intersting.
i have configured many a Site within an Org, but domain security boundaries
existed between; configuring inter-Site permissions is an obvious and
necessary step.
in my lab, i set up two Sites (within an Org) within a common domain. my
expectations were contray to that which i
Tried it .. didn't work out and I'm never going to do it again. Is that what
you were looking for?
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
From:
Can't get any better than that. Except for, you'd rather stick a sharp
object in your eye than do that again.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 as a file server
:P
For now my opinion is that files should belong on a file server and not let
the E2k server be your file server.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
--
- Original Message -
Finally got my test lab back. If you edit the anonymous access account
under the directory security tab of the virtual folder in IIS admin by
changing the user to an Exchange Admin it will not fail at the impersonation
command in WMI. I am sure that giving this user less permissions will work,
Hello
Is there someone out there that can give any suggestions on the following:
I have an exchange-environment containing several sites. A mailbox deleted
somewhat a year ago still exists in the GAL of some other sites.
I have to get it out, because the person, still working for us is
Exchange 5.5, Outlook 2000.
I suspect this discussion is going to head deep into There are seldom
technological solutions... country. Please bear with me.
A number of our users are moaning about OoO only sending out one response
per OoO setting. It seems that they send a message to a user near
Hi Jean-Francois
Why don't take a look at Sharepoint Portal Server as solution to this
requirement??
Regards
Peter Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 January 2002 04:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 as a file
Tell them to migrate to sendmail. The vacation program resets weekly.
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 0ut 0f 0ffice
Exchange 5.5, Outlook 2000.
I suspect this discussion is
Jean-Francois,
We tried it here as well and were very disappointed with the results. It
would have been really good to have a single file-store accessible with
a variety of clients, but alas IFS just doesn't work very well. A real
shame.
Mike Scott
EPS Ltd
-Original Message-
From:
Thank you Ed, I understand.
But, please, give me an idea...:
1. install another software for this or...
2. leave this problem...change server or else...
Cezar Haraga
Network Admin
--- Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is not a standard feature of Exchange Server.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I
Does anyone actually know what this is doing. I cannot find anything in
TechNet to find out what this actual is. I have checked Microsoft MSDN and
no joy there either. One of my users is trying to synchronise and it just
says Synchronizing Hierarchy and after 30 mins the line drops and he has to
If CDO live (http://www.cdolive.com) does not have a code sample to do this,
I believe Herr Weber could be contracted to write such a solution in short
order.
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 1/18/2002 4:15 AM
Subject: 0ut 0f 0ffice
Exchange 5.5,
I was thinking along the same lines. Something like the system is gathering
the information about which folders it needs to check to synchronize. Inbox
Calendar etc
Thanks
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:35 PM
-Original Message-
From: Cezar Haraga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 January 2002 11:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 through MS Exchange 5.5 Server
Thank you Ed, I understand.
But, please, give me an idea...:
1. install another software for this or...
2.
No dick it wasnt me
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
You're an idea guy, aren't you, Richard?
I think I've met you before. You go to MCP classes and sit
I find that using Sendmail's MILTER is best.
g.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: Anti Spam
How antispam do you want to be??
One could run one of the BSD
Hi all
No need to reply on this, it's solved.
regards,
Mahesh Bharatsingh
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Replication problem?
Hello
Is there someone out there that
Hi Mahesh
How did you fix it?? I'm in a similar position.
Thanks
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 January 2002 15:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem?
Hi all
No need to reply on this, it's solved.
Hi Peter
Microsoft has a article about this: Q152614.
It's quite easy
Regards,
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem?
Hi Mahesh
How did you fix
I know you're right.
But my customer already have an exchange 2000 server, and from what I know I
think it should work also with exchange 2000.
Probably not as flexible as MS SharePoint Portal server but...
JF
- Original Message -
From: Peter Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Thanks to all for your answer
JF
- Original Message -
From: Mike Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:08 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder,
http://server/public/files)
Jean-Francois,
We
Boy, do you have a whiny bunchTell them to email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Honestly, I'm sure there is somebody that can do it if there is enough money
involved. You need to ask management what they would be willing to pay for
this feature. Start at a mid 5 digit number.
-Original Message-
I don't do this off-list. You have something to say to me, you can say it
in front of the other thousands of people here.
