Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
nstream maintainer, I find many packages with errors in distributed sources would have been caught by make distcheck when releasing. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

2016-10-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 10 octobre 2016 à 10:01 +0200, Milan Crha a écrit : > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:39 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > > Also, does CMake support make distcheck yet ? As a downstream > > maintainer, I find many packages with errors in distributed sources >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Chaning fields in the message list view

2007-01-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
code, particularly at CamelMessageInfo and CamelMessageInfoBase. > Am i on the right track ? Would appreciate some pointers towards where > to code this... I've found the feature of your first point by looking at mail/message-list.c -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Evolution-hackers] NSS PKCS#11 modules

2007-01-14 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
for adding such modules and I would like to know if there is any base to start something like this. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The recent camel-lite improvements

2007-02-07 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
It'd be nice to see the work for IDLE make it to mainline too. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

[Evolution-hackers] evolution releases and intltool brokeness

2007-02-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Please fix it for next release. Currently I'm sure gtkhtml-3.13.91 is affected but the fix is present on all evo related ebuild on gentoo so you might want to check these anyway. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Evolution-hackers mail

[Evolution-hackers] Plugin and menu icons

2007-04-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, in the process of enhancing plugins, I was looking for a mean to add an icon in the top level menus. After some code reading it seems it is not possible if the icon is not a gtk stock icon. Did I miss something ? Any pointers would be appreciated. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EM

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Plugin and menu icons

2007-04-27 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 23:11 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > Hi list, > > in the process of enhancing plugins, I was looking for a mean to add an > icon in the top level menus. After some code reading it seems it is not > possible if the icon is not a gtk stock i

[Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
the prev/next page id with GtkAssistant. On the other hand, integrating new pages into an assistant seems really easy. So, what should be done here, indefinitely keep the current implementation or get rid of one more part of libgnomeui and simplifying evo's implementation ? -- G

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GnomeDruid migration

2007-05-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
the access of next and previous page through pointers which is not the case with GtkAssistant. We could simulate that obviously but I think the result wouldn't be easy to either debug or maintain. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki & spam

2007-05-15 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
spam in it too but I can't fix it since I don't have the proper rights. I've seen a user's comment asking "what about turning anonymous editing off ?". Will this be done ? The version of wikipedia seems a bit old too, is an upgrade planned ? -- Gill

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki & spam

2007-05-15 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > Hi Gilles, > > I dont see the spam in the Main_Page. Am I seeing elsewhere? click on "see source as text". It's in a tag with css style making it invisible to users (namely ) -- Gilles Dartigue

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org wiki & spam

2007-05-16 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 19:27 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 15:40 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 18:51 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > > > Hi Gilles, > > > > > > I dont see the spam in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
> > Thanks you in advance. in fact it seems evolution uses branches over tags evolution stable branch can be found at : http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/branches/gnome-2-18 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Evolution-

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > > > Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers, > > > > > > it appears

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

2007-05-21 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:39 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : >

[Evolution-hackers] XML APIs in evolution

2007-05-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
on other warnings but I feel it doesn't help with code reading. There are some places where e-xml-utils functions are mixed with libxml calls. Don't remember exactly the place though. The question is, what shall we do now ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
alendars, contacts) Please advise. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364385 [2] http://www.go-evolution.org/User_Interface -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EE/CS last year student, ESIEE signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée __

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:> > > First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it > > doesn't understand _ markup. > > I think th

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-05-31 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > I've seen that too, but the point was more: "Why are the message view > > headers looking different than every other ETable I can see

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions

2007-06-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
on > fetches a ridiculous large amount of headers for each message for > building its summary). > isn't the imap-features plugin's goal to reduce/customize the amount of downloaded headers ? Or is it that it's still not enough ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL P

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Plugin and menu icons

2007-06-09 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le vendredi 27 avril 2007 à 10:07 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 23:11 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > > Hi list, > > > > in the process of enhancing plugins, I was looking for a mean to add an > > icon in the top level men

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Plugin and menu icons

2007-06-10 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 17:05 +0400, Nickolay V. Shmyrev a écrit : > В Сбт, 09/06/2007 в 17:45 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue пишет: > > Le vendredi 27 avril 2007 à 10:07 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : > > after reading more code, it seems bonoboui doesn't like icons s

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Overview of camel-lite

2007-06-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
am is interested in fixing as much compilation warnings as possible. In last week's meeting, Matthew told me he was especially interested in fixes for camel and I was about to start to work on it but if you have it all done already... :) -- Gilles Dartigue

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase

2007-07-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 11:01 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Data storage question

2007-08-09 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
lution or something like that. Thing is modifying the file directly will give you problems about which daemon is running or not and is cashing informations while using gconftool-2 directly talks to the gconf daemon. You might still need to restart evolution-data-server depending on what you

[Evolution-hackers] Right click menu ordering

2007-11-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
;d like to bring up the discussion here in order to get something that could be made available on the wiki and could be used as a reference for evo hackers. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numé

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Ical (WebDAV) Web-Calendar read-only!?

