Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
Note: As many core developers are on leave during the 3rd and 4th week
Wednesday's of this month. We are postponing
the meeting to the last Wednesday of this month, June 29.
- Chenthill.
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:41 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello Chenthill!
>
> You are the calendar maintainer, right? Do you have some time to review
> these patches? On this occasion let me add some further explanation of
> the motivation for this patch series.
Can you please attach these patches
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
Check out http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CommunityMeet for more details.
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnom
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 12:43 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> > Is there a way to determine where I'm mixing GTK 2 & 3?
>
> I'm not aware of a good way. In the past I've had to pick through
> pkgconfig files to figure out what's dragging it i
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.g
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.g
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 08:33 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 04:47 -0700, Vibha Yadav wrote:
> > Evolution is now compilable against gtk3. Please checkout the gtk3 branch
> > for
> > + gtkhtml
> > + evolution-data-server
> > + evolution
>
> Awesome! Nice work!
+1 :)
- Chenth
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 08:29 +0530, chen wrote:
> Hi,
> The meeting goes as follows,
>
> * Project updates
> * Discussion on queries/decisions
> * Individual updates
The meeting was post-poned last week since many core developers were on
leave. The meeting will happen on Nov
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.g
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 11:39 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> As part of our transition from GConf to GSettings, which Rodrigo Moya
> has graciously been helping with, I've put some thought into addressing
> the XML string lists which we currently store in GConf under "accounts"
> and "sources" keys.
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:21 -0600, Sankar P wrote:
> >>> On 10/18/2010 at 07:01 PM, in message
> <1287408711.3126.11.ca...@localhost.localdomain>, Matthew Barnes
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:10 +0530, chen wrote:
> > > The other solution was
Hi,
The meeting goes as follows,
* Update on EWS plan
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, vis
Hi,
We had discussed about merging the collaborative providers such as
evolution-exchange, evolution-mapi, groupwise, kolab and evolution-ews
(on development) into a single package in previous community meeting.
There are certain advantages and some concern areas in it, let me
summarize them on w
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 17:19 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hello again.
>
> While working through the IMAPX sources, I noticed that there are three kinds
> of licenses in the headers for the *.[hc] files of the IMAPX implementation:
>
> * GPLv2
> * LGPLv2
> * {nil}
>
> The COPYING file in th
Hi,
We are at the end of 2.32 release and heading towards Evolution 3.0. We will
be going through the plans for the upcoming release apart
from the regular meeting format. The meeting goes as follows,
* 3.0 plans
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chent
Hi,
The following modules have been branched for GNOME 2.32, gtkhtml,
evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
branch is gnome-2-32.
Hard code freeze starts from Sep 13 and ends on Sep 27. Please do not
commit any patches to gnome-2-32 branch until hard-code freeze ends.
Exce
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 10:30 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Thursday 05 August 2010 David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:22 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > > Now, I would like to know how we should deal with the issue. We (the
> > > evolution-kolab develope
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 18:20 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:00 PM, chen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some
> > interesting updates during meeting. The meeting goes as follows,
>
> I
Hi,
This is first meeting after our GUADEC 2010! There would be some
interesting updates during meeting. The meeting goes as follows,
* Project updates
* Discussion on queries/decisions
* Individual updates
- Chenthill.
___
evolution-hackers mailing
--- Begin Message ---
Migration has been done and I'll submit the patch soon.
Regards
Punit
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:56 +0530, chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:21 +0530, chen wrote:
> > > Is it
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:21 +0530, chen wrote:
> > Is it required ? Having it in ECalBackendStore simplifies the backend
> > code to form the path based on the type (calendar,tasks,memos) at a
> > single place rath
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:41 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Is it possible to define certain IMAP folders as "hidden" from within our
> > plugin's EPlugin part? Or is it possible to hide certain IMAP folders (and
> > their subfolders) i
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 12:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ...still continuing...
>
> Kolab makes use of "RFC5464 - The IMAP METADATA Extension" IMAP folder
> annotations to differentiate between the various folder types which are
> handled by Kolab. Remember, anything (Email and
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 17:27 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 09:10 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > that's a part which should be changed. The ideal way, as I understand
> > it, is to have an ECalBackend function to retrieve a path for
> > attachments, and ECal should ask backend fo
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:37 +0530, chen wrote:
> > ECalBackendSync - Abstract class from which you would need to subclass
> > kolab backend. (http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/CalendarStore)
>
> Though only subclass thi
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:36 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> no ideas? Anything?
I will summarize some of the DataStructures here which you will be using
in the backend,
ECalComponent - This holds the calendar event's data in Ical format. It
wraps Icalcomponent, but has not complet
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 11:34 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, chen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Our this month's community meeting happens on July 14th. This would
> > be the community meeting before GUADEC 2011!!
>
> Isn't th
Hi all,
Our this month's community meeting happens on July 14th. This would
be the community meeting before GUADEC 2011!!
Post any queries to the list today if you want them to be answered in
the community meeting. Gives some thinking time for all the people for a
fruitful discussion.
I wil
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 15:35 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 15:11 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > From 1d1b146e58f918f67ccff93c4fb5388429bf12e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: David Woodhouse
> > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:11:17 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] imapx: Avoid run
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:22 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 10:29 -0600, Sankar P wrote:
> > (oh that out-of-tree Scalix backend is still using
> > flat-file-summary-APIs-oh-wait-lets-ignore-it etc. types)
>
> Is evolution-scalix even alive?
> It hasn't seen a release in over
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 19:20 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> thank you very much for taking time to clarify things! Much appreciated.
