Dear Edger,
Where does the fire come from that animates the logic?
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
on Reality available on Amazon under my name.
Marchal is on the right
this abacus dwells?
Thanks,
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Paul King stephe...@charter.net
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 22, 2013 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: Bruno's mathematical reality
Dear Edger,
Where does the fire come from that animates
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 22, 2013 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: Bruno's mathematical reality
Dear Edger,
Where does the fire come from that animates the logic?
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote:
All,
The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my
On 12/22/2013 5:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Dec 2013, at 01:00, Edgar Owen wrote:
Hi John,
First thanks for the complement on my post!
To address your points. Of course we do have some knowledge of reality. We have to have
to be able to function within it which we most certainly do
Dear Edgar Owen: thanks for a post with reason. I am sorry to be too old to
read your (any?) book so I take it from your present communication. You
wrote among others:
*...Modern science has a major lacuna, the notion that all of reality is
mathematical, that prevents science from grasping the
I had a question about the quote below of Edgar's. In what sense of
'compute' do you believe that something computes reality? Also, I'm
wondering if Laplace's demon is relevant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%27s_demon
According to the article, we have:
In 2008, David
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
All,
The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
on Reality available on Amazon under my name.
Cool, it sounds quite interesting. I've added it to my wish list.
Marchal is on the right
I don't have time to read many books (although I managed to get almost half
way through BOI). However, can you explain what you mean about the universe
being based on something that is running ? That seems to rely on the
prior existence of time, which is one of the things a TOE should probably
be
On 12/20/2013 3:52 PM, Edgar Owen wrote:
All,
The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book on Reality
available on Amazon under my name.
Marchal is on the right track, but reality consists not just of numbers (math) but is a
running logical structure analogous
Hi John,
First thanks for the complement on my post!
To address your points. Of course we do have some knowledge of reality. We
have to have to be able to function within it which we most certainly do to
varying degrees of competence. That is proof we do have sufficient
knowledge of reality
For me, the critical issue for accounting for everything under a single
reality theory is what I call the Presentation Problem. In simple terms,
there is no logical reason for the logical universe to produce shapes,
colors, flavors, or feelings of any kind when we already know that
information
201 - 211 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
