FYI: TrendMicro Releases version 5.5 of their ScanEngine
Just checking www.antivirus.com I see TrendMicro's released a new version of their ScanEngine and new numbering scheme for virus definitions. All of us out there with Active Update keep an eye out for the new version. As of 11:45 PDT the release hasn't made it to the Active Update site yet. Go check out http://solutionbank.antivirus.com/solutions/scanengine55.asp Also TrendMicro also announced ScanMail v6.0 for Exchange 2000 set to be released Q4 2000. http://www.antivirus.com/corporate/media/2001/pr100101.htm - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New connector server
Dear All, We have a dedicated connector server (NT4 SP4, Ex5.5 SP2, 1 IMS, 41 X-400 Connectors 38 Directory Replication Connectors, no Mailboxes) that needs to be replaced by a new one. Does anybody have a best practice or any tips how to do this. Do we have to rehome all the connectors or is there an easier way? Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Goldmine
Hi Leeann We were using Goldmine as a contact manager for Exchange until quite recently. We were also using it as a progress monitor for specific contacts/jobs with our customers.(Workflow type thingy) The decision was taken to cease using it as separate package and develop a solution withing Exchange/Outlook mainly due to the severe challenges we experienced with Goldmine. Whilst I would not go so far as to say it's a bad product, it had certainly not been well implemented here, and our support provider was next to useless in addressing the issues. As these things go, had it been well planned prior to implementation, it probably would have worked quite well but trying to sort out the retrospective mess was a veritable nightmare. Try it by all means, it may do what you want BUT... See it work in a test environment which replicates yours before you part with any cash! Good luck Dominic. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 06:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Goldmine Anyone used Goldmine against an Exchange Server? A group of mgrs here are evaluating it and asked me to check the Exchange connectivity. Their support site appears to be down at the moment and I can't find too much info on it. I don't have a copy to install myself at this point until later in the week as the CD is off-site. any info would be appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
Ed, The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her .pst was opened temporarily to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc for permanent storage in her Exchange Mailbox. During the moving of a large folder to the Server, she exceeded the size limit of her new mailbox. From what I heard (I was of course not in the office at the time), she did the equivalent of a move paste and not a copy paste. Allison Wittstock inubit AG On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: I think you are confused. The mailbox size limit does not apply to a PST. There is a 2GB limit on PSTs, though. Did your user blow up the PST by exceeding that? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower)
Apply SP1 for XP, it adresses this issue Doris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. Oktober 2001 04:29 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower) yes and half the time it doesnt run the rules it is supposed to -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower) Has anyone noticed that OL XP is horribly slower to get messages from a POP account ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages with an Unreachable Destination
I've got 2 exchange 2000 servers, in 2 different physical locations, but members of the same exchange 5.5 site (mixed mode). Mail from 2000 to 5.5 within the site is flowing OK, but anything outgoing for other 5.5 sites or external addresses is sitting in 'Messages with an Unreachable Destination' on the SMTP virtual servers on both machines. Having turned up logging, it seems that 2000 is reporting one of the 5.5 site connectors as linkstate down, but its not (or at least not that 5.5 notices!) If I stop and start the SMTP VS on the 2000 boxes, on one box it retries the messages, and generally sends most or all of them, but on the other box, it retries then moves them all back into the 'unreachable destination' queue. As I understand it, 2000 will hold messages until it knows the end to end route is available, but is there any way of overriding this, to get 2000 to basically 'fire and forget'? The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messages with an Unreachable Destination
Ok, I've created a new Routing Group Connector with a higher cost than the existing one, and the mail is now flowing ok, using the new connector. I still don't know why 2000 sees the 5.5 connector as down. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Messages with an Unreachable Destination I've got 2 exchange 2000 servers, in 2 different physical locations, but members of the same exchange 5.5 site (mixed mode). Mail from 2000 to 5.5 within the site is flowing OK, but anything outgoing for other 5.5 sites or external addresses is sitting in 'Messages with an Unreachable Destination' on the SMTP virtual servers on both machines. Having turned up logging, it seems that 2000 is reporting one of the 5.5 site connectors as linkstate down, but its not (or at least not that 5.5 notices!) If I stop and start the SMTP VS on the 2000 boxes, on one box it retries the messages, and generally sends most or all of them, but on the other box, it retries then moves them all back into the 'unreachable destination' queue. As I understand it, 2000 will hold messages until it knows the end to end route is available, but is there any way of overriding this, to get 2000 to basically 'fire and forget'? The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange FOLDERS
What?? A huge company in it for the money? Say it's not so! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS No I did research TechNet a long time ago and they gave me 3 resources that had to do with my error on OWA but it seems like it didn't apply to my problem. Plus I really don't think Microsoft is that great when it comes to helping people with their software, sometimes it seems to me that they are in it for the money. Its kind of ridiculous when you can only get support from Microsoft if you pay a monthly or yearly fee. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS That's it!! I am hereby relinquishing my tech buddy assistance. It has become apparent that you do not care to learn for yourself and I as well as the rest of us are NOT going to baby you through Exchange. Maybe... Just maybe if you had one inkling of a clue you'd know how to search TechNet and other resources for such matters. I've never had a great deal of trouble researching TechNet. In fact, I find very useful information there almost daily as I would imagine others around here do. Maybe the problem is NOT TechNet, but YOU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. _ This message has been checked for
RE: scanmail blocked macintosh file attachment
Are you blocking .bin files? Macs sometimes add that extension when using binhex encoding. no it's not in the blocked list. these are the files included in the blocked list cmd;com;exe;hta;js;jsc;jse;lnk;pif;reg;sct;scr;vb;vbe;vbs;wsc;wsf;wsh;nws; thanks Peter jojo -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 6:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scanmail blocked macintosh file attachment Are you blocking .bin files? Macs sometimes add that extension when using binhex encoding. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scanmail blocked macintosh file attachment i have scanmail 3.0 in my exchange 5.5, attachment blocking is enable on selected file extensions, we have some mac users here complaining that the file attach on their mail has been blocked. they only attached word and excel documents and sometimes txt file but still scanmail blocked and delete the file. i think scanmail can't recognized the type of file attached from mac machine that's why it's being blocked. what should i do to allowed attachement from mac machine? thanks jojo --- here are the message from scanmail. ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked a file attachment(s). Place = Tara Sering Sender = Mariel Chua Subject = Southern Adventure article Delivery Time = October 01, 2001 (Monday) 11:04:13 Action on file attachment(s): Delete 'south adventure tour' at Tara Sering Message from recipient's administrator: Warning to sender. ScanMail has blocked a file during a real-time scan of the email traffic. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: listadmin@swynk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange FOLDERS
