Happy New Year All.
Just a quick question for the new year. I am running exchange 5.5 on an NT
Server , i know i am upgrading soon 8-)
Ok, I have 2 offices A and B, A being head office. Both are connected via
site connector. Now Office B has been shut down and the server is now
offline. I have
You could be right to think that i don't understand my
issue as best as it should be, and that is the very
same reason i am trying to be as much explicit and
detailed as possible, so that i can get assisted.
Don't you agree with me it will be more appropriate to
ask me questions about the whole
Ok, lets try to clear something up.
Open Relay is a very specific term within email systems, it is a
defacto standard way of describing one particular configuration issue
that, as Ed says, leaves you wide open to having a server used to send
spam to others. It should have little or nothing to do
ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected the
first time:
remove the Directory Replication Connector, then the site connector
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You mean Office B will never come back online?
-Original Message-
From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: site connector question.
Happy New Year All.
Just a quick question for the new year. I am running exchange
Are you dealing with Spam received in the Inbox of your users or 4000
NDRs per hour? The answer to this question will really tell you what
you need to do. If you are receiving 4000 messages per hour in your
user's mailboxes then you REALLY need a Spam filtering solution (we use
SurfControl's
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Ward, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: RE: site connector question.
ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected
the
first time:
remove
Well, one nice thing about Trend's license model is that it is per user, not
per server. So, if you're licensed for all your users, you can install it in
as many places as you want.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems
Yeah, and the bad thing about Trend's license model is that it is per user,
so if you have 600 users, but only 250 computers (like in a school setting),
you pay a lot more.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original
IIRC, Symantec works the same way, at least for most of the products (if
you get the Enterprise edition, not just Corp edition, that is). I do
agree, it is nice, though.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Amen brother. Testify. That's why I don't use it. Would love to though.
I know that businesses are not charities, I'm not asking them to give us everything
for free because we are an educational establishment, but based on the licence models
that are presented to us, I can only conclude that
Hi All,
I am in the process of migrating to exchange 2003 from Exchange 5.5. I
have setup the 2003 server, have ADC running and have moved 3 of the 200
mailboxes so far to the new server.
In exchange 5.5 my account was sent as a permissions admin and I had access
to open anyone's mailbox from
You have to grant the admin account explicit permissions on the
mailboxes or on the information store that contains those mailboxes.
There are KB articles about this.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Guys,
I have an Exchange 5.5 organization with one Exchange 2k server having all
mailboxes. Internet mail service is running on a 5.5 box in the DMZ. I am
seeing occasional errors 4031 with source MSExchangeIMC and category SMTP
Interface events. I am concerned the most about the following
Thanks I did see a KB article.
When I go to the user on the 2003 exchange server and click exchange
advanced then the mailbox rights button. The enterprise admin group is in
their with full rights. I am part of that group. I can not however open
the mailbox via OWA or outlook.
-Original
Greetings!
We have 4 Exchange Servers (E2K Enterprise) and 4 Enterprise Blackberry
Servers (2.6). Over the last few months, we have had our Blackberry
users complain of their Exchange Calendar's locking up when they attempt
to access them. If another user (their assistant) attempts to open their
I need to restore 5 mailboxes over three different periods of time. The
Exchange restore server was recently taken away for a different project, so
rather than recreating the restore environment I thought it a good time to
try Powercontrols. I have used it before and liked it.
Ok long
Have you actually loaded the tape in the drive? It needs to be in the
drive instead of an open slot.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Powercontrols
I
hrm... if I remember right, the group 'domain admins' (and likely 'ent
admins') are explicitly denied this ability.
You can use an account that is not in those groups to get access... just
give it 'send as' and 'receive as' rights on the database or mailbox.
-Original Message-
From:
Can't someone just go and look this up on Google? You can explicitly
override the denies to domain admins if you go to the properties of an
information store, click on the security tab and explicitly select Allow
next to those Denies. Then wait 15 minutes or restart the information
store service.
Any chance this is simply a corrupt meeting in the calendar? How many users
is this affecting?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server
Greetings!
