Just checking www.antivirus.com I see TrendMicro's released a new version of
their ScanEngine and new numbering scheme for virus definitions. All of us
out there with Active Update keep an eye out for the new version.
As of 11:45 PDT the release hasn't made it to the Active Update site yet.
Go
Dear All,
We have a dedicated connector server (NT4 SP4, Ex5.5 SP2, 1 IMS, 41 X-400
Connectors 38 Directory Replication Connectors, no Mailboxes) that needs
to be replaced by a new one. Does anybody have a best practice or any
tips how to do this. Do we have to rehome all the connectors or is
Hi Leeann
We were using Goldmine as a contact manager for Exchange until quite
recently. We were also using it as a progress monitor for specific
contacts/jobs with our customers.(Workflow type thingy)
The decision was taken to cease using it as separate package and develop a
solution withing
All,
Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk.
Picture is this:
650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout
software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote
desktop control for support etc.
Any suggestions would greatly be
Ed,
The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her .pst was opened temporarily
to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc for permanent storage in her
Exchange Mailbox. During the moving of a large folder to the Server, she
exceeded the size limit of her new mailbox.
From what I
Apply SP1 for XP, it adresses this issue
Doris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. Oktober 2001 04:29
An: Exchange Discussions
Betreff: RE: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower)
yes and half the time it doesnt run the
I've got 2 exchange 2000 servers, in 2 different physical locations, but
members of the same exchange 5.5 site (mixed mode). Mail from 2000 to
5.5 within the site is flowing OK, but anything outgoing for other 5.5
sites or external addresses is sitting in 'Messages with an Unreachable
Ok, I've created a new Routing Group Connector with a higher cost than
the existing one, and the mail is now flowing ok, using the new
connector. I still don't know why 2000 sees the 5.5 connector as down.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM
What?? A huge company in it for the money? Say it's not so!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS
No I did research TechNet a long time ago and they gave me 3
Are you blocking .bin files? Macs sometimes add that extension when using
binhex encoding.
no it's not in the blocked list. these are the files included in the blocked
list
cmd;com;exe;hta;js;jsc;jse;lnk;pif;reg;sct;scr;vb;vbe;vbs;wsc;wsf;wsh;nws;
thanks Peter
jojo
Filemaker? That still exists?
Bit of a dinosaur, innit, Barney?[1]
[1] In joke
Les Bessant MCP[1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce!
[1] W2K Pro, W2K Server, Net Inf
ScanPST did not find any errors. But, it found 19 folders and 2697 Objects.
Does this sound right for a PST that is about 370MB? She has a Contact list
with 800 contacts, and some Calendars that are not so large. Could it be the
missing data is somehow 'hidden' in the .pst?
On Mon, 01 Oct
Dear All
I have been asked to provide corporate email for one of our subsidiary
companies under their own domain name. I know this is possible on Exchange
5.5 and I also know there are a number of ways of doing it. My question is
Which is the best/easiest/most efficient way??
Should I create
Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it.
Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop
being clickable.
Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech
buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it.
Avi
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a
Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving
and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the
MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having
problems.
FWIW, the problem persists after
And what do you have now for AV that does cause this issue?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Loftus Greig
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a
Can someone send me the file or a link to the file that allows you to choose
the options you want to use to export a list from Exchange. I can't seem to
find it, and need to get it.
_
List posting FAQ:
VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST
synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan
it before it hits the mailbox.
Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI
scanner. The two articles seem to point towards
I have opened the file, but I do not see a Lost Found folder.
I tried to count the items, and I can account for about 2/3's of the 2697
items. Her deleted items were ALL of her emails.
Is there anything else I can do to this .pst to recover the lost items? They
have to be somewhere, no?
Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by
telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or
console one then you MUST be smoking crack.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Actually, I believe the point is that, whatever you are most familiar
with, you will find is easier to use. Let's not get into a pissing
contest with OS's please. Because if we did, my VIC-20 blew everything
else out of the water!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano
I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't
about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like
one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Are you saying that on the same email, sometimes the URL will work and
sometimes they won't? Or are saying that on different emails, some work and
some don't?
If they are on different emails, it will depend on who sent the email and in
what format they wrote the email in. It is possible to write
Just out of interest, would it be viable to do things like run traditional
file-based AV scanners on the IMC and MTA queues? Or would MIME (and any
exchange internal formats) obscure things? Would there be file locking
issues anyway?
As an aside, we currently use CA InoculateIT and have made
Let me be more specific:
The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other
http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my
examples better...)
The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the
message. It will usually pick up the
Chris, it is one the Exchange Resource kit 2. it is called header.exe and
needs to run from an exchange server. Send me your email address and I can
send you file.
Thanks
Don White
Perot Systems
VWoA Account
Competency Center Computing and
Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD
anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps
are using AD right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: October 2, 2001
Hi
Is there a workaround to make the Calendar view of OWA 2000 default to
Monthly view ?
