On Feb 23, 9:46 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2011, at 22:14, benjayk wrote:
> Molecules and Cells are formal things. Form is matter, in *some*
> sense.
Form is not *primary* matter in any sense.
> People having problem with numbers have been victim of a traumatic
> teaching of mat
Dear Evgenii & Bruno,
Half tongue in cheek, in:
Tuszynski, J.A. & R. Gordon (2008). A mean field Ising model for
cortical rotation in amphibian one cell stage embryos. In. Eds.
Toronto, Society for Mathematical Biology Conference, July 30 - August
2, 2008.
I used the following reasoning:
IF micr
On 22 Feb 2011, at 22:14, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Now, just recall that "Platonia" is based on classical logic where
the
falsity f, or 0 = 1, entails all proposition. So if you insist to
say
that 0 = 1, I will soon prove that you owe to me A billions
On Feb 23, 3:02 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:32 PM, 1Z wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 3:06 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:15 AM, 1Z wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 5:30 am, Jason Resch wrote:
> > > > > Peter,
>
> > > > > Correct me if I am wrong but I think
On Feb 23, 4:10 pm, benjayk wrote:
> 1Z wrote:
>
> Then God does not exist as an actor in the world, but God does still exists
> as an idea.
>
> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> >>"something existing" or simply existence exists, if it is meaningful
> >> >> >> to use the word "not", "som
On Feb 23, 4:10 pm, benjayk wrote:
> 1Z wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk
> >> wrote:
> >>
Dear Bruno,
Could you explain this a bit more?
“The ideally correct machine
is to the human what a material point is to the sun. My answer tries
only to help you to understand what I mean by a knowing machine, not
really a knowing human. Human have non-monotonic layers, they can
updat
On 22 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thank you for your answers. I have still a coupled of questions.
> But with computer science, intuition can be misleading.
Intuition could be misleading not only in computer science. I know.
>> Moreover my first person view assumes that there a
1Z wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 18, 4:00 pm, benjayk wrote:
>> 1Z wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 17, 10:38 pm, benjayk wrote:
>> >> Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>>
>> >> > On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
>>
>> >> 1Z wro
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>
>> The easy way is to assume inconsistent descriptions are merely an
>> arbitrary
>> combination of symbols that fail to describe something in
>> particular and
>> thus h
1Z wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, benjayk wrote:
>> 1Z wrote:
>>
>> > On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk wrote:
>> >> 1Z wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk wrote:
>> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>>
>> >> >> > On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Comp
Hi!
On Feb 22, 12:22 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2011, at 07:58, Russell Standish wrote:
>
snip
>
> > When observing data, it is important that observers are relatively
> > insensitive to error. It does not help to not recognise a lion in the
> > African savannah, just because it is part
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:32 PM, 1Z wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 18, 3:06 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:15 AM, 1Z wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 18, 5:30 am, Jason Resch wrote:
> > > > Peter,
> >
> > > > Correct me if I am wrong but I think we have established some things
> we
> > > > a
13 matches
Mail list logo