Filemaker? That still exists? Bit of a dinosaur, innit, Barney?[1] [1] In joke Les Bessant MCP[1] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! [1] W2K Pro, W2K Server, Net Inf Implementation[2] [2] Watch this space -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS ~ndi You pay 25k for basic 5 day support on a Lucent PBX! I've got an INDeX 400 and only pay 6kgbp for the same level here in the UK. This includes the IVM, the IPNC and ad-hoc callout. Don't talk to me about crap databases, Filemaker support alone makes me acidic PBB -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 22:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS *** WARNING - THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATES FROM THE INTERNET *** I don't want to flame Richard, even though the only time he doesn't use caps is at the beginning of a sentence. Richard, Microsoft support is good. One the system I administer is our Lucent pbx and we pay $25,000 for basic 5 day business hours support. Also we just paid $30,000 support for a crap database called Vantive. Just a couple of examples. Microsoft is a great deal for $245 per incident. The one place Microsoft can not be accused of ripping us off is Support. Non commitment support, how can you slag that off? Not to mention TechNet? Nathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet I went to the MSFT search page and entered crap. This was the first hit: Can We Get Along? The Application Compatibility Team http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/server/evaluation/news/fro mms/kanoc ompa t.asp Can't we get along? I know what you mean, though. But they cost of $245 a call for Product Support Services is really not that much and provides a deterrent so people who don't have a clue don't use tech support as user/admin training. Technet has a little learning curve for searching, because your choice of words to look for might not be theirs. A little time spent will show you. Look at the search words at the bottom of the KB articles. The cost is standard. Most other large software producers do not provide free support. Even smaller applications. We support Great Plains Accounting software now. Their knowledge base is not available to the public or to customers without the big support contract, so I *have* to pay for tech support. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS No I did research TechNet a long time ago and they gave me 3 resources that had to do with my error on OWA but it seems like it didn't apply to my problem. Plus I really don't think Microsoft is that great when it comes to helping people with their software, sometimes it seems to me that they are in it for the money. Its kind of ridiculous when you can only get support from Microsoft if you pay a monthly or yearly fee. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS That's it!! I am hereby relinquishing my tech buddy assistance. It has become apparent that you do not care to learn for yourself and I as well as the rest of us are NOT going to baby you through Exchange. Maybe... Just maybe if you had one inkling of a clue you'd know how to search TechNet and other resources for such matters. I've never had a great deal of trouble researching TechNet. In fact, I find very useful information there almost daily as I would imagine others around here do. Maybe the problem is NOT TechNet, but YOU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original
RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
ScanPST did not find any errors. But, it found 19 folders and 2697 Objects. Does this sound right for a PST that is about 370MB? She has a Contact list with 800 contacts, and some Calendars that are not so large. Could it be the missing data is somehow 'hidden' in the .pst? On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: Make a copy of the file, then run ScanPST on it. If it's successful. Try importing the messages into exchange instead of moving them... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Losing data after moving to Exchange server Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second domain on Exchange 5.5
Dear All I have been asked to provide corporate email for one of our subsidiary companies under their own domain name. I know this is possible on Exchange 5.5 and I also know there are a number of ways of doing it. My question is Which is the best/easiest/most efficient way?? Should I create another recipients container? Or maybe just create the new users in the existing one and edit their SMTP addresses to reflect the correct domain name? Or, is there a better way altogether? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
outlook urls losing clickability
Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange-aware virus scanners
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
And what do you have now for AV that does cause this issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Loftus Greig Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Header file
Can someone send me the file or a link to the file that allows you to choose the options you want to use to export a list from Exchange. I can't seem to find it, and need to get it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan it before it hits the mailbox. Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI scanner. The two articles seem to point towards changing the values in 2 dif't directions (changing OpenRetryDelay to 250 or 5000 where the default is 500). Also check out Q263949 to give you a more thorough overview of VAPI and attachments. Stephen -Original Message- From: Loftus Greig To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 7:02 AM Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
I have opened the file, but I do not see a Lost Found folder. I tried to count the items, and I can account for about 2/3's of the 2697 items. Her deleted items were ALL of her emails. Is there anything else I can do to this .pst to recover the lost items? They have to be somewhere, no? Yes, I have seen your quote, but the fact is, I'm the Administrator and I am expected to solve any technical problem for my users. Allison Wittstock On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote: Could be...I've seen users with Tens of thousands of items and only have 25MB. On the other hand I've seen users with about a few hundred items and be well over 400MB. You will have to open up the file and look. Also, look for a Lost Found folder in the Scanned PST. PS Have you seen the Jim Schwartz quote below my signature? Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server ScanPST did not find any errors. But, it found 19 folders and 2697 Objects. Does this sound right for a PST that is about 370MB? She has a Contact list with 800 contacts, and some Calendars that are not so large. Could it be the missing data is somehow 'hidden' in the .pst? On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: Make a copy of the file, then run ScanPST on it. If it's successful. Try importing the messages into exchange instead of moving them... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Losing data after moving to Exchange server Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Actually, I believe the point is that, whatever you are most familiar with, you will find is easier to use. Let's not get into a pissing contest with OS's please. Because if we did, my VIC-20 blew everything else out of the water! Bob -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Are you saying that on the same email, sometimes the URL will work and sometimes they won't? Or are saying that on different emails, some work and some don't? If they are on different emails, it will depend on who sent the email and in what format they wrote the email in. It is possible to write a url so that Outlook will not recognize it. For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Just out of interest, would it be viable to do things like run traditional file-based AV scanners on the IMC and MTA queues? Or would MIME (and any exchange internal formats) obscure things? Would there be file locking issues anyway? As an aside, we currently use CA InoculateIT and have made sure that the background scanning (as per ms suggestion) is off. I think we tried fiddling the OpenRetryDelay value too, but to no effect. Cheers, Loftus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan it before it hits the mailbox. Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI scanner. The two articles seem to point towards changing the values in 2 dif't directions (changing OpenRetryDelay to 250 or 5000 where the default is 500). Also check out Q263949 to give you a more thorough overview of VAPI and attachments. Stephen -Original Message- From: Loftus Greig To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 7:02 AM Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Header file
Chris, it is one the Exchange Resource kit 2. it is called header.exe and needs to run from an exchange server. Send me your email address and I can send you file. Thanks Don White Perot Systems VWoA Account Competency Center Computing and Network 3800 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 United States Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Header file Can someone send me the file or a link to the file that allows you to choose the options you want to use to export a list from Exchange. I can't seem to find it, and need to get it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 2000 Calendar default to Monthly
Hi Is there a workaround to make the Calendar view of OWA 2000 default to Monthly view ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moving mailboxes
Moving mailboxes between 2 exchange 2000 servers across the WAN, does it use SMTP or what? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
Allison, You may have to concede on this one. Unless one of the grey beards has an idea, I don't see how you're going to recover that missing data. Excerpt form Q171371: On the View menu, click Folder List to turn on the Folder List view. In your Folder List, the following recovered folders should be displayed: - Recovered personal folders - Calendar - Contacts - Deleted Items - Inbox - Journal - Notes - Outbox - Sent Items - Tasks These folders are usually empty because the folders are part of a rebuilt .pst file. A Lost and Found folder should also be displayed. This folder contains the folders and items that the Inbox Repair Tool recovered. Any items that are missing are beyond repair. Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server I have opened the file, but I do not see a Lost Found folder. I tried to count the items, and I can account for about 2/3's of the 2697 items. Her deleted items were ALL of her emails. Is there anything else I can do to this .pst to recover the lost items? They have to be somewhere, no? Yes, I have seen your quote, but the fact is, I'm the Administrator and I am expected to solve any technical problem for my users. Allison Wittstock On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote: Could be...I've seen users with Tens of thousands of items and only have 25MB. On the other hand I've seen users with about a few hundred items and be well over 400MB. You will have to open up the file and look. Also, look for a Lost Found folder in the Scanned PST. PS Have you seen the Jim Schwartz quote below my signature? Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server ScanPST did not find any errors. But, it found 19 folders and 2697 Objects. Does this sound right for a PST that is about 370MB? She has a Contact list with 800 contacts, and some Calendars that are not so large. Could it be the missing data is somehow 'hidden' in the .pst? On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: Make a copy of the file, then run ScanPST on it. If it's successful. Try importing the messages into exchange instead of moving them... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Losing data after moving to Exchange server Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG ___ __ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: exchange FOLDERS
