The best way is to hire me to do it for you. Barring that, you'll likely
need a program which can do full text indexing of the information store...
like Content Inspector for Exchange from Intellireach or one of the products
listed here:
As William said, get the W2K migration done first. Being comfortable with
W2K will help reduce the stress you'll feel when your E2K world changes.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
by.
.
Ahem, I believe Douglas Adams (well known for missing deadlines) said this
g.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email attachments
Exchange version and service
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so
much easier. Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail
from a telnet session (to duplicate what's being done in the
RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits will last much longer.
I don't see how anyone could call themselves
You could investigate implementing ISA or an e-gap solution to improve
security... ISA has broader functionality which might also be useful to the
organization.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:33 PM
To: Exchange
When the age limit is reached, the item is deleted from the folder and
deleted item retention kicks in.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clarify Thinking on Age Limits, please
Goofy folder view? Try starting Outlook with the /cleanviews switch perhaps?
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spooky Sent folder problem
Outlook user sends message internal to
Sounds like a permissions issue on the IIS virtual server perhaps.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
Yeah, tried that variation to log in domain/username
Oh... was this box upgraded from 5.5 with OWA installed by chance?
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA setup problems
Yeah, tried that variation to log in domain/username
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Front-end Servers
Questions:
1. Front-End servers are only used for OWA access to mailbox servers
(back-end)?
No. They support
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST Files on a network share
Mr. Tech,
I've worked for companies with 3 employees to 130k employees. I've seen
managers and CxO's focused different
E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OWA setup problems
Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS and exchange with defaults
and some
Buy and implement an antivirus solution.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
Exchange5.5
NT4
We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I
Check the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disclosures on Email
I know that a user can create a disclosure that appears when the signature
is chosen in outlook tools.
My
Is that address defined in a recipient policy? Have you checked the many
answers to this question in the archive? (Some of which are going on a year
old now)
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
How many security specialists do you have on staff for 45 users. If the
answer is the same as most 45 user companies I know, there's probably no
good reason to do it that way.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:59 PM
To:
With a 3rd party mail server or an event sink, you could remove portions of
headers, but the IP address of the sending machine is recorded by the
receiving machine. What's the design objective anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July
Adams (well known for missing deadlines) said this
g.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email attachments
Exchange version and service pack? Client version?
It's
The fact that OWA is being used at all does not inherently mean that a box
is exposed to the internet.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on
Exchange 2000 has no directory service to connect to via LDAP.
/fishing lesson
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: LDAP problem
I have an Exch2k with SP2
When I try to
Have you bothered to look at the Outlook.txt file mentioned in the TechNet
article?
/fishing lesson
BTW, it's they're, not their.
/grammar lesson
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange doesn't care about networks or trusts. However, to provide a more
accurate response to the query requires some additional detail on your part.
Combining is a rather generic term which could be interpreted any number
of ways.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert
Poorly written import file?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Duplicate accounts appearing
mixed 5.5/2k
Came in this morning, started noticing duplicate accounts in the
The ABVs aren't empty.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Cannot delete Empty ABV's
Ex 5.5 SP4 NT4 SP6a
I have asked this before but it was some time ago and I still havent
be looking at !
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 16:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Cannot delete Empty ABV's
The ABVs aren't empty.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Programmatically or?
-Original Message-
From: Sammy Rashid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contact item or distribution list
How do you check if a contact item is a distribution list or a standard
contact?
com
Subject: RE: Duplicate accounts appearing
Not me, not us. Nobody should be importing anything. For any reason.
I guess maybe I should ask for ideas on how to track down how this is
happening (other than event viewer).
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
there... actually it duplicated the whole thing in
about
20 minutes.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Duplicate accounts appearing
Has anyone made any changes to your ADC? (Missed
Reading those docs makes troubleshooting e-mail issues so much easier.
Printing out RFC821 and trying to send e-mail from a telnet session (to
duplicate what's being done in the RFCs) takes only a day, but the benefits
will last much longer.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Have you looked at what ports and what machines your OWA server in the DMZ
has to communicate with on the internal LAN? Unless you have some good IDS
software and security skills, I don't believe that OWA in a DMZ alone meets
your desired objective.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L.
Mr. Tech,
I've worked for companies with 3 employees to 130k employees. I've seen
managers and CxO's focused different things at every level. I've seen small
companies which were visionary in the tech spending and technology
implementations and fortune 500 companies who had IT shops so bad I
Is this a daunting undertaking?
Adding a new Exchange 5.5 server to a site is fairly straightforward,
especially in a smaller org. Run setup and join the existing site.
Does it makes sense?
That depends. I know of organizations which have 5,000+ users on a single
box. They have a low
What vulnerabilities would those be? What IDS system do you run in your DMZ
and are you confident it would alert you if the box were compromised?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
In my mind, step 0 in this process would be to rename the affected users NT
account before even thinking about doing anything else.
