Maybe you want to take a look at this :
http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice
versa.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38
To: Exchange
How access to Public Folders in different Sites, in Differents Domains??
I configure Public Folder Affinity, but nobody have access out the Site.
Trust relationship?? It´s necesary??
I access to Public Folders in other Sites, without Trust, and Public folder
Affinity.
Thanks.
Daniel Mataloni
Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine.
On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this
winxp machine it is asking for a double login.
Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login.
Went to ms site and couldn't
Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security settings for the
zone (look at the bottom of the list for settings that say Log on using
current password, etc.)
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:01 AM
You said that the user has offline folders enabled? Has synchronization
finished properly? The OST file may have become corrupt which is
causing background synch to hang the Outlook process. Does disabling
offline folders fix the problem? If the machine isn't a laptop, there's
no real reason
The machine is a stand alone not on the domain.
It logs in remotely.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: owa issues
Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security
If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders
anyway
Disagree. All of my power users where I am now, and every other
customer job I've worked on, has OST's setup for desktops. Allows a server
to be pulled with less impact on them (it does happen from time to
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, at 3:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a
problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece
of data.
... and I know people who don't ware their seatbelts because they've
never been in
Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It
seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL.
Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely
don't want to block real customers from sending us
email--just the spam.
--- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maybe you want to
Rgearding the fax proxy address: We had similar problems, but you don't have
to remove the custom addresses.
If you look in the event log, an error is generated by ExchangeSA which
states that a dll couldn't be found in the appropriate directory (path is
given in the event). That means that RUS
Let me think of an appropriate response: get stuffed. Your analogy is
inane and irrelevant.
I'm describing a real-world situation - he's lost the server a couple of
times; he's never lost data. Why should he spend the extra cash for a
backup solution that he wouldn't use? [1]
[1] Disclaimer:
Does he have ActiveSync installed? I've had this problem before but I
never had offline folders enabled, the only thing that solved it was a
complete reinstall of the system
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent:
Patrick,
If you have not done so already, I would restart the SA on the box that
is hosting the RUS. Typically this is where you will see any errors
that my relate to your problem (when the RUS is initialized), but only
when the SA starts (even with the default logging). Turning up the
There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange
environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're
kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If
you have individuals who are really
Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash
Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam
There are a couple of free Bayesian
Spammunition filters very well, though you have to maintain a good collection of spam
for it to use in building its rules. It just pops up error screens every once in a
while. It also doesn't deal well with Inboxes containing lots of unread messages, as
it rescans all of them whenever something
We use the Surf Control product and have great success with it. It
(along with a lot of other products) allows us to use Reverse DNS
lookups and RBL lookups against incomming e-mail to block a lot of spam
before it even gets through the door. After it makes it through those
checks they have a
Hello
I have an Exchange 5.5 server configured to send internet messages using
DNS, except for a couple of domains, that are configured to be forwarded
to a relay host instead (the configuration is done in Exchange 5.5 IMS).
Now, I have put my Exchange server behind a firewall and configured it
CloudMark's SpamNet is another good client-side filter.
http://www.cloudmark.com/products/spamnet/
Of course, having all of your users' e-mail addresses posted on your web
site doesn't help matters. ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Seriously, Siegfried, Andy, at least half the time I access the PFs (of
which I am owner) using OL2002 I get a logon prompt box in which I enter
my same logon credentials (THREE times because it rejects them each
time) and then goes ahead and let's me in the PF with appropriate
access.
Yes, I
Jeez, how is that an upside?
After we spent the resources to develop this stuff to make it work right
during the 5.5 era, now we're told to rewrite everything. So where does
this leave us?
In another 2 years, given Microsoft's penchant for change, none of it
will work with Yukon and here we are
Yes. All you need to do is to set different remote domains under the
SMTP virtual server. Be careful, though, do NOT check the allow
incoming mail to be relayed to this domain for domains that you are not
receiving mail for.
Andrew
MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Nizar
Ok, so I am a little confused now...
In the AutoDL 2.1 upgrade it says:
Next, run the install program that came with this readme file.
This will install the files needed to create the website, COM+
application, and services. It will also have the scripts
needed to upgrade the existing AutoDL
Spamassassin is an open source solution that works very well in front of
your Exchange Server. Runs best on RH7.3.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tigue Williams
Sent: June 24, 2003 5:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: how to cut down on
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello List Gurus,
I'm having the following problem, We've got two AD structures completely
independent (2 Forests). Each of them has an Exchange server with mailboxes
and Public Folders. Just now the Administrators decided they wanted
Check out the Interorg Replication Utility. I believe it ships with the
Resource Kit, but it could be on the CD. Don't remember.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de
Runs VERY well on OpenBSD 3.3 with sendmail using mimedefang for its milter.
-ME
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam
Change the application so that it authenticates or enable anonymous
authentication for LDAP.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma
Sent:
How long have you waited?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John
[JM1]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm
days
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade
How long have you waited?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of
Terry,
I feel for you. I really do.
The lighthearted upside I meant was that rather than sorry, you're
screwed, there's no possible way to improve the situation, you at least
have an option available to you, however unpalatable it might be.
Public Folders are very likely to change again
Three times? That reminds me... If you have the Exchange Server
scripting add-on enabled in Outlook, MAPI Outlook will open three
connections to the Exchange server (without the Exchange scraping
add-on, only two). One for each store (mailbox and public) and one to
the scripting system folder. I
Peter,
That said, the latest on the Spammunition website is to suggest he is
changing the logic so that there is no need to manually rescan.
I agree the errors are frustrating - but the product is not bad for free
for a client.
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter
See also Andy's comments. I really don't think it's in a 2 year
timeframe. I saw the first Yukon demo 2 years ago and the beta just
started now...
As for anything will change in the next version of Exchange Server: yes,
no doubts. Same happened in Windows 2003 IIS6 and Sharepoint Portal
Server
Hello,
NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com
I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something
strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but
the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an
Open
We use IQLinkXS with NetIQ AppManager and have been happy. But I do
know there have been lots of cuts and tech support has gone down hill.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably.
-Original Message-
From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Not Open Relay, but...
Hello,
NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com
Hi John,
Is this in response to my question #3? If so, does everyone receive over
2000 messages every hour in the 'Admin' mailbox with a subject line of
'Notification: Inbound Mail Failure? I understand getting some but over
2000 an hour? Each of these messages is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For #3, what you are seeing is spammer trying to find valid addresses
@dfg.com by simply guessing addresses and trying them, your best bet would
be to turn off the notification on your IMS for E-mail address could not be
found. For #2, yes they will sit in the queue until they are delivered or
Then something is keeping replication from happening. How is public folder
replication schedule configured?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John
[JM1]
1. Probably not. If your Exchange faces the Internet, it should reject the
relay attempt during the RCPT TO: command, so the messages won't be accepted
for delivery and therefore they won't be NDRed.
2. Yes.
3. If dfg.com is your domain then it's normal spam to automatically
generated
41 matches
Mail list logo