I guess you didn't know that Microsoft is actually a non-profit NGO. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS What?? A huge company in it for the money? Say it's not so! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange FOLDERS No I did research TechNet a long time ago and they gave me 3 resources that had to do with my error on OWA but it seems like it didn't apply to my problem. Plus I really don't think Microsoft is that great when it comes to helping people with their software, sometimes it seems to me that they are in it for the money. Its kind of ridiculous when you can only get support from Microsoft if you pay a monthly or yearly fee. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS That's it!! I am hereby relinquishing my tech buddy assistance. It has become apparent that you do not care to learn for yourself and I as well as the rest of us are NOT going to baby you through Exchange. Maybe... Just maybe if you had one inkling of a clue you'd know how to search TechNet and other resources for such matters. I've never had a great deal of trouble researching TechNet. In fact, I find very useful information there almost daily as I would imagine others around here do. Maybe the problem is NOT TechNet, but YOU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in
RE: exmerge question
There's top notch support for your clients. I just wish that my employer was as laid back as yours. S. -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question No I haven't called them yet. I'm leaving tomorrow to go on site for a convention for our clients.. Good thing is all the people who have been complaining about the email will be at the convention as well.. So the fire has been put out until I return, then I will be calling PSS.. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question To me, downtime is not JUST time without email flow. It is also time that my users do not have access to all of their email. BTW, did you call PSS to get them to sort it out? -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question The new server is up and running already... I'm just trying to get everyones old email stuff back. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question Preach it, brother S! Dude, it you've had this much downtime, and the situation is that mucked up, do yourself a huge favour and call PSS and get them to sort it out! Stephen -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 12:07 PM Subject: RE: exmerge question I remember, is this the one where you actually tried to move the mailboxes by changing the home server property in the Advanced tab? You will need to change it back somehow. You can try directory export/modify csv/import method. If that doesn't work you can always try to go into the Exchange Admin in raw mode, which is very dangerous. A third option is to restore from backup to a recovery server offline. I would call PSS if I were in your shoes. S. -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question I can log into them. My problem I have is a handfull of the mailboxes show the home server being the new server, so I can't get into their old email boxes.. The old email box was not moved to the new server when the new accounts were made so I want to go into the edb and get the files manually. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question Just for kicks, can you open Outlook when logged in as the Service Account and access all data in all mailboxes that you appear to be missing from the PSTs? If so, can you successfully pull the data down to a PST that way? Are any errors showing up in any of the logs from the ExMerge? ExMerge is a real straight forward login based on Service Account Access rights. Stephen -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 11:34 AM Subject: RE: exmerge question yes... Unfortunetly whoever setup that machine before I worked for the company made the service account Administrator.. So I'm logged in as Admin and still have that problem -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question Are you logged into the box as the Exchange Service Account? That would be the only reason that I could think that it would happen. Stephen -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 11:11 AM Subject: RE: exmerge question I looked through it pretty well, and read all I could from the doc and newsgroups. A lot of people have had this same problem but no one seems to post their solution.. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exmerge question Go through the options and make sure that there are no filters on. S. -Original Message- From: Victor Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exmerge question I'm trying the Exmerge utility. It shows that users have email on the server by the size listed, but when I move them into the PST all it does is move the default folder names and it doesn't copy any messages/contacts ect.. Just empty folders any faq's about something like this? Or does anyone have any ideas? thanx Trying to make PST's from Exch 5.5 SP3, on NT 4.0 SP6 using Exmerge 3.71 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
Second thoughtDo you buy chance have deleted item rention time turned on? If so, with the dumpster always on reg hack you should be able to recover at least mail for the amount of days you have retention time set... Where was the personal folder stored? PC...? Network share? If share, was it backed up? How important is this info that is lost? Is it worth $245..if so, you might want to call PSS. I don't think they'll charge if they can't help... Have you looked at Slipstick.com...? PST files blow, don't they...? Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server I have opened the file, but I do not see a Lost Found folder. I tried to count the items, and I can account for about 2/3's of the 2697 items. Her deleted items were ALL of her emails. Is there anything else I can do to this .pst to recover the lost items? They have to be somewhere, no? Yes, I have seen your quote, but the fact is, I'm the Administrator and I am expected to solve any technical problem for my users. Allison Wittstock On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote: Could be...I've seen users with Tens of thousands of items and only have 25MB. On the other hand I've seen users with about a few hundred items and be well over 400MB. You will have to open up the file and look. Also, look for a Lost Found folder in the Scanned PST. PS Have you seen the Jim Schwartz quote below my signature? Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Losing data after moving to Exchange server ScanPST did not find any errors. But, it found 19 folders and 2697 Objects. Does this sound right for a PST that is about 370MB? She has a Contact list with 800 contacts, and some Calendars that are not so large. Could it be the missing data is somehow 'hidden' in the .pst? On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: Make a copy of the file, then run ScanPST on it. If it's successful. Try importing the messages into exchange instead of moving them... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Allison Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Losing data after moving to Exchange server Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG ___ __ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then Novell, battle. Can't wait to see where this goes -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Mass Email server
We have two dedicated SMTP gateways running on dual P333 with 512MB RAM each. We also have an official company spammer that sends about 7000-13000 emails in one shot using global DLs. Message flow slows down a little but no problems other than that. S. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Perhaps. But Lyris can integrate right into a SQL DB and carry the load. Pumping 30K messages through your standard Exchange server would probably bring it to it's knees. I suppose if you had a large cluster you could probably pull it off. Brent, what is the config of your Exch server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Martin I have seen GroupWise clusters handle that load easily. I would think that Exchange Enterprise would be able to as well properly configured. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: October 1, 2001 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Dude, for 30K emails, your company is gonna need to spend some money PERIOD. Exchange isn't gonna do it and it shouldn't be expected too. Tell management to get out their checkbook and call Lyris. www.lyris.com It integrates very well with a SQL back end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brent Miller Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server How can I configure Exchange to be a mass email server. My company wants to send out the same email to 3 recipients external to the company. These recipients will come from web based front end and a SQL back end. What is the maximum recipients a Distribution list can have? Does any have any idea how to implement a solution for this scenario? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: New connector server
