NRTL Acceptance

2001-02-06 Thread WOODS
A previous message indicated that Listing marks from some NRTLs may not be accepted by all jurisdictions. Has anyone encountered a jurisdiction that did not accept the TUV Rheinland Listing mark? Richard Woods --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-24 Thread Frank West
: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 11:22 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: NRTL acceptance Vitaly, Allow me to try and clear some confusion over NRTLs and marks. NRTL is not a mark. An NRTL is an OSHA Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory accredited to evaluate

Re: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-24 Thread Frank West
Hello Tac I am sure that you will get many answers to this question. The short answer is it's only important if you wish to sell any! Any PC manufacturers that you supply who are attempting to get their end product certified will require your power supply to be also certified. To cover all

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-24 Thread Frank West
of us who is recognized CO and who is not. Best Regards -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 5:02 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: NRTL acceptance S. William, Thanks

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-24 Thread Frank West
@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance George, Canada is not as straight forward as that. There is not a mutual agreement. In order for a lab to issue a Canadian Approval Mark, the lab must be accredited as a CO(Certifying

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-24 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
, etc. Thanks again -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 11:22 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance Vitaly, Allow me to try and clear some confusion over NRTLs and marks

Re: NRTL acceptance of component certifications

1999-11-24 Thread Peter E. Perkins
Tac PSNet, Altho we've discussed this here at some length before, the certification and marking of components is intended to simplify the evaluation and certification of equipment because the component doesn't have to be evaluated again. This works well if the test house

Re: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Tac Pham
Hello all, Would the NRTL program be a big plus for the ITE certified component, such as power supply??? Tac Pham HC Power, inc. I tried to recall NRTLs that were approved for asessments of ITE to UL1950. I did not overlook MET (listed in my note), but may have missed NTS which may fit

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
/Lexmark@LEXMARK, emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance Graham, In the second paragraph, I said CSA is recognized NRTL. Thus, CSA can issue both NRTL and c-NRTL marks (as well as UL and c-UL marks as far as I

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
Chatsworth, CA 91311 Best Regards, Vitaly Gorodetsky -Original Message- From: Graham Rae Dulmage [SMTP:grdulm...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 7:06 PM To: Gorodetsky, Vitaly Cc: 'geor...@lexmark.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: NRTL acceptance

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance S. William, Thanks for the words on COs and TOs and SCCs. Apparantly UL is one or more of these, as the c-UL mark is legally acceptable in Canada. Now, what other COs has the SCC accredited to issue an approved Canadian mark

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Kevin Robinson
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: NRTL acceptance Kevin, Thanks for the website pointer. I found the site nearly impossible to use via the search

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Ned Devine
e-mail ndev...@entela.com PS Yes, Entela is a CO. -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 8:02 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance S. William, Thanks for the words on COs and TOs

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance You can check out the SCC website at www.scc.ca http://www.scc.ca , click on accreditations and then certification orgs and type in the name of your favorite test lab (or your least favorite as the case

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread swilliam
:(bcc: Steve Williams/SDD/NAM/APCC) From: geor...@lexmark.com on 11/23/99 08:02 AM Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance S. William, Thanks for the words on COs and TOs and SCCs. Apparantly UL is one or more of these, as the c-UL mark is legally acceptable in Canada. Now, what other COs has

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Kevin Robinson
, 1999 8:02 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:RE: NRTL acceptance S. William, Thanks for the words on COs and TOs and SCCs. Apparantly UL is one

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance George, Canada is not as straight forward as that. There is not a mutual agreement. In order for a lab to issue a Canadian Approval Mark, the lab must be accredited as a CO(Certifying Organization) by the SCC(Standards Council of Canada). The CO must use data that has come

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Frank West
...@sensormatic.com Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 2:07 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: NRTL acceptance Terry, We have used four agencies through the years, and still have many products with other than our main agency. Over the past three years

Re: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Graham Rae Dulmage
-Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 5:11 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance Actually, the following NRTLs are approved by OSHA for evaluation to UL 1950: UL, CSA, ITS

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread swilliam
/SDD/NAM/APCC) From: geor...@lexmark.com on 11/22/99 03:42 PM Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance I tried to recall NRTLs that were approved for asessments of ITE to UL1950. I did not overlook MET (listed in my note), but may have missed NTS which may fit this description. I'm not sure the others

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread georgea
@interlock.lexmark.com on 11/22/99 03:10:00 PM To: George_Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark@LEXMARK, emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance George, You have overlooked MET, NTS, WYLE, SWRI and others. For a complete list

RE: NRTL Acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread Scott Douglas
- From: oover...@lexmark.com [mailto:oover...@lexmark.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:21 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: NRTL Acceptance Importance: Low Try this website for current information on approved NRTLs. http://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/optsc/nrtl/index.html; OO

RE: NRTL Acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread rbusche
] Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 7:21 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:Re: NRTL Acceptance Try this website for current information on approved NRTLs. http://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/optsc/nrtl

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread swilliam
...@sensormatic.com on 11/22/99 10:47 AM Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance A corollary to Jim's comments -- We were using a non-traditional NRTL with favorable experiences -- rapid approval process, cost competitive, etc. Then a particular contract that we were bidding on specified the traditional NRTL

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread UMBDENSTOCK
: RE: NRTL acceptance Terry, We have used four agencies through the years, and still have many products with other than our main agency. Over the past three years, there was one incident with a NEC inspector that did not correctly identify the backwards RU of a very famous NRTL

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread georgea
: NRTL acceptance Terry and George, In this country of ours, there are three equally acceptable safety marks: UL, ETL and NRTL. But, as we all know, some acceptable marks are more equal than others. -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Friday

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-22 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: NRTL acceptance Terry and George, In this country of ours, there are three equally acceptable safety marks: UL, ETL and NRTL. But, as we all know, some acceptable marks are more equal than others. -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-19 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
, 1999 11:02 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: NRTL acceptance Terry, You have raised a very good question. The problem is that the U.S. had only one approved safety agency for so long, that it is difficult to wean non-laymen away from that one agency mark. This includes

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-19 Thread GOEDDERZ
Goedderz Sensormatic -- From: Terry Meck[SMTP:tjm...@accusort.com] Reply To: Terry Meck Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 12:25 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: NRTL acceptance Hi: We have been using an old reliable but very busy Safety agency

NRTL acceptance

1999-11-19 Thread georgea
PM Please respond to tjmeck%accusort@interlock.lexmark.com To: emc-pstc%ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: NRTL acceptance Hi: We have been using an old reliable but very busy Safety agency to review our products and apply their safety mark

NRTL acceptance

1999-11-19 Thread Terry Meck
Hi: We have been using an old reliable but very busy Safety agency to review our products and apply their safety mark. From time to time we are approached by their competitors, NRTLs, or European soon to be NRTL labs for our business. My question is in this `NRTL enlightened market are there