of quantum mind (whatever that is).
>
> etc. as I frequently but ineffectively try to correct.
>
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
ntent -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
Straw dog there is no mention of a separation
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>> Dear Roger,
>>
>> Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
>> non-physical and therefore part o
orld of mind.
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> *From:* Alberto G. Corona
> *Receiver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
>
> In the world of the mind, that is, in what we call reality
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
> non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
> thru quantum mechanics. Only 4 dimensions for example of the 11d
> univ
they are physical. So the block universe is a waste of time.
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> From: Richard Ruquist
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-02-03, 07:19:51
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
>
> Roger,
>
> I think the blo
-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind and in it is written all
possible futures and pasts based on comp and quantum mechanics
as well as info on what
ng the following content -
> From: Alberto G. Corona
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
>
> In the world of the mind, that is, in what we call reality, it causes
> everithing because causality is an
ne it).
2013/2/2 Roger Clough
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do think that a
That everything possible may have mathematical existence is my
fundamental hypothesis. How much of this everything that can possibly
become physically existent depends on the definition of physical which
in turn depends on theory. MWI theory predicts a near infinity of
possibilities within a single
Don´t limit yourself to the math of string theory . there may be argued
that any mathematical figure exist, including the ones with no interesting
structure or simetry of constants including ranndom structures, that is
with a high kolmogorov complexity. That means that everithing may exist .
Not b
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> 2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist
>>
>>
>> It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
>> evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
>> be strongly affected by biological consciousness
>>
> But
Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> *From:* Alberto G. Corona
> *Receiver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
>
>
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do think that a block universe can contain minds
I do think that a block universe can contain minds in a certain way. The
objections against that are based in the absence of time, but space(3D
geometry) and time can and should be a product of the machinery of the
mind, in the kantian sense. But while in Kant things in themselves are
unreachable,
Hi
2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist
>
> It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
> evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
> be strongly affected by biological consciousness
>
> But then, what is the anthropic principle about?
>
>
> > --
> > Stathis P
Hi Bruno Marchal
The block universe is the physical universe. So we are not part of it,
for it does not allow subjectivity, which is nonphysical. Or
mathematics or comp, which are also nonphysical.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:13:19 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
Hi Richard Ruquist
Consciousness is not a force that might do things.
It is what allows us to perceive and know things.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 20:39:40
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:03:04 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
>
> >> wrote:
> >> > O
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>>> A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
>>> The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist
>> > wrote:
>> >> A block universe does not allow
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
> >
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist
> > >
> wrote:
> >> A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
> >> The fact the we all possess c
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>> A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
>> The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
>> means that our universe is not completely blocked,
>> although
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
> The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
> means that our universe is not completely blocked,
> although the deviations from "block" may be minor
> and inconsequential rega
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
means that our universe is not completely blocked,
although the deviations from "block" may be minor
and inconsequential regarding the Omega Point.
Richard.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:18 PM,
27 matches
Mail list logo