If you're using Compaq hardware, you can simply relocate the disks to the new server and power it up [1], provided you have enough space to plug the disks in and you are content with the amount of disk space you have. But, probably a clean burn with relocating connectors is a much better idea. S. [1] Before anybody jumps on this, it works! I had a dedicated SMTP gateway server, as a matter of fact, that was having hardware problems. I simply pulled the drives out, put them in a completely different architecture Compaq server (from a Proliant 5000 to Proliant 3000), and powered it up. It worked without any problems at all. It was even a different RAID controller (2P vs. 2DH). Gotta love the Compaq SMART controllers. The controller read the array information from the disks and voila! After we replaced the motherboard on the 5000, we simply moved the disks back and boom. Back in business. -Original Message- From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New connector server Dear All, We have a dedicated connector server (NT4 SP4, Ex5.5 SP2, 1 IMS, 41 X-400 Connectors 38 Directory Replication Connectors, no Mailboxes) that needs to be replaced by a new one. Does anybody have a best practice or any tips how to do this. Do we have to rehome all the connectors or is there an easier way? Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Linux with samba, ssh , and webmin. Load it and leave it. (you may wanna patch it every now and then so you don't get owned) -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:13 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject:RE: Exchange on a Netware network On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville wrote: alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then Novell, battle. Linux! ;-) Anyone want to argue for the Macintosh? We could get a full-scale holy war going. The flames might not die down for weeks... -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
You are hilarious. I'm going to stop now. I know when I've been beaten by someone who's had way to much Microfoofoo koolaid today :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting
RE: OWA 2000 Calendar default to Monthly
Are you trying to make this the standard for all of your users? Because, Outlook will remember the view settings from the previous session and use those for each user. S/ -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Calendar default to Monthly Hi Is there a workaround to make the Calendar view of OWA 2000 default to Monthly view ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Well, what fun are you? You start a war and end it before I even get started... Damn it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network You are hilarious. I'm going to stop now. I know when I've been beaten by someone who's had way to much Microfoofoo koolaid today :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
We had a travel ban too after the WTC attack. My coworker is at the MEC now. We had to jump through hoops to get a special permission for him to fly during the travel ban. 2 days after the bureaucracy battle, they lifted the travel ban. AARGH. S. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source You got that right buddy! We have a no travel moratorium. Somebody doesn't think we made enough money last year. I often wonder in regards to a bank, how much is enough? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Man, it seems everybody is grumpy for not being at the MEC! Go Lori! Go! Go! Go! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Get fired up Lori!! LOL LOL LOL That's too funny!! John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source What don't you understand? The part about stopping/starting the IMS service after such a change? -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Ok, maybe I'm just not understanding something... If I want to stop email from a specific source, let's say fakename.com that is done on: IMS Properties/Connections/Message Filtering Right? (Environment: E5.5 SP4, 2 servers, single site. OS=Nt4 post 6a SRP) Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tastes great! No! Less filling!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then Novell, battle. Can't wait to see where this goes -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Now may be a good time to stop watching all the AVIs your content filter catches. LOL -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source ROFLMAO!!! Uh huh... I suppose there are some out there that might consider the result of your work a beverage... Maybe even a snack.. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Stopping inbound email from a specific source s%*t! I meant beverage damage... :-) - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source I hope they were taking a nap when you were doing that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Now I ruined *my* keyboard. (home with sick kids) John Allhiser - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:28 PM Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source No masturbating for you then. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source All I have left it my humor. Apparently everything I touch turns to crap today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower)
Same here on the rules thing...also, some W98 clients are having problems sending web pages and links using the mail button in IE...press the send button and nuttin happens. Still trying to figger it out. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower) That has been my experience as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower) yes and half the time it doesnt run the rules it is supposed to -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Francois Bourdeau Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP to get message using POP (Slower) Has anyone noticed that OL XP is horribly slower to get messages from a POP account ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
Thanks, Andy. That was tasty. (He really did pour me beers.) Ed --- Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm here in Orlando my friend! That was a little MEC Oy for you and Darcy (who is here as well)... Hold on, I have to pour Ed another beer. Andy -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hey dude, I thought for sure you were going. The ladies won't let you fly south? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS MEC Oy. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS As they said so well in Mr. Mom, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
No. The files in those queues are transient and in encoded formats that the file-based scanners won't recognize. Keep file-based scanners away from \exchsrvr\*data directories. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of interest, would it be viable to do things like run traditional file-based AV scanners on the IMC and MTA queues? Or would MIME (and any exchange internal formats) obscure things? Would there be file locking issues anyway? As an aside, we currently use CA InoculateIT and have made sure that the background scanning (as per ms suggestion) is off. I think we tried fiddling the OpenRetryDelay value too, but to no effect. Cheers, Loftus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan it before it hits the mailbox. Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI scanner. The two articles seem to point towards changing the values in 2 dif't directions (changing OpenRetryDelay to 250 or 5000 where the default is 500). Also check out Q263949 to give you a more thorough overview of VAPI and attachments. Stephen -Original Message- From: Loftus Greig To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 7:02 AM Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange-aware virus scanners
The Exchange AV products I've used do not interfere with such things. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
The new Macs are beautiful. MAC OS X is just too late for the market. It will always have its niche applications though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott Sent: October 2, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville wrote: alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then Novell, battle. Linux! ;-) Anyone want to argue for the Macintosh? We could get a full-scale holy war going. The flames might not die down for weeks... -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
Please define Mailbox size limit. What are your exact settings? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed, The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her .pst was opened temporarily to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc for permanent storage in her Exchange Mailbox. During the moving of a large folder to the Server, she exceeded the size limit of her new mailbox. From what I heard (I was of course not in the office at the time), she did the equivalent of a move paste and not a copy paste. Allison Wittstock inubit AG On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: I think you are confused. The mailbox size limit does not apply to a PST. There is a 2GB limit on PSTs, though. Did your user blow up the PST by exceeding that? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mass Email server
Write code. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Brent Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I configure Exchange to be a mass email server. My company wants to send out the same email to 3 recipients external to the company. These recipients will come from web based front end and a SQL back end. What is the maximum recipients a Distribution list can have? Does any have any idea how to implement a solution for this scenario? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Second domain on Exchange 5.5
