Re: "No black-hole singularities" in an undated loop-quantum-gravity theory

On 1/3/2019 6:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: As a scientist, I just count the evidences, and evaluate the plausibility of the big picture proposed.I predicted the many-world appearances much before I realised the physicists were already open to this for empirical reason. Once you understand tha

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On 1/3/2019 6:03 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: So learn from this! The 't' in your formula above is the coordinate time, not the proper time. Learn the difference! The proper time is defined as the time kept by a perfect clock travelling on a geodesic. And a geodesic i

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:03 PM wrote: > On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 8:58:14 AM UTC, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM John Clark wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brent Meeker wrote: >>> >>> *> That's like saying if two people drove different cars from L.A. to >>

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 8:58:14 AM UTC, Bruce wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM John Clark > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brent Meeker > > wrote: >> >> *> That's like saying if two people drove different cars from L.A. to New >>> York and their odometers registere

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On 1/3/2019 12:05 PM, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:58 AM Bruce Kellett > wrote: /> The 't' in your formula above is the coordinate time, not the proper time. / What the hell are you talking about? If I travel from event A to event B and us

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:06 AM John Clark wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:58 AM Bruce Kellett > wrote: > > >> *> The 't' in your formula above is the coordinate time, not the proper >> time. * >> > > What the hell are you talking about? If I travel from event A to event B > and use the formula

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 3:58 AM Bruce Kellett wrote: > *> The 't' in your formula above is the coordinate time, not the proper > time. * > What the hell are you talking about? If I travel from event A to event B and use the formula x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -(ct)^2 where x,y,and z are the differences in

Re: [SUSPICIOUS MESSAGE] Towards Conscious AI Systems (a symposium at the AAAI Stanford Spring Symposium 2019)

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 7:46:58 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 2 Jan 2019, at 21:09, Philip Thrift > > wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 1:07:37 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 12:30:22 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>>

Re: "No black-hole singularities" in an undated loop-quantum-gravity theory

> On 3 Jan 2019, at 02:26, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 12:18:50 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 30 Dec 2018, at 18:56, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 12:10:12 PM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> > On 24

Re: [SUSPICIOUS MESSAGE] Towards Conscious AI Systems (a symposium at the AAAI Stanford Spring Symposium 2019)

> On 2 Jan 2019, at 21:09, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 1:07:37 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 12:30:22 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 8:44:36 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >>

Re: What is more primary than numbers?

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM John Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brent Meeker wrote: > > *> That's like saying if two people drove different cars from L.A. to New >> York and their odometers registered different distances then one of the >> odometers must have measured miles di