Jacqueline wrote:
That's very disappointing for me, because I like being a booth babe. If I
had know there would be no booth, I probably would not have signed up to
attend.
I cannot find anything on http://www.linux.conf.au/ or
http://www.openoffice.org.au/miniconf/ to indicate that there were
bo
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 07:56, Jacqueline McNally wrote:
> Ian Lynch wrote:
> > I'm about to book air tickets. I am a little worried about travelling
> > the distance if there are no points of focus apart from lectures and
> > talks. Anyone like to reassure me that it will be worthwhile?
> >
>
> I
Jonathon wrote:
> The main MiniConfs of interest to OOo people and speakers on this list
would be OOoMiniconf :), the Open Computing in Government which is for
a lot of government dept people etc, and the Education MiniConf for all
the schools etc. Along with the LCA, there are a select number of
Graham Lauder wrote:
Hi Jonathon,
Define the value. I must admit I'm a little concerned myself. Right now
I'm a poor student trying to wrangle cash to get to the conference. Not
having a OOo/INGOTs focus point would be a bit of a problem.
Would you say then that this is pretty much a developers
Ian Lynch wrote:
I'm about to book air tickets. I am a little worried about travelling
the distance if there are no points of focus apart from lectures and
talks. Anyone like to reassure me that it will be worthwhile?
I can't decide for others what will be worthwhile :)
Jonathon has already replied
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Jacqueline wrote:
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference
all week, in addition to a 2-day programme, similar to San Diego. Is
this correct?
[snip]
LCA (http://www.linux.conf.au/) is very unlike DLS.
There are no booth
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:43 +1300, Graham Lauder wrote:
> Jonathon Coombes wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:39 +, Ian Lynch wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:02, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Jacqueline wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> >>>
Jonathon Coombes wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:39 +, Ian Lynch wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:02, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Jacqueline wrote:
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference all
week, in addition to a 2-day
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 21:18, Jonathon Coombes wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:39 +, Ian Lynch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:02, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> > > Jacqueline wrote:
> > > >Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> > > >>I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 18:02, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Jacqueline wrote:
> >Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> >>I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference all
> >>week, in addition to a 2-day programme, similar to San Diego. Is this
> >>correct?
> >[snip]
> >
> >LCA (http://ww
Jacqueline wrote:
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference all
week, in addition to a 2-day programme, similar to San Diego. Is this correct?
[snip]
LCA (http://www.linux.conf.au/) is very unlike DLS.
There are no booths at LCA. Some sponsors ma
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I'm assuming we'll have an OOo booth at the main LCA 2005 conference all
week, in addition to a 2-day programme, similar to San Diego. Is this
correct?
[snip]
LCA (http://www.linux.conf.au/) is very unlike DLS.
There are no booths at LCA. Some sponsors may have a presence
12 matches
Mail list logo
