Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-22 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno and Roger, What would distinguish, for an external observer, a p-zombie from a person that does not see the world external to it as anything other than an internal panorama with which it cannot interact? -- Onward! Stephen Hi Stephan, That sounds like autism to me. Roger

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-21 Thread Roger Clough
WHOEVER: Hi Bruno and Roger, What would distinguish, for an external observer, a p-zombie from a a person that does not see the world external to it as anything other than an internal panorama with which it cannot interact? BRUNO: Nobody can distinguish a p-zombie from a human, even

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-21 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal You say "No, a zombie will stop at the red light. By definition it behaves like a human, or like a conscious entity. " My problem is that the definition is an absurdity to begin with. If he has no mind, he could not know what a red light means. He could not know anything.

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-20 Thread Alberto G. Corona
Roger Different Qualia are a result fo different phisical effect in the senses. So a machine does not need to have qualia to distinguish between phisical effectds. It only need sensors that distinguish between them. A sensor can detect a red light and the attached computer can stop a car. With no

Re: RE: RE: A test for solipsism

2012-10-20 Thread Roger Clough
everything-list Time: 2012-10-19, 08:42:36 Subject: RE: RE: A test for solipsism > Hi William R. Buckley > > You can speak to a potential test subject, > but it can only reply if it indeed has a mind. This is an assumption you make. > This is the Turing test, the result

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-20 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal In that definition of a p-zombie below, it says that a p-zombie cannot experience qualia, and qualia are what the senses tell you. The mind then transforms what is sensed into a sensation. The sense of red is what the body gives you, the sensation of red is what the mind transf

RE: RE: A test for solipsism

2012-10-19 Thread William R. Buckley
> Hi William R. Buckley > > You can speak to a potential test subject, > but it can only reply if it indeed has a mind. This is an assumption you make. > This is the Turing test, the results of which are not > certain. But it is the only test I can think of unless > you want to get into the C

Re: RE: A test for solipsism

2012-10-19 Thread Roger Clough
Hi William R. Buckley You can speak to a potential test subject, but it can only reply if it indeed has a mind. This is the Turing test, the results of which are not certain. But it is the only test I can think of unless you want to get into the Chinese room argument, etc. If it does not rep

Re: Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-19 Thread Roger Clough
everything-list Time: 2012-10-18, 17:48:57 Subject: Re: Re: A test for solipsism On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Stathis Papaioannou > > If a zombie really has a mind it could converse with you. > If not, not. > If true, then you have

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-18 Thread Russell Standish
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Stathis Papaioannou > > If a zombie really has a mind it could converse with you. > If not, not. > If true, then you have demonstrated the non-existence of zombies (zombies, by definition, are indistinguishable from real people

Re: Re: A test for solipsism

2012-10-18 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stathis Papaioannou If a zombie really has a mind it could converse with you. If not, not. Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 10/18/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Stathis Papaioannou Receiver: