You have to order the CD to get OL11
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I just downloaded Exchange 2003 Beta 2 and was interested in checking out
Outlook 11 first.
I read on slipstick
Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT-Outlook 11 in Exchange 2003 Beta 2 download
You have to order
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange55/plan/ekmgem
.asp?frame=true
I think you will find a majority of us here don't really endorse the
OWA/DMZ scenario, as you end up having to punch so many holes in the FW that
it ends up essentially negating any security benefits
Yup
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
That would be nice, but as I recall you have to create these yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Well, that's one option.
Another would be to setup a separate box with IIS and install OWA on it
inside the private network. Do the standard IIS hardening, etc, and you are
good to go.
I don't know how many users you are serving and what the usage would be,
but I have setup OWA for 100 user
Yea baby!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
That is my preferred method.
With Exchange5.5, OWA connects to Exchange using MAPI. MAPI by proxy if
you will. Putting the OWA server
But you said the other 2 are just connectors. I'm assuming the one that is
using so much memory is the one that actually houses the mailboxes. Correct?
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Interesting.
I would still use 3.8 with ESE based scanning.
There is a 3.81 in beta currently.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scnmail 3.8 or 3.52?
I asked a couple of days
http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984683.html?tag=fd_top
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blackberry/Cingular down
This is just a problem with Blackberrys running on the
This has always been an issue with OWA and why some companies flat out
refuse to use it.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K OWA timeouts
Thanks for trying but at the end of
I cant confirm that it's a problem, but I could certainly see it happening.
Since the sync software is so intertwined with OL, there could easily be
issues.
My advise would be to call BB and ask them what they have seen.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984683.html?tag=fd_top
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blackberry still (partially) down?
We still have 2 blackberry users who are not receiving
http://pchelp.ncms.org/HelpDocs/ANN99/owa.htm
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=/support/exchange/content/whi
tepapers/owa_tshoot.asp#Logging
-Original Message-
From: Allen Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
No kidding. Until you have sat in a room with 10 MVP's and some MS
development people, you have no idea.
Martin Blackstone
Microsoft MVP.
M MVP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Oooh. I should change my sig.
How's this?
Martin Blackstone
MSMVP
Not MCP, MCSENothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
-Original
I'm very interested to know what secret compensation he is speaking of.
Deckler, care to elaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Yeah. You
Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my desk. F5, Zones, Quest,
Printer Ribbons Plus, MS, Dell, Compaq, Jack in the Box, etc. None of this
stuff had nothing to do with being an MVP. I also don't do business with all
those vendors. If you think I am going to be influenced by a 2.00
I cant. I'm counting my secret MVP money.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Leggo my Eggo!
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL
In part. I have an ego. Why not? I'm good at what I do and I'm proud of it.
Why shouldn't I be? MS comes to me and says Hey, we just want to say thanks
for all your work in the public groups. Here is an award. I think that's
pretty cool.
There are also a number of things I'm not good at. Ill be
Plus the last thing in the world I want is too be compared to a lawyer.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Time to Chime in because I disagree
You are 100% wrong. They do have a code of ethics. Whether they decide to
follow them is up for debate. Regardless you are making broad assumptions.
You can say IT has no ethics. While that certainly may be true for you, it
isn't for me.
Why are you even in IT? You do nothing but talk bad about
Yes! Well said! Kudos to you
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Personal integrity cannot be imposed through rules and ritualized conduct.
and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Martin Blackstone
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my
.
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:15 AM
To: Exchange
Its in the History settings in IE
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Browser addresses drop down arrow list
How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list?
I certainly cant confirm this, but there would have to be some kind of
connector for Exchange server for them to talk to each other.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New
) so it was site specific. 3.5 and above,
you do not need to do that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Blackberry Server
I certainly cant confirm this, but there would
1990
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits
Since 1997
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
] Like I didn't already like USAA enough.
On 2/3/03 13:46, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1990
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits
already like USAA enough.
On 2/3/03 13:46, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1990
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Storage Limits
$20
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much
maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of.
