On 28 Feb 2013, at 05:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 7:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 20:40, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 2:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Feb 2013, at 21:40, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/26/2013 1:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
How did number arise? We
On 2/28/2013 7:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 05:04, meekerdb wrote:
You are assuming that justification comes from logic; and indeed it
is too much to expect from such a weak source. I look for such
justification as can be found from experience, which you demoted to
mere
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Even if it could [ tell the difference between a audio and a video file]
that would only represent a more advanced file analysis function, not any
kind of audio or video sensitivity.
Please explain the difference
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
It is a basic law of logic that if X is not Y and X is not not Y then X
is gibberish,
X = alcohol Y = poison.
becomes alcohol is not poison and alcohol isn't not poison
Exactly, and 2 negatives, like isn't
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:08:07 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Even if it could [ tell the difference between a audio and a video file]
that would only represent a more advanced file analysis
On 2/28/2013 4:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 05:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 7:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 20:40, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 2:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Feb 2013, at 21:40, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/26/2013 1:24 AM, Bruno
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:03:40 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 4:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 05:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 7:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 20:40, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/27/2013 2:59 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a basic law of logic that if X is not Y and X is not
not Y then X is gibberish,
X = alcohol Y = poison.
becomes
Thanks. I think you pretty much covered it :)
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:59:55 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
It is a basic law of logic that
On 2/28/2013 10:59 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a basic law of logic that if X is not Y and X is not not Y
then X is
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-AzLqBmVGyOo/US-9KrXclfI/AaY/nqw4xM2a8aM/s1600/evo.jpg
http://25.media.tumblr.com/762bc11d112a3e03ecb8a05b39ce14d3/tumblr_miy5uxCcE41qeenqko1_500.jpg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote
Even if it could [ tell the difference between a audio and a video
file] that would only represent a more advanced file analysis function, not
any kind of audio or video sensitivity.
Please explain the difference
Hi Craig, what's your point with this diagram? That free will lies on
a continuum of random processes, perhaps?
Cheers
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:25:29PM -0800, Craig Weinberg wrote:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-AzLqBmVGyOo/US-9KrXclfI/AaY/nqw4xM2a8aM/s1600/evo.jpg
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:52:59 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote
Even if it could [ tell the difference between a audio and a video
file] that would only represent a more advanced file analysis
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:29:13 PM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote:
Hi Craig, what's your point with this diagram? That free will lies on
a continuum of random processes, perhaps?
Just the opposite. All processes begin intentionally, but end up appearing
more unintentional the
On 2/28/2013 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You have no way of knowing what I can't know about you either.
You have no way of knowing what ways I have of knowing what you know about what ways John
knows of having ways of knowing about what you can know...either. :-)
Brent
blather, n.
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:37:50 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You have no way of knowing what I can't know about you either.
You have no way of knowing what ways I have of knowing what you know about
what ways John knows of having ways of
On 2/28/2013 2:29 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:59 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg
whatsons...@gmail.com mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a basic law of logic that if X is not Y and X
-- Forwarded message --
Apparently so...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23221-first-mindreading-implant-gives-rats-telepathic-power.html
The world's first brain-to-brain connection has given rats the power to
communicate by
thought alone.
Many people
On 2/28/2013 4:11 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:37:50 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You have no way of knowing what I can't know about you either.
You have no way of knowing what ways I have of knowing what you
On 2/28/2013 4:48 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/28/2013 2:29 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:59 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
It is
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:01:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 4:11 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:37:50 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You have no way of knowing what I can't know about you either.
Cool, although brain conjoined twins already do this.
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 7:59:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Apparently so...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23221-first-mindreading-implant-gives-rats-telepathic-power.html
The
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, although brain conjoined twins already do this.
But this is with electrodes.
--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
True, but we already know that nerves can be stimulated with electrodes.
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:56:37 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Cool, although brain conjoined twins already do this.
But this
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
True, but we already know that nerves can be stimulated with electrodes.
Yes, and it shows that there is nothing special about biology. It's
just a technical problem to find non-biological components that will
work as
Suddenly, everybody was astonished to realise that this has already happened.
The Engineers expressly designed the human neocortex so we could get this far
and this far only. As Kurzweil says - we only need a brain smart enough to get
us to the point where we can design a better brain. We are
On 2/28/2013 5:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:01:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 4:11 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:37:50 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/28/2013 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You have
28 matches
Mail list logo
