>Worms are probably between humans and inanimate objects in this respect.
There consciouss blurs quite >much, but less so than that of your tables.
It's probably experienced as a consistent, but very blurry life, >outside of
drug trips and the like.
This question was adressed in a dream that I ha
On 25 Jul 2011, at 03:05, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 7/24/2011 4:03 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Jul 2011, at 19:14, Stephen P. King wrote:
I found an alternative to this that does not assume P = NP and
that an infinite computation can occur in 0 steps which I can
show, at least in Leib
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Jul 24, 9:52 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> It sounds like you do believe that if the neurons in your visual
>> cortex are replaced you could become blind but not notice that
>> anything has changed and continue to behave normally.
On Jul 25, 8:32 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> The replacement neurons are integrated so that they interact with the
> rest of the brain just as normal brain tissue would. An example is the
> one you came up with, neurons without their nucleus, which would
> function normally at least for a few
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Jul 25, 8:32 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> The replacement neurons are integrated so that they interact with the
>> rest of the brain just as normal brain tissue would. An example is the
>> one you came up with, neurons without th
On Jul 24, 11:00 pm, Colin Geoffrey Hales
wrote:
> Hi,http://www.stationlink.com/docs/Executive_Summary_SEE_TOE_v4.pdf
> There's a lot of unfamiliar terminology. However, I think I can see a very
> high correlation between my general ideas (for example, Hales, C. G. (2009).
> Dual Aspect Science
On 25 Jul 2011, at 15:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Jul 25, 8:32 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
The replacement neurons are integrated so that they interact with the
rest of the brain just as normal brain tissue would. An example is
the
one you came up with, neurons without their nucleus,
On Jul 25, 1:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2011, at 15:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > If they can only function for a few minutes, then that function may
> > not be 'normal' to anything except us as distantly removed observers.
>
> This like saying that a plane which crashes at 10 pm, wa
> You've completely missed the point again. Perhaps you could try
> reading Chalmers' paper if you haven't already done so:
>
> http://consc.net/papers/qualia.html
>
> Unfortunately some people just don't seem to understand it.
I have read it, and it's a good way of understanding the issue if you
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > You've completely missed the point again. Perhaps you could try
>> reading Chalmers' paper if you haven't already done so:
>>
>> http://consc.net/papers/qualia.html
>>
>> Unfortunately some people just don't seem to understand it.
>
> I h
On Jul 25, 7:44 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> The argument in the paper is independent of any particular theory of
> consciousness. It just asks the question of whether consciousness can
> be separated from externally observable brain function.
With my theory of consciousness, that's the wron
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Jul 25, 7:44 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> The argument in the paper is independent of any particular theory of
>> consciousness. It just asks the question of whether consciousness can
>> be separated from externally observable br
Not zombie neurons, just zombie imitation neurons. A natural neuron
could not be a zombie, but you could make a neuron that you think
should function like a natural neuron and it would not be able to be
well integrated into the person's consciousness.
That's beside the point. The only requirem
13 matches
Mail list logo