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking OWA
Oh and for $deity's sake SP4 for Exchange 5.5 has been out for a couple of
years now... upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tracking OWA Logons
In my mind, step 0 in this process would
By product design I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Calendar Question
We are running Office XP. Our CIO has multiple months on his calendar
where the
Exchange version and service pack? Client version?
It's likely your AV software though
-Original Message-
From: Ian Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email attachments
Good afternoon,
Has anyone had a
When you figure out how to verify the from address is legitimate, let me
know. A similar related conversation took place last week on a similar
topic. The subject of the thread was RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Taguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Upgrade to Exchange 2000 and write an event sink or if this is for some
mailing list or marketing blather, use a subdomain of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and route that to a box which can support that type of wildcarding natively
or through script.
-Original Message-
From: joshua frankamp
To:
Delegates.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/15/2002 3:55 PM
Subject: Calendar issue in Outlook 2002
Hello All,
Got one for you.
I have two users that are homed in different Ex5.5SP4 sites in the same
=
Org (user1 and user2). They both are using
What does boss hope to achieve by doing this other than increasing start-up
times for users?
-Original Message-
From: Nelsen, Grant
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/15/2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Putting Outlook 2000 in everyone's startup group
My boss wants everyone to have Outlook in their
One could install an SMTP gateway application which refused inbound SMTP
mail FROM your domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
The only way I
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Reverse DNS and Exchange
Exchange 5.5
I'm a little confused on Reverse DNS. I kind of understand the concept
that
with
You can prevent unauthorized workstations (e.g. machines which are not part
of the domain) from accessing any network resources. It's not an Exchange
thing though, it's a security team thing.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12,
this happen? OS?
Thanks,
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:16 PM
To: Exchange
were showing up in the
pst
folder.
This just started happening a couple of weeks ago.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy
O2K.. any hotfixes or SP? Eliminate
It'd be a damn bad idea to store PST files on a network share here since our
IT guy deletes them nightly... oh wait, maybe that makes it a good place to
store them.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:45 AM
To: Exchange
Have them enter their name in the from field.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Additional Mailbox
I'm using it with Exchange 2000. I want to actually stop it. Our
. That still doesn't
explain why it is doing it though. Plus, it's a pain in the ass to do
that
every time.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Additional Mailbox
Have them
Go buy CommVault. Mention my name and get a 0.00% discount.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
My company prefers to backup individual
into
what backup software should I be using.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
Go buy CommVault. Mention my name and get a 0.00% discount.
-Original Message
swYnk perhaps? They're owned by internet.com, what other answer did you
need? ;)
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives
I just want to know why you can't get the
I think it might be a little more complicated than that for a law firm.
Imagine having to restore a mailbox for an employee who worked there 5 years
ago because you are being subpoenaed for correspondence with a client in a
case related to the firing of a 49 year old woman in 1996.
It's very
Exchange 5.5
I don't have any tapes older than 6 weeks. That's good, right? Nips that
request right in the bud anyway! I had a request yesterday for a file
restore from 2000. We laughed and laughed!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
How large is the actual database being restored?
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Recovery Server
Here's where I am at so far (my $245 is getting me no where)
- on the
I guess creating a new PST file and dragging/dropping stuff between them was
ruled out as being too easy? You must really hate this user to keep storing
his mail in a PST file.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 11:27 AM
in the PST to keep from
takig space on the server.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy
I guess creating a new PST file and dragging/dropping stuff between them
permissions ??
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 9 iulie 2002 17:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL empty
Sounds like the search permissions have been restricted inappropriately.
What changes were made prior
It'd likely require going through the message tracking logs... Having had
similar requests and requirements in the past, I'm going to take a WAG as to
the underlying business reasons for this question and suggest that
developing and implementing a proper e-mail workflow application is the best
The server specified in the OWA setup was a server to provide directory
information; it didn't represent the server(s) which OWA would service.
-Original Message-
From: Kuske, Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA
Correct. What did you need suggestions on?
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Default reply-to address
Here's the scenario:
Exchange 2000 server
Email addresses are
And you've tried accidentally rebooting the OWA server?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA timeout
All,
I have NT4.0 SP5 Proxy 2.0 and OWA sp 4 on one server and NT4.0
Are they anything other than AT jobs (asked he who doesn't use Mailbox
Manager)?
-Original Message-
From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager in Exch2K
I mistakenly started multiple
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL Inconsistencies
Yes, but I think because the USNs are a lower value than they 'should' be
they're not being noticed.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:02 PM
To: Exchange
AdDiTiOnAl InFoRmAtIoN rEqUiReD i ThInK.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Free/Busy
I am getting more and more people that are unable to update their
Free/Busy
schedule.
...is there an easy way to bring a GAL back into consistency, or re-
create
it on one server? (I've not found anything on doing this.)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL
.
It
is set to update every 15 mintues by default.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy
AdDiTiOnAl InFoRmAtIoN rEqUiReD i ThInK.
