The IMC is set to route traffic only for the internal domain and only if
the traffic is inbound. [Routing Tab - Reroute incoming SMTP mail
(required for PP3/IMAP4 support) is checked. Below this is a box that
contains 'ourdomain.cominbound'. Hope that clears things up.
Damian Scoles
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 5:44pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that inbound meant _all_.
One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound.
Right, which is why all firewalls come with default rules set to block
It's 16 gig. If you have hit that limit, you can contact PSS and they
can send you an updated version of the store.exe that will temporarily
extend the size to 17 gig. You then need to have users delete email,
let online maintenance run and then defrag the database. Also, make
sure your deleted
Does anyone know what dumpset is in the context of Exchange 2000?
Thanks...
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I would DL the eEye tester and see if your servers are vulnerable
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Tools/register.html?file=RetinaRPCDCOM
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe
I believe that would more be a function of the MUA, not Exchange.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:47 AM
To:
Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having
trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit
exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be
having problems with it.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
VPN works just great here.
From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:20:54 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
We are in the process of rolling out VPN
I don't know of any except that you would have to install ADC first and your
organization name would be fixed at that point in time.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could probably use LDFIFDE to do so. If you want to do it en mass then
there is the LegacyDN tool.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Jason Clishe
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
http://www.ISAserver.org
Best Regards,
Dan Bartley
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 09:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ISA group list
I will be doing a rather complex deployment it the near future dealing
with
Hello,
I have heard that RPC over HTTP can also work in a non Windows 2003 only
environment.
Microsoft whitepapers state that besides EX2K3 on W2K3 you also need W2K3
on your DC's and GC's. Now i have heard rumours that you only need one
server running on W2K3 with RPC Proxy service installed.
The read receipts are generated when sending to users which are internal or
external?
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:37:26 +0100
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: System Messages (Read)
That's a nice, arrogant way to put it. I can only hope that the powers-that-be at
Microsoft do not have a similar attitude towards their customers. I do not think it
too much to ask that a fresh install of a supported OS, fully patched using their
supported methods, would allow me to install
Add Storage Limits to the System Manager view and sort.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Finding full mailboxes.
Does anyone know of a way to query the exchange server or
Dear all,
Basically a lot of staff are forwarding their email to another account for
reading it out of hours or when travelling. Both the out of office assistant
and the rules wizard are used for this purpose by different staff
For unknown reason for a months now, this email forwarding feature
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 9:24am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that your ISP holds you hostage because it owns your DNS entries
until you can get them moved somewhere else.
Well, first off, my original point was that Internet access is not the
inalienable right that some people seem to think
I'm not sure why you would need this on servers unless you have a problem
with people just installing stuff on there.
I can tell you that my servers are the one thing I know exactly what is
installed on them.
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I think someone needs a nap.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange
Hello.
I did an in-place upgrade this past weekend. It is now Monday and all 1000 users have
logged into Outlookno problems reported as of yet.
If I can be of any assistance to you or you want to ask a specific question, please
don't hesitate to ask.
I used the MS White Paper on
Does anyone have a problem running Trend Micro Server
Protect with E2K? We have a E2K server would not mount
Priv1.edb store. This problem occured last week and we
isolated it to Trend Micro Server Protect. Everytime we
enabled Trend Micro Server Protect, E2K crashed (i.e.
priv1.edb would
My system logs an event in my event log telling me who is over the limits
every morning after it gets done with its maintenance.
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Finding
I found it.
My user neglected to tell me that he experienced it on our remote box.
All is well once more.
Thank you for the responses though.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 6:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Will it take a long time? I have a 19Gb IS.
Thanks again.
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KCC
It should be run off hours, but I have run it during the day before
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ISP/Exchange Question
You're going to try that tired argument in every thread until it sticks?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little
knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me. Your
statement saying exchange is not listening confuses me. Are you saying
there is some other software running between my exchange server and the rest
of the
That's what I thought. I thought it was unique acronym to Trend.
From: Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:51:33 -0700
SUS is software update
yes at 300 baudI cant understand why it wont generate anything...Ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Over dialup?
-Original
I drink the generic, non-DMCA approved equivalent. ;)
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:31:34 -0600
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
Hey you all,
My users have been getting the following NDR when they try to send an
email,
Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem. These users have
been sending email for the last 4 years and have not had their x400 address
changed so I don't think its any way related to
I have been doing some testing with the PFADMIN for removing the DNs and also adding
an account with all access. I wrote a macro that would delete the cells that started
with /O and the permissions cell to the right of it and then add and account with all
permissions at the end of every line
Hi there all,
I have a manager here who would like to collect information on
Email usage per person during a given day, excluding smtp.