Go ahead and create another container IF you NEVER WILL need to move users between the containers. Never is a long time, by the way. I think using the same container and employing Address Book Views would be a superior alternative. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Olds, Dominic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All I have been asked to provide corporate email for one of our subsidiary companies under their own domain name. I know this is possible on Exchange 5.5 and I also know there are a number of ways of doing it. My question is Which is the best/easiest/most efficient way?? Should I create another recipients container? Or maybe just create the new users in the existing one and edit their SMTP addresses to reflect the correct domain name? Or, is there a better way altogether? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
Does the functionality ever return? Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
upon reboot it returns. Avi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Does the functionality ever return? Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Less users = less complaints It's basic logic to me! -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 8:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly... Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners
Thought as much. Thanks anyway, Loftus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 15:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners No. The files in those queues are transient and in encoded formats that the file-based scanners won't recognize. Keep file-based scanners away from \exchsrvr\*data directories. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Loftus Greig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of interest, would it be viable to do things like run traditional file-based AV scanners on the IMC and MTA queues? Or would MIME (and any exchange internal formats) obscure things? Would there be file locking issues anyway? As an aside, we currently use CA InoculateIT and have made sure that the background scanning (as per ms suggestion) is off. I think we tried fiddling the OpenRetryDelay value too, but to no effect. Cheers, Loftus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan it before it hits the mailbox. Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI scanner. The two articles seem to point towards changing the values in 2 dif't directions (changing OpenRetryDelay to 250 or 5000 where the default is 500). Also check out Q263949 to give you a more thorough overview of VAPI and attachments. Stephen -Original Message- From: Loftus Greig To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 7:02 AM Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox-PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Yes, how so Rocky? I was on Don's side! ;-) Neil -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:48 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
You're goading me and I don't have the time to insult you and your OS!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Oh, I am fully aware of what's crashing and what's to blame. As Stephen mentioned... Less Users=Less Complaints -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly... Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I took the comment on sleepless nights as sarcastic. You should have too ahaha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Yes, how so Rocky? I was on Don's side! ;-) Neil -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:48 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on
RE: outlook urls losing clickability
The first thing to come to mind is that the file associations for the URL protocol is missing (Q257464) However this would not explain why it would return on reboot. Perhaps something else is running that is preventing the proper association from working? Some further questions: Are you running Word as your email editor? Do you run any 3rd party plug-ins for Outlook? Does anything happen at all when you try to open a link? How long is Outlook open before it stops working? How long has the machine been running before it stops working? Outlook 2000 SR1? SR2? Have you tried reinstalling Outlook? Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability upon reboot it returns. Avi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Does the functionality ever return? Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Thanks but I am talking about clickable urls in the same email yes. It is not specific emails. It works for a while then bam, it stops working in all emails. AVi -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability Let me be more specific: The middle msn.microsoft.com link should not work. The other http://msn.microsoft.com; link does work (next time, I'll choose my examples better...) The reason for this is the way Outlook scans for URL's in the text of the message. It will usually pick up the www.whatever as a URL to click on (the same goes for anything that starts with the http://. However, for URL's that don't start with these, like msn.microsoft.com, etc.. it will not scan for these automatically. These can be made into clickable URL's by the sender if they are using Word as their email editor (shudder) and make the text a hyperlink through word. Or if they are creating messages as HTML. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Choi Rex Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook urls losing clickability For example: www.hotmail.com msn.microsoft.com http://msn.microsoft.com The msn.microsoft.com link should not work, but the others should. Rex Choi Siemens Building Technologies -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook urls losing clickability Running Win2k sP2 with outlook 2k on it. Sometimes I can click on some urls in my email, but then somehow they stop being clickable. Have looked through MS technet and all and was hoping one of the tech buddies might have seen such an issue and/or know what to do about it. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Goldmine
Leeann, We have been using Goldmine here for several years. The Exchange connectivity works in a very basic form. Goldmine has a simple POP/SMTP mail client that can be used with Exchange, but only for POP mail. Goldmine also has a feature that allows you to send an Outlook email directly from Goldmine. The only downside is that the email details do not get fully recorded in Goldmine like they would if the email was sent using the Goldmine email client. All in all, it isn't great, but it does work. Chuck -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Goldmine Anyone used Goldmine against an Exchange Server? A group of mgrs here are evaluating it and asked me to check the Exchange connectivity. Their support site appears to be down at the moment and I can't find too much info on it. I don't have a copy to install myself at this point until later in the week as the CD is off-site. any info would be appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
You can't insult me! That's a pretty tough thing to do... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network You're goading me and I don't have the time to insult you and your OS!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network How so... I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it anymore... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Now that was funny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. Not to mention any sleepless nights. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I love opening cans of worms! Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that. Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their 3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful. Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve any administration and functionality issues I have. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities and huge corps are using AD right? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network I think NWAdmin SUCKS! I can do way more with AD and the MMC. It isn't about what I'm used to because I'm used to both, I just happen to like one better than the other. Not to mention, the scalability... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Don I use MS way more then Netware today but if you are misleading people by telling them that the mmc and AD plugins are easier to use then nwadmin or console one then you MUST be smoking crack. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: October 2, 2001 12:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network One issue that I am aware of is that ADS and NDS do not mix so I would imagine that would complicate things. My company is running NDS as well, but I'm fixing to migrate all the CRAP to W2K, ADS, and E2K and be gone with NetWare nastiness for good. Did I mention I hate NetWare and the odd thing about it is that was the first NOS I certified in. It's garbage... ADS is way better from an administration standpoint. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Karma, simply karma. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Just enter the domain name.. Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and appreciate all the help I can get. I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But it was worth a try. Thanks again. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source That, or it's not really from there. The best thing really is to educate your users to utilize the delete key and to not go on the internet willy-nilly waving a work e-mail address. Keeping up with spammers is like keeping up with content filters. It's a losing battle and only ends up making you crazy. -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source No. That's probably it. Thanks! Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Ya, we had major problems with NAV NLM and a CDtower NLM when I first
started here - they did not like each other at all. They finally fixed the
prob. Our Novell server runs pretty well. NAV seems to spike the processor
pretty hard at times. If it remains at 100% usage for a period of time it
will crash. As it did a few days ago when we kicked off a manual virus scan,
and it is a Proliant 5500! But, it had been up well over a year.