2007-11-30 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ond person to write will replace the > first > person's changes. publish_calendar is the closest thing to be compared to "on the web" calendar write support. It uses plain gnome_vfs_write and (although I didn't read this part yet) I suspect gnome_vfs handles most of the tric

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build failure in evo: need a lot of stuff!

2008-01-19 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ou might want to warn the glib guys about this then... seems they have > broken API or ABI which is a strict no-no. libbonobo-2.20.3 changelog indicates that it is intended to fix some problems with glib-2.15, make sure you have at least that version. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.22 released

2008-03-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
(hopefully with patches). Keep up the good work. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http:

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution and ldap contacts

2008-06-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ike > the contacts on the local hard drive. > which is filled as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324203 -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Re: [Evolution-hackers] make dist error in evolution-data-server

2008-07-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
un intltoolize --force (or just use autogen.sh, it does all the dirty first run things) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutio

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bug fixing in stable 2.22.x branch

2008-08-20 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
aches stable though so you better group submission :) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gno

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution: Taking forward...

2008-08-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
rgot to send a mail so here it is. Permission granted for any pieces of code I've produced. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hacke

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Configuration masquerading Data

2008-09-18 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
bly can with "individual" exports) but that's probably because nobody even thought about getting started on standardizing this kind of stuff before. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci e

[Evolution-hackers] String addition to evolution

2009-02-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi, I added 1 msgid to evolution, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568176 This string is meant to be the title of the migration dialog for evolution 2.24 summary migration. #: ../mail/em-migrate.c:2974 msgid "Migrating Folders" msgstr "" Thanks, -- G

[Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-02-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
title=Evolution_Keyboard_Navigation_Specification_for_Version_2.4&action=history&offset=0&limit=500 it's been going on for months and I'm sick of trying to fix it without the proper tools/rights/whatever. Thanks for your attention. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: Cec

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Command line

2009-03-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
RFE at http://bugzilla.gnome.org because it would much useful for git users. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gn

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-07-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Whatever you do, please do something quickly, todays spamming is at a rate that I can barely sustain. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list

Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org

2009-08-12 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
can we get the new user lockdown now at least ? -- Gilles Dartiguelongue ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Want to contribute to evolution-mapi

2009-11-13 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
d live ebuilds for gnome-live overlay. This goes the usual route, check latest ebuild in tree or in gnome overlay, adapt, submit to bugzilla for review. If you stick around often enough, you might even get write access. Visit us on #gentoo-desktop on Freenode if you want to discuss it or poke m

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gcc 4.4 may be causing a number of bugs in Evolution

2010-02-01 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ngly. gcc just got a lot less fool proof in the last releases in order to force developers into coding more easily optimizable code (probably not the way they would put it but that's the wanted result afaik). -- Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rebooting ChangeLog files in 3.x

2010-03-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
ingle top-level ChangeLog > placeholder file whose contents will be automatically populated with > commit messages when creating release tarballs. > as long as it is not the, sadly common since git migration, raw git log output, which is unreadable for downstream, then sure. -- Gilles Dartiguel

Re: [Evolution-hackers] XDG Base Directories

2010-10-15 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
quot;d like to mention again that it would be nice if evolution could take into account system certificates as a basis for user trust settings in certificate signatures, etc. I don't know if nss is just getting in the way for this, but evolution and firefo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] libedata-cal-1.2.la: undefined reference to `e_cal_recur_ensure_end_dates'

2010-10-22 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
> > Only one 2 hits in Google, no solutions. > Anyone with a tip how to continue? This was reported in gnome's bugzilla and in gentoo's. It should be fixed in master by now. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cache encryption

2011-03-22 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
gt; Will it be not simpler if we can make Evolution use a custom location for > cache, that the user/root can set ? XDG_CACHE_HOME [1] ? with pam_mount and you get everything compliant with XDG base directory specification to have encrypted cached data for free. I don't think it's