Had you really read the FAQ you should have cited your resource. Had you
really read the FAQ you would already know what is required to get an answer
to your question. You
Hello,
I am wondering if someone can contact me off the list who is running Exchange 2000 SP2
and try sending an email to a particular Exchange 5.5 box in Luxembourg. I can
successfully communicate with this box with a hotmail account and through a manual
telnet session, but fails with Exch2k.
I guess I could be wrong, but I thought Ed was short for Edgar and Dick was
short for Richard. If that's not the case, then people have been calling my
dad by the wrong name for years!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 1/18/2002 7:31 AM
Subject: RE:
Thanks
That is what I was afraid the answer was going to be.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 17, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Orphan Site probem - need HELP!!!
If I were in your shoes, I'd call PSS.
Ed Crowley
How are all the sites connected?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mahesh
Bharatsingh
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:00 AM
To:
m
on-list rebuttals...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: changing Outlook client mail profile
I don't do this off-list. You have something to say to me, you can say it
in
Poor Richard. Can't even get a flame right!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
I guess I could be wrong, but I thought Ed was short for Edgar and Dick was
No. Poor Richard was much smarter.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
Poor Richard. Can't even get a flame right!
-Original Message-
From: Chris
Mmmm flaming Richard
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
Poor Richard. Can't even get a flame right!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Thank you very much for the reply. It's solved. Microsoft had a article
about the problem: Q152614
Cheers,
Mahesh
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Replication problem?
How are
wooo h
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
Mmmm flaming Richard
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Looks like teacher has left the room for a second...
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 January 2002 14:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I am having a problem with public folder permissions. Here is the
scenario:
We have several conference room calendars setup as public folders. They
use a custom form to schedule appts. There is one person in another
building who schedules the meetings for that building. Yesterday she
had no
Here's one that works very well for us:
((|((objectCategory=user)(memberof=cn=supreme court,ou=supreme
court,dc=courts,dc=state,dc=tx,dc=us))((objectCategory=group)(memberof=cn=supreme
court,ou=supreme court,dc=courts,dc=state,dc=tx,dc=us
...and you thought building LDAP queries for
Is there any way to easily convert OL 2000 forms so they can be viewed in
OWA 2000 ?
Any product converting forms into HTLM (ASP whatever) so they can be viewed
in owa of exchange 2000 ?
JF
_
List posting FAQ:
Boy, do you have a whiny bunchTell them to email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes I think my sections name has been changed to Moon on a Stick
Inc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
We just attempted this because we have Mac users. (Macs can't use
custom forms except through OWA). Brought in a consultant who knew what
he was doing4 weeks later he still can't make the OWA forms work.
There's no converter like there was with 5.5. I know it's possible to
make the forms
Our university is forcing us to switch to Lotus Notes that's maintained by
the Central IT Department. Anyone has any experience with this type of
migration? We are not happy about it but have no choice :-( I would like
to get any feedback on things that we need to look out for. We have about
Correct me if I am wrong here Ed. He is saying you don't configure your
Exchange server to pull POP mail. It's not a good idea, and doesn't work
without 3rd party software, and even then, doesn't always work correctly.
If you really need to read mail from an outside ISP, then configure your
-Original Message-
From: Cezar Haraga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 through MS Exchange 5.5 Server
Thank you Ed, I understand.
But, please, give me an idea...:
1. install another software for this
What is the real cost of planned downtime? Does it
really cost your company anything at all? (Some have
suggested that productivity might actually increase
when e-mail is down!) Does reducing planned downtime
really justify the added cost, a very significant
cost, of clustering, especially
Lori,
I am not understanding what you are saying I am sorry.
I have not been able to get a successful PST. Also where do I find scanpst?
Thanks and I am so sorry I am so slow.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:47 AM
To:
Oh!! Sorry. Gotcha. I got a PST created, but now I can't do anything with
it. I have not yet tried Mr. Scharff's suggestion about using a client
other than Outlook. Might try that then, install Exchange client 4.0 or 5.0
and have a look that way. I did the /clean every friggin thing, and
The SMTP address in the NDR example is an invalid SMTP address.
--
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com
The Home Page for Mail Administrators.
Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders):
http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm
Exchange FAQs:
Access the mailbox using the Exchange 5.0 client? Tried running /cleanviews
and or /cleanfreebusy?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
I am running Exchange 2000 SP1 using Outlook 2000 and 2002 clients.
When I open the GAL and look under the properties of a user I see all
their phone, organization, etc info.
If I go to Phone/Notes there is filed for Business 2.