JF
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Moving mailboxes between 2 exchange 2000 servers across the WAN, does it
use SMTP or what?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Allison,
You may have to concede on this one. Unless one of the grey beards has an
idea, I don't see how you're going to recover that missing data.
Excerpt form Q171371:
On the View menu, click Folder List to turn on the Folder List view. In
your
Folder List, the following recovered
I guess you didn't know that Microsoft is actually a non-profit NGO.
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS
What?? A huge company in it for the money? Say it's not
There's top notch support for your clients. I just wish that my employer
was as laid back as yours.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exmerge question
No I haven't called
Second thoughtDo you buy chance have deleted item rention time turned
on? If so, with the dumpster always on reg hack you should be able to
recover at least mail for the amount of days you have retention time
set...
Where was the personal folder stored? PC...? Network share? If
alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then
Novell, battle.
Can't wait to see where this goes
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
We have two dedicated SMTP gateways running on dual P333 with 512MB RAM
each. We also have an official company spammer that sends about 7000-13000
emails in one shot using global DLs. Message flow slows down a little but
no problems other than that.
S.
-Original Message-
From:
I love opening cans of worms!
Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest
gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in
my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we
weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it
If you're using Compaq hardware, you can simply relocate the disks to the
new server and power it up [1], provided you have enough space to plug the
disks in and you are content with the amount of disk space you have.
But, probably a clean burn with relocating connectors is a much better
Linux with samba, ssh , and webmin. Load it and leave it. (you may
wanna patch it every now and then so you don't get owned)
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:13 AM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
You are hilarious. I'm going to stop now. I know when I've been beaten by
someone who's had way to much Microfoofoo koolaid today :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are you trying to make this the standard for all of your users? Because,
Outlook will remember the view settings from the previous session and use
those for each user.
S/
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:58 AM
Well, what fun are you? You start a war and end it before I even get
started... Damn it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should
solve any administration and functionality issues I have.
Not to mention any sleepless nights.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
We had a travel ban too after the WTC attack. My coworker is at the MEC
now. We had to jump through hoops to get a special permission for him to
fly during the travel ban. 2 days after the bureaucracy battle, they lifted
the travel ban. AARGH.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter,
Tastes great! No! Less filling!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
alright, a good ole'
Now may be a good time to stop watching all the AVIs your content filter
catches.
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
ROFLMAO!!! Uh
Same here on the rules thing...also, some W98 clients are having problems
sending web pages and links using the mail button in IE...press the send
button and nuttin happens. Still trying to figger it out.
Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse
Endoxy Healthcare
847-465-2351 x2232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Andy. That was tasty. (He really did pour me
beers.)
Ed
--- Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm here in Orlando my friend! That was a little MEC
Oy for you and Darcy
(who is here as well)...
Hold on, I have to pour Ed another beer.
Andy
-Original Message-
Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes.
It is not specific emails.
It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails.
AVi
-Original Message-
From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Exchange
No. The files in those queues are transient and in
encoded formats that the file-based scanners won't
recognize.
Keep file-based scanners away from \exchsrvr\*data
directories.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of interest, would it be viable to do
The Exchange AV products I've used do not interfere
with such things.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a
Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't
interfere with archiving
and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations,
The new Macs are beautiful. MAC OS X is just too late for the market. It
will always have its niche applications though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Please define Mailbox size limit. What are your
exact settings?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed,
The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her
.pst was opened temporarily
to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc
for permanent
Write code.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Brent Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I configure Exchange to be a mass email
server. My company wants to
send out the same email to 3 recipients external
to the company. These
recipients will come from web based front end and a
SQL
Go ahead and create another container IF you NEVER
WILL need to move users between the containers. Never
is a long time, by the way.
I think using the same container and employing Address
Book Views would be a superior alternative.
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Olds, Dominic [EMAIL
Now that was funny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
Does the functionality ever return?
Rex Choi
Siemens Building Technologies
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Thanks but I am talking
upon reboot it returns.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Does the functionality ever return?
Rex Choi
Siemens Building Technologies
Less users = less complaints
It's basic logic to me!
-Original Message-
From: Rocky Stefano
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/2/01 8:16 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading
people by
telling them that the mmc
It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty
good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly...
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
Thought as much.
Thanks anyway,
Loftus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
No. The files in those queues are transient and in
encoded formats that the
Yes, how so Rocky? I was on Don's side! ;-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:48
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
How so...
I'll be
You're goading me and I don't have the time to insult you and your OS!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
How so...
I'll be my
Oh, I am fully aware of what's crashing and what's to blame. As
Stephen mentioned... Less Users=Less Complaints
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I took the comment on sleepless nights as sarcastic. You should have too
ahaha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Yes, how
The first thing to come to mind is that the file associations for the URL
protocol is missing (Q257464) However this would not explain why it would
return on reboot. Perhaps something else is running that is preventing the
proper association from working?
