rceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2019 17:31:03 Ken Strauss wrote:
>
> > Yes, a cute design. However, unless I missed it, he doesn't address
> > determining the varying stickout of the cutter. After every to
being to verify that
the cat is well and truly dead. :-[
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 5:24 PM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with
plus
the height setter.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 5:24 PM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>
> On Thursday 10 January
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:43 PM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>
> On Monday 07 January 2019 05:22:53 andy pugh wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 05:07, Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users
> >
>
https://hackaday.com/2016/06/20/hackaday-prize-entry-diy-automatic-tool-changer/
Martin
From: Gene Heskett
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 12:43 PM
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
On Monday 07
On Monday 07 January 2019 05:22:53 andy pugh wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 05:07, Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users
>
> wrote:
> > I've seen some that have each tool holder coded and read the holders
> > in the chain or carousel as it moves.
>
> In fact the machine in the first post is just such a
How many sockets on that chain? Could it run the other direction? What about
modifying to be able to number the chain sockets so the tool locations can be
tracked? Could still have it so that if it finds an empty socket or wrong tool
number in a socket it would do a full pass on the chain to
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 12:01 PM Ken Strauss wrote:
> Wow! Support for 32000 tools! I would have thought that a 10-bit barcode
> would be sufficient for most any machine.
>
> > Each tool has 15 rings that can be 'present' or not. So when I tool is
> > called - the chain just runs around until it
he tools move around so the system has to keep track of where they
>>> are.
>>> Nice video. Thanks for posting that.
>>>
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Sam Sokolik [mailto:samco...@gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Janu
ing that.
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Sam Sokolik [mailto:samco...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: January-07-19 9:00 AM
>> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>> >
>
r posting that.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam Sokolik [mailto:samco...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: January-07-19 9:00 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
> >
> > That is our mach
But the tools move around so the system has to keep track of where they are.
Nice video. Thanks for posting that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Sokolik [mailto:samco...@gmail.com]
> Sent: January-07-19 9:00 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [
Jeeze... Let me re-word my previous email...
That is our machine... We just call the next tool after the previous tool
change.. (too easy?) So the tool is ready before the next op.. (as long
as the operation isn't too short - then it has to wait a bit depending on
tool location in the
That is our machine... The we just call the next tool after the previous
tool change.. (too easy?) So the tool is ready before the next op.. (as
long as the operation isn't too long..)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39q6kvrSBSk=2s
sam
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jon Elson wrote:
> On
On 01/06/2019 11:29 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
Excuse my ignorance. The G Code selects a tool by #. The operator has placed
the tools into the numbered positions for the tool changer.
Now here I guess it gets interesting. Most efficient would be if the G-Code
Parser read ahead and signaled
The Toyoda FA800 horizontal with a Fanuc 16i control at MPM has a tool
changer that uses assigned pockets. Immediately after a tool change the
programmer tells the control what the next tool will be using a T number.
The carousel positions the next tool number to be picked up by the tool
change
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 05:07, Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users
wrote:
>
> I've seen some that have each tool holder coded and read the holders in the
> chain or carousel as it moves.
In fact the machine in the first post is just such a machine. The tool
holders all have a mechanical bar-code made of
January-06-19 9:05 PM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Cc: Gregg Eshelman
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer with swiveling arm
>
> I've seen some that have each tool holder coded and read the holders in the
> chain or carousel as it moves. The system
I've seen some that have each tool holder coded and read the holders in the
chain or carousel as it moves. The system has no idea where any of the tools
are but it does know the difference between an empty spot and one with a tool.
So when a tool is requested it just runs the carousel or chain
On 01/06/2019 10:54 AM, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
To clarify the question:
With this type of tool changer, one could speed up the tool change delay:
1. when loading a tool
1. unload the previous tool into one side of the arm
2. move the chain so that the new tool is ready to be
To clarify the question:
With this type of tool changer, one could speed up the tool change delay:
1. when loading a tool
1. unload the previous tool into one side of the arm
2. move the chain so that the new tool is ready to be loaded (if not
already there)
3. grab the
https://www.dropbox.com/s/nkw590aq1koyiif/toolchange.mp4?dl=0
or this?
This is LinuxCNC on an Enshu running a tool change component I wrote. It
checks the tool change status when starting and recovers from all but one
positional error. The error is doesn't recover from is with the tool change
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 6:33 AM andy pugh wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 at 08:43, nkp wrote:
> >
> > Are there any examples where the tool is prepared in advance?
>
> > like this
> >
> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/toolchangerspindle.JPG
>
> You mean other than that one?
