Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

Spud is the culprit doing this. If he wants to go off-topic, he should start a dedicated thread, not wreak this one. AG On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 5:51:30 PM UTC-7 Lawrence Crowell wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:10:51 PM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com > wrote: > >> Ah, and

Re: WAMP-the-Ingrate of Thanksgiving Sabbath

When the People of the Book Wronged https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2022/01/when-people-of-book-wronged.html > On 18-Nov-2022, at 7:41 AM, Samiya Illias wrote: > >  > > The Kingdom & The Throne > https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2022/02/the-kingdom-throne.html > > > >>> On

Re: WAMP-the-Ingrate of Thanksgiving Sabbath

The Kingdom & The Throne https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2022/02/the-kingdom-throne.html > On 18-Nov-2022, at 12:42 AM, Philip Benjamin wrote: > >  > WAMP-the-Ingrate For Thanksgiving Sabbath > Philip BenjaminNovember 2022 > Induce! Increase! Iniquities

Re: FW: WAMP-the-Ingrate of Thanksgiving Sabbath

You would make a nice case study for some research program in abnormal psychology. Damned if the stuff you write is not just delusional nonsense. LC On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 1:42:06 PM UTC-6 medinuclear wrote: > *WAMP-the-Ingrate For Thanksgiving Sabbath * > > *Philip Benjamin

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 12:10:51 PM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com wrote: > Ah, and Minkowski's higher dimension appears to require Willem DeSitter to > step in and re-normalize the view from such an observer. My thinking is, > would this be some sort of tachyonic field in some kind of

FW: WAMP-the-Ingrate of Thanksgiving Sabbath

WAMP-the-Ingrate For Thanksgiving Sabbath Philip BenjaminNovember 2022 Induce! Increase! Iniquities intensify immorally Nothingness nor nonexistence needs no newness Generating gravels, grass, genomes, growing gifts Return reprobates, revolutions rot, revivals renew Awaken!

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

"Policy is everything" is what a sycophant says when his guy is a narcissistic scumbag with the world view of a 4th grader.  The policies that were "everything" consisted of keeping out immigrants, cutting taxes on the richest people, withdrawing from international alliances, denouncing global

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:36 PM wrote: *> The people who lie the most have been dem pols and their supporting > propagandists.* > Democratic politicians, like all human beings, lie from time to time, but when they give public speeches they don't tell a different lie every 15 or 20 seconds

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

Hmmm. Have you considered that a Malamet-Hogarth Spacetime, (mathematically speaking), would conflate with your blackhole-wormhole conundrum? Specifically: Forever is a Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth Spacetimes (book stub). Forever is a Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

On 11/17/2022 4:49 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: LC: If we have two accelerating frames accelerating at the same rate but in opposite directions, do the Laws of Physics transform according to the LT where v in the LT is now the instantaneous relative velocity of the frames at every time t? AG

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

Ron DeSantis, Say his name!!! Oh, and, um, Go Team! Joey's policies seem awful and hostile to the rest of the US. I don't see Fetterman or Newsome having the record to run on. Kamala? Um Hillary, maybe, but it'll be what the lass promises in 2024, the economy, war, all the finer things of

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

I understand Team Playing which is what we are both doing LC. Go Team! Look, I say let the truth be known. For Don, I can't even persuade my own flesh and blood family that the Donald is just a NY personality who won because people hated and feared Obama and Hillary. Gio Team! It's simply that

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

Ah, and Minkowski's higher dimension appears to require Willem DeSitter to step in and re-normalize the view from such an observer. My thinking is, would this be some sort of tachyonic field in some kind of Lorentzian Manifold? You may know, but I cannot.  -Original Message- From:

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

My thinking is that recently, an astronomy team in Romania, and a submission to the American Physical Society yesterday, indicated the plausibility of traversable wormholes. Now, for me it seems exciting although I am not expecting anything so groovy as aliens emerging from 80K years ago and

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

John, and maybe this is just me, I believe or trust that most politicians like most of the time. The people who lie the most have been dem pols and their supporting propagandists.The deal with you is that you screen out what these folk claim.  Remember words are often nothing to these people,

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:41 AM John Clark wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 PM wrote: > > >> *> Setting aside relativity for the nonce, the workability of >> transversable wormholes is getting more, >> better! https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104024 >>

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 PM wrote: > *> Setting aside relativity for the nonce, the workability of > transversable wormholes is getting more, > better! https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104024 > *

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

Jessem: I was wondering if the LT can be used to determine how the laws of physics change between two accelerating frames, accelerating at the same rate but moving in opposite directions. AG On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 7:58:31 AM UTC-7 jessem wrote: > That doesn't address my specific

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

LC: If we have two accelerating frames accelerating at the same rate but in opposite directions, do the Laws of Physics transform according to the LT where v in the LT is now the instantaneous relative velocity of the frames at every time t? AG JC: take notice. These are the TWO frames I was

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 5:22:44 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:11 PM Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > > *You cannot take anything t'Rump says as real. Even words like "and" >> and "the" are lies. * > > > All politicians lie from time to time but I have

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 2:50:41 AM UTC-6 spudb...@aol.com wrote: > You don't need to take Don's word on anything. But you'll have to take > your fellow progressives WaPo (owned by Bezos) when, after the recent > election, the FBI says no money motive in the documents. Like there is >

Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY.

What I outline is the idea of the Rindler wedge, or the spacetime according to an accelerated observer. The Unruh effect is a quantum field theoretic result on how quantum fields on either side of the induced particle horizon have no complete description according to the accelerated observer.

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:11 PM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: > *You cannot take anything t'Rump says as real. Even words like "and" and > "the" are lies. * All politicians lie from time to time but I have never heard a politician, or any human being for that

Re: NYTimes.com: We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech

You don't need to take Don's word on anything. But you'll have to take your fellow progressives WaPo (owned by Bezos) when, after the recent election, the FBI says no money motive in the documents. Like there is dealings with Hunter taking cash from China and Russia, but for the Don protecting