All it does is file/print services. Still at 4.10 :-)
The only 3rd party NLMs are NAV and a ProComm tower NLM (CD tower connected
by ethernet)
I was just noticing the other day how if I have rconsole open and type
anything my processor goes to 100% on my pc. Or if I have it on a screen
that constantly updates like monitor or NAV. I have a very new pc with W2K
Pro. NWADMIN is also a hog. Makes WinAMP skip! :-)
I don't see us getting rid of Novell because our manager is a die-hard
novell guy... :(
He can't wait to go to NW6 and start controlling NT from it. And start using
web services, et c on it. {HELP!}
All our app servers/Email/etc are NT/2000
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty
good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly...
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
How so...
I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The
Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a
crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it
anymore...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Now that was funny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should
solve any administration and functionality issues I have.
Not to mention any sleepless nights.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I love opening cans of worms!
Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest
gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in
my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we
weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it
is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the
snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it
that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still
have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that.
Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's
do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not
forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which
client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain
versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their
3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of
not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful.
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve
any administration and functionality issues I have.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out
scales AD anytime, anywhere. That's why people like CNN, Universities
and huge corps are using AD right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: October 2, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I think NWAdmin
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
My Psychic friends tell me In the future there will be no Novell, no Apple No Compaq I cant Wait.. The So caleld Niche MAC applications can be eqasily handled by a Toaster NT System or SGI Octane. Mac os X? I would rather run Amiga OS 3.9 ehehhhehe -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network The new Macs are beautiful. MAC OS X is just too late for the market. It will always have its niche applications though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott Sent: October 2, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville wrote: alright, a good ole' fashion, Novell is better then NT, NT is better then Novell, battle. Linux! ;-) Anyone want to argue for the Macintosh? We could get a full-scale holy war going. The flames might not die down for weeks... -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Yeah my boss is a die-hard Novell guy too. Too bad his boss is
listening to me... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Barry
Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Ya, we had major problems with NAV NLM and a CDtower NLM when I first
started here - they did not like each other at all. They finally fixed
the prob. Our Novell server runs pretty well. NAV seems to spike the
processor pretty hard at times. If it remains at 100% usage for a period
of time it will crash. As it did a few days ago when we kicked off a
manual virus scan, and it is a Proliant 5500! But, it had been up well
over a year.
All it does is file/print services. Still at 4.10 :-)
The only 3rd party NLMs are NAV and a ProComm tower NLM (CD tower
connected by ethernet)
I was just noticing the other day how if I have rconsole open and type
anything my processor goes to 100% on my pc. Or if I have it on a screen
that constantly updates like monitor or NAV. I have a very new pc with
W2K Pro. NWADMIN is also a hog. Makes WinAMP skip! :-)
I don't see us getting rid of Novell because our manager is a die-hard
novell guy... :( He can't wait to go to NW6 and start controlling NT
from it. And start using web services, et c on it. {HELP!}
All our app servers/Email/etc are NT/2000
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty
good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly...
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
How so...
I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The
Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a
crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it
anymore...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Now that was funny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should
solve any administration and functionality issues I have.
Not to mention any sleepless nights.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I love opening cans of worms!
Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest
gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in
my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we
weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it
is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the
snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it
that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still
have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that.
Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's
do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not
forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which
client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain
versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their
3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of
not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful.
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve
any administration and functionality issues I have.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Don you love opening cans of worms eh? Scalability. Please NDS out
scales AD
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
HEHE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Yeah my boss is a die-hard Novell guy too. Too bad his boss is
listening to me... ;o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Barry
Patterson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Ya, we had major problems with NAV NLM and a CDtower NLM when I first
started here - they did not like each other at all. They finally fixed
the prob. Our Novell server runs pretty well. NAV seems to spike the
processor pretty hard at times. If it remains at 100% usage for a period
of time it will crash. As it did a few days ago when we kicked off a
manual virus scan, and it is a Proliant 5500! But, it had been up well
over a year.
All it does is file/print services. Still at 4.10 :-)
The only 3rd party NLMs are NAV and a ProComm tower NLM (CD tower
connected by ethernet)
I was just noticing the other day how if I have rconsole open and type
anything my processor goes to 100% on my pc. Or if I have it on a screen
that constantly updates like monitor or NAV. I have a very new pc with
W2K Pro. NWADMIN is also a hog. Makes WinAMP skip! :-)
I don't see us getting rid of Novell because our manager is a die-hard
novell guy... :( He can't wait to go to NW6 and start controlling NT
from it. And start using web services, et c on it. {HELP!}
All our app servers/Email/etc are NT/2000
Barry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
It is all due to Poorly written NLMS by a vendor.. The core is pretty
good. But NLM was so complicated to write in, no one did it properly...
Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA
~~~
All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker
~~~
This space has been rented by:
Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs
You 2 can rent this space if you need it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
How so...
I'll be my W2K servers stay up longer than those POS Novell servers. The
Novell boxes here seem to puke about daily due to some problem. What a
crock! I remember when Novell used to claim stability. I don't see it
anymore...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Now that was funny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson
Sent: October 2, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should
solve any administration and functionality issues I have.
Not to mention any sleepless nights.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 02 October 2001 15:15
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: Exchange on a Netware network
Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network
I love opening cans of worms!
Now granted, I've only got back into working with Novell at my latest
gig and that's been for almost 3 months now. However, I can tell you in
my short lived experience... It SUCKS and badly! Now I suppose, if we
weren't running Nix, Linux, and NT here it wouldn't be soo bad, but it
is garbage for administration. At least with W2K, I can add all the
snap-ins to one MMC and manage the entire network from one console it
that's why you think NWAdmin is better. I think the fact that I still
have to deal with IPX crap is even more BS, WTF is up with that.
Granted, we still have one bindery server, but the rest of these POS's
do not need that crap a$$ protocol running on a network. Oh, let's not
forget the fubared client piece that you have to be careful of which
client to load because Novell based apps won't run under certain
versions of the client. What a friggin joke!! I like Novell in their
3.x days and even in the 4.x days, but since I've had the pleasure of
not looking at it for a couple of years... I am s thankful.