Anyone know how this can be done, do I need an external tool to
Make this easier?
Where running Exchange 5.5 sp4
Answers are appreciated
David
Oy. I would highly recommend you test this out in a lab. A lab can consist
of old PCs. New copy of Exchange? Use an eval copy to test if necessary.
And yes, E2003 can run in a W2000 environment.
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
and yummy.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange2K (or 2003) and Outlook 2K2
Absolutely. Plain text = good.
From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Mr. Kong,
Please check the box in your application to include the reply so that others
might follow along. If the directories are excluded, I'd recommend using
that software maintenance Trend is so keen on everyone buying and dial them
up. File based scanners should effect Exchange if the working
Hee hee hee
I think I have that book somewhere...
Actually, the settings have changed between E2K and E2K3. I
think there are a few more things you can turn on/off in E2K3.
Unfortunately, no one seems to know what the settings are.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
I was simply lamenting the off the cuff troubleshooting being done by some
folks who traditionally have much stronger technical and troubleshooting
skills than that. If any of them was offended, they can bite me.. or wait
until I screw up and point it out with glee. Or heck, they can point back to
You could set up specific subnets which will go to their primary site
for authentication (in AD Sites Services snap-in). It is not a 100%
guarantee they will do this, but in our environment with over 50 +
sites, it seems to work well.
-Original Message-
From: Lady Chie [mailto:[EMAIL
You're not working for a software development company, are you? Aside from
IT managed resources, we have a lot of other users running a lot of
applications that are not completely under our control.
When you run as many servers as we do (150+) with a handful of admins,
having the centralized
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 12:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.
You can always switch to another OS. Of course if all OS vendors are doing
the same thing, then you can either accept it or go without automated
software updates. No one is
We use Palm based devices here to access email wirelessly and have been
using ThinAirApps for a while... However, ThinAirapps no longer will be
supported from Palm. I have been looking for different solution and
have come across http://www.corsoft.net/home.asp for our Palm devices.
Brian
Well I can only speak for myself, a 5.5 shop that did 2K AD and waited for
the rest. We're going Ol2K3, Ex2K3 and Win2K3 when it all comes together. I
think Terminal Server (dialup or Internet) is more viable than VPN.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I dont think it would matter.
Its not as if you are installing Exchange 5.5 on the W2k server.
- Original Message -
From: knighTslayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:26 AM
Subject: Running eseutil on another non-exchange
del *.pst should clear up the issue.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:03 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Subject: PST version
Had to rebuild... had office XP, now have office2k.
Will win2k vpn allow me to set up so only internet traffic destined to
the exchange server is routed correctly and I do not carry customers
internet destined load to internet on my backbone?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13,
Quick one...
If I am running Exchange 5.5 sp4 on NT4.0 sp6a and want to run the
eseutil on another non-exchange server because it has more disk space,
would that other server need to be the same OS level or could I run it
on a Windows 2000 server with sp3 for example?
I'm worried that because of
With all do respect, I don't want to argue the symantics of the issue.
I understand public keys and digital signatures but that isn't what I
need for this solution. I am sorry that the phrases are the same but I
am not aware of that the catch phrase is for what I require. What I
need is to
If I am looking to purge all mailboxes from a single store on E2K, is there
an easier way to do this than through the ESM?
Can I just dete the entire store or will that cause problems?
_ John Q
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN
heh
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
I drink the generic, non-DMCA approved equivalent. ;)
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL
Kool-aid
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Way OT: Love that Windows File Protection - NOT!
Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.
You can always
Quality plays no part in the choice. Its all cost driven.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
Tried that argument but
I've started a slow migration of users from a POP/SMTP system to
Exchange. I've moved over myself and a few other users. I recently run
into problem with low disk space! With only a few users on
Um... Sounds like you really need a larger disk.
The thing to remember is that your exchange
You can set up a view in Active Directory Users and Computers, arranging
entries by mailbox store. Then you can easily mailbox-disable the
collection that is on the store you want to delete. That's the way I would
do it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 9:41am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One man's outbound is somebody else's inbound.
