On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:36:04 +0100 Tomas Cech said:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:06:52PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:42:16 +0100 Tomas Cech said:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:30:47PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> >> >On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:19:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:10:48 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:13:54 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 David Seikel
> > said:
> >
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > > wrote:
> >
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:13:54 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 David Seikel
> said:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
> > > said:
> >
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:06:52PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:42:16 +0100 Tomas Cech said:
Hi all,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:30:47PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:19:15 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, David Seike
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:42:16 +0100 Tomas Cech said:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:30:47PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> >On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:19:15 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Cars
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
> > said:
> >
> > > Simon even mentioned that it's his work system that has this
> > > problem. It's very
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:27:10 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:10:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:59 AM, David Seikel
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:11:50 +1030 Simon said:
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 From: David Seikel
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Automake 1.11 To:
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID:
> <20121115200028.339b23c0.onef...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/pla
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:11:50 +1030 Simon wrote:
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 From: David Seikel
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] Automake 1.11 To:
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID:
> <20121115200028.339b23c0.onef...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/pla
Hi all,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:30:47PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:19:15 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld
wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +10
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:00:28 +1000 From: David Seikel
Subject: Re: [E-devel] Automake 1.11 To:
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID:
<20121115200028.339b23c0.onef...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii" On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:19:15 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld
wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
> >> said:
> >>
> >>> Simon even mentioned that
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:10:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:59 AM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > Hi
On 15/11/12 10:00, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
>> said:
>>
>>> Simon even mentioned that it's his work system that has this
>>> problem. It's very likely that some company p
On 11/15/2012 11:00 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
>> said:
>>
>>> Simon even mentioned that it's his work system that has this
>>> problem. It's very likely that some comp
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:53:06 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel
> said:
>
> > Simon even mentioned that it's his work system that has this
> > problem. It's very likely that some company provided systems are
> > locked down to specifi
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:59 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees
>> said:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was
>> > wondering if
Hi David,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:59 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees
>> said:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was
>> > wo
Hi Simon
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Simon Lees wrote:
> Hi all,
> Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was wondering
> if this requrement change was due to functionality or just because it is
> what people are testing? The reason i ask is 1 because at work i am runni
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:59:18 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees
> > said:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was
> > > won
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:06:13 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees
> said:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was
> > wondering if this requrement change was due to functionality or
> > just beca
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:37:45 +1030 Simon Lees said:
> Hi all,
> Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was wondering
> if this requrement change was due to functionality or just because it is
> what people are testing? The reason i ask is 1 because at work i am running
> Ubu
Hi all,
Today i noticed the Automake requirements have changed and i was wondering
if this requrement change was due to functionality or just because it is
what people are testing? The reason i ask is 1 because at work i am running
Ubuntu 10.10 and i am not likely to upgrade anytime soon, untill no
23 matches
Mail list logo