On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:21 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think this misunderstands Jason's thought experiment. I think he's
assuming the source is polarized at 0deg, the same as A, not a random
source as you assume.
The photon has no polarization at all unless a filter is
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:21 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think this misunderstands Jason's thought experiment. I think he's
assuming the source is polarized at 0deg, the same as A, not a random
source
On 7/26/2013 8:52 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:21 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I think this misunderstands Jason's thought experiment. I think he's
assuming the
source is polarized at 0deg, the same as A, not a random source
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
If a photon passes a filter orientated at 0 degrees, then it encounters a
filter at 90 degrees it will be blocked.
How do you know the photon is oriented at 0 degrees? If the photon has
never been measured, if neither it nor its
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
If a photon passes a filter orientated at 0 degrees, then it encounters
a filter at 90 degrees it will be blocked.
How do you know the photon is oriented at
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
So why is it the entanglement is destroyed by the presence of the 45
degree filter, but not the 0 degree filter?
Because before the photon hit the 0 degree filter, that is to say before it
was measured, neither it nor
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
To me it seems that must be incorrect, because it would enable super
luminal communication. By sending a continuous stream of entangled photons
in opposite directions
I can't send a message that way because I have no way of
On 23 Jul 2013, at 16:00, Jason Resch wrote:
When there are two polarizers A and C, which are rotated by 90
degrees to each other then no photons will pass through both
polarizers. However, if we insert polarizer B at a 45 degree offset
to A and C then 1/4 of the photons will make it
On 7/23/2013 7:00 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
When there are two polarizers A and C, which are rotated by 90 degrees to each other
then no photons will pass through both polarizers. However, if we insert polarizer B at
a 45 degree offset to A and C then 1/4 of the photons will make it through.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/23/2013 7:00 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
When there are two polarizers A and C, which are rotated by 90 degrees
to each other then no photons will pass through both polarizers. However,
if we insert polarizer B at a 45
On 7/23/2013 2:49 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/23/2013 7:00 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
When there are two polarizers A and C, which are rotated by 90 degrees to
each
other then no
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/23/2013 2:49 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/23/2013 7:00 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
When there are two polarizers A and C, which are rotated by 90
12 matches
Mail list logo