Right, which is why all firewalls come with default rules set to block all
inbound and all outbound traffic.
By default, most products on the market are hideously insecure, and should
Thanks for the lesson Ed.
So letÂ’s say I don't know what I did, or in this case the person who managed
this environment is no longer around.
What is the easiest way to get the OWA portion back to the og configs w/o
backups?
Re-install E2K on the FE?
Why is doing what is listed in Microsoft
Actually, there's one more option script the Alternate Recipient
process and put a web front-end on it.
Works great here.
-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent Help - Email
I didn't see anything on whitehouse.gov or ready.gov, but my counterpart in
Facilities just forwarded a BOMA memo mentioning such a warning coming from
DHS.
Hopefully we are all already on alert for this virus, and are already
protected. It's an old issue that should have been eliminated a
Matt,
If you mean S/MIME when stating digital signatures, then your solution
may be problematic or difficult to achieve.
A digital signature only provides security by showing the recipient that
the sender is authentic (by checking their certificate is valid) and
that the message hasn't been
If you are looking to reset the mailboxes but keep the accounts mailbox
enabled, then yes, you can delete the store. First, dismount the store,
then delete the edb and stm files associated with that store, then
remount the store (it will complain about the files being gone, click
yes)... this
I've started a slow migration of users from a POP/SMTP system to
Exchange. I've moved over myself and a few other users. I recently run
into problem with low disk space! With only a few users on the server, I
have some concerns. A backup system hasn't been set up yet, so I have a
bunch of log
Thnx Ed
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 August 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can anyone help with this one pls
You would be looking at a third-party product, such as NetIQ.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
i was going to suggest wireless knowledge which i did some work with in
2001, but it appears they are no more, and support for their former products
ends this year :(
- Original Message -
From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Sounds right, just checking.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:27 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: ports over VPN
Subject: RE: ports over VPN
Well it would be within the VPN right.
I also think that most good network citizens should be egress blocking those
ports anyway - there are precious few reasons a corporate network should be
allowing egrees traffic on those ports, or for that matter on most ports.
--
Roger
You are absolutely right Andy. Since W2K server can act as a VPN, you have
everything you need.
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cannot login
There's really just the investment
Any work on when they would be able to do pocketPC devices? I would rather wait till
then to move.
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Same here,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, at 4:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard of the Dept. of Homeland security putting out an
anouncement to ISP's to block TCP/UDP ports 135, 137, 445?
The DHS advisory doesn't target ISPs in particular.
Many ISPs block 135, 137, 138, 139, and 445. More have
Try http://www.80-20.com.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:47 AM
To:
Fix the permissions. Since I wasn't there when the unnamed person munged
the permissions in the first place, I can't tell you what to undo. You can
call PSS for help if you need this fixed.
I don't see where 311154 addresses your problem, but maybe I didn't spend
enough time with it.
Ed
What type of VPN are you using, i.e. Microsoft, cisco
routers/pix/concentrators? Are you blocking any ports on the routers
(due to DCOM)
Nick Thakkar
Network Administrator
American Medical Response
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Needless to say, Microsoft is not on my A-list this week.
You can always switch to another OS. Of course if all OS vendors are doing
the same thing, then you can either accept it or go without automated
software updates. No one is forcing you to use software.
Hmm... Nope. Just drink the
You are kidding, right? A VPN would wrap all traffic through either a
PPTP or L2TP connection. It doesn't use standard ports. PPTP VPN's use
IP Protocol 49 (port 1723). L2TP uses UDP Protocol 17 and ports 1701
and 500 (IPSec).
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext
Although Exchange administrator allows me to add additional smtp addresses I can see
no way of doing it via import. Putting 2 smtp addresses in the import file causes an
error. Adding an additional address via import using the append multi valued
properties selected just overwrites the original
When I try from inside, I am able to loginno problem. Only when accessing from
outside or from home is when the login fails.
???
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Problems
Yah...that seems
Except that your ISP holds you hostage because it owns your DNS entries
until you can get them moved somewhere else. Changing ISPs is not a trivial
task for most small- to medium-sized businesses.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and
Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's. Planning to migrate to E2K on
W2K in a couple months. Down time is hard to come by.
Question: Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner
than migrating to E2K?
I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length
Hello All.
