First Person Indeterminacy (new attempt) (was Theology or not theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Bruno Marchal
John, Let me try again, with a slightly different thought experiment. In this case I invite Arthur to make some experience. I think it is indifferent if Arthur knows or not the protocol (except that it would violate the comp ethics to not tell him the protocol, gievn that he will be, as

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread David Nyman
On 16 March 2012 21:04, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:    Would it be not wrong to think of ordinary motion of an object through space as a form of repetitive cut and paste operation? You mean on the basis of the same assumptions as the UDA, I assume? Well, insofar as movement

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:20 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: There are many possible enormous changes that could happen without you being aware of them. Show me. Show me a example of a change being made between 2 conscious beings that resulted in a enormous difference between them,

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote: so according to you, we should throw pronouns in the toilet Most of the time pronouns work just fine, but if you're discussing personal identity and duplication chambers you've got to be very stingy with their use,

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2012/3/17 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote: so according to you, we should throw pronouns in the toilet Most of the time pronouns work just fine No they are fine or not... If MWI is true What will *I* do in one

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2012/3/17 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote: so according to you, we should throw pronouns in the toilet Most of the time pronouns work just fine, but if you're discussing personal identity and duplication chambers

Re: First Person Indeterminacy (new attempt) (was Theology or not theology)

2012-03-17 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: The experience consists in being duplicated each day, for ten days in a row. Oh dear, Is this really necessary? He is duplicated in two similar rooms, except for a big 1 painted in the wall of one of these rooms, and a

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Stephen P. King
On 3/17/2012 8:18 AM, David Nyman wrote: On 16 March 2012 21:04, Stephen P. Kingstephe...@charter.net wrote: Would it be not wrong to think of ordinary motion of an object through space as a form of repetitive cut and paste operation? You mean on the basis of the same assumptions as the

Re: First Person Indeterminacy (new attempt) (was Theology or not theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2012/3/17 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: The experience consists in being duplicated each day, for ten days in a row. Oh dear, Is this really necessary? He is duplicated in two similar rooms, except for a big 1

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread David Nyman
On 17 March 2012 17:48, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:    But why make copies of some original object when the program can just generate many by paralleling running one subroutine or simultaneously running multiple programs ala UD? But surely (still arguing from comp

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 17 Mar 2012, at 05:05, John Clark wrote: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: If he knew he was duplicated both would mention it, if he didn't neither would. The point is that he cannot perceive it. he can not known it by any personal observation, So you're saying that neither

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread meekerdb
On 3/17/2012 8:01 AM, John Clark wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:20 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: There are many possible enormous changes that could happen without you being aware of them. Show me. You are placed in a closed room and

Re: First Person Indeterminacy (new attempt) (was Theology or not theology)

2012-03-17 Thread Pierz
Oh my god, I'm going to scream. Do you think it's possible John and Craig are actually *one and the same person*, some kind of evil mastermind über-troll intent on driving us all over the brink of sanity? What's clear now is that John has painted himself into a corner from which he can never

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: You are placed in a closed room and anesthesized. While you are unconscious you are moved to an identical room in Moscow. You wake up. There has been an enormous change in your position but you are not aware of it.

Re: Theology or not theology (Re: COMP theology)

2012-03-17 Thread meekerdb
On 3/17/2012 9:45 PM, John Clark wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: You are placed in a closed room and anesthesized. While you are unconscious you are moved to an identical room in Moscow. You wake up. There