Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 16:51 Bruno Marchal said the following:

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread meekerdb
On 5/15/2013 11:00 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 16.05.2013 08:22 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 11:00 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 May

Reversing the flow of oil

2013-05-16 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
http://vimeo.com/52888178 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter

2013-05-16 Thread Roger Clough
The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter According to the Dao de jing, the solution to the mind-brain problem is that it is not a problem. Matter is mind, mind is matter is one way of saying it. Leibniz said the same, that monads are expressions of material bodies. The

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 16 May 2013, at 08:00, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 16.05.2013 15:50 Bruno Marchal said the following: On 16 May 2013, at 08:00, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

Re: A thought on right and left hemispheres and reality - and their relationship to 'comp'

2013-05-16 Thread Craig Weinberg
If the first three assumptions define consciousness as software, then why would there be any 'extension' of the original program to the copy? Say I have a phone in L.A. with a GPS indicating the local weather. I duplicate the entire phone, send it off to London in a package, which I pick up on

Re: A thought on right and left hemispheres and reality - and their relationship to 'comp'

2013-05-16 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2013/5/16 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com If the first three assumptions define consciousness as software, then why would there be any 'extension' of the original program to the copy? Say I have a phone in L.A. with a GPS indicating the local weather. I duplicate the entire phone, send

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread meekerdb
On 5/16/2013 12:41 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 16.05.2013 08:22 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 11:00 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following: On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following: On

Re: Natural vs. Artificial

2013-05-16 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 16.05.2013 18:22 meekerdb said the following: On 5/16/2013 12:41 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: ... I might be wrong and it might be interesting to look the archives through more carefully. Well, this was my impression that mental is physical was expressed quite often here. What is

Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter

2013-05-16 Thread Richard Ruquist
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter According to the Dao de jing, the solution to the mind-brain problem is that it is not a problem.

Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter

2013-05-16 Thread meekerdb
On 5/16/2013 12:32 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity You mean the one George Gamow wrote for him? Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter

2013-05-16 Thread spudboy100
From an ancient Simpsons, from Homer to Bart: what is mind? Never matter. What is matter? Never mind. I will hold with Chalmers, on this one. That it is the hard problem. Perhaps like the pure materialists love to say, the mind is merely an epiphenomenon, of the human brain. Ok, but I ask,

Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter

2013-05-16 Thread Richard Ruquist
This list appears to support MWI in which every wave function and its associated particle becomes physical but in a differing parallel world or universe. So from a 3p perspective, everything is predetermined and from what I can tell from a 1p perspective there is only the illusion of consciousness