>
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 at 08:43, nkp wrote:
>
> Are there any examples where the tool is prepared in advance?
> like this
> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/toolchangerspindle.JPG
You mean other than that one?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment
On Saturday 05 January 2019 03:42:43 nkp wrote:
> Are there any examples where the tool is prepared in advance?
>
> Machine : tool changer with swiveling arm.
>
> like this
> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/toolchangerspindl
>e.JPG (image taken from the forum)
>
Neat.
Are there any examples where the tool is prepared in advance?
Machine : tool changer with swiveling arm.
like this
http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/toolchangerspindle.JPG
(image taken from the forum)
___
Emc-users mailing list
be exchanged or
> put away.
>
>
> Rick
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
> From: "John Dammeyer" <jo...@autoartisans.com>
> Date: Tue, November 10, 2015 9:33 pm
troller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
>
>
> Proportionally controlled hydraulic motor, with hard stops and limit
> switches at each stopping point of its travels. It takes about 2.5 seconds
to
> make the 180 degree rotation. That
On 11 November 2015 at 17:10, John Dammeyer wrote:
> In that case a switch signalling clear or midpoint would be the best option.
> If you even wanted to do speed things up a tad.
Outside of Brother demos on Youtube the tool-change time is normally a
tiny proportion of
Very nice Rickcolor me jealous!!
Pete
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Rick Lair wrote:
> Here it is, after putting all the pieces together, and working the bugs
> out, I finally got the tool change working using Andy Pugh's carousel
> component to control the tool
Here it is, after putting all the pieces together, and working the bugs
out, I finally got the tool change working using Andy Pugh's carousel
component to control the tool carousel, and a pretty healthy chunk of
ladder logic to control everything else. All using Linuxcnc 2.7.
Thanks for the
il.com]
> Sent: November-10-15 10:00 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
>
>
> Very nice Rickcolor me jealous!!
>
> Pete
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Rick Lair <r.
Good Day
Top job really looks the part.
Has the same shift pattern as my Matsuura MV 100V.
Cheers john
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:00:03 -0500
> From: petefro...@gmail.com
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our
10:00 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
> >
> >
> > Very nice Rickcolor me jealous!!
> >
> > Pete
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Ric
When I was writing the ladder logic I followed the original sequence of events,
but this does make sense, guess I've got some tweaking to do.
Thanks
Rick
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
From: "Pete Matos"
n I was writing the ladder logic I followed the original sequence of
> events, but this does make sense, guess I've got some tweaking to do.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rick
>
> Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
&g
was writing the ladder logic I followed the original sequence of
> events, but this does make sense, guess I've got some tweaking to do.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > Original Message
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finall
as it does now.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cole [mailto:linuxcncro...@gmail.com]
> Sent: November-10-15 1:55 PM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
>
>
> If you rotate it with
to be exchanged or put
away.
Rick
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Tool changer finally working on our mill project
From: "John Dammeyer" <jo...@autoartisans.com>
Date: Tue, November 10, 2015 9:33 pm
To: "'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'" <em
Thanks for all the help everyone gave me getting my rack toolchanger going.
It's working well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mwmas6hFRQ
--
___
Emc-users mailing list
What spindle is that?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Rod Fitzsimmons Frey rodf...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for all the help everyone gave me getting my rack toolchanger going.
It's working well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mwmas6hFRQ
It's a no-name Chinese spindle I got from alibaba.com. 24000 RPM, 1.5kW,
ISO20 toolholders, water cooled.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Stephen Dubovsky smdubov...@gmail.comwrote:
What spindle is that?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Rod Fitzsimmons Frey rodf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:18:09 -0800
From: dengv...@charter.net
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer question
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:06:54 +0330
Farzin Kamangar farzin.kaman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 02:45:44 PM Sam sokolik did opine:
You were going to write something, Sam?
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:18:09 -0800
From: dengv...@charter.net
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] tool changer question
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:06:54
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:06:54 +0330
Farzin Kamangar farzin.kaman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool changing process, is there a way to send
some movement commands from PLC to CNC?
I have entered the TOOL_CHANGE_POSITION and TOOL_CHANGE_QUILL_UP in
the INI
dave wrote:
Some years ago a group of emcer's converted a Mazak V5 to emc. Lots of
information is available in the wiki, logs, logic, etc but I cannot
find an entry on the classicladder code (for tool change), etc. Maybe
someone else can help here.
Every EMC2 install should have the CL
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool changing process, is there a way to send some
movement commands from PLC to CNC?