>
> On Friday 09 July 2010 at 18:43:32 chen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> &g
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 18:25 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> On Friday 09 July 2010 at 18:01:53 chen wrote:
> > [...]
> > Let me try to summarize some pointers for calendar and you could do the
> > same for address-book as well,
> > + Create New ECalBackend for Kolab
gt; > have a first preview ready.
> >
> > Perhaps something to dicuss on #evolution (irc.gimp.net) - but it'd be
> > great to have you working in the same git repo IMHO [ not that it's my
> > decision of course - I defer to Matthew/Chen etc. ;-]
>
>
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:50 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in evolution-kolab, we need to provide full offline capabilities for working
> with Kolab 2 groupware data in offline mode.
>
> Evo 2.30 has an offline mode which works for IMAP email. If I understood
> correctly, email h
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:33 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How is Evolution's "Show a reminder before every
> appointment" feature meant to be implemented? Is that something that has
> to be checked each time an appointment is created (in which case
> SyncEvolution would have to be upda
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:41 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> On Thursday 01 Juli 2010 at 08:58:32 Milan Crha wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm working on a way to be able to report detailed errors from
> > addressbook/calendar backends to UI, so users will be able to see
> > something more sensible t
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 16:14 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> reading about the new IMAPX implementation used by Evo >=2.30, I found it
> stated that
>
> "Maybe if imapx had come up before, many backends such as groupwise, mapi
>etc. would have followed this design rather than
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:22 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all. I'm wondering if anyone can provide a summary/recommendation
> for IMAP vs. IMAP+ (IMAPX) in Evo 2.30 (I'm actually building the very
> latest gnome-2.30 branch from git)?
>
> I use a dovecot IMAP server which I don't think supports a
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 14:05 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:28 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Does the "front-end process" refer to Evolution, i.e. is a Camel.Provider
> > running inside Evolution instead of EDS? I was hoping that all
> > non-UI-related
> > stuff c
Hi all,
The meeting format goes as follows,
* project updates
* Discussions on specific bugs, decisions to be made etc.
* status updates from everyone
Please join the community meeting to share the interesting evolution
stuffs your working on and discuss specific issues/doubts while all
the ac
Hi all,
Evolution 2.30.2 stable release is scheduled to be released next
week June 21st. Please commit all the important patches to the stable
branch from upstream and downstream. Keep in mind that all freezes valid
in stable branch gnome-2-30.
Thanks, Chenthill.
___
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:56 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:41 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > So a local source group with a base URI of:
> >
> > file:///home/mbarnes/.evolution/calendar/local
> >
> > will become:
> >
> > file:///home/mbarnes/.local/share/evolut
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 06:32 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 09:18 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > Are you going to change ESourceGroup's base_uri to contain only the
> > protocol for all the ESourceGroups? If yes, then I think it's not the
> > best thing, because for example evolu
LED / Ubuntu LTS ? or more community
> focused distros ?
>
> AFAICS the latest enterprise desktops current in late spring will have
> the underlying O/S deps necessary (GNOME 2.28) to build & run the code
> as of now. Matthew / Chen - we have a general policy of not requir
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:35 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le mardi 30 mars 2010, à 09:18 -0400, Matthew Barnes a écrit :
> > > Even better, can we get a macro added to gnome-common that implements
> > > this deprecation flag policy, and pe
Hi,
Following evolution packages have been branched for GNOME 2.30,
gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution, evolution-exchange and
evolution-mapi.
So master branch is now free of all freezes and ready to
accept the commits :)
gnome-2-30 branch has the code which would b
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 17:47 -0500, Shreyas Phadnis wrote:
> hello all,
>
>
> I just got the latest evolution (from git master) up and running on my
> machine. I am testing few things specifically with IMAPX
> performance... is there any documentation on camel and its threading
> arch... and on I
of a corrected string,
gconftool-2 --set /apps/evolution/mail/accounts --type=list
--list-type=string "[akhilak...@ocean.comimap://ak...@164.99.99.195/;imap_custom_headers;command=ssh%20-C%20-l%20%25u%20%25h%20exec%20/usr/sbin/imapd;use_ssl=never;soap_port=7191smtp://ak...@164.99.99.195/;i
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 13:56 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 18:07 +0530, chen wrote:
> > I also come across another issue, even if we start using maildir
> format,
> > we cannot assume that multiple applications would access the data
> > especially since
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:54 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Ohly
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 09:19 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 15:09 -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:16 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> >>
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 12:15 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 14:09 +0530, chen wrote:
> >
> > Now the file org-gnome-mail-to-task.xml will not be added in the
> > tarballs. The menu item will not appear in the evolution main menu under
> > M
Hi kmaraas,
I see the following commit made in the
plugins/mail-to-task/MakeFile.am. This does not have a ChangeLog.
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ INCLUDES =\
@EVO_PLUGIN_RULE@
-plugin_DATA = org-gnome-mail-to-task.eplug org-gnome-mail-to-task.xml
+pl
What is the version of libnotify-devel your using ?
- Chenthill.
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 21:27 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 20:20 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 01:33 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > > hi lee,
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, den 06.01.2006, 13:58 -0
You can do that through Evolution-data-server. There was some discussion
regarding communication with EDS, you can find those mail threads here
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2005-October/msg00070.html.
thanks, Chenthill.
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 16:21 +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
> Hell
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 09:14 +0200, Dick Kniep wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> Op zaterdag 15 oktober 2005 20:59, schreef Dick Kniep:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > This is my first post to this list, and I am definitely no wizard in Bonobo
> > or evolution. On the other hand I have done a fair amount of searching on
>
56 matches
Mail list logo
