Hi All.
I have problems receaving SMTP mail to my Exchange2000 SP2.
I can send internaly and to other internet users. But not recieve.
I did a track on the inbound messages, and this is what I'm getting:
time SMTP: Message submitting to Advanced Queueing
time SMTP: Startes Message Submission to
Thanks guyssorted the problem...it was the hosts file! Added the
relevant IP it's ok now.
PS Not my idea to change the card...I just get asked to solve problems when
others create them!!
Stephanie.
UoG.
UK.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20
Non-delivery reports (NDRs) are system messages that report the delivery status of a
message to the sender. The messages are a subclass of a general message information
structure referred to as delivery status notifications. Delivery status notifications
describe three different types of
This is the no. generated in NDR:
snta001w.snekkernnta.no #5.0.0
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Irfan Malik
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 11:13
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Advanced Queue Failed to
Non-delivery reports
Hmm..
1 Exchange person (me and you've seen my postings in this list...still
learning!)
3 admins
2 seperate sites and almost 20,000 (yes 20 thousand!) users.
plus all other other support work I do..
Stephanie.
UoG.
UK.
-Original Message-
From: Harald van Bebber [mailto:[EMAIL
* Numerical Code: 5.0.0
First Available: All numerical codes that were first available with Exchange 2000
Service Pack 1 (4.3.2, 5.4.0, 5.4.4, 5.5.0) were initially all classified as 5.0.0
prior to Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1.
Possible Cause:
* There is no route for the given address space,
You'd learn a lot quicker if you read this list more frequently than every 3
monthsthat thread was from last November!
:-)
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
Troubleshooting: Correct or add an address space of type SMTP with asterisk (*) value
to one or more SMTP connectors; verify that DNS is working; make sure that routing
groups have connectors connecting them. Also, if not on Exchange 2000 Service Pack 1,
apply Service Pack 1 to narrow the
Not really, as AppManager doesn't do Event Viewer consolidation
Amit Zinman
MCSE,
Project Manager
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Well,
we do not have an SMTP connector.
We also do not have any routing group.
(maybe we should)
That leavs out:
* DNS returned an authoritative host that was not found for the domain.
* An SMTP Protocol error occurred
We are running an standalone Exchange Installatin. win2kSP2 and E2kSP2
The
Is any MX record pointing to your mail server?
-Original Message-
From: Ronny Pedersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Advanced Queue Failed to
Well,
we do not have an SMTP connector.
We
Yes !
We have an MX-record pointing in to my server.
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Irfan Malik
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 11:31
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Advanced Queue Failed to
Is any MX record pointing to your
And it was working before.
SYMPTOMS
Inbound messages to an Exchange 2000 Server domain may not be delivered. The sender
may also receive one of the following non-delivery reports (NDRs):
* Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Test Message
Sent:
This is one for the books it was never Scanmail. Apparently OfficeScan by Trendmicro
is the product that effects browsing.
Anyway, the real problem solution:
I am using a tool, namely Scriptlogic, for various things. One such task was to
automatically fill the comment or srvcomment
YES !!!
Thanks a lot. That did the trick.
Knowledge is power. And You people got it.
Regards,
Ronny
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne av Irfan Malik
Sendt: 21. februar 2002 12:03
Til: Exchange Discussions
Emne: RE: Advanced
Sorry, I was going to do that after I skimmed the 9,770 hits that google
returned.
But seriously, the Microsoft site does not play well with non-MS browsers, so I
tend to look there last.
AW
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, you wrote:
Doesn't anyone know how to do research anymore? Putting in icalendar at
I have 5.5 SP4 on NT server and E2K SP2 on another server. All mailboxes
and PFs are homed on the latter. The last thing I have to do before
decommissioning the 5.5 server is to route Internet mail via E2K. At the
moment I have everything going out through E2K but everything coming in to
5.5.
