Just choose server.
On 3/5/03 23:26, Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for a way to export Rules in Outlook.
I need to amend a rule on a particular mailbox hosted on an Exchange 5.5
SP4
Server. When I open Rules Wizard (with Outlook 2000 SR-1), I am
Start outlook in offline mode - it shouldn't try to connect and therefore won't find
out/know about the server side rules.
Look at export the rules.
Reconnect on online mode, select 'keep server'.
Look at export those rules.
Decide what you want to keep.
Oh, I've never tried this, but I
and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
In 23-plus years of programming and computer infrastructure experience
I've never seen
: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
SO you've never managed to completely debug the requsisit Hello World
applications you've written in the 15 or so languages you've used? I'm
shocked!
Roger
.
-Mike
http://www.uselessthoughts.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I guess I should have qualified that as commercial software.
Ed Crowley
whatsoever.
-Mike
http://www.uselessthoughts.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I guess I should have qualified that as commercial software.
Ed
PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Same here, except that they sometimes don't fire, or two of the rules
come in conflict, a problem I believe I have fixed through a rule
modification. However, I use
Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Curious. If your using rules on say Outlook Express to access say my
personal email account on Hotmail, are you limited by the same sizing
32K I believe it is on a MAPI client to Exchange? Also is there a way
to see what your rules sizes are?
- Original
to Exchange? Also is there a way to see
what
your rules sizes are?
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Same here, except that they sometimes don't fire, or two
it is on a MAPI client to Exchange? Also is there a way to see
what
your rules sizes are?
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Same here, except
OK Time for you to go on the next edition of Star Search.
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
No, I haven't been in the military anywhere
: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
No, I haven't been in the military anywhere.
RPC packets are pretty small.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the
EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to
follow. One is for this mailing list
: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
There are two options for rules - move the message or move a copy of the
message. You're using the latter on the rule that doesn't work
, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message.
Either way, this used to work in Outlook 2000 with no issues. I am
assuming that it is a bug in Outlooks 2002 not user error
, GA
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
I am using the move message, not move a copy of the message.
Either way, this used to work
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
I've got plenty of rules just like the ones you're descibing, in Outlook
2002, that all work fine. Hence, the belief its not the product
]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
Look back at the previous emails in the discussion and see the
EXACT description of the rules. The rule is set to move the
email. Not
make a copy. As for it not being a product
there as this is the base version of Outlook 2002
(10.2627.2625) and see if this cures my ills... Otherwise I am out of luck I
guess. Thanks.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
I can't get rules after it to work. - well, that is kinda the point of
that particular rule option.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 16:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Tried this and it makes
: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that,
or are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug?
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Here is my issue, the laptop is brand new, the install of Outlook 2002
is brand new, the rules created were brand new on a new profile. This
is why I say it is a bug
support person myself, I'm not sure how they'd take to this
quite yet... Still need to feel the waters to see what I can do yet.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
You've never indicated the results of using contacts to define the rules
did you?
On 1/17/03 9:57, Scoles
, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only',
does that mean it is a client side rule? If so, why?
On 1/17/03 10:06, Scoles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
My apologies
-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Chris,
I'm not sure why it created the rule as client side only...
This is the process I used to create the rules:
Tools -- Rules
. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
Does this make any
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant?
There is a KB article about that.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger,
I am
I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox
Wizard Issue
Have you tried to disable Rules Wizard and use the Inbox Assistant?
There is a KB article about that.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Roger
if this clears things up. Thanks.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
You mentioned earlier in the thread this rule is 'on the client only',
does
as they
did earlier). Thanks.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Selected 'From people or distribution group'. Picked a
contact in my PAB
,
You were right, it was user error. Thanks for all your input.
Thanks for all the help!
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Should be 'to people
Well maybe in this particular case it will solve this dude's problem.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
I havent seen a need to do that since Outlook 98
Update to this issue. I only have two rules for my rules wizard to
follow. One is for this mailing list and the other is for another
mailing list. Both are set the exact same way. I noticed that the
first rule in the list copies the message to the folder but does not
remove it from the Inbox.
You might try adding and stop processing more rules to the end of your rules.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard Issue
I have a rule setup to move a message
not find anything on Microsofts web page yet.
Thanks anyways.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
You might try adding and stop processing more rules
Choose move instead of copy in the rules creation process.
On 1/16/03 12:52, Scoles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a rule setup to move a message when it comes in if it matches
certain criteria in the recipient address. The messages is copied to
the folder in the rule, but it does
Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
You might try adding and stop processing more rules to the end of your
rules.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard
folder
However, only one will work at a time. Hope this clarifies things.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Choose move instead of copy
address
Move it to the Ntsysadmin folder
However, only one will work at a time. Hope this clarifies things.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Hey what if you disable Rules Wizard and put the good old Inbox Assistant back in?
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Update to this issue. I only have two
.
Damian
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard Issue
Both ought to be subscribed to PFs as described in the FAQ, instead of
going directly to you... However, create
Q174045
-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: rules wizard stops working
User has about 15 - 20 rules. A few days ago they all stopped running
automatically. Apparently he had recently
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
I checked the user doesn't have any other rule set besides a different user
tried to create the same rule or a similar rule and got the same error...
Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
(408) 583 1130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 May 2002 15:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard
This is a reach. I think rules wizard is limited to 32 because that is
the size limit of RPC packets. Are you having RPC issues?? It's a WAG
- Original Message
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 May 2002 15:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard
This is a reach. I think rules wizard is limited to 32 because that is
the size limit of RPC packets. Are you having RPC issues?? It's a WAG
- Original Message
Not that I know of
Bashir Malekzada
AOptix Technologies , Inc.