Tis OK, in a couple of months I will be doing a full scale migration
from anything related to Novell to W2K, ADS, and E2K. That should solve
any administration and functionality issues I have.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
Keep it flowing! (as long as it's not Bud Light that is ...) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS I'm here in Orlando my friend! That was a little MEC Oy for you and Darcy (who is here as well)... Hold on, I have to pour Ed another beer. Andy -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hey dude, I thought for sure you were going. The ladies won't let you fly south? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS MEC Oy. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS As they said so well in Mr. Mom, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Header file
What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's mailboxes. Can someone send me that, or tell me where to get it. -Original Message- From: White, Don (PSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Header file Chris, it is one the Exchange Resource kit 2. it is called header.exe and needs to run from an exchange server. Send me your email address and I can send you file. Thanks Don White Perot Systems VWoA Account Competency Center Computing and Network 3800 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 United States Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Header file Can someone send me the file or a link to the file that allows you to choose the options you want to use to export a list from Exchange. I can't seem to find it, and need to get it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
Yucky!!! Break out the Red Hook or something... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Keep it flowing! (as long as it's not Bud Light that is ...) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS I'm here in Orlando my friend! That was a little MEC Oy for you and Darcy (who is here as well)... Hold on, I have to pour Ed another beer. Andy -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hey dude, I thought for sure you were going. The ladies won't let you fly south? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS MEC Oy. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 04:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS As they said so well in Mr. Mom, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exmerge
Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate without losing all the data. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders based help desk?
There was one shipped on the 5.0 CD IIRC. It also used to be on the App Farm, if that's still there. Took some configuring, but we used it very happily for about two years until a bigger fish gobbled us up and then we got Remedy. -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folders based help desk? Good day... I was wondering if anyone has seen some software for running a help desk through public folders on exchange 5.5? (and hopefully 2000 - for when we upgrade). I know I could just make a simple form, and set it to be posted, but I was looking for something a little more advanced Thanks. Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Hmmm, guess that was a doubled up redundancy wasn't it. It's cuz I'm drinking at work in your memory. ;) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source A moratorium on not travelling? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You got that right buddy! We have a no travel moratorium. Somebody doesn't think we made enough money last year. I often wonder in regards to a bank, how much is enough? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Man, it seems everybody is grumpy for not being at the MEC! Go Lori! Go! Go! Go! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Get fired up Lori!! LOL LOL LOL That's too funny!! John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source What don't you understand? The part about stopping/starting the IMS service after such a change? -Original Message- From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Ok, maybe I'm just not understanding something... If I want to stop email from a specific source, let's say fakename.com that is done on: IMS Properties/Connections/Message Filtering Right? (Environment: E5.5 SP4, 2 servers, single site. OS=Nt4 post 6a SRP) Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
This is valuable news to me. My husband = Major Slob when in the proximity of keyboards. He's tried to blame the kids, but I know better. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source For seriously! I've had to do it a couple of times... As a side note, I do not suggest computing while intoxicated... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Really for seriously Don? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Put the KB in the dishwasher and it will be fine.. Trust me... Works with laptop KB's too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Just enter the domain name.. Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and appreciate all the help I can get. I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But it was worth a try. Thanks again. Bill Lambert, Mcp, Mcse Endoxy Healthcare 847-465-2351 x2232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions
RE: Exmerge
LOOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL atta boy Don!!! Man the humor on this list just keeps getting better. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exmerge Strange... You searched all over and found nothing.. How odd... One simple query and I come up with all kinds of shit... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q259/6/88.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/0/37.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/4/41.ASP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Davis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate without losing all the data. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
I did that once to a guy here who uses all of two fingers to type with. Not
at the same time, of course.
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
You need to remove the keycaps first and put them in the silverware tray.
Then when you put it back together, you can go ahead and alphabetize the
keys, so you can find the one you want, instead of this ridiculous QWERTY
arrangement. 8-{)
...Joel Osborn
PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader Is
Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only
in a Vague and Undetermined State.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Really for seriously Don?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Put the KB in the dishwasher and it will be fine.. Trust me... Works
with laptop KB's too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Al right...I like you guys. Here it is
I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It
punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB,
mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our
T1 went down! I would kill a user for this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
oh, right, can't tell anyone.
Soda boy.
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to
each other. (Mother Theresa)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance
in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
S!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard.
Drew
If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to
each other. (Mother Theresa)
KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net
One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the
universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the
middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime
invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese,
and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry
Pratchett)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
We're just a funny guy today aren't we?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Do you wear your leather mask while doing it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Just enter the domain name..
Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well.
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and
appreciate all the help I can get.
I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain
name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
HEE HEE HEE... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source This is valuable news to me. My husband = Major Slob when in the proximity of keyboards. He's tried to blame the kids, but I know better. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source For seriously! I've had to do it a couple of times... As a side note, I do not suggest computing while intoxicated... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Really for seriously Don? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Put the KB in the dishwasher and it will be fine.. Trust me... Works with laptop KB's too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Just enter the domain name.. Flowgo.com and that's it. Stop/Restart the IMC and all should be well. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Lambert Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Thanks, Lori. As you can tell, I'm relatively new to Exchange and appreciate all the help I can get. I did try the *.flowgo and it didn't work. I get the invalid domain name message which I thought I would using a wildcard. But it was worth
RE: Header file
Search technet for mbinfo Mark -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Header file What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's mailboxes. Can someone send me that, or tell me where to get it. -Original Message- From: White, Don (PSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Header file Chris, it is one the Exchange Resource kit 2. it is called header.exe and needs to run from an exchange server. Send me your email address and I can send you file. Thanks Don White Perot Systems VWoA Account Competency Center Computing and Network 3800 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 United States Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Header file Can someone send me the file or a link to the file that allows you to choose the options you want to use to export a list from Exchange. I can't seem to find it, and need to get it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source
Make sure you let the keyboard dry out first, and do not I repeat do not have on the heated dry Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source HEE HEE HEE... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source This is valuable news to me. My husband = Major Slob when in the proximity of keyboards. He's tried to blame the kids, but I know better. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source For seriously! I've had to do it a couple of times... As a side note, I do not suggest computing while intoxicated... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Really for seriously Don? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Put the KB in the dishwasher and it will be fine.. Trust me... Works with laptop KB's too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Al right...I like you guys. Here it is I just hit a full Coke on the corner of my desk (on accident). It punched a hole in it and proceeded to hose down both my monitors, KB, mouse and my minions laptop. The KB is wrecked. At the same moment our T1 went down! I would kill a user for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source oh, right, can't tell anyone. Soda boy. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One of the greatest joys known to man is to take a flight into ignorance in search of knowledge. --Robert Lynd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source S!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source He's gotta do something after destroying his keyboard. Drew If we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other. (Mother Theresa) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One universal manifestation of raw, natural magic throughout the universe is this: that any domestic food store, raided furtively in the middle of the night, always contains, no matter what its daytime invertory, half a jar of elderly mayonnaise, a piece of very old chese, and a tomato with white mold growing on it. (From Mort, by Terry Pratchett) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source We're just a funny guy today aren't we? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stopping inbound email from a specific source Do you wear your leather mask while doing it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions
RE: Exmerge
YEAH Well I did. I guess I used a simmiliar query but did not get the first link you sent here. But the others I have read and did not give the steps I needed. Thanks. Strange... You searched all over and found nothing.. How odd... One simple query and I come up with all kinds of shit... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q259/6/88.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/0/37.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/4/41.ASP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Davis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate without losing all the data. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders based help desk?
