Craig,
I will comment your post asap. But I have to go (busy day).
Have a nice day,
Bruno
On 07 Sep 2011, at 22:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:36 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 22:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What accounts for substitution level?
It is the level wh
On 07 Sep 2011, at 21:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/7/2011 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
That seems to me to be a gratuitous affirmation. Even today
computers inherit from a long history, and they evolve quickly
(with or despite humans, that is not entirely clear: today the
humans do not want
On 07 Sep 2011, at 20:39, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/7/2011 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But what is the threshold at which a reconstituted person feels
anything at all?
It does not exist. The person always feel something. I guess you
ask what is the threshold for such machine to manifest genui
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>When neuroscientists consider
>> consciousness at all they consider the so-called neural correlates of
>> consciousness: processes A, B, C, D in the brain are associated with
>> experiences E, F, G, H. Processes A, B, C, D never involve anyt
On Sep 7, 10:36 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 06 Sep 2011, at 22:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> >>> What accounts for substitution level?
>
> >> It is the level where your local constituants can be replaced by
> >> digital device without changing your private experience.
>
> > That doesn't account
On 9/7/2011 9:24 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Interesting discourse, indeed. Brent, I would add to:
/*"usually believers cannot say what evidence they would accept that this
belief of theirs is wrong."*/
*//*
the *_scientific BELIEF _(sic!) which is* also a belief, based on prerequisite
e
On 9/7/2011 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
That seems to me to be a gratuitous affirmation. Even today computers inherit from a
long history, and they evolve quickly (with or despite humans, that is not entirely
clear: today the humans do not want intelligent machines. I am not sure they even wan
On 9/7/2011 7:36 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
But what is the threshold at which a reconstituted person feels
anything at all?
It does not exist. The person always feel something. I guess you ask what is the
threshold for such machine to manifest genuinely the phenomenon of feeling something?
Her
On 9/7/2011 6:48 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 6, 10:10 pm, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/6/2011 5:42 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If all bodies are computations, then what's the difference?
You're just being obtuse. All bodies are composed of atoms, so what's the
difference
between them.
No, I'm
On 9/7/2011 4:47 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Does the existence of said universals act as a guarantor of the definiteness of the
properties of the universals? As I see it, existence per say is neutral, it is merely
the necessary possibility to be.
?? "necessary possibility" = necessity ??
Interesting discourse, indeed. Brent, I would add to:
*"usually believers cannot say what evidence they would accept
that this belief of theirs is wrong."*
**
the *scientific BELIEF (sic!) which is* also a belief, based on
prerequisite evidences BELIEVED to be TRUE. Those precurso
On Sep 7, 2:25 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >> Many discoveries have of course been made in neuroscience in the past
> >> hundred years, eg. mapping brain function and working out its
> >> neuropharmacology, but all these discoveries ar
On Sep 6, 10:10 pm, meekerdb wrote:
> On 9/6/2011 5:42 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > If all bodies are computations, then what's the difference?
>
> You're just being obtuse. All bodies are composed of atoms, so what's the
> difference
> between them.
No, I'm being facetious. I'm not the one
On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:23, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let me try it this way. Could we say that universals exist already
in the 3d person view and they are independent from the 1st person
view?
I think we can say that.
With the 'modern logic' approach we can bypass the middle-age "problem
of
On 9/6/2011 3:23 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let me try it this way. Could we say that universals exist already in
the 3d person view and they are independent from the 1st person view?
Evgenii
On 06.09.2011 09:00 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 05 Sep 2011, at 21:02, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
