I believe that you could also leave the smtp addresses in tact and simply
empty the address space on the IMS. Also set the IMS to inbound only.
Removing the address space will stop Exchange from sending (route will be
removed from the routing table) but the IMS can still receive mail.
This
Is anyone currently using SurfControls Superscout E-mail filter (Or even
their web filter)?? I am currently using MAILsweeper for exchange but I am
currently upgrading all of our systems. I have tried the Super scout web
filter but not the E-mail filter. I'm really just after an idea how
Sorry if this posted the first time, but I never saw it come across the wire here.
Got a problem with dir.edb here, need to see if anyone has a solution.
Mail server (5.5 on NT sp 6) went down hard. Brought it back up and now the
directory service won't start.
I ran the eseutil program
Trend Scanmail (183) for exchange 2000, Exch 2K SP2
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December, 2001 4:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stripping attachments
AV version? Server version and SP?
-Original Message-
From: Kim
simply so that a group of mailboxes incorrectly set up in one recipient
container can be re homed in another one on the same site. What I'm trying
to find out is whether this can be achieved without exporting all of the
affected mailboxes to pst and then recreating tha mailboxes in the new
Check that the users who cant open the attachments have a 'Temporary
Internet folder' in their profile.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: DJB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 December 2001 22:07
To:
By design, no.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Julian Lovell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 December 2001 10:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving mailboxes between recipient
Chris,
Why is it a 'stupid' option for null senders?
Cheers
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's filling my mailbox
Well at the moment I'm unable to access an
RFC 2821 states that MTAs must accept all mails from ,
as they are delivery notification messages. Bouncing them,
as a lot of mailers do, is not RFC compliant and a bloody
nuisance :-)
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Easier to rehome them than to recreate. If you bring up your second ADC
whilst the first is still running then on the General Tab of each agreement
you can change the server that that CA runs on. You will be prompted to
retype in the connection username/password.
If you are really concerned
Check the Registry to see where the server thinks the dir.edb should be
located. Then go there and make sur eit is there. It may very well be on
C:.
If the Dir.edb won't recover using eseutil then the only option I know of is
that you restore from backup.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
Thanks Wilson
We did lose SI of all attachments, but that did not explain size. Size
also changed some 2 weeks after Exchange 2000 set up, following serious
degradation in performance especially noticeable in one Public Folder
contact folder which eventually did not restore form the backup.
I thought MS recommended not trying to fix the dir.edb using eseutil as if
it drops anything you wont know what state your system will be in. If you
have a backup then use it, it's going to be a lot quicker and safer.
Stewart
-Original Message-
From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Cheers for the info Phil
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's filling my mailbox
RFC 2821 states that MTAs must accept all mails from ,
as they are delivery notification
Is this the first server in the site? If so be sure to read through the
Technet articles about removing same.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Ed Crowley
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 00:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Changed the exchange iis website to anonymous now I get page can not be
displayed even when I change it back I get nothing.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Did this behavior happen prior to the application of E2K SP2?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 12/18/2001 4:07 AM
Subject: RE: stripping attachments
Trend Scanmail (183) for exchange 2000, Exch 2K SP2
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
It can be done by upgrading to Exchange 2000 where recipient containers no
longer exist in the context that you currently think of them.
You say you don't want to use views, so w/o an upgrade you're stuck with
deletion and recreation to 'move' the mailboxes in question.
-Original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have no experience with Surfcontrol's E-mail filter, but I can tell
that there Superscout webfilter product has some serious issues.. It
can be bypassed with easily.. This bug was brought to their
attention, released to the Bugtraq comunity and
Basic authentication.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: Help please
Changed the exchange iis website to anonymous now I get page can not be
displayed
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a
replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52
We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I
understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for
viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how
notification works. I sent a
Woops. Thanks. OK I did that and it has the same result. Pops up the
login box repeatedly.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Basic authentication.
/Peter
-
Q292723?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Help please
Subject: RE: Help please
Woops. Thanks. OK I did that and it has the same result. Pops up the
Upgrade to 6.0 IOS
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I can't recall some great examples off hand, but I remember a time where the
PIX would to funny things to the network
Had a local user send a message out this morning to a Mailing List. Open
the message being sent, the sender received a message from the System
Administrator for the DL, and each individual user. The NDR is stated
below.
ESIT Team on 12/18/01 7:41 AM
The message was undelivered because
You do't want to do that.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Exchange
Check Q260198
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Problems
Had a local user send a message out this morning to a Mailing List. Open
the message being sent, the sender
giggle. thanks to all who replied. for info outlook 2000 behaved the same. I've told
her to delete the offending appointments via OWA and get rid of her hideous backlog of
appointments.
