Re: It's all in your head

On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 12:22:11 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 4 Sep 2019, at 15:52, Philip Thrift > > wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:52 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 3 Sep 2019, at 10:55, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> ... Michael

Re: The Neuroscience of Reality

Didn't read it as it was behind a paywall. Brent On 9/5/2019 9:58 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: And what about the paper in Scientific American? Is it also about a pseudo-problem? If not, what is the difference? Evgenii Am 04.09.2019 um 21:59 schrieb 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List: On

Re: It's all in your head

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 15:52, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:52 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 3 Sep 2019, at 10:55, Philip Thrift > wrote: >> >> >> ... Michael Forrest's paper [ >>

Re: The Neuroscience of Reality

And what about the paper in Scientific American? Is it also about a pseudo-problem? If not, what is the difference? Evgenii Am 04.09.2019 um 21:59 schrieb 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List: On 9/3/2019 12:32 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote: It looks like this is yet another virtual world theory,

Re: Observation versus assumption

> On 5 Sep 2019, at 01:12, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 9/4/2019 8:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> On 2 Sep 2019, at 22:31, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9/2/2019 8:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Indeed that can be said

Re: Observation versus assumption

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 19:36, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >> The reality of being prime means being unable to be divided by any integer > >> except for itself and 1, > > >OK. > > >> and if the amount of computation

Re: Observation versus assumption

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 17:43, PGC wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:52:58 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 2 Sep 2019, at 21:48, Philip Thrift > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 10:57:50 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 1 Sep 2019, at

Re: Quantum Foam

> On 5 Sep 2019, at 12:04, John Clark wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:06 AM Bruce Kellett > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > Exercise: explain why Trump is definitely NOT Löbian … > >

Re: Quantum Foam

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:06 AM Bruce Kellett wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > *Exercise: explain why Trump is definitely NOT Löbian …* >> > > Because he has had his Löb removed via a löbotomy. > Because Trump is a self described "very stable genius": A

Re: Quantum Foam

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > Exercise: explain why Trump is definitely NOT Löbian … > Because he has had his Löb removed via a löbotomy. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To

Re: Quantum Foam

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 23:07, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 9/4/2019 1:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 21:44, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9/3/2019 9:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I define the

Re: Quantum Foam

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 23:03, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 9/4/2019 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> After 1500 years of brainwashing. For a long time, everyone else was >> believing that drugs exist, and surely they do if we mean the original sense >> (medication

Re: Quantum Foam

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 22:59, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > wrote: > > > > On 9/4/2019 12:43 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 3 Sep 2019, at 02:44, spudboy100 via Everything List >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> Well, I tend not to disagree with you

Re: How to estimate the total energy of the visible universe

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:06:53 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Alan Grayson > wrote: > > *> It's claimed the energy is undefined in GR. Regardless, what I am >> trying to do is estimate what the total energy is, not whether it's >> conserved for

Re: How to estimate the total energy of the visible universe

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:48:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell >> wrote: >>> >>> You also have to include the total