-Original Message-
From
Network
== University of Maine System
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Default reply-to address
Correct
is a hub.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 July 2002 16:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA timeout
And you've tried accidentally rebooting the OWA server?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy
O2k, His Inbox, then it is moved to a pst, No, every 15 minutes when
free/busy updates, What do you mean by see his free/busy data
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
www.mail-resources.com lists several archival products in the web links
section.
-Original Message-
From: malcolm taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archiving old email to tape silos
I have been asked by
Sounds like the search permissions have been restricted inappropriately.
What changes were made prior to this?
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: GAL empty
I have Exchange
I think Ed understands SIS quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
On your comment about
Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on
There's an E2K developer edition?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K Developer Edition
Can anyone tell me or provide a ref to the differences between Exchange
2000
Sounds like it might be an AV issue...
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't open attachments
Hi Everyone,
I have a problem with a user (using Outlook 2000) who can't
Since OWA is running by default on all E2K servers... what are you hoping to
test on the FE server that can't be tested on the E2K server directly?
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
All users? Some users?
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar issue
Good day All,
Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;
Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy
It's in the public information store. Check the swinc.com Exchange FAQ for a
link to the disaster recovery whitepapers. I was just rereading them last
week... quite helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:30 AM
To:
Only applies to PST files.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Folder (was Unlimited Quotas)
I mentioned this before, but I am pretty sure there is a limit on the each
Set quotas and allow users to manage their mailboxes however they'd like
within those quotas. For the most part you're over thinking the rest. It
would be nice if users sent shortcuts to files located on network drives,
but since I haven't had occasion to do that in 2+ years, I tend not to harp
buy It has some neat little bits and bobs in it.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Tuesday, July 09
I don't reboot my Exchange servers ever... nor do I restore individual
mailboxes. I'd contact your backup vendor to ask them why their product is
failing to work as you believe it should and check out 'never restore'
portion of the Exchange FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller
First I'd change my DL SMTP addresses to something non-obvious. Then I'd
implement an antivirus solution which could be configured to drop worms.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
the spoofed email from coming in.
I would like to find out the source of the infection - who is the user who
has been infected. Can I tell from the message header attached below ?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:25 PM
You can, but while all users will be able to use the 5.5 OWA server, only
E2K users will be able to connect to the E2K OWA server.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B.
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/2/2002 1:19 PM
Subject: OWA 2k in mixed mode with ex.5.5 owa
Getting to the
Merge both Exchange orgnizations into a single organization... As one who
has consolidated a number of organizations, this is your best long term
option for further reducing administrative costs as well. IMO, none of the
users should now (or ever) have accounts on both mail systems even if you
- the most pra
ctical solution
tombolian?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
So, the name of your recovery server was different and the dir.edb wasn't
restored huh?
-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disastor Recovery Testing
Hello all,
I was testing
Sounds normal to me.
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Memory usage of store.exe high
I have Exchange 5.5 and my memory usage on all servers seems extremely
high. With a gig
I wouldn't put any shipping version of Antigen in the same league with the
products Mark listed for the most part unless they've snuck in a whole bunch
of features I'm not aware of. The initial question as asked was a bit vague
to make any solid solution recommendations IMO.
-Original
couldn't you remove the need for
the separate SMTP gateway solution?
That depends entirely on what the SMTP gateway solution was doing. I don't
believe there's anywhere close to a 1 to 1 feature map between MMS and
Sybari's Antigen, so it would depend in large part on the functionality
desired
.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as SMTP internet gateway
couldn't you remove the need for
the separate SMTP gateway solution?
That depends entirely on what the SMTP
No E2K around? No, you probably don't need LDAP enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ldap enable?
Ok...standing by for the blast wave.
I will try to word this best as
32k limit on rules... suppose one could go to a server side script after
that however, if Jane Doe from the warehouse was subscribed to 57 joke
of the week mailing lists which neither check for bounces, nor offer
unsubscribe information, adding her to a black hole DL eliminates her mail
I disagree entirely. Michael is a typical dumb-ass and ascribing smart-ass
stature to his comments demeans smart-asses everywhere.
As for his school bully status, again... school bullies everywhere are
insulted.
I really wonder about the maturity level of some of you people!
I don't know what
I just recently explained a much better way of 'killing' those unwanted
messages by way of a server based rule.
As I mentioned making a DL forces Exchange to accept the messages as
legitimate mail rather than bouncing them, as it should.
I think the definition of 'much better' is very much a
Are you entering his username in the proper format?
(domain\nt_id\mailbox_alias)
-Original Message-
From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K - Pop3
Silly little problem with authenticating to my
employees
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:23:08 -0500
X-Message-Number: 35
Per 4, it might explain why the acronym DL was such a foreign concept
to
him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail
is
hardly a self-apparent one. When I
that way and
they're working fine and since I could telnet to the server and exchange
recognizes the username I didn't think that would make any
difference...we'll give it a try though
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4
that the user is ok, it may not be.
Then it may be a problem of exchange not getting the changes of the newly
created account yet.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K - Pop3
1301 - 1400 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
