RE: mail stuck in a strange way

This is not a good answer, but you really should consider Outlook2000. William -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mail stuck in a strange way Brothers and sisters, 2 notebook

xcng routing in detail

Hi, at present I have the following network layout: Internet - gateway - mailserver1 - frame relay - distant mailserver2 All inbound emails go through the gateway to mailserver1, which sends them over to mailserver2 (connected via IMS). Outbound emails are being send directly by mailserver2. now

best practice

Hi, looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs, * how long do most of you keep your logs * how do you keep them (tape, CD, on the server) ... thanks, Kim _ List posting FAQ:

RE: best practice

What logs do you mean? William -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: best practice Hi, looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs, * how long do most of you keep your

RE: best practice

I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: best practice Hi, looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs,

RE: best practice

mdbdata -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice What logs do you mean? William -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,

RE: best practice

do anyone of you ever get asked that a mail of a year old has actually been delivered to a destination? I don't have those logs anymore... -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best

RE: best practice

The transaction logs. You don't 'keep' them. They are purged with a successful full online backup. What are you doing for backups? William -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

AW: best practice

Kim, I use the default to delete the tracking logs after a week. But this depends on how large yours are and on how much space u have. And of course, on the need you have by means of security or company policy to keep them in order to be able to track message flow for a period of time. I very

RE: best practice

A year ago? I would consider that an unrealistic request. If our email policy addressed this need, I might restore an old backup from the time to a recovery server. If the destination is internal, I would assume it delivered. If it's external, there is no way to know. William -Original

RE: best practice

well, they want it all to be kept, euhhh for backups I don't do anything at the moment as I'm awaiting a renovation of our entire domain (hardware)... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: best practice

Well, then you might consider message tracking and keep those logs, because the logs in MDBDATA are not going to help you. William -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best

RE: best practice

I'll have a look, might get back about this subject though... Cheers, Kim -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice Well, then you might consider message tracking and keep

RE: best practice

If message tracking is enabled, those logs would be located in \\exchsrvr\tracking.log. They can be used to determine message flow within your exchange site. They are viewable in Excel as well as the Message Tracking function in Exchange. The logs in MDBDATA are transaction logs where data is

RE: Public Folders

William, I'm convinced CA did something bad to you in a former life, not just this one :-) Perhaps if they took themselves less seriously ... e.g rename BAOF to ROTFL Agent etc. Regards Mylo -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 00:17

RE: Public Folders

I love CA. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders William, I'm convinced CA did something bad to you in a former life, not just this one :-) Perhaps if they took

RE: Public Folders

The last good thing they wrote was Clipper. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 10:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I love CA. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Email review

To overcome the possible chance of every increasing archive storage you can have an HSM product to reduce on-line storage requirements, as the Emails are stored within a NTFS structured file/folders. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one

RE: mail stuck in a strange way

willam, i cant begin with outlook 2000. They wouldnt like it. gr -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:32 AM Aan: Exchange Discussions Onderwerp: RE: mail stuck in a strange way This is not a good answer, but

RE: mail stuck in a strange way

No reaction? Brothers and sisters, 2 notebook users (VIP) have the next problem: When they work offline and send a message, the message goes to outbox.When they are online and sychronised it,the message wordt delivered but still exist in outbox.( Not italic letter type)There is also a

RE: performance monitoring

Heather, A basic tool comes with the NT Backoffice resource kit that supplies a version of Crystal reports (4.5 old!!) but with sample reports that give A) the records your interested in B) basic server summary of Email transferred in/transferred out/ local delivery and they can be used in a new

RE: Customize Address Book View - require urgent help

By default, when outlook users click Address Book, the default profile will Show Names from the or Type name or Select from list Global Address List. Are there any tools/scripts that can be customised to Show Names from the...from a new place. Unfortunately, Automatic Profile Generator does not

RE: Public Folders

I hate CA. ArcServe is very easy to use, but it never works:) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folders I love CA. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian

How to customize Address Book View not looking at GAL within Outlook?

Dear