Alex,
The new A2 (Feb 2001) of EN61000-4-2:1995 is very clear on this point.
Paragraph 7.1.3 states the charge on the EUT shall be removed prior to
each applied ESD pulse. I think this would take care of the problem you are
seeing with the charge reversal that you talk about in question 2.
Dan
plates arranged in a coaxial manner.
Dan Kinney
-Original Message-
From: George Tang [SMTP:gt...@lsil.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:17 PM
To: Ken Javor; Price, Ed; 'EMC-PSTC List'
Subject: RE: Explosive Atmosphere Safety Question
You are exactly right. I used
John,
This looks like a good site. I have noticed one point you should be aware
of. EN61000-4-2 is listed with Amendment 1 only. Amendment 2 came out in
2001 and has some significant changes.
As I go through you site, I'll send whatever comments I have to you
directly.
Dan
-Original
Try http://www.jfwindustries.com/
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [SMTP:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:45 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Coaxial Switches
Other than Adilent, what are some other sources for low power (1W)
rating. Does anyone have any experience with either SIL ratings or IEC61508
who might be able to shed some light?
Dan Kinney
Lead Qualification Engineer
Horner APG, LLC
Indianapolis, IN
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
Dave,
Everything seems reasonable and right to me. I would do it just as you have
stated but I have never worked with a system of this sort (RF port and
antenna).
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Spencer, David H [SMTP:david.spen...@usa.xerox.com]
Sent: Wednesday
questions, but for now, all of you have given me a clear direction to
follow.
Thanks again.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG, LLC
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http
and UL 508 and UL1604, but we are unfamiliar
with telephone line connectivity. Can anyone tell me what FCC or other
requirements will need to be met for sale of this product in the U.S.; no
intention at this time to sell outside the U.S.
Thanks
Dan Kinney
Horner APG, LLC
Indianapolis
the document. In all cases, tests
are conducted with an 80% modulated 1kHz sine wave (instead of pulse
modulation at 200Hz). A1 was added to justify this.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: wmf...@aol.com [SMTP:wmf...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:39 PM
me a
call and I will read it to you. I can be reached at (317) 916-4274
extension 462.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Wood [SMTP:andrew.w...@landinst.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:46 AM
To: 'emc-pstc'
Subject: Request for help RE: NEMA 7
. Is the
proper method then to lift the ground leg of the regulator and then work on
down the line lifting each current conducting component to ground?
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee
shall
be used where contact discharge cannot be applied. What conditions would
make it such that contact discharge could not be applied?
Thanks in advance.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Douglas C. Smith [SMTP:d...@emcesd.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 2:54 PM
the installer
and the FAA or an issue for us to be concerned and involved with.
My request might be a little off topic for this group, but if anyone can
point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it.
Dan Kinney
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
to receive multiple views and reassuring when several tend to tell you
the same thing.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: S Raz [SMTP:ieee-...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 4:00 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: jim_bac...@monarch.com
Subject
too, have to tell all of you. I would be in
total darkness without your insight.
Thanks,
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Ned Devine [SMTP:ndev...@entela.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 2:19 PM
To: Emc-Pstc (E-mail)
Subject: RE: creepage distances (EN61131
my
interpretations and can be distilled down to one question; have I
interpreted each point above correctly? Any advice, general or specific,
will be greatly appreciated.
Happy Holidays all.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC
Joe,
UL uses super glue to attach the thermocouple.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Joe Finlayson [SMTP:jfinlay...@telica.com]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 2:53 PM
To: 'NEBS Newsgroup'; 'EMC PSTC'
Subject: Thermocouple issues
I am in the process
47CFR Part 15 Subpart B, paragraph 15.101(a) would lead you believe so.
Within the table, under Type of device, it says Other Class B digital
devices and peripherals. - Verification.
Dan Kinney
-Original Message-
From: Courtland Thomas [SMTP:ctho...@patton.com]
Sent: Tuesday
Thanks all for the enlightening feedback. Most of the information was
consistent and helps me make a case. This group continues to be one of my
best sources of professional information.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
Great point Dave. This and paragraph 15.29 are found under Subpart A -
General. In my book, they're on page 615 and 619.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: David Spencer [SMTP:dspen...@oresis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 7:25 PM
To: 'Grant, Tania (Tania
Bravo Robert - you're right on the mark.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Loop, Robert [SMTP:rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:58 AM
To: tgr...@lucent.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Got another beef about an NRTL
. And this
will cost you for their time and transportation. If you have one or two
applications and you're dealing with large equipments, this might be a
viable option. However, if your product is spread all over creation,
there's no way.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From
and
two durations (and no discrimination in performance).
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [SMTP:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 7:23 AM
To: david_ster...@ademco.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN61000-6-2
Schaffner does. They can be reached at 800-367-5566 or 732-225-9533.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: David Gelfand [SMTP:gelf...@memotec.com]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:07 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: 90 V gas-filled arrestors source
I just reviewed my copy of EN 61000-4-3 and can see where it replaces ENV
50140 but no mention of ENV 50204. What am I missing?
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
-Original Message-
From: Gert Gremmen [SMTP:cet...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:54 PM
To: Helge Knudsen; emc-p
Why do you need the MOVs? Why not just take the L N to ground via a gas
tube each?
Dan
dan.kin...@heapg.com
-Original Message-
From: James, Chris [SMTP:c...@dolby.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 7:10 AM
To: 'Peter Merguerian'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE:
of specific dimensions. I
would appreciate any comment on the apparent requirement for a 1m by 1m
ground plane as our ground plane is 36 inches by 6 feet.
Dan Kinney
dan.kin...@heapg.com
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
to the
relevant standard [EN 50081-1]?
Dan Kinney
dan.kin...@heapg.com
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line
Chirs,
Everything you said sounds reasonable except EN61000-6-2 is not a product
specific standard; it is a generic standard.
Dan Kinney
Horner APG
(317) 916-4274
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell, Chris [SMTP:chr...@gnlp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 7:35 AM
To: emc-p
: http://www.heapg.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [SMTP:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:36 AM
To: 'Dan Kinney (A)'
Subject: RE: Immunity Port distinction EN 50082-2:1995
Yeah, no sweat.
If the ports are for signal functions
: http://www.heapg.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [SMTP:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:28 AM
To: 'Dan Kinney (A)'
Subject: RE: EMC - Declaration of Incorporation?
Dan;
Until 6 minths ago I was working for one of your competitors
Greetings all.
There is little difference between Table 2 and Table 3 of EN 50082-2 but
there is some. I don't know if the ports on my products are considered
Ports for signal lines and data buses not involved in process control,
etc. (Table 2) or if they are Ports for process, measurement and
I too have a problem with application of DOC or DOI. We produce
Programmable Logic Controllers and associated Input/Output cards. I've been
told I should use the DOI since the PLC will be incorporated into some
larger machine that it will control and that the I/O cards will be
incorporated into
33 matches
Mail list logo