I did a search, on the MS site, and couldn't find it... Any links? Dustin Krysak -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October 1, 2001 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders based help desk? Microsoft have a sample Helpdesk Application based on Public Folders. Haven't looked at it myself, but may be a good place to start. -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 12:42 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folders based help desk? Good day... I was wondering if anyone has seen some software for running a help desk through public folders on exchange 5.5? (and hopefully 2000 - for when we upgrade). I know I could just make a simple form, and set it to be posted, but I was looking for something a little more advanced Thanks. Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge
Okay, I know that this is a bit radical and unconventional, but I'm feeling rebelious! Have you tried reading the DOC file that comes with it? Stephen -Original Message- From: Kenneth Davis To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Exmerge YEAH Well I did. I guess I used a simmiliar query but did not get the first link you sent here. But the others I have read and did not give the steps I needed. Thanks. Strange... You searched all over and found nothing.. How odd... One simple query and I come up with all kinds of shit... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q259/6/88.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/0/37.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/4/41.ASP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Davis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate without losing all the data. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA users unable to Attach files
Hi, We use Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4.0 SP5 and Outlook Web Access. Lately our users have been unable to use the Attachment feature when connected to OWA. The applet runs, and they can browse and choose a file to attach, however all that happens is the little paper icon (copy graphic) keeps running but the file is never attached. Any ideas on what to look at? I have looked at TechNet but was unable to find an article with this specific issue. My next step is to call MS support, but I thought I might run it by this list first. Thanks, Dave This email message may contain confidential information of Integrated Biosystems, Inc., and is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge
What? Read a manual? Are you kidding me? I would've never thought... Wow! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exmerge Okay, I know that this is a bit radical and unconventional, but I'm feeling rebelious! Have you tried reading the DOC file that comes with it? Stephen -Original Message- From: Kenneth Davis To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Exmerge YEAH Well I did. I guess I used a simmiliar query but did not get the first link you sent here. But the others I have read and did not give the steps I needed. Thanks. Strange... You searched all over and found nothing.. How odd... One simple query and I come up with all kinds of shit... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q259/6/88.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/0/37.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q265/4/41.ASP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Davis Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge Does anyone have directions on how to use exmerge to export one users mailbox. I have serached all over technet and can only find directions for the whole database. I have a problem child mailbox I need to recreate without losing all the data. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
great! Last question. Let's say I've got my SMS server setup, do my 95/98 clients run the SMS setup through a logon script which sets them up automatically or do I deploy it manually ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
RE: Mass Email server
We were thinking about bring up a new Exchange Org. There would be one server in the site and it would be a dual Giga Hertz processors - Half gig of ram. I still don't believe that exchange's imc and mta can handle 3 messages. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Perhaps. But Lyris can integrate right into a SQL DB and carry the load. Pumping 30K messages through your standard Exchange server would probably bring it to it's knees. I suppose if you had a large cluster you could probably pull it off. Brent, what is the config of your Exch server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Martin I have seen GroupWise clusters handle that load easily. I would think that Exchange Enterprise would be able to as well properly configured. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: October 1, 2001 8:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server Dude, for 30K emails, your company is gonna need to spend some money PERIOD. Exchange isn't gonna do it and it shouldn't be expected too. Tell management to get out their checkbook and call Lyris. www.lyris.com It integrates very well with a SQL back end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brent Miller Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Email server How can I configure Exchange to be a mass email server. My company wants to send out the same email to 3 recipients external to the company. These recipients will come from web based front end and a SQL back end. What is the maximum recipients a Distribution list can have? Does any have any idea how to implement a solution for this scenario? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ScanMail
I've been having problems with the Trend's ScanMail ever since I re-booted the Exchange server. When I look at the services both the Realtime Scan service and scan monitor are up and running, and the Realtime scan monitor window says that everything is fine, however it does not appear to be scanning e-mails as it used to. I'm running NT4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4 with ScanMail 3.52. If anyone has any ideas please let me know. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Losing data after moving to Exchange server
At 200MB, the user gets a warning that they are reaching the limit. At 250MB, the user cannot send any emails. At 300MB, the user cannot receive any emails. On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, you wrote: Please define Mailbox size limit. What are your exact settings? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed, The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. Her .pst was opened temporarily to retreive her eMails, Calendar appoinments, etc for permanent storage in her Exchange Mailbox. During the moving of a large folder to the Server, she exceeded the size limit of her new mailbox. From what I heard (I was of course not in the office at the time), she did the equivalent of a move paste and not a copy paste. Allison Wittstock inubit AG On Mon, 01 Oct 2001, you wrote: I think you are confused. The mailbox size limit does not apply to a PST. There is a 2GB limit on PSTs, though. Did your user blow up the PST by exceeding that? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Allison Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, One of my users switched from having .pst and Internet-only mode to Corporate Workgroup mode, to utilize the new Exchange (2k) server. The mailbox size limit on the Server is 300MB. She opened her .pst (in Outlook 2k) to move data from it to her new mailbox. Her .pst exceeded the limit by a hundred MBs. The last folder she moved was very large, and during this move she exceeded the mailbox size limit. The move was unsuccessful, but now the data is neither in the old .pst nor the Exchange mailbox Folder she was trying to move it to. In her deleted Objects Folder there is the Folder she tried to move, but it is empty, and none of the Sub-folders are there. Is there any way to recover this data? Where is the data? I hope that I used the correct terminology, as I am not working with English language clients or Server. Thank you, A. Wittstock inubit AG _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
Not with 2.0. I can configure it automagically take over without them having anything to say about it. ;o) Would I do that??? Maybe... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
All acceptable clients can be done either way... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk great! Last question. Let's say I've got my SMS server setup, do my 95/98 clients run the SMS setup through a logon script which sets them up automatically or do I deploy it manually ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **
Forwarding email
Been using Exchange 5.5 for awhile and have deployed a couple of 2000 versions recently. The feature I can't find is to forward a users email to an outside account. i.e. He will only have access say to a Hotmail email account and wants his company email sent there also. You used to be able to have Exchange5.5 send it to both accounts by setting up another email address and configuring them both to do this. Looked and I can't find it in 2000. Don't embrass me too much. Thanks in advance. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
