sufficient to distinguish IS from non-IS, especially when the customer
had become used to the blue for IS.
Good luck, - Steve Brody
"Massey, Doug C." wrote:
> Hello group -
>
> I have another question about equipment for use in hazardous locations. I
> find no requirements
Yes - same message and issue. I forwarded to administrators Scott Douglas and
Mike Cantwell for additional info if possible. I am, or was, subscribed through
my IEEE.org alias and then forwarded to my Comcast.net email account.
> On April 24, 2019 at 11:32 AM Doug Powell mailto:doug...@gmail.co
It did.
> On April 24, 2019 at 11:15 AM "Nyffenegger, Dave"
> wrote:
>
>
> I received the same systematic notification last night as everyone else
> and have not done anything with it. I am receiving email today but I don’t
> think my post from earlier this morning went through. So we
HI all,
I have a client with whom I am having a discussion about grounding for an EN
60204-1 product. The product consists of 3 sub-modules all of which use mains
power derived from the first module where the external mains comes into the
unit.
In the first module the ground from the branch
> 79 2015 is harmonized with EN 60204-1 and I don’t think there is such a
> requirement in there either.
>
>
>
> The use of the screw-less DIN rail terminal blocks for protective bonding
> connections should be fine if that is their intended purpose and they are
>
Experts:
One of my clients has a process tool for use in a controlled EMI environment,
that incorporates a plasma generator for cleaning housings before glue is
applied. The plasma electron density is typically around 1011 cm-3
There are two parts to this question:
* an EMC test house told t
IMO, part of the answer is how it is being sold. If the product is known and
sold as Model ABC, then it should be tested as a system for compliance to the
applicable directives and standards and a DoC would be written for Model ABC
and it would indicate the various 'components' that comprise Mo
...@danaher.com mailto:hunter.bi...@danaher.com
(618) 384-0557
Best Wishes to all for a Happy and Healthy Happy New Year,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product
ange the design then we will need to find a different standard to
apply for. We’re all confused because we’ve submitted other cables for this
project that passed UL 2238 with the shield connected to the connector shell.
Thoughts, comments, but no sticks or stones, please.
Thanks all,
Steve Br
t; Mike Cantwell mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org >
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org >
> David Heald mailto:dhe...@gmail.com >
>
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
-
oduct.
However is there an OSHA requirement for how heavy the center panels can be
(now at about 55 lbs), and how they are to be handled - 2 people, lifting
device, etc.?
Inputs gratefully welcome.
Thanks,
.
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617
experience in getting this approval
* if so how long did it take, what is required, and how painful was it to
complete?
You can reply to this email or privately at stev...@productehscosulting.com
mailto:stev...@productehscosulting.com
Thanks and stay healthy,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net
with a
non-detachable power cord is when the power cord is hard wired to the unit
under test, but still has a plug for mains connection.
Thoughts?
Thanks in advance and you can reply here or privately to
stev...@productehsconsulting.com
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr
healthy,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All
his team let me know
by private email at stev...@productehsconsulting.com
mailto:stev...@productehsconsulting.com
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Pr
...@productehsconsulting.com
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send
Hello all,
I have a client who is looking for an entity in the UK they can contract with
to be their UK AR.
Any suggestions, preferably based on experience?
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
rst I have heard of this and as recently as two weeks ago I
received, from a different 3rd party, a 61010 report that had all UL, CSA, IEC,
and EN standards on it.
Can someone explain to me if this is a recent OSHA change for NRTL reports, and
if so when was it implemented?
Thanks,
Steve Brody
mains surge to impact the
secondary voltage?
I look to the experts for an explanation.
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engine
Thank you to all who provided a response to my question. Your input and
comments are, as always, greatly appreciated.
Happy Holidays to all I look forward to seeing you at ISPCE in Dallas in May.
Best regards,
> On 12/01/2022 3:51 PM Steve Brody wrote:
>
>
> I have
issing?
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
the systems the facility
panel number
Thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion
eable, you may need
> additional risk mitigations beyond what you propose.
>
> Good to see you at ISPCE, too!
>
> Mike Sherman
> Sherman PSC LLC
>
>
>
> > > On 05/15/2023 6:25 PM CDT Steve Brody
> wrote:
> >
> >
>
(requirements for
visual, acoustic, and tactile signals) and did not find anything that prohibits
the use of a single LED.
