1:24 am
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
Everything List wrote:
Atthe risk of
re-starting the Thorium wars grin thisis a current
article on the why
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
A thorium, liquid salt reactor does make Pu239, and it gets a lot of
it's energy from Pu239 fission. The difference is that it essentially
burns the plutonium as fast at it's made.
From
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:45 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:13 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/20/2014 11:45 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05
-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
OK, point by point:
the United States has tried to develop thorium as an energy source for
some 50 years
They sure didn't try very hard! The United States did stick some Thorium
into conventional reactors that were never
. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
OK, point by point:
the United States has tried to develop thorium as an energy source for
some 50 years
They sure didn't try very hard
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:28 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
What about the waste tails he alludes to.
A Thorium reactor only produces about 1% as much waste as a conventional
reactor simply because Thorium has a atomic number of only 90 but
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, May 20, 2014 1:24 am
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via
Everything List wrote:
Atthe risk of
re-starting the Thorium wars lt;gringt
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article
on the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder
, May 19, 2014 10:25 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current
article on the why NOTS of Thorium
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 11:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 8:28 GMT+02:00 'Chris de Morsella
@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Thorium: the wonder fuel that wasn't
2014-05-20 8:28 GMT+02:00 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:
What about the waste tails he alludes to. I had not known that they had
actually constructed and tested U233 bombs – had always
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature but cut right to
the core [pun intended] of a world in which a multitude of thorium U233 breeder reactors
proliferate widely. There is a risk that this unintentionally leads to
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature
but cut right to the core [pun intended] of a world in which a multitude of
thorium U233 breeder reactors
:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current
article on the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
A mishmash of criticism most of which have to do with administrative and
poltical mistakes or which
On 5/20/2014 11:45 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-20 18:44 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/19/2014 11:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
These are valid criticisms that are very much not administrative nature but
cut
right to the core
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article on
the why NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
On 5/19/2014 9:30 PM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
At the risk of re-starting the Thorium wars grin this is a current article on the why
NOTS of Thorium. It addresses them point by point.
http://thebulletin.org/thorium-wonder-fuel-wasnt7156
A mishmash of criticism most
On 1/30/2013 2:38 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
A great post Stephen thanks
Well, in fact what the post says is that the ones that sucks are the
logical positivists (and their dwarfs, the scientists), who took over
the power in Modernland.
I take this phrase, which IMHO describes very well
Hi Stephen P. King
Even Wittgenstein, who invented logical positivism,
soon abandoned it and spent the rest of his life
showing why it doesn't work.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 00:32:44
Subject: No Wonder
On 30 Jan 2013, at 08:38, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
A great post Stephen thanks
Well, in fact what the post says is that the ones that sucks are the
logical positivists (and their dwarfs, the scientists), who took
over the power in Modernland.
I take this phrase, which IMHO describes
A great post Stephen thanks
Well, in fact what the post says is that the ones that sucks are the
logical positivists (and their dwarfs, the scientists), who took over the
power in Modernland.
I take this phrase, which IMHO describes very well what is inside of what
In fact, the opposite is
Hi meekerdb
A computer can not experience the wonder produced by the night sky,
for example.
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/17/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
On 8/17/2012 10:18 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
A computer can not experience the wonder produced by the night sky,
for example.
Many assertions...no proofs.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send
25 matches
Mail list logo
