g the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-21, 10:21:22
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind
On 20 Dec 2012, at 17:40, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
This is just an intuition. IMHO
conventional p
pecially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 10:14:38
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling
the mind
On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brun
everything-list
Time: 2012-12-19, 14:59:12
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind
On 18 Dec 2012, at 15:55, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
It would be interesting to see which logical statements apply
to the monadic=quantum domain, which is beyond
oody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 10:14:38
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling
the mind
On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Pardon my ignorance, b
On 17 Dec 2012, at 20:27, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Why just 8? I would have expected every possible "person points
pf view"
consistent with MWI. Richard
There is 8 main types of points of view given by:
Dear Bruno,
p
1
Bp
oody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 10:14:38
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind
On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Pardon my ignorance, b
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Why just 8? I would have expected every possible "person points pf view"
consistent with MWI. Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> There is 8 main types of points of view given by:
>>>
>>
>> Dear Bruno,
>>
>>> p
>>
>>
>> 1
>>>
>>> Bp
>>
>>
>> 2
>
On 16 Dec 2012, at 19:22, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/16/2012 4:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
The 1p is not left out. Eventually comp singles out eight person
points of
view. If you
On 12/16/2012 4:47 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
The 1p is not left out. Eventually comp singles out eight person
points of
view. If you think comp left out the person, you miss the meaning
eceiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 04:47:59
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling
the mind
On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal
> w
, 04:47:59
Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind
On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> The 1p is not left out. Eventually comp singles out eight pe
On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
The 1p is not left out. Eventually comp singles out eight person
points of
view. If you think comp left out the person, you miss the meaning
of the
comp hope, or the comp fear.
Bru
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 05 Dec 2012, at 11:05, Roger Clough wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno Marchal
>
> Indeed, we can not code for [1p]. But we need not abandon
> itr entirely, as you seem to have done, and as cognitive
> theory has done.
>
>
> On the contrary, I define
On 05 Dec 2012, at 11:05, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Indeed, we can not code for [1p]. But we need not abandon
itr entirely, as you seem to have done, and as cognitive
theory has done.
On the contrary, I define it is a simple way (the owner of the diary)
the the self-multiplicat
14 matches
Mail list logo