Some further questions:
Are you running
Leeann,
We have been using Goldmine here for several years. The Exchange
connectivity works in a very basic form. Goldmine has a simple POP/SMTP mail
client that can be used with Exchange, but only for POP mail. Goldmine also
has a feature that allows you to send an Outlook email directly from
You can't insult me! That's a pretty tough thing to do...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
You're goading me and
Karma, simply karma.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01,
Ya, we had major problems with NAV NLM and a CDtower NLM when I first
started here - they did not like each other at all. They finally fixed the
prob. Our Novell server runs pretty well. NAV seems to spike the processor
pretty hard at times. If it remains at 100% usage for a period of time it
My Psychic friends tell me In the future there will be no Novell, no
Apple No Compaq I cant Wait.. The So caleld Niche MAC applications can be
eqasily handled by a Toaster NT System or SGI Octane. Mac os X? I would
rather run Amiga OS 3.9 ehehhhehe
-Original Message-
From: Rocky
Yeah my boss is a die-hard Novell guy too. Too bad his boss is
listening to me... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Barry
Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware
HEHE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Yeah my boss is a die-hard Novell guy too. Too bad his boss is
listening to me...
Keep it flowing! (as long as it's not Bud Light that is ...)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
I'm here in Orlando my friend! That was a little MEC Oy for you
What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's
mailboxes. Can someone send me that, or tell me where to get it.
-Original Message-
From: White, Don (PSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yucky!!! Break out the Red Hook or something...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
Keep it flowing! (as long as it's not Bud
Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users
mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions
for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate
without losing all the data.
With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I
know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I
gotta say 1.2 Rules.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM
To: Exchange
There was one shipped on the 5.0 CD IIRC. It also used to be on the App
Farm, if that's still there. Took some configuring, but we used it very
happily for about two years until a bigger fish gobbled us up and then we
got Remedy.
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL
Hmmm, guess that was a doubled up redundancy wasn't it.
It's cuz I'm drinking at work in your memory. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific
This is valuable news to me. My husband = Major Slob when in the proximity
of keyboards. He's tried to blame the kids, but I know better.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping
LOOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL atta boy Don!!! Man the humor on this list just
keeps getting better.
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
I did that once to a guy here who uses all of two fingers to type with. Not
at the same time, of course.
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific
HEE HEE HEE...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
This is valuable news to me. My husband = Major
Search technet for mbinfo
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 16:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Header file
What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's
mailboxes. Can someone send me
Make sure you let the keyboard dry out first, and do not I repeat do not
have on the heated dry
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space
YEAH Well I did.
I guess I used a simmiliar query but did not get the first link you sent
here. But the others I have read and did not give the steps I needed.
Thanks.
Strange... You searched all over and found nothing.. How odd... One
simple query and I come up with all kinds of
I did a search, on the MS site, and couldn't find it... Any links?
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 1, 2001 6:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders based help desk?
Microsoft have a sample
Okay, I know that this is a bit radical and unconventional, but I'm feeling
rebelious! Have you tried reading the DOC file that comes with it?
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Davis
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/2/01 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Exmerge
YEAH Well I did.
I guess
Hi,
We use Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0 SP5 and Outlook Web Access. Lately our
users have been unable to use the Attachment feature when connected to OWA.
The applet runs, and they can browse and choose a file to attach, however
all that happens is the little paper icon (copy graphic) keeps
You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager.
WWW.Microsoft.com/mom
It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration
management.
Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard
equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98.
John
can you remote manage client with SMS ?
i.e. see and control their desktop ?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
You may want to look into
Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*!
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL
What? Read a manual? Are you kidding me? I would've never thought...
Wow!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Mynhier
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge
Okay, I know that this
great!
Last question.
Let's say I've got my SMS server setup, do my 95/98 clients run the SMS
setup through a logon script which sets them up automatically or do I
deploy it manually ?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 17:23
To:
We were thinking about bring up a new Exchange Org. There would be one
server in the site and it would be a dual Giga Hertz processors - Half gig
of ram.
I still don't believe that exchange's imc and mta can handle 3 messages.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
I've been having problems with the Trend's ScanMail ever since I re-booted
the Exchange server. When I look at the services both the Realtime Scan
service and scan monitor are up and running, and the Realtime scan monitor
window says that everything is fine, however it does not appear to be
At 200MB, the user gets a warning that they are reaching the limit.
At 250MB, the user cannot send any emails.
At 300MB, the user cannot receive any emails.
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote:
Please define Mailbox size limit. What are your
exact settings?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
---
Not with 2.0. I can configure it automagically take over without them
having anything to say about it. ;o)
Would I do that??? Maybe...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Exchange
All acceptable clients can be done either way...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
great!
Last
Been using Exchange 5.5 for awhile and have deployed a couple of 2000
versions recently. The feature I can't find is to forward a users email to
an outside account. i.e. He will only have access say to a Hotmail email
account and wants his company email sent there also. You used to be able to
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
