On 05 Dec 2014, at 17:20, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:06 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/4/2014 8:05 PM, LizR wrote:
I suspect that Bruno is differentiating physical existence from
primary existence.
What's the difference? Isn't physical existence the
On 05 Dec 2014, at 20:04, Richard Ruquist wrote:
What I want to know is if anyone takes conservation of energy
seriously?
Yes. Quantum mechanics without collapse does not violate the
conservation of energy. You just cannot sum up the energy in the
different branch of the superposition.
On 05 Dec 2014, at 12:16, Samiya Illias wrote:
As a person who takes the Quran literally, I'm not at all surprised
as it is stated that the ancients had been given much more, and we
haven't been given a tenth of what they had.
In theology, I agree. In the natural science and mathematics,
On 06 Dec 2014, at 06:56, Samiya Illias wrote:
On 06-Dec-2014, at 10:25 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:16 AM, Samiya Illias wrote:
As a person who takes the Quran literally, I'm not at all
surprised as it is stated that the ancients had been given much
more,
On 06 Dec 2014, at 06:25, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:16 AM, Samiya Illias wrote:
As a person who takes the Quran literally, I'm not at all surprised
as it is stated that the ancients had been given much more, and we
haven't been given a tenth of what they had.
Samiya
Well then you
On 6 December 2014 at 18:25, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:16 AM, Samiya Illias wrote:
As a person who takes the Quran literally, I'm not at all surprised as it
is stated that the ancients had been given much more, and we haven't been
given a tenth of what they had.
On 6 December 2014 at 19:25, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06-Dec-2014, at 11:15 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/5/2014 9:56 PM, Samiya Illias wrote:
On 06-Dec-2014, at 10:25 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:16 AM, Samiya Illias
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 05 Dec 2014, at 20:04, Richard Ruquist wrote:
What I want to know is if anyone takes conservation of energy seriously?
Yes. Quantum mechanics without collapse does not violate the conservation
of energy. You just
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 05 Dec 2014, at 17:20, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:06 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/4/2014 8:05 PM, LizR wrote:
I suspect that Bruno is differentiating physical existence from
This thread remember me the discussions of the dumbest of a city disussing
the relative merits of each basket team player based on if they are redhead
or not.
2014-12-06 10:37 GMT+01:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
On 6 December 2014 at 19:25, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 1:18 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: World's oldest computer may be older than previously thought
Which go in the direction
On 12/6/2014 12:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2014, at 06:25, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/5/2014 3:16 AM, Samiya Illias wrote:
As a person who takes the Quran literally, I'm not at all surprised as it is stated
that the ancients had been given much more, and we haven't been given a tenth
On 5 December 2014 at 20:06, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/4/2014 8:05 PM, LizR wrote:
I suspect that Bruno is differentiating physical existence from primary
existence.
What's the difference? Isn't physical existence the paradigmatic case?
the example we point to when asked
On 6 December 2014 at 05:20, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:06 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/4/2014 8:05 PM, LizR wrote:
I suspect that Bruno is differentiating physical existence from primary
existence.
What's the difference?
14 matches
Mail list logo
