This reminds me of something: this is the best test question I ever
came up with:
In the language of the Japanese quails, what was the gödel' statement
that started the universe over again at 0 AD? explain your answer
precisely in pure mathematical terms without appeal to the existence
of mayan
Apologies, meant to capitalize Gödel and explain. Anal-retentive
to post just to fix that, I know.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com wrote:
This reminds me of something: this is the best test question I ever
came up with:
In the language of the Japanese
It's just a big joke, obviously.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
http://www.fabioghioni.net/blog/2011/09/15/scientists-successfully-implant-chip-that-controls-the-brain-allowing-thoughts-memory-and-behavior-to-be-transferred-from-one-brain-to-another/
This is a joke.
Quantumly the quines computed the qualia of the quails and so on until...
That's why we have qualia before everything else!
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1676
As stated above,
Again and again, the same joke. Sorry about it, this time we got it
really good. Thank you.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com wrote:
It's just a big joke, obviously.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
http
I'm afraid I don't understand how your idea qualitatively predicts all
features of GR without QCD or QFT. or what it means for (Feynmann diagram?)
loops to have net entanglement coming out. I think you need to be more
explicit and precise (e.g. mathematical). The idea that GR can be explained
.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:03 AM
Subject: The final TOE?
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Hi all,
Consider the following fully general way of saying this is the
following: quantum mechanics
Hi everything-list guys, does anyone have any suggestions for our
friend Pete down here? He is eager to learn physics!
Contact him directly if you have any suggestions.
Stephen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:10 PM
Hi guys,
Time travel is actually possible, as long as you are consistent (i.e.
Novikov self-consistency principle). Please consider the argument for
it, beginning at:
http://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/hr4x2/physicists_what_do_you_think_of_the_following/
Continue the discussion there
Has anyone watched the movie Contact, in which the structure of the
universe was encoded in the transcendental number Pi? What if
something like that is what is going on, and that's the answer to all
paradoxes?
So the physical universe beings with Pi encoded in the Big Bang,
chaotically inflates,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/5 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
Bruno: But if the universe is computable, we are Turing computable.
So the universe cannot be computable, in any sense.
Dick: That makes no sense.
If the universe is
universe, for some definition of
observable, from any subjective observer's point of view, is
constantly being added non-random information from outside.
I truly beg you all to consider this argument fully.
Please let me know what you think,
F.H.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk
, Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Consider the following fully general way of saying this is the
following: quantum mechanics and general relativity are symmetrically
the exact same theory, modulo the additional bit of information
that quantum entanglement reduces net
message --
From: Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:03 AM
Subject: The final TOE?
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Hi all,
Consider the following fully general way of saying this is the
following: quantum mechanics and general relativity
into this. It'll take some
time to fully digest what you're saying, but I'll post a few comments
now to get the conversation going.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 07:39:03PM -0700, Felix Hoenikker wrote:
So, here goes:
Computability implies conservation of algorithmic information
This follows
Hi Russell,
I know I replied already, but I wanted to elaborate on a physics conjecture
that I had:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
We can also conclude that, since inflation speed is related to the
energy density of the universe, and the size
is the force
of gravity, and all other forces are the result of converged structure at
different levels.
I don't know what to say anymore. Oh my god.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Felix Hoenikker fhoenikk...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Russell,
I know I replied already, but I wanted to elaborate
Every apparent event horizon is really a separation of two
universes, where the outside universe is entangled geometrically with
the inside universe. The Hubble volume is sitting inside of an
expanding supermassive black hole, of another universe. However, by
the uncertainty principle, this means
Hi all,
I'm a long time reader of this forum with a strong interest in all TOE
concepts but has never felt able to contribute to the discussion.
However, over the last few days, I think I've discovered a *very*
general argument (no numbers whatsoever!) that implicates determistic
non-local hidden
19 matches
Mail list logo