This is a known feature of E2k. The only workarounds I know of are
3rd party, such as PostToNote here:
http://victori.hypermart.net/
Maybe Siegfried will chip in here with an alternative offering...
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For
They want the mailboxes moved to different storage databases on a cluster
server based on certain attributes.
There are 10 of 1000s of mailboxes.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20,
Its probably Tumbleweed MMS.
www.tumbleweed.com
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MMS Notification
What the heck is an MMS Notification, and why am I getting one for
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned using an Alternate Recipient and
creating a Custom Recipient. Setting this up should keep the sender intact
- the mail is redirected to the custom recipient, which would be the e-mail
addy of the POP account. Anything rules to do with forwarding are
Write [EMAIL PROTECTED] and tell them about the problem. They know it
exists, but say it's by design. Maybe if enough people complain...
In the meantime, check www.cdolive.com for a possible solution.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: David Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6a
Having read something similar in another thread, I must ask...
Mail sent to mailing list (currently using ReddfishListServer) is sent to
all recipients specified for that list including PF Solaris server running
Mailman for web archives. This works pretty well --
It's a standard for exchanging calendar items across dissimilar systems.
Exchange/Outlook uses one form by default, but the *nix world seems to be
running with the Anything-but-Microsoft iCalendar. Outlook2000 and later
(definitely in XP) will send in iCal format.
If you have OutlookXP, open a
How about you create a DL that has all of your users in it and
A. Give Read Only rights to that DL and deny posts
OR
B. Create a Folder Assistant rule that deletes all incoming mail from those
people and responds with a template you've gotta send mail to the list not
here
OR
C. Create a
You can filter the users by using the find command and then move them.
See my article on http://www.msexchange.org for details.
Amit
-Original Message-
From: ToddMicro, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How
Is there any way to tweak the amount of time (or number of retries)a Routing
Group Connector is willing to go through before giving up on a message and
generating an NDR? The general SMTP settings do not seem to apply.
/Gordon
How does that forward the mail already in the mailbox?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz
Export to pst and send it to them. Then they can import into the final
destination.
Tom Mezyk
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forward mail already in mailbox?
Duh - I
I read the article, but on my setup, you can see the Exchange 5.5 accounts
showing in the AD, but Mailbox Store is blank because it is an Exchange 5.5.
account.
If you select, Exchange Tasks on these accounts, Move Mailbox is not an
option.
I read somewhere that this is because the Active
Doh!
Hmm..what can I say! I try to keep ontop of things...better late than
never!
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 February 2002 10:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Survey; Support vs No. or users/servers
You'd learn a lot
Did you set up the Connection Agreement (CA) on ADC for both ways? Or
just one way only?
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: ToddMicro, Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:44 AM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: How to
Recently we have been experiencing stability issues with one of our
Active/Active clusters once it was updated to SP2. The store appears to
hang and ultimately the server has to be powered down to resolve the
user mode hang.
Reviewing the times of the crashes it appears to happen frequently
This may be a stupid question, but here goes anyways.
Anytime anyone saves anything to a public folder the document becomes read
only. And the people that are doing this are either owners, or publishing
editors and have the proper permissions. Am I missing something?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Winnt
How much does each cost you? What is the additional cost of the reduced
function?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It told me I had to set it up one way only because the Exchange 5.5 server
was not in the same organization.
However, the Exchange 2000 server and the Exchange 5.5. server are both
listed in the same site and organization under the Exchange 5.5.
administrator program.
The Exchange 2000 server
I found that the Q article is for Exchange 5.5. Will this also work for
Exchange 2000?
Thanks
Saul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:35 PM
Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups
Conversation: Retention period in Public
Maybe you did something wrong in the process.
You should review your ADC setup. If all else fails you can use the Exchange Migration
Wizard.
