physics and relativity.
and have familiarity with concepts in Information Theory, Game Theory,
Cryptography and these kinds of somehow separated fields of study in
Computer Science.
Actually I'm not a fluent English writer, but I'm not lame too...:)
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
Sharif University of Technology
instantaneous state of a universe, not about the uncountability of possible
universes. (Maybe I didn't get your point)
What you are saying just proves that we have uncountable number of
universes.
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
the realizability of mathematical concepts. Real numbers are
mathematical, so they should have a counterpart in real world. What ever
that counterpart is, it's toils the problem of uncountability.
But I think your answer is the best shot.
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
examples in
which we need them!
Consider the use of Pythagoras theorem in nature. There are many cases in
which the distance between two points should be irrational.
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
according
to a rational unit(Width of pixels), and for such diagonal the distance is
an irrational number, although it might be made up of rational numbers of
another irrational unit (diagonal pixels)
I mean there's some irrational distance out there!
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh.
On 3/13/07, Stathis
equations have solutions(At least sometimes those equations
have some real counterparts). Similarly imaginary numbers are introduced to
complete the algebra. They are all our inventions - except some people
think the integers are not.
You're right to some extends, but my point still is a point!
Mohsen
' theorem says no. You might say we
can not measure such distance because when we're talking about elements of
space there should be nothing smaller than it... So what is that distance?
How you gonna make a discrete space when it's intuitively continuous.
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
the influence is evident. Different rules in CA might correspond
to various basic shapes of vibration in strings...
I don't know much about S.T. but the idea of such mapping seems very
interesting.
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
building blocks'
of nature are a meaningful concept (we are tricked into the belief be our
perceptual/epistemological goals) ...
cheers,
colin hales
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
I'm thinking there's some kind of similarity between string theory and
depicting the world as a big CA. In String
better than Wolfram pure classical CA approach which
has no rules for distinguishing 1 and 3 person notion, and so miss the
idea of internal emerging physical laws.
Le 14-mars-07, à 10:23, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh a écrit :
I'm thinking there's some kind of similarity between string theory
this help a bit?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
similar sentences like This sentence is false)
3.in the first claim consider the first system to have the same attitude
toward the second one, I mean let there be a loop (some how similar to
Hofstadter's Strange loops as the foundation of self)
Is it complete of not?
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
. But in the logical sense ONE system wont be able to overcome the
incompleteness,
so I might conclude:
I'M NOT ONE LOGICAL SYSTEM!
This is how we might rich a theory of self. A loopy(!) and multi(!) self.
*
*Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
fix them.
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
On 5/23/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mohsen,
Le 22-mai-07, à 12:20, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
My sixth sens says you're talking about something important :) but I
don't get it.
Note that it could help me if you could
be avoided by two or more systems. They
are reliable in each other's view, and have statements for that. maybe that
is the only (symmetric!) difference of those systems. Except for that,
both(all) are the same.
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
been asymmetrically transported to A and not to B. Why? parallel
universes again? I thing it wont be creditable, because we have (as far as
we know) no quantum collapse. A mere information transfer does not need
branching :) ! Does it mean comp is wrong?
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
(was!) just a way
to avoid it.
Bruno:*...Only if S2 is much more simple than S1, can S1 be complete on
S2. *
And finally this ruins everything...
-
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 5/26/07, Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
Hi everybody,
I need to clarify. When we build this new combined system, we would be
immune to Godelian statements for one of them not for the whole system,
whatever it might be. So Jesse's argument does not hold
)
Mathematics
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australiahttp://www.hpcoders.com.au
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh
, and discusses bats seeing colors with
their ears, or dogs being able to judge the size of molecules they
smell.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6308228560462155344
Jason
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
explain fully my (and your...)
behaviour. Our brains are very complicated structures, but it is nothing
supernatural with them. Physics explains everything.
--
Torgny Tholerus
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
that a
third person view can evaluate! All the problem is this first person
experience.
On 6/11/07, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh skrev:
What is the subjective experience then?
The subjective experience is just some sort of behaviour. You can make
computers
human beings are slaves under our language. The language restricts out
thinking.
--
Torgny Tholerus
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
Sharif University of Technology,
Tehran.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
from this, even if there is a multiverse there's an
information content for whole universe, and that might need another cause.
--
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group
On 7/9/07, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:39 am, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
While I was reading the previous discussion; justifying theory of
everything , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of
our
TOE. The problem
25 matches
Mail list logo
