On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:32 PM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 3:06 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:15 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 5:30 am, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
Correct me if I am
Hi!
On Feb 22, 12:22 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Feb 2011, at 07:58, Russell Standish wrote:
snip
When observing data, it is important that observers are relatively
insensitive to error. It does not help to not recognise a lion in the
African savannah, just because
1Z wrote:
On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
The easy way is to assume inconsistent descriptions are merely an
arbitrary
combination of symbols that fail to describe something in
particular and
thus have only the content that every utterance has by virtue of
1Z wrote:
On Feb 18, 4:00 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 10:38 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk
On 22 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thank you for your answers. I have still a coupled of questions.
But with computer science, intuition can be misleading.
Intuition could be misleading not only in computer science. I know.
Moreover my first person view assumes that there are
Dear Bruno,
Could you explain this a bit more?
“The ideally correct machine
is to the human what a material point is to the sun. My answer tries
only to help you to understand what I mean by a knowing machine, not
really a knowing human. Human have non-monotonic layers, they can
On Feb 23, 4:10 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk
On Feb 23, 4:10 pm, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
1Z wrote:
Then God does not exist as an actor in the world, but God does still exists
as an idea.
1Z wrote:
1Z wrote:
something existing or simply existence exists, if it is meaningful
to use the word not,
On Feb 23, 3:02 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:32 PM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 3:06 pm, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:15 AM, 1Z peterdjo...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 5:30 am, Jason Resch
On 22 Feb 2011, at 22:14, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, just recall that Platonia is based on classical logic where
the
falsity f, or 0 = 1, entails all proposition. So if you insist to
say
that 0 = 1, I will soon prove that you owe to me A billions
Dear Evgenii Bruno,
Half tongue in cheek, in:
Tuszynski, J.A. R. Gordon (2008). A mean field Ising model for
cortical rotation in amphibian one cell stage embryos. In. Eds.
Toronto, Society for Mathematical Biology Conference, July 30 - August
2, 2008.
I used the following reasoning:
IF
On Feb 23, 9:46 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Feb 2011, at 22:14, benjayk wrote:
Molecules and Cells are formal things. Form is matter, in *some*
sense.
Form is not *primary* matter in any sense.
People having problem with numbers have been victim of a traumatic
13 matches
Mail list logo