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December
Why not? I'm curious; bad experiences? It's working fine for me here. My
people are even afraid to open the virus_detected_and_removed.txt file. I'm
so proud. :)
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM
To: Exchange
After re-reading the problem I have to agree. I should have read the
entire message. I missed the part about being able to receive internal smtp
mail. This will only work if the users are located on the GC.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have
16mb in my router.
Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I had posted this before and didn't get any help (a very perplexing problem
to say the least) but I have found out some more specifics so I'll try
again. I rebuilt the info store by using exmerge to export all mailboxes to
.pst's, created a new priv.edb, and imported back from the pst's. About
I'm running only MAPI mode and I can't get the notifications to come to me
either. When I try a test at the server I get a MAPI error. I installed an
old Exchange mapi client and that didn't help. I made sure there was a
valid scanmail profile on the server and that didn't help. Trend wanted
That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp.
Tftp the image to your router?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Can't upgrade to 6.0.
What version are you on now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp.
Tftp the image to your
Router??? I thought you said you have a PIX. They have much more than
16MB, well, not much more, but at least 32MB.
D
Arrogance: The Best Leaders Inspire by Example. When that's not an option,
brute intimidation works pretty well too. - - http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
Sorry PIX. And according to cisco and show ver I have 16mb. I would
install it but cisco wont even let me dl it off their site.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Version 5.3(5)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
What version are you on now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Do you not have a CCO login?
D
Pretension: The downside of being better than everyone else is that people
tend to assume you're pretentious. - - http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:19 AM
To:
Which model of the PIX do you have?
D
Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Version 5.3(5)
Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail
Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed.
As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My
suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning.
Yes I have a cco login that's where it blocks me.
Pix 515
Web site says that it comes with 16mb but 6.0 requires 32mb
I really appreciate all the help.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Generates a lot of Helpdesk calls from users that report that they have an
attachment in a Email that has reference to Viruses (they never read the
email properly).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original
Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am
beginning to think this is a proxy problem.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Router??? I
That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX.
Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly...
D
Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can
survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From:
I will have to call cisco as per starting logs. I am not that secure
enough about the proper way of turning the loggin up.
As for proxy I am attempting that now.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:37 AM
To: Exchange
I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends
an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an
infected message. Only the recipient receives a message.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
That could also be another limitation of the AVAPI, but I cant remember
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and
OK, let us know what you find.
D
DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I will have to call cisco
OK, I guess one man's meat is another man's poison. I actually like that
they get scared and call in. I MUCH prefer that scenario to the scenario at
ADS whereby the CEO and VP of IT repeatedly launch virii such as love letter
and melissa because they stubbornly refuse to purchase any antivirus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a Pix 515 that I run 6.1 on.. I thought they only shipper
with 32mb as a minimum.. You should be able to download IOS versions
with a valid cco, regardless of what PIX model you have..
~John
- -Original Message-
From:
::Context Alert::
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stripping attachments
OK, I guess one man's meat is another man's poison. I actually like that
they get scared and call
Ronald, the 16MB you see is for the flash memory, not the RAM. I just
looked on their site. You should have at least 32MB of RAM in there.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/fw.htm
D
Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis
-Original Message-
From:
I like to look at it this way, the lesser of two evils.
On the one hand it is more work for me to have to pull items from quarantine.
On the other hand, it is even MORE work for me to rid the entire network of a
virus.
Far better for the users to get a message letting them know something came
When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log
2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET
/scripts/proxy/w3proxy.dll 038b0008,+http://tahoe/exchange/USA/ 200
Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+6.0;+Windows+NT+5.1;+Q312461)
tahoe is the internal exchange server.
I never quarantine. If it breaks the rules, it is deleted. I'm not screwing
around with that crap. The users know what is not allowed.
As for notifications, I want my users to see them. I want them to know who
is sending infected files so they can be wary of them.
-Original Message-
I have a user who was recently migrated to Win2K about 4 months ago.
She's pretty sure she's been using Outlook2K all along. She has a 133MB
.pst file. But, when you open the file, all the folders she archived are
empty. I ran scanpst on it. The scan found no errors, 50 folders and
only 3
Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the
logs when you try to pass authentication?
D
A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human
history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch
Ratcliffe, Technology Review
You should run scanpst about 3 times. Then delete the PST and tell the user
PST=BAD
-Original Message-
From: Farquharson, Andrea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Archive process
I have a user who was recently
Logging is fairly straight forward. Telnet to device and add the following
lines
logging on
logging timestamp
logging trap errors
logging history errors
logging facility 7
logging host inside (internal_ip)
Your logging host inside needs to be running compliant software.
Complaint defined
A. It's a PST file, things can be just because.
B. A single item which is 132.9MB would explain a PST file which was 133MB
with only 5 items.
C. Simply restore the PST file from the last known good backup.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't
Perzactly. However, one must be careful as Level 7 is the highest level
and generates the most traffic, so one must ensure to decrease logging when
done researching.