I have entered the TOOL_CHANGE_POSITION and TOOL_CHANGE_QUILL_UP in the INI
file and in the EMCIO section. This is fine and causes the tool go to the
tool change
On Monday, November 14, 2011 08:06:29 AM Farzin Kamangar did opine:
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool changing process, is there a way to send some
movement commands from PLC to CNC?
I have entered the TOOL_CHANGE_POSITION and TOOL_CHANGE_QUILL_UP in the
INI file and in the
Farzin,
an alternate route would be to use an M6 remapped to a o-word procedure, which
is now in master.
For an example, see
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 16:06 +0330, Farzin Kamangar wrote:
... snip
I was wondering how these actions could be done without using subroutine
calls in the Gcode? Please
let me know if I am not clear enough.
... snip
I use HAL comps for my changers. My lathe has a simple one:
2011/11/14 Farzin Kamangar farzin.kaman...@gmail.com:
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool changing process, is there a way to send some
movement commands from PLC to CNC?
How about using PLC part of EMC2 - ClassicLadder? It seems to me that
this would perfectly fit Your intended
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 16:06 +0330, Farzin Kamangar wrote:
Hello, dear EMC users;
Considering the tool changing process, is there a way to send some
movement commands from PLC to CNC?
I'm not familiar with PLC's but they should at the very least have pins
that can set or clear bits. You
Hello Gentlemen,
during the past 20 years our family used to have (an still is using) a lot
of Nissan (formerly Datsun) cars, especially Bluebird and Primeras, which
name ever these cars may have had in America. They had a very simple
mechanism to dip the headlights with a step switch on the
Peter blodow wrote:
As far as I could
see there was no position feedback. Still this mechanism never failed or
went to a wrong position. If someone knew how this works, wouldn't it be an
alternative for a tool carousel?
Best regards
Peter Blodow
yes, in the past 10 or so years we
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 18:28 +0100, robert wrote:
i just asked on IRC about the var file, cradek said you cant realy do it
and looking through the docs i cant see any ref to setting a parameter
in atxt file from hal, unless one makes there own hal comp file
I guess I never worried about
Robert,
Chris Morley has a base tool change Classic Ladder program
that sounds like what is being talked about here
It requires homing of the carosel on power up though.
Has a counter that keeps track of carosel position (CW CCW),
one position has a home switch.
Later
Terry
On Mon May 4 1:47
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the above the tool-number value did not change from 0 to
2 as
M61 Qxx is there to allow you specify the currently loaded tool.
If you shutdown emc2, and restart it will not remember the tool number it
last had loaded, so one can use the M61 to specify the current number.
This only works in MDI though, I don't think it's usefull to specify it from
a
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 09:56 +0100, robert wrote:
this is a shame if emc does not store current tool into a paramiter
looks like i need to keep a perm record in plc some how then.
You could use a parameter in the var file to keep track of current tool
number. This ability has been a part of
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 07:04 -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 09:56 +0100, robert wrote:
this is a shame if emc does not store current tool into a paramiter
looks like i need to keep a perm record in plc some how then.
You could use a parameter in the var file to keep track of
Kirk Wallace wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 07:04 -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 09:56 +0100, robert wrote:
this is a shame if emc does not store current tool into a paramiter
looks like i need to keep a perm record in plc some how then.
You could use a
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 18:28 +0100, robert wrote:
i just asked on IRC about the var file, cradek said you cant realy do it
and looking through the docs i cant see any ref to setting a parameter
in atxt file from hal, unless one makes there own hal comp file
I guess I never worried about
hi
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the above the tool-number value did not change from 0 to
2 as
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 21:19 +0100, robert wrote:
hi
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the above the
My guess is that you need to make sure that your PLC sets tool-prepared
true when the tool is ready to be changed. The T word invokes the
prepare - prepared thread, the M invokes the change - changed thread.
You should be able to check the prepare and prepared signal status with
HALmeter.
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the above the tool-number value did not change from 0 to
2 as
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 23:06 +0100, robert wrote:
My guess is that you need to make sure that your PLC sets
tool-prepared
true when the tool is ready to be changed. The T word invokes the
prepare - prepared thread, the M invokes the change - changed
thread.
You should be able to check the
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:49 +, Chris Morley wrote:
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the
In that case, don't use prepare-prepared. Just link the two signals so
that as soon as the prepare is set true, prepared becomes true. Most
example configurations have this because they don't usually have
changers. This will put all of the control burden on the M6. Do you have
a tool
Chris Morley wrote:
i am just implementing the tool changer and i would like to know when
setting the current tool with
M61 Q02
this should set current tool in spindle to T02
will this also set the iocontrol.0.tool-number = 2
as when issuing the above the tool-number value did not
70 matches
Mail list logo