(408) 583 1130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Rules Wizard
This is a reach
What is the rule trying to do EXACTLY.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
I checked the user doesn't have any other rule set besides a different user
tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Rules Wizard
What is the rule trying to do EXACTLY.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto
Use CleanSweep from the Resource Kit to clear the ruleset. Then try
again.
- Original Message -
From: Bashir Malekzada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
The user wants the server to reply
The reply message must be too big.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
This happens when they try this rule and have the server to reply...
Bashir Malekzada
Check to be sure that the mailbox is not overlimit, and if not then do what
Missy said!
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
The user wants the server to reply
The user hit the limit. There is no way to change limit. They probably have
more than one rule.
- Original Message -
From: Bashir Malekzada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: Rules Wizard
A user trying to create
Friggin!!
-Original Message-
From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Rules Wizard
Sorry, your message was not sent out to 'exchange'
because the first word of your message looks very similar
MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user. This is a hard
limit and there is no getting around it.
The only solution is to delete old rules and try to consolidate some.
This applies to 5.5 and E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Oops...32K
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user. This is a hard
limit and there is no getting around it. The only solution
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Rules Wizard
MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user. This is a hard
limit and there is no getting around it.
The only solution is to delete old rules and try to consolidate
mb? k?
: )
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user
They have no rules at all?
Is this only happening when trying to create just one specific rule?
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
I checked the user doesn't
Discussions
Subject:RE: Rules Wizard
They have no rules at all?
Is this only happening when trying to create just one specific rule?
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
The limit is the limit. Can you consolidate any of the first 26 rules?
That seems high to me as I am not a proponent of rules. You should sub a
public folder to this list and sub yourself as the poster and eliminate the
rule altogether.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman
sub stantial answer. Well Done.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
The limit is the limit. Can you consolidate any of the first 26 rules
Are there any rules set to permanently delete any items? I have noticed
that when I upgraded to OL 2002 that if I tried to implement a rule to
permananently delete an item, it automatically stopped processing other
rules. Just a thought.
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
The limit is the limit. Can you consolidate any of the first 26 rules?
That seems high to me as I am not a proponent of rules. You should sub
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
sub stantial answer. Well Done.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Exchange
FAQ. Although there's no limit to the number of rules, there's a
hard-coded 32KB limit to rules. Some rules take up more space than
others, by the way. There's no known workaround.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs
Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Winzenz
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
Are there any rules set to permanently delete any items? I have
Subscribe a PF to the list as recommended in the FAQ and you won't need that
silly 27th rule.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Dean Michael Dorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
Well, thanks for the answer but it really didn't contain any info I was
hoping for. For instance...what is the rules limit? After I sent the
email to the this list, I went and exported all the emails (27), deleted
them, and imported
Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Failure in Outlook 2002
sub stantial answer. Well Done.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
there's a limit on rules; it's either 32 or 64k. That's not 32/64k of rules,
but of actual space used. Rules can be cut down in size by using
server-based distribution groups instead of local groups (as one example).
- Original Message -
From: Dean Michael Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Sue used to have a nice breakdown on what was what over at slipstick.com.
Myself, I uninstall RW and use Inbox assistant instead.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Ok Lori, do you have a table that compares the two? This is interesting.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Sue used to have a nice breakdown on what was what over
Assuming we are in Corporate/workgroup mode, it really depends on the rule.
Certain parameters within rules may require client-side information to fire,
and therefor reside client-side and depend on Outlook to be open.
I have many rules that are based on header information and are server-side
Depends upon the rule - some of them are client-side and some are
server-side.
Off the top of my head the criteria that determines it include: Whether or
not the rule actions require authentication (like posting to a public
folder), or if they require access to the local hard drive.
i.e. A rule
ahhh... but if they use the 5.0 client, they might find the inbox
assistant.
nice try though.
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Yes. Make
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Rules Wizard
ahhh... but if they use the 5.0 client, they might find the inbox
assistant.
nice try though.
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10
Tape them to the back of the stall doors in the bathroom. And over the
urinals in the men's room.
...Joel Osborn
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Every once
Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Tape them to the back of the stall doors in the bathroom. And over the
urinals in the men's room.
...Joel Osborn
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Puhleeeze! [1]
[1] Hi, Ben!
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
I think Ed's still on the can
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Tape them to the back of the stall doors in the bathroom. And over the
urinals in the men's room.
...Joel Osborn
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier
Yes. Make everyone use the Exchange 5.0 email client.
Of course, they can still delete them without reading them.
There are seldom good technical solutions for personnel issues. If they
don't read something marked high priority and urgent and mandatory in ALL
CAPS, they deserve anything they
They should be forwarding them to the deleted items folder, not PSTs!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Khin Thuzar Nu
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules Wizard
Hi to all,
Is there a way
Every once in a while, buy a bunch of Krispy Kreme donuts and hide a
reference to the fact that the first five people to come ask for them
will get half a dozen. The first three people to respond to this email
get every Feb 30th off for the rest of the century, paid double salary.
Give 'em a
Well, my first instinct is to consider if the announcements are particularly
important if they simply delete them. If it impairs their work efficiency
that they don't read the announcements have HR caution them that they need
to improve their performance.
If it doesn't impair them to not read
Door prizes , maybe ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 20:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard
Well, my first instinct is to consider if the announcements are
particularly
www.slipstick.com.
FAQ. Read it. Love it. Live it.
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Drew (MOS)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
89 matches
Mail list logo