That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like that in that price range.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
I've got
expensive fax machines!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find
anything like
that would cost us huge..
bill
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70
users
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron
Brasslett
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance
You buy expensive fax machines!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003
The IS shouldn't really get fragmented unless you have the logs writing to
the same drive or there is some other file activity taking place.
If you really wanted to defrag it, I would probably shut all the Exchange
services down first (to close the open files) and then run the defrag.
Mmmm blow away my users
-Original Message-
From: Haber, David J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sybari Antigen Problems with Exchange 5.5
I'm using Antigen 7.0 with E2K and I haven't had any problems with
I have personally seen him after a few too many beers. He does look better.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
He's so
Bargain!!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives - Buy yours today.
SPAM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Its pretty cool. I have tried it and it works as advertised. Just point it
an EDB file you can go right in.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ontrack Powercontrols
Has anyone
Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin.
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the
I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Server capacity
I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server
is well beyond end-of-life.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2
The maximum size is somewhere around 165 items.
-Original Message-
From: Imran Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP
Please help, I am trying to create a large Personnal
What Exchange AV product are you running?
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe at 99-100% CPU on 5.5 SP4
OK, I just had to restart my exchange box because of a 100%
.
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
The IIS logs (of which the SMTP service is one), are all in GMT.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Time in logs is 7 hours greater than the actual time
Hello! I am trying to
Nimda baby!
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: .eml attachments
Can anyone advise me as to why .eml attachments should be in the hotlist of
blocked attachments on a mail server ? Aren't
Honestly, there is no reason they should be receiving those. People should
just forward the message rather than embed it in another email.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: .eml
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
The best way hands down.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replicating an Exchange 55 server?
Before I tackle the issue of
It will probably be a brisk 78 here today.
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
I don't know about the rest of you
But here in Detroit we haven't seen above
No, but I know Ojo the bear.
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
You from Handleman? You know who Sequoia is?
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
Sounds like a WWF person.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
Who's Sequoia?
Jake
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is missing a roof, who cares what the temp is?
On 1/27/03 12:40, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It will probably be a brisk 78 here today.
-Original Message-
From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
?
But still see usual people on this list :-)
Jake
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
Sounds like a WWF person.
-Original
Somewhere along the line you are blocking UDP packets from the Exchange
server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange to Outlook latency
I had posted this sometime ago and
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
We never even used to use the phrase wind chill back in the USSR.
Thermometer does not care if it is windy or not.
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Icy grip on the US
No, but I know Ojo
Have you tried using it on a different machine than the one you are
currently using?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE
It once worked and now it doesn't for
Reboot to refresh your RAM.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: EXMERGE
I cant login.
- Original Message -
From: Reed, Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
If you have deleted item retention on, you may be able to get it back.
What Exchange version are we talking about anyhow?
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restore explicit
That icy grip kept the temp here down to 77 degrees today!!
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Icy grip on the US
Whats this crap about a icy grip in the US that I see in the
1TB. Holding all the spam from my Hotmail account.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
250 TB ( 1 User).
Using Arcserve with the Open File Agent.
It's a dictionary style spam attack. They seem to be on the rise. I get this
about every other day. Sometime hundreds in the just 1 or 2 minutes.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
is that the
emails are attaching our users' names to the external domain.
John Orban
System Administrator
The Country School
www.countryschool.org
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;197036
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Anyone come across this before?
Hi all,
I have user who is using Outlook, and when
Wait it out. What's the hurry? He never had access to them before and now he
cant live without them?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox permission problems
No I
When installing an Exchange SP you need to stop as many services as
possible. Including but not limited too
SNMP
Any server agents such as Compaq Insight Agents
All Exchange service
All Backup services and/or agents
IIS Admin Service (which will stop all other IIS services)
-Original
, 2003 4:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Installing Service Pack 4
I was not aware of that. I know the exchange services are stopped as part
of the SP install.
Thanks. I will give it another go..
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Whispers
It's a beta
/Whispers
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Failed for me the first time too, but I ran it again and it worked just
fine.
I'm holding out...