On another note, a good security admin has logging turned on already to
watch the inbound/outbound traffic in an effort to
That's all I see in the log for that access point. Although I just set
up another internal web site to try redirection with and I get the same
problem so I would guess that the proxy or pix are the prob not the
exchange server.
Yes that ip is a dialup client
-Original Message-
From:
Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the
logs when
Yes it is set to the server name
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Exactamente!! How do you think I know that the CEO and the VP of IT at ADS
are lusers?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stripping attachments
I never quarantine. If it
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in
case someone ran into it as well.
I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into
the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot
delete due to a sharing violation
I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I get the
m
Box of Checks...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box.
I think I've got it! What there should be an address translation from the
172.16.1.1 (private address) to a Public address. You're trying to route
a non-routable address to the outside. I don't know about proxy, but the
PIX is telling you to fsck off.
That 172 address HAS to be routed to a
IMHO, It is better not to have an attachment but a message in the original
email telling them that there was a virus in an attachment, rather then let
them open unexpected named attachment in the Email (we ask users never to
open unexpected or named attachments they don't expect).
Cheers
Paul
Ronald,
Can you login to OWA from your internal network ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes it is set to the server name
-Original
Yes, he can.
I think his translation from pub address to priv and back to pub is screwed
somewhere along the lines.
D
A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18,
I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip
208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I think I've got it!
Yes internal works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Ronald,
Can you login to OWA from your internal network ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From:
Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work.
Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically
defined Pub address that points to your priv address.
D
I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan
Hale
-Original Message-
From:
I'm not sure why your using host headers but you need to do one of two
things:
1. First, make sure that your IP address is set to all unassigned
2. Next, remove the host headersor
3. or add the host header matching your outside alias (dns).
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Guys,
I don't think this is a routing problem. I can access the default web page
on tahoe.sss-cpa.com w/o any problem. This IS an authentication issue.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December
Oh.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Guys,
I don't think this is a routing problem. I can access the default web page
on tahoe.sss-cpa.com w/o any problem. This
Sh xlate returns
Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work.
Do a sh
Yes my bad sorry. I do and I just received ios 6.0. maybe ill do that
tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ronald, the 16MB you see is for the flash memory, not
Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there anything
else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX are
dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get
locked out with the bad login attempts?
D
May you have the foresight to
No prob, just remember to pay attention to details. We like details,
especially finite details. ;o)
D
In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. -Desiderius Erasmus
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:41
No lockout
That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests
go to it first.
That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection.
Im setting up the pix syslog serve now.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
One thing you might try is to take the proxy server out of the picture.
Direct OWA straight to the PIX and see if that works. That will limit one
point of failure. You can't take the PIX out of the picture, but if your
problem still exists after taking proxy out of the middle, then you can
I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy
then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then
directly forwarding the port 80 packets to your internal owa server. I only
say this because your behind the PIX firewall. I could understand
Also... When you upgrade to 6.0 make sure you add the following lines:
ip audit info action alarm
ip audit attack action alarm
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server community public
no snmp-server enable traps
floodguard enable
Thx.
Murphy
-Original Message-
From:
I am trying to connect to our Exchange Server 2000 in order to publish a
public calendar on our website. I tried code similiar to the following
example, but got an error stating: ADODB.Connection (0x800A0E7A)
Provider cannot be found. It may not be properly installed. Do I need
the Exchange
Having an issue in that when a user sends an email with attachments he
receives no NDR in response. If he sends it as himself - he gets the
NDR. The NDR is not generated to him or the account he is sending as.
Searched MSKB and returned nothing related to this issue. W2k SP2
Ex2000 SP1. Any
PST can have 133MB file size even there's nothing in it. She probably
had something in that PST with 133MB, but then deleted everything in her
PST. Until you compact the PST, you will not find out the true size of
that PST.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I
can use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out
along with the other statement. Your last statement was correct BUT
there is no tcp or www in my static statement.
-Original Message-
From:
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE
http://www.cdolive.com/anonymousposting.htm
I used this method. You may be able to configure and then send a poll
created and sent as the Anonymous mailbox. When it returns to the
Anonymous mailbox the headers will be stripped and fowarded to a public
folder for public view. I did not try this
Is the account he's sending as a public folder by chance?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Exchange
The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement... 1 IP
address??? Might I ask why?
D
Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a
warning to others.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
I have a E2K box w/ clients running Outlook 2K 98. When I grant a user
send on behalf of rights to an mailbox, that user can see the entire Inbox.
Is that how it is supposed to work.?Second everyone has rights to see
everyones entire calendar. Not just the free busy data. Where are these
Try logging out and back in and then deleting.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
This is going to be a little off topic, but
Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in 6.0
IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use 1
IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For example:
Using one IP you can setup several different redirects
static
Had to install kiwi enterprise syslog. Did everythin stated but no info
is logged to the syslog server
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Logging is fairly
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
