On 22 Nov 2016 at 10:56, David "Battery Boy" Hawkins via EV wrote:
> I'm assuming EVerybody caught this story about the Alliance of Automobile
> Manufacturers, which includes GM and Toyota?
'Fraid so. :-(
Threads started on the 11th and 12th:
All,
I'm assuming EVerybody caught this story about the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers, which includes GM and Toyota?
http://www.autonews.com/article/20161110/OEM11/161119989/automakers-reach-out-to-trump-on-regulation-seek-review-of-fuel
--
Suck Amps,
Dave "Battery Boy" Hawkins
Check
/"Chart 63 says they have known reserves for 150 years."/
Exxon Mobile has energy reserves for many years, that is true, but that
doesn't mean they can maintain current production rates for that number of
years. Production rate is what is important, not reserves. The production of
oil is like a
I'm not sure what you are implying. Chart 63 says they have known reserves for
150 years. Yes, it's more expensive but the reason production peaked is because
the are switching to other sources of energy.
I grew up in Oklahoma and I have friends in the oil business. One friend has a
chart of
Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car
On 20 Nov 2016 at 11:43, Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
> If China and India and Europe and several countries of S America and
> Asia are moving to electric transportation then it is pretty
irrelevant
> what happens in USA ...
I wo
On 20 Nov 2016 at 11:43, Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
> If China and India and Europe and several countries of S America and
> Asia are moving to electric transportation then it is pretty irrelevant
> what happens in USA ...
I wouldn't go so far as to say "irrelevant," because the US is (at
When you consider that Exxon Mobile, in their 2016 World Energy Outlook:
A View to 2040, (ref:
http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/outlook-for-energy/2016/2016-outlook-for-energy.pdf)
on page 62 of 80, has a graph that clearly shows conventional oil
production peaked in 2005. The
I've decided to be selfish on this issue. I put a deposit down on a BoltEV at
my local Chevrolet dealer. I'm told they are expecting 100 to be delivered
beginning next week (after Thanksgiving).
As I understand it, GM will be selling the BoltEV. I will not lease it. After
my experience leasing
To: 'Electric Vehicle Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GMonly
sellingBolt in CA ...
I find it very interesting that since GM suddenly changed how they are
going to
present the Bolt to the public that we are actually discussing why they
made
that choice. Cor
I emailed GM 5 days ago asking if they are committed to the Bolt roll-out and
EV in general. I have not heard back.
--
View this message in context:
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/GM-Killed-The-Bolt-Electric-Car-GM-only-selling-Bolt-in-CA-OR-tp4684542p4684560.html
e Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GM only sellingBolt in
CA ...
>
> Mark,
>
> I share the hope.
> But I am also wondering why GM suddenly changed their roll-out strategy
significantly
> (reducing it and making it much more non-committa
gt;
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_emission_standards
>
> Peri
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Cor van de Water via EV" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List" <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> Cc:
> Sent:
A few possible reasons for the slowed introduction of the Bolt:
1) LG Chem has had a glitch in increasing battery production so cannot
supply the planned quantities in the required time frame.
2) GM has discovered some problems with the Bolt which they do not want to
advertise, but need to delay
Message-
>From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mark
>Abramowitz
>via EV
>Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:33 AM
>To: EVDL Administrator
>Cc: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GM only
>sellingBo
, or copying of any part of
this message is prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: Peri Hartman [mailto:pe...@kotatko.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 9:09 AM
To: Cor van de Water; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re[2]: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GM only
@lists.evdl.org>
Cc:
Sent: 20-Nov-16 8:50:14 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GM only
sellingBolt in CA ...
Mark,
I share the hope.
But I am also wondering why GM suddenly changed their roll-out strategy
significantly (reducing it and making it much more non-committal
of
this message is prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mark Abramowitz
via EV
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 12:33 AM
To: EVDL Administrator
Cc: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt) Electric Car : GM only
via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> To: Electric Vehicle
Discussion List <ev@lists.evdl.org> Subject: Re: [EVDL] GM Killed The (Bolt)
Electric Car : GM only selling Bolt in CA ... Date: 11/20/16, 12:00 AM
History tells us that -- for better and/or worse -- what governments do
makes a bi
History tells us that -- for better and/or worse -- what governments do
makes a big difference in whether EVs advance or retreat.
Bruce is 100% correct that GM's specific history predicts their current and
future involvement with EVs. As I said a couple of weeks ago, I'm still
waiting for
In reference to Mike's post
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/Re-EVLN-EV-newswire-posts-for-20161119-tp4684540.html
Below is all that is left (the internet has been white-washed) of the hoopla
that happened back in 2002 when GM announced they were killing their EV
20 matches
Mail list logo
