Thanks Brent. I read Mermin and am both wiser and none-the. It seems to me
in this paper he is chickening out by saying that QM shouldn't really think
about the conscious observer, because that leads to the fairy tale of
many worlds. Instead it should consider consciousness to reside outside
On 4/22/2014 4:54 AM, Pierz wrote:
Thanks Brent. I read Mermin and am both wiser and none-the. It seems to me in this paper
he is chickening out by saying that QM shouldn't really think about the conscious
observer, because that leads to the fairy tale of many worlds. Instead it should
First of all, on reflection I think my behaviour has been a little hostile
lately, and I'd like to broadcast a general apology about that. Not only
Bruno, but I make a special mention for him because the guy gives me and
other people a lot of time, and I was actually rather unpleasant in at
On 21 Apr 2014, at 17:46, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:05:20 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Apr 2014, at 22:33, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Physorg runs a report today in which brain abnormalities are linked
with cannabis use,
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:03, Pierz wrote:
Just came across this presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
It's a bit long, but I'd be interested to hear anyone's thoughts who
is knowledgeable on QM. I don't follow the maths, but I kind of got
the gist. What intrigued me was
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:39, Pierz wrote:
I agree with you, up to the point when you start advocating (on the
other thread?) the notion that drink driving should be legal.
Well, I agree that we have to wait the politics invests a bit more in
education.
The key point relates to harm
On 22 Apr 2014, at 15:19, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, on reflection I think my behaviour has been a little
hostile lately, and I'd like to broadcast a general apology about
that. Not only Bruno, but I make a special mention for him because
the guy gives me and other people a
Yeah, it will be costly whether we live or die. It's better to focus on a
techno fix rather than social engineering by red-greens, and the uber rich. If
we want to reduce heating, then reduce CO2, methane, water vapor. Easier said
then done, but what isn't?
The military industrial complex
I would like to read those papers but haven't had time yet.
On 23 April 2014 04:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:03, Pierz wrote:
Just came across this presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
It's a bit long, but I'd be interested to hear
On 4/22/2014 4:28 PM, LizR wrote:
would like to read those papers but haven't had time yet.
On 23 April 2014 04:00, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:03, Pierz wrote:
Just came across this presentation:
I think you'll find China is trying to cut its pollution, particularly* air
pollution, and succeeding to some extent. Basically it has to, because the
problem is so bad that it's severely impacting health and production.
http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/specials/gpm04/fierce-fight-gdp-air/
*an
On 23 April 2014 11:37, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I do not fear death, in view of the fact that I had been dead for
billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the
slightest inconvenience from it.'
--- Mark Twain
Did Mark Twain really say that? I
Understood, but China is not pursuing a policy of eliminating AGW, but
reducing smog in its cities. Its not a kumbaya moment now for anything
nowbin east asia as you hsve noticed, regarding china. The best way
then to reduce carbon emissions is to develop clean energy generators,
that can
Yes they're trying to reduce smog but that should still have that effect to
some extent (reducing AGW). But yes, clean green energy is needed - maybe
nuclear reactors (Russia is doing a good line in small portable reactors, I
believe). Probably not THE best solution but needs must...
On 23 April
Even if Clemmens said it, I don't take that statement as anything more
than a witty line. When his daughter died, she was a pre schooler, I
had read the it messed him up. Yes, we can jolly it all away till it
happens to us and hits home. Then its a different story, and I don't
mean Tom Sawyer.
I was just a bit surprised at his use of billions rather than millions
which in context seems rather extravagant. Actually google indicates that I
am not alone in wondering this.
http://www.telecomtally.com/blog/2006/12/did_mark_twain_1.html
Wikiquote http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mark_Twainalso
I should have said, my emphasis.
On 23 April 2014 14:23, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I was just a bit surprised at his use of billions rather than millions
which in context seems rather extravagant. Actually google indicates that I
am not alone in wondering this.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of spudboy...@aol.com
Understood, but China is not pursuing a policy of eliminating AGW, but
reducing smog in its cities. Its not a kumbaya moment now for anything
nowbin
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Yes they're trying to reduce smog but that should still have that effect to
some extent (reducing AGW). But yes, clean green energy is needed - maybe
nuclear reactors (Russia is doing a
On 23 April 2014 15:09, 'Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com' via
Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of spudboy...@aol.com
Understood, but China is
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:28 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: cannabis, cancer and mechanism, and climate.
On 23 April 2014 15:09, 'Chris de Morsella
21 matches
Mail list logo
