Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 September 2016 at 02:06, Gene Heskett wrote: > Looking at the lut5 modules man page, where it claims all kinds of > functions can be performed, I am not grokking what it says. > It allows you to define a single output value for every combination of the 5 input

Re: [Emc-users] Got "new" PC, some question about setting it up.

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 12:06:47 Chris Albertson wrote: > Gene, > > That was a good data point: " 60IPS". May I ask about the lead > screw and if you are micro stepping? And the motor size. Lead screw is a 1605, 40 tooth gear on the motor by way of a taperloc hub I made, ditto for the

Re: [Emc-users] Got "new" PC, some question about setting it up.

2016-09-16 Thread Chris Albertson
Gene, I think I understand now On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2016 12:06:47 Chris Albertson wrote: > > > Lead screw is a 1605, 40 tooth gear on the motor by way of a taperloc hub > I made, ditto for the 80 tooth gear on the

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 11:38:20 Jon Elson wrote: > On 09/16/2016 09:58 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 16 September 2016 08:58:53 andy pugh wrote: > >> On 16 September 2016 at 13:46, Gene Heskett > > > > wrote: > >>> Ok, what I need is a true output for any input

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 11:43:53 andy pugh wrote: > On 16 September 2016 at 15:58, Gene Heskett wrote: > > bookmarked. But where does it display the answer? > > J40 I saw that, said 0xB That said I did have to make one change in what I posted before, because it

Re: [Emc-users] Got "new" PC, some question about setting it up.

2016-09-16 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Joshua Glenn wrote: > .You run it by opening Terminal then copy/paste this command into the > command line (then press enter): > > while true ; do echo "nothing" > /dev/null ; done > > That will start the cpu hog running, then run the

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
Maybe it would be easier for you to draw out what you want to do with ladder logic? - Original Message - From: "Gene Heskett" To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:38:43 AM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question On Thursday 15

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 04:15:07 andy pugh wrote: > On 16 September 2016 at 02:06, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Looking at the lut5 modules man page, where it claims all kinds of > > functions can be performed, I am not grokking what it says. > > It allows you to define a

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 September 2016 at 13:46, Gene Heskett wrote: > Ok, what I need is a true output for any input condition of i0 and i1 > except i1 true and i0 false. function 0x2, the only answer that lut5.py > gives you, doesn't do that. > That's function FFFB actually.

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
- Original Message - > From: "Gene Heskett" > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 8:46:25 AM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question > > On Friday 16 September 2016 04:15:07 andy pugh wrote: > > > On 16 September 2016 at

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 September 2016 at 15:58, Gene Heskett wrote: > bookmarked. But where does it display the answer? J40 -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." — George

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 08:26:07 Todd Zuercher wrote: > Maybe it would be easier for you to draw out what you want to do with > ladder logic? No experience at that Todd. But I believe I have it working. A timedelay to give the spindle time to start moving. 200 milliseconds. A retriggerable

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 16 September 2016 08:58:53 andy pugh wrote: > On 16 September 2016 at 13:46, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Ok, what I need is a true output for any input condition of i0 and > > i1 except i1 true and i0 false. function 0x2, the only answer that > > lut5.py gives you,

Re: [Emc-users] Got "new" PC, some question about setting it up.

2016-09-16 Thread Chris Albertson
Gene, That was a good data point: " 60IPS". May I ask about the lead screw and if you are micro stepping? And the motor size. I think I'm going to design for a target speed of 100 IPS but if it comes out 60 I'll be happy. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Gene Heskett

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Jon Elson
On 09/16/2016 09:58 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2016 08:58:53 andy pugh wrote: > >> On 16 September 2016 at 13:46, Gene Heskett > wrote: >>> Ok, what I need is a true output for any input condition of i0 and >>> i1 except i1 true and i0 false. function

Re: [Emc-users] Got "new" PC, some question about setting it up.

2016-09-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
I've found that a half stepping motor (400step/rev) with a scale of 2000 steps/inch (5 turns/inch screw lead) works pretty well for a 100ipm with software stepping. - Original Message - From: "Chris Albertson" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
- Original Message - > From: "Todd Zuercher" > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 9:24:55 AM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question > > I would have thought that 0xc would have given

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
- Original Message - > From: "Todd Zuercher" > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:09:35 PM > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question > > > > - Original Message - > > From:

Re: [Emc-users] Oneshot question

2016-09-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 September 2016 at 18:09, Todd Zuercher wrote: > > I feel dumb, no idea how I got that wrong number the first time should > have been 0xb. (or 0xfffb if you worry about the unused bits) Actually, to be really on the safe side, and to ensure that no spurious