Nonetheless, this is a terrible idea. An admin should grant himself
permissions to read someone's mailbox only when there is a need to do so and
should remove the permission when the need is over.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and
I saw this before and we even recreated the Calendar folder and that didn't
help. We just ended up giving him Outlook 03 to fix it.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar
Thanks all got it ...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 mailbox permissions
Nonetheless, this is a terrible idea. An admin should grant himself
permissions
Well sometimes one needs to ExMerge a bunch of mailboxes...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 mailbox permissions
Nonetheless, this is a terrible idea. An
doh
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Powercontrols
Have you actually loaded the tape in the drive? It needs to be in the
drive instead of an open slot.
-Original
From RFC 2821
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
(e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected
for policy reasons)
Alamedanet doesn't want to play with your sender for some reason. You
might have to call them.
--
be - MOS
As President I have to go
I've had to deal with it a few times. I would just use O2k3 (or a
client called GWClient in the 4.5 Backoffice Kit) and move all items out
of his calendar to a new folder (which would allow you to use the
calendar again). Then I would move all the older items back to the
calendar since the
IIRC I had a feeling that o2k3 does mess with the mailbox structure on e2k , which may
cause the problem you are having
Ask MS to fix the outlook version access problem before pointing the finger at
blackberry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
All,
We just finished migrating all of our Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange 2000, and are
still in mixed mode. I have my 3 original OWA 5.5 servers online, pointing to an
Active Directory servers for lookups. I also have 3 Exchange 2000 Front End servers
online serving up OWA 2000. And to
When you go native, what are you going to need 5.5 OWA for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5 OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06,
If you mean native mode Exchange, then yes, OWA 5.5 will break. It will
still work for user IDs that were created BEFORE you went native, but
will not work for users created AFTER you go native. I think the ADC
might be involved in this equation somehow, but I remember this problem
bit us hard.
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still doesn't indicate that he
is an open relay. It simply means that someone spamming his domain name is
trying to brute-force the spam through in mass quantities (probably ~50,000
at a time) by appending every combination they can think of, to the
Dean,
I'm not sure you understood my message.
All of my clients are running Outlook 2000 (around 1400 users). I am the
only one with an Office 2003 installation and the lockup's occurred long
before I ever noticed I could get in with O2K3.
This is most definitely a Blackberry - Exchange issue.
Yes, have done that as well, but only seems to be a temporary fix to the
issue. I am hoping for something more long term.
Thanks,
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yeah, this is where we are at as well...
Thanks,
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server
I saw this before and we even recreated the
Understand better now.
Was it a typo that you said 4 Enterprise Blackberry Servers (2.6). did you mean 3.6
? and if so what service pack are you at?
Also FWIW a Exhange 5.x client will enable you to massage the calendar folder as well
as the GWClient.
cheers
Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/01/2004
I am in the process of moving my Exchange 2000 users to a new Exchange
2003 server. I only have 3 users that use Outlook 2003, and 2 of those
users have cached mode enabled. (Everyone else uses Outlook 2000)
Based on preliminary pilot testing that I've done, I'm seeing the
following behavior:
Hi Bailey,
Its the second one. Getting NDRs. And they all (or
most of them)have from field as and To field
addressed to various different emails. Those emails
are mostly aimed to yahoo etc.
Many Thanks
--- Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you dealing with Spam received in the
James, few of these emails are directed to my domain,
however the large portion of these junkies are going
to third part emails, like Yahoo etc.
Many thanks.
--- Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just because he is getting 4000 NDR's an hour still
doesn't indicate that he
is an
Ontracks support is useless for powercontrols.
How long does it take the people using Ontrack to catalog the tapes?
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Powercontrols
If a spammer sends mail to an invalid mailbox at some e-mail domain and
spoofs that the mail is coming from your e-mail domain, it is your server
that will get the NDRs.
If a spammer sends mail to your e-mail domain to addresses that don't exist,
Exchange will reply to whatever address it thinks
We are running Exchange 2003 and Outlook 2003 on the clients. We want to
be able to setup public folders with an associated email address. From
that email address we need to be able to send and receive
internal/external email messages. Our users would be logged on to outlook
viewing their
44 matches
Mail list logo