Some accounts are unable to logon via OWA. Just keeps coming back with the logon
window. It has to be a permissions problems somewhere, but where
I changed the permissions on the x:\program files\exchsrvr folder to Read execute,
List and Read for Authenticated users. I
Hi Experts,
Is it okay to rename an exchange 5.5 server? I understand the hassle of
updating Outlook profiles.
Thanks
Davinder
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
You cannot rename and exchange server.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta
Posted At: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: renaming an exchange server
Subject: renaming an
DNS?
MBLAST Virus?
DOS attack?
I'm sure we could just guess all day about this, but perhaps you can
enlighten us a bit more about how things are setup, what you have done
to diagnose the issue, when did this start, did you make changes to
something and then have this start?
If you provide
None the less, I know where my bet is just because you are reporting the
sudden onset of symptoms very typical to this problem. You don't have
any machines that pass through the firewall (exchange front end outside
the firewall for example?) or laptops who travel with bosses or sales
peoples and
Running Exchange 2000 SP3 with front-end/back-end setup. My first
priv.edb is kind of messed up. Are there any restrictions in moving the
mailbox's into another store, removing the 1st store and creating a new
store in it's place. Current 1st store contains 2 priv's and 1 pub. I
thank we can
I understand the aspect of setting the perms on his worksation(Outlook) but, how do I
set her up so she can see it?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Question
You should
Inbound, Inbound Inbound INBOUND INBOUND CONNECTIONS!
Fscking Road Runner SSMs decided that inbound meant _all_. It's really
unfortunate for the Austin RR group that I live within stal^H^H^H^Hwalking
distance.
RECOMMENDATION
Due to the seriousness of the RPC vulnerability, DHS and Microsoft
Once permissions are set to share on the bosses go to the shared users
outlook then use file|open|other user's folder
From: John Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Calendar Question
Date: Tue, 12 Aug
Write an event sink or server side script to do it.. Www.cdolive.com is a
good place to start
From: Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:46:35 -0500
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pipe dream or
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Well, don't do that!
Undo whatever you did and instead restrict access to the top level public
folder(s) under All Public Folders.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
No, but how can it be that now, when everyone has left (so also those
laptops) that I can't find any trace of it?
Kind regards,
Kim Schotanus
===
Kim Schotanus
Information Systems Manager
INTAS
Avenue des Arts 58
B-1000 Brussels
Belgium
T. +32 2 549 01 11
F. +32 2 549
Mr. Kong,
I assume you've excluded the Exchange working directories from being scanned
by your file based AV product, is that correct?
From: HongKong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:06:47 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Samantha,
Thanks for the offer. If anything comes up I'll be sure to check with you.
And thanks for the vote of confidence in the whitepaper... My techie
paranoia alarms are just going off on this one.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
thanks, I had gotten that. When I was running the active update from the
scanmail interface I was getting the error. After about 30 or so tries I
got the update downloaded to my system.
Now I'll see how well SUS is working for us.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
Hello !
We have just finished migrating our Exchange 5.5 users
to Exchange 2000.
A two-way-trust was established between
the domains.
The users log on in NT domain and the Exchange2000 server
is in W2K domain . The rights on mailboxes is set in the
following way : user in NT domain is
Trend has an unstable scan engine. I have had to upgrade to their
non-ga of 6.6 in order to resolve the problem you are experiencing. I
have had to do this on all servers globally.
I would contact them and isolate the issue to the modular engine they
have in their product line.
I had the same
Have you run a network trace? If so do you notice bursts of traffic? An
unusual number of broadcasts? A lot of traffic to / from one source or on
one port?
Are these outages occurring at regular intervals?
Have any patches been applied to any of the servers recently?
-Original
Also:
www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.blaster.worm.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Ko
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Watch Out - New Virus
But the mailbox has no limits on either the individual or the default.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Its not the attachment per se that's
That's why test labs rock... And in addition to just reading the E2K3 help,
I'd strongly recommend migration to it over E2K.
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:37:33 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the responses guys and gals.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Question
Once permissions are set to share on the bosses go to the shared users
outlook then use
I created an external contact in a new OU in the AD of a Win2K3 Ent server
that is also running Exchange 2K3 (RC1). So the client is using Outlook
Express 6.1 with all patch's, we are using Outlook2K2 SPK2 all the patch's.
If we send using RTF, the attachments are no where to be found. If I
The glitch is since this morning 8.30 Brussels time
With ups and downs
-Original Message-
From: Shotton Jolyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 14:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
Going on the information provided I'd say it was a
301 - 400 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