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
As per normal in this group when posting I will brace myself for all the
RTFM and/or www.google.com
I doubt it
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mac IM for Exchange?
Do you think Microsoft will make one? I hate Macs, but unfortunately I
have to support them.
in the Exchange 5.5 admin program.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EX5.5: Move mailbox that is over 2Gig???
Agreed. If the server is in the same site and org
The store will use as much memory as it can get its hands on.
Did you run the Exchange Optimizer AFTER you had gotten everything moved
over and finished? I would recommend you do if you haven't yet.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January
Exchange flavor BB or Internet mail flavor?
-Original Message-
From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Anyone know why appointments are doubled with Blackberry and Office
: 20 January 2003 14:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
Exchange
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OFFICE XP and BLACKBERRY
http://www.blackberry.net/support/faqs/enterprise/installation/index.shtml#q
8
So are the double appointments just on the BB or in his OL calendar as well?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Microsoft Exchange MVP
Superior Access Insurance Services
949.470.2111 x279
Just do this
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
-Original Message-
From: Steven Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full Exchange Server restore query
I have been looking to move an Exchange Server
If all the mailboxes are gone, just delete the priv.edb. Otherwise, offline
defrag.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving from 1 server to another
I have moved my old server
Especially if you had Mexican food the night before.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving from 1 server to another
Give it a courtesy flush.
- Original Message -
What you want to do is get something that runs as a gateway rather than on
the mail server. That will negate any issues of compatibility and keep the
stuff from ever getting near the Exchange box.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January
Filtering for Exchange, and things like that?
e-
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
What you want to do is get something that runs as a gateway rather
I'm not actually going to install it on the
exchange server or the smtp server? I would think not, but I'm not sure.
And if I don't need a product specific then why do they have for example
Symantec Filtering for Exchange, and things like that?
e-
-Original Message-
From: Martin
need to be software specific cause I'll never be
actually installing exchange 5.5 on my antispam server?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: the spam product question
Because
Its rolled into a blunt
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC 2003
Is it rolled in with TechEd this year?
_
That's not honey
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003
Mmm.. With honey?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Size queen
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus activity
so much bigger or sobig!
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC 2003
Its rolled into a blunt
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange
Is the browser on this machine configured to use a proxy from Starpower? If
so, try disabling it.
-Original Message-
From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA - page is currently not available.
starpower proxy.
Just want to add more detail info for the pc. It is a gw2000 with celeron
366, 64MB of RAM. Win98 (first ed) and running IE 5.5 with sp2
Thanks
-- Khoi
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:38 AM
Synchronize? Are we talking PST or OST?
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendations on backing up .pst files
Sensitivity: Private
Yes, that will work but since .pst files
The only port you need is 80 (for HTTP) or 443 (for SSL).
You don't want or need an MX record.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MX Record For OWA ?
Hi,
If I am placing an OWA
Here is how you do it. Follow step by step. Send Ed beer when done.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Restore Exchange Information
Were they all in one folder or multiple folders?
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Missing emails
YOU GUYS RULE!
That was EXACTLY the problem. DumpsterAlwaysOn did it! We found
I'm not sure about you guys, but we are getting hammered with this. NAI
doesn't even see it. That is what we use at our Gateway. Latest engine and
all. They say they can catch it, but it flies through the gateway like it
doesn't even care.
HOWEVER, the lovely and talented Trend Scanmail sees it
The Windows version
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: GAL Lost
What version of Exchange?
On 1/13/03 18:32, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It appears our GAL
Alpha
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: GAL Lost
Alpha or x86?
On 1/13/03 19:40, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Windows version
-Original Message
PPC
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GAL Lost
Alpha
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
MSMail MVP, MCP, MCBS
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: GAL Lost
Oh... You're running MSMail...
On 1/13/03 19:56, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PPC
The guy sounds like nothing short of a pack rat. I keep the mail from most
of my lists in PST's as well, burned to CD, since the fact is that most of
the stuff I will never look at again, but it is nice to keep. If I lost it,
I wouldn't feel terrible. Most of it is probably out of date by now.
401 - 500 of 2003 matches
Mail list logo