Amit Zinman
MCSE,
Project Manager
Professional Services Group
Getronics (Israel)
Tel: +972-3-5127306
Mobile: +972-53-570139
Email: [EMAIL
You're saying that Word says Read Only in the title bar when you open
the document? That's not a problem with Exchange, but with Office. In
fact, Exchange 5.5 doesn't support object permissions, just folder
permissions. Do you have that damnable Outlook security patch
installed?
Ed Crowley
The Q article is for Outlook. Yes, it should work.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange
Newsgroups
Did you install ADC before running /ForestPrep and then when running
/ForestPrep specify that your Exchange 2000 server would be in the
existing Exchange 5.5 organization? If not, you aren't in the same
organization and as far as I know you can't use Move Mailbox without
some drastic surgery to
I'd put the FE server with the BE server. Connections for mail will, in the
end, be across the WAN either way...
- Original Message -
From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Design Question
Good
Can anyone tell me if the InterOrg Synchronization Tool works in conjunction
with an Exchange 5.5/NT 4.0 Cluster? I am currently doing some planning
testing toward synchronizing with another Exchange organization who are
running a cluster. I don't have any cluster-capable hardware abailable
Thanks Missy. I wasn't sure if connections to the backend server would be
aggregated, making it more efficient or not.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys!
-Original
I continue to get this message, see Subject line. I am lost at this point. I
have checked the performance on the server, Processor, memory, network
communications.
Even checked Queues. Everything looks good. Including no error inthe Event
log at all.
But users continue to get the popup message
I think I found what might be wrong. I checked the differences between a
working public folder and a non working one using ADSI Edit. It seems the
working one has the HomeMDB set and the others didn't. With Microsoft's
help I am rebuilding my RUS and let's hope this takes care of it..
Thanks
Just turn it off in Outlook. The your users can whine because OL isn't
responding.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: Fw: Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange
I don't no.
Most of the users having problems with this are using Microsoft Office 95
and Outlook 98without the security patch.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public
Office 95?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
I don't no.
Most of the users having problems with this are using Microsoft
Yes...
Windows 95 workstations, Office 95 and some people still use the Exchange
client that came from Exchange 4.0, but mostly Outlook 98 for mail.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Well, if I didnt know any better, it sounds as if you work for a bank! ;)
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
Yes...
Windows
How about the tangible fixed costs like:
OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
Bandwidth of Outlook versus OWA
Hardware requirements of Outlook versus OWA (scalability)
VPN costs for Outlook
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002
I agree with Missy. While E2K's front-end server arrangement requires
you to open fewer ports than with Exchange's 5.5 equivalent, you still
have to open more than if you just allowed HTTP SSL across the WAN.
I still think a VPN is a superior alternative.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
I am experiencing the exact opposite problem, internal users can send mail
to public folders and external can't. Any ideas?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
LOL!! Oy!!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes read only.
Well, if I didnt know any better, it sounds as if you work for a bank! ;)
I am having troubles send mail from external sources into public folders.
I have set thepermissions for anonymous user to contributer as per Q300221
but the mail still stalls in our inbound gateway Q. Any ideas.
_
List posting
I can't reproduce it here, but this bank at least bought us Office97. How
are they saving it there?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes
Considering that the Outlook Rules Wizard is merely a shadow of what
procmail can do, I suggest setting up a separate sub-domain with its own MX
and routing mail there on a per user basis. That system can continue to use
Sendmail.
Dunno your environment/infrastructure though so it may not work
Try
Default: contributor
Anonymous: none
Worked for me.
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: send mail from external sources into public folders
How long did
Yep, I think you're right. But if you have your IMS on another server, you
still might have to wait for the address to update in the directory on that
box.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
H.
Well I've got a few Office 2k and some XP installs as well. I've got office
2k on my machine and the same exact thing happens. So it doesn't seem to
matter what version of Office or Email client we have.
BTW, All the folders I've tried this on the user, or users have had either
owner
I'm not a good person to test because I have domain admin rights, so that
could be why I can't repro it here. What domain rights do you have? What
rights do you have on the Exchange server?