Where in the world do I enter that info? I can't find it anywhere
Try running scanpst on the pst file you exported multiple times. I just had
this happen, and scanpst didn't fix it, but your mileage may vary if you are
lucky.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:42 AM
To: Exchange
I should have caught that myself. Thanks again!
Saul
The SMTP address in the NDR example is an invalid SMTP address.
--
Chris Scharff
The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com
The Home Page for Mail Administrators.
Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders):
Yesterday I helped out some folks who keep blowing a circuit with their
microwave oven. I told them they would have to get rid of one of the two to
keep this from happening as there isn't enough power for 2 plus all their
other gadgets. I was told that wasn't an acceptable answer. Which in reply
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject:
Sent: 1/17/2002 2:33 PM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/17/2002 9:52 PM
Your mail system could not find a way to successfully
communicate with
I can't say enough good things about trend. Bad thing is it is $$$, but
other than that (because it isn't my money), turn it on, configure it and
watch it do it's thing.
-Original Message-
From: John Shi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:02 AM
To:
Don't I remember you saying you moved to Norton a while back? If you own the
corporate suite, go get disk 2 and install the one you already own. NAV for Internet
Email gateways can block by attachment name, type, and subject line in addition to
performing antivirus tasks.
I can't tell
Agreed. I am speaking for the few companies that have money to spend,
and say, Yes, I am willing to pay for that. It's worth it to me to get
the reduced (planned) downtime.
Per Farny
Senior Network Architect
Goliath Networks Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Hi Everyone,
Has anyone know a good product that would block the virus and Active X,
Java Applet on the gateway? Any life experience is appreciated. I heard
about TrendMicro only.
Thanks
John Shi
_
List posting FAQ:
Hi All,
I'm moving all the email forward our company has hosted at Mindspring Business to
exchange so that we can fully manage our own mail. I'm trying to decide how to do the
following:
I want to have mail from user [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but when it arrives I want
Rules Wizard. Redirect the mail.
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forward's for ex-employees problem
Hi All,
I'm moving all the email forward our company has hosted at
Rules wizard in Exchange or in Outlook?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem
Rules Wizard. Redirect the mail.
-Original Message-
From:
There is a rules wizard in Exchange??
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem
Rules wizard in Exchange or in Outlook?
-Original
Or setup hidden mailboxes for each ex-employee, and make the boss the alternate
recipient in each.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem
Outlook 2000 and above IIRC correctly. Before that you had to remove the
Wizard and use the old Inbox Rules feature in order to redirect the mail in
that manner.
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange
Or one hidden mailbox with all of those email addresses! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees problem
Or setup hidden mailboxes for each
Unfortunately I'm in a situation where asking the fearless leader to perform tasks
such as rules is really out of the question. This needs to happen in the background
without him ever knowing how it happens. Perhaps I need to make a contact and have
that forward to him.
Hmm.. this is the
The one problem with that would be that they'll all look like they're from that user.
I need them to appear to be for the original recipient.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I'm so happy to hear I'm not the only one that didn't know that until
recently!
I mentioned it to PSS during a call and the support person said yep, it's
that way by design. In thinking about it, there are some advantages, but
here I was making changes to the Org permissions, thinking they were
Does any one have any experience in shutting down Exchange 5.5
and converting a mixed site to pure, native Exchange 2000 ?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
I have an Exchange 5.5 site to which I joined an Exchange 2000 server.
The mailboxes have been moved and clients all hooked up to the E2K.
The Public folders are all based off of the new server, and no
replication between the 5.5 and 2K servers is taking place.
The Exchange 5.5 server is
I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange
server by adding keys tot he registry. I cannot remember the exact keys
and syntax needed to do this. If any of you Exchange Gurus out there may
know what I am talking about, I would really appreciate the memory
refresh.
What do you mean by virus file extensions? Are you attempting to setup
attachment blocking by extension?
-Original Message-
From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering virus file extensions.
I know
Well said Daniel. The only thing you didn't mention (maybe it didn't happen
to you) is that when you want to stop/start a service for a good reason, the
cluster admin sometimes finds that as a reason to failover the whole darn
server.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel
Pro: You'll have lots of opportunities to tell your supervisor what an eejit
they truly are.
Con: Everything else about clustering.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering
There is?
-Original Message-
From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering virus file extensions.
I know there is a way to filter virus file extensions on an exchange
server by adding keys tot he
I have an Exchange 5.5 site that I added Exchange 2000 to.
