00 PM To
"Kunde, Brian"
cc
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject
Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
In message
<0ed66cd2c9bd0a459d54fb9119a60567d55...@mailserver.lecotc.com>, dated
Tue, 13 Jan 2009, "Kunde, Brian" writes:
>So, it would be difficult to identify something as "professional" when
>the definition of the type of devices used in a home is constantly
>changing.
Predicting the fut
tly changing.
IMHO,
The Other Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:07 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
In message
,
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, l
In message
,
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, lauren_cr...@amat.com writes:
>This seems to create some ambiguity with regard to the question of
>"does this regulation apply to consumer-type equipment that happens to
>be integrated as a component of industrial equipment?"
It does mean that, and I don'
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
lauren_cr...@amat.com
Sent: 13 January 2009 15:48
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
What I find troubling in this new reg is the last line of the definition for
In message <001801c97593$6e3291e0$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Tue,
13 Jan 2009, Brian O'Connell writes:
>Annex V
>
What Annex V?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Wo
- external use -
Save paper and trees! Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail.
"James, Chris"
Sent by: emc-p...@ieee.org
01/13/2009 06:35 AM To
cc
Subject
First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby power
Annex V
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of
James, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:35 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby
power
http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3
=
Chris
-
This message is from the IEEE
In message ,
dated Tue, 13 Jan 2009, "James, Chris" writes:
>
>If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where
>consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another
>party to go to... L
There is a similar interpretation issue with the last p
http://tinyurl.com/6tkth3
Entered into force 7/1/09
If the interpretation of Annex I (3) (below) is the same as RoHS where
consumer covered B2B professional products also then we have another party to
go to... :-(
3. Consumer equipment
Radio sets
Television sets
Videocam
21 matches
Mail list logo