-Original Message-
From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21,
I've got domain admin rights myself. And admin rights on the exchange
server as well. But testing it with other users, still comes up read only.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Ahh ok, got ya.
I'm going to go play around with a few users Outlook clients and see what
happens.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder problem - Everything goes
You said it happens every time. Does it even happen with a simple post, or
only when you've got a Word document, Excel file, or some other attachment
saved to the folder?
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:30 PM
To:
It is just when it is a document. Office documents are the only things we
use in public folders, and they are the only cuplrits.
-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public
This is going to sound like a silly question, but bear with me... Is the
attachment saved directly to the public folder, or do you have to open a
post before you can open the document?
If the latter, what happens if you drag the document from the post and drop
it in the folder? Can your users
More comments inline
...snip...
How about the tangible fixed costs like:
OWA CAL versus Outlook CAL
-- Same cost.
Right, its just the cost of Outlook, which includes a CAL so something like
$60 Outlook versus $20 OWA, dependent on order quantities and licensing
programs?
Bandwidth of
Bandwidth of Outlook versus OWA
-- How much does bandwidth cost?
Depends, I guess we need to know the avg utilization of Outlook in kpbs
versus OWA in kpbs. I suppose this will also be dependent on Outlook 97
versus 2000 versus XP.
Serdar says:
We have done a network utilization comparison
Yeah, install MercuryMail on their workstations.
Have you reminded them that Sendmail is merely a shadow of what Exchange
can do? I mean, shoot, I can't go off-roading in my Ferrari like I did
in my Jeep Wrangler. Can you jack up my Ferrari and put big knobby
wheels on it?
-Original
As I understand it, but you can confirm this with Microsoft, is that a
license for Outlook is included with an Exchange 2000 CAL. An Exchange
2000 CAL is the same price regardless of which client you use, OWA
included.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
So it is made that way by design? There is no way to work around this?
Lou
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Time-out
They won't.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
I am having some trouble with this so I thought I would throw this out to
everyone. Here is my situation:
Exchange 5.5 SP4 with dedicated OWA servers. About a year ago we had the
issue described in Q238444 (Password is going to expire in 0 days). We
decided at the time to change the entry
What version of IIS are you using?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA change password option
I am having some trouble with this so I thought I would throw this out to
everyone.
Do you by chance have a local account on the OWA server, as referenced in
Q190433?
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA change password option
What version of IIS
None that I know of without an add-on. I think I read something about
an add-on to do it but I don't recall the details.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
ISA may provide something. There is nothing in IIS that I know of since E2K
does not use sessions. Also, Check out SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 by
Messageware:
www.messageware.com
- Original Message -
From: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthew Seon [EMAIL PROTECTED];
You can have your mailboxes on one server,and spec it for high
availability (ie redundant power, redundant Nic's, etc)but you may only
achieve around 99% availabiltiy, unless you look at clustering.
Without picking a brand of server you will probably need a quad processor
server, with 1.5Gb
I had a user ask me if I control how their email sent to another company
was displayed. They want their Display name to show up in the from field
not [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone educate me on how this resolution
occurs.
Thanks
_
ISA may provide something. There is nothing in IIS that I know of since E2K
does not use sessions. Also, Check out SecureLogoff for OWA 2000 by
Messageware:
www.messageware.com
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: OWA Time-out
I have been searching for info on timing out OWA
I'm officially punishing myself. I found the answer (Q257891) at
Microsoft PSS.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Liona
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA problem in 1of my 2 domains
I've got a 2 domain (separate tree) forest with an
I don't have a 5.5 server handy, but this is a setting in the IMS. It's
pretty obvious when you see it.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: Display Names
I had a user ask me if
We are using IIS 4.0 and no there are no local accounts.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
What are you talking about?
Please be sure to include the message you are replying too as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA change password option
We are using IIS 4.0 and
84 matches
Mail list logo