I have migrated mailboxes, Public folders and totally hooked up clients
onto the E2K.
I want to dis-entangle E55 from the site and convert to native mode
for E2K.
My plan: Un-install E55 and remove the computer from the domain and
Good morning,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4
We have a resource called OHR10. When trying to access the calendar for
this resource via Outlook the workstation clocks. We have to do a CTRL ALT
DEL to get out of this loop.
We can access this calendar from OWA without a problem.
We have tried to
I really need some feedback about some anti-spam products/services. What I
am looking for is if anyone is using MessageLabs and what they think about
them. They claim to have 750,000 addresses that they are cleaning
viruses/spam/porn for, so there's got to be someone on the list that is
using
If I throw a stick, will you go away?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
No dick it wasnt me
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
No. There isn't. Exchange does not do any attachment blocking. It is not
a feature of the product. Antivirus software, on the other hand, most
likely will.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: adam voorhies [mailto:[EMAIL
Not exactly - there is a way to have Outlook block the user from opening
certain attachments and that can be configured with registry entries and/or
a special public folder in Exchange. If that's the kind of thing you're
looking for, see:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup.htm
Aloha,
Make it so Number 1.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: clustering wireless
If I throw a stick, will you go away?
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
Interesting debate on clustering Exchange. We just put in an Exchange
cluster (5.5, sp4, Win2K servers) and I'm slowing getting my feet wet with
the whole thing. In was working from home today, reading the debate, when my
colleague calls me and says our system just failed over (down time aprox. 1
No, actually that's a very clever solution. The messages will continue to
appear to be TO: the original recipient but by setting the Boss as an
alternate recipient he will get the messages in his Inbox. Try it - you'll
like it.
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of
Just open his mailbox and do it for him
Joshua Morgan
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward's for ex-employees
I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later this year. I have already
purchased the Sybex Study Guide (ISBN 078212898X). If it is as good as the
Exchange 5.5 Study Guide was, then that may be all I really need. However,
I wondered if anyone might point me toward anything else they found
I recall a former tech lead removing all attachments on an Exchange server
because he put a wrong value in the registry (he just want to remove the I
love you attachments). I had to restore that server, which is why I
remember.
I don't remember where exactly this was set, but if I come across it
Agreed, especially when it's cold outside. But why should I truss you? Into
kink, are we?
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange
Do not work on servers
The MSPress book isn't bad.
Bill English and Linda Vittori.
William
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 70-224 Study Materials
I intend to certify on Exchange 2000 later
Did that block future messages with attachments or did that just kill the
attachments already in the store? (or both)
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
Thanks Tom,
I should try my NAV. I think I have a copy of Norton. Thanks for reminding
me.
John Shi
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Gateway Virus Protection.
Don't I remember
I have the current situation:
two domains, one org. exchange 5.5 sp4. Multiple sites, some connected via
IMS Connected Site with directory replication connection over vpn. At
present the vpn only allows smtp traffic. Each side can control only their
own mailboxes (which is fine).
One
Yes. Inquiring Minds want to know!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
Did that block future messages with attachments or did that just kill the
Yes, that would be relevant wouldn't it? I would need to find the solution
and test it to answer that question. It's probably something that an
exchange developer just whipped up to help out with the Melissa virus.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
While you are at it, can you whip me up a sandwich and chips as well?
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
Yes, that would be relevant wouldn't
No, but I can whip you up.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
While you are at it, can you whip me up a sandwich and chips as well?
Hi All,
Thanks for your help so far. In trying to create a test model of what I'm trying to
do, here's what needs to happen.
First note that the boss actually doesn't have an exchange mailbox, Exchange forwards
his mail to an external pop account.
So this is what needs to happen:
[EMAIL
I recommend the Mastering Exchange 2000 Administration
by Barry Gerber.
He covers it all, and has some good insights.
I does spend quite of bit of time with installing Windows 2K
and DNS [you have to get it right]; if you haven't done that,
try it at home first.
Andy and Ben already gave you a solution. Did you try it?
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A better description of my forward issues
Hi All,
Thanks for your help so
I'm a bit confused -- why doesn't the boss have an Exchange mailbox? Who
DOES have an Exchange mailbox?
What about creating a Custom Recipient (is this Exchange 5.5?) for the
Boss's outside POP account and setting that Custom Recipient to be an
Alternate Recipient for the hidden-former-employee
Mm, whipping up :)
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering virus file extensions.
No,
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