Thoughts?
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from
be further
assistance or clarify any of the above.
Steve Brody
Product EHS Consulting LLC
StevenB @ ProductEHSConsulting .com
www . ProductEHSConsulting .com
- Original Message -
From: "Gary McInturff "
To: EMC-PSTC@ LISTSERV .IEEE.ORG
Sent: Monday
Because when in use the cart is supported by [properly rated] feet, then the
tests for castors should no longer apply?.
That is the third question.
Your thoughts and comments are requested and appreciated, as always.
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 60
Is it correct that an AR on an EU DoC cannot be based in the UK, even though
the UK is still accepting EU DoCs, and therefore EU ARs?
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is
able?
You can respond here publicly or privately, or at
stev...@productehsconsulting.com mailto:stevenb@prduct
Thanks in advance,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is
nkedIn
> https://streaklinks.com/B2gQNFh5uTDCaJcTcQbLipiI/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fcoloradocomplianceguy%2F
>
> (UTC-06:00, US-MDT)
>
>
>
>
>
> ᐧ
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 10:36 PM Steve Brody mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >
ssment document.
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send
Hi all,
If you have experience with UL 3100, Standard for Safety for Automated Mobile
Platforms (AMPs), please contact me privately at
stev...@productehsconsulting.com mailto:stev...@productehsconsulting.com
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617
when your product is being inspected,
but will instead just look for the approval marks and rating as
stipulated in your end product report.
Steve Brody
Regulatory Management Group, Inc.
Email - sbr...@prodigy.net
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
additional help email me directly.
Steve Brody
Regulatory Management Group, Inc.
Email - sbr...@prodigy.net
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail
g through sales and marketing is the least
favorable path if you want any info such
as this.
Your a compliance guy - be inventive. It's like finding a loophole in a
standard.
If all else fails write me directly and we'll see what we an do.
Steve Brody
Sr. Compliance Engine
.
Responses can be emailed to Robert Pratt at robert.pr...@axcelis.com, or
Steve Brody at sbr...@prodigy.net or steve.br...@thermoneslab.com,
or just reply to the list server.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc
ing people should look at the competition and
see what they have done for approvals on their products. If the approvals on
their products give the customer a a warmer fuzzier feeling than your unapproved
products...
Steve Brody
Personal Opinions Only
(but based on 25 + years in th
Marking.
Steve Brody
Sr. Compliance Engineer
Thermo NESLAB
steve.br...@neslab.com or sbr...@prodigy.net
..
Kevin Harris wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> I just had a question posed to me that made me think a little bit. So I will
> pose it to all of you. First some preamble. A device is goin
is for
internal servo motors, AC and DC.
My understanding was that as long as the motors are not external to the product,
that a 1077 device is OK for circuit protection in this scenario.
Is this correct or am I wrong?
Sorry I can't provide a circuit diagram.
Thanks,
Steve Brody
. my client.
You can respond here or privately to: stev...@productehsconsulting.com
mailto:stev...@productehsconsulting.com or text my cell.
Thanks in advance and Best Wishes for the Holiday Season and Happy New Year to
all.
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603
Following to my earlier email, does the end product need ne retested for RED
compliance?
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
EN 50566 : 2017
EMC (Art.3(1) (b)):
EN 301 489-1 v2.2.3
EN 301 489-17 v3.2.4
EN 301 489-3 v2.1.1
Spectrum (Art.3(2)
EN 300 328 v2.2.2 (WLAN & BT)
EN 301 893 v2.1.
EN 300 440 v2.2.1
What needs to be on the end product DoC?
Thanks in advance,
S
,
> https://www.redca.eu/Unrestricted%20Documents/TGN/REDCA%20TGN%2001%20RED%20Radio%20equipment%20modules%20V1.2a%20March%202020.pdf
> TGN30 on Risk Assessments
> https://www.redca.eu/Unrestricted%20Documents/TGN/REDCA%20TGN%2030%20-%20RED%20NB%20Risk%20assessment%20guide%20-%20V3.1%2
examined.
This does not appear to be a hazard to service personnel, but I was asked if
there are any requirements to mitigate this.
Thoughts and comments, please.
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
.
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
EMC-PSTC
44 matches
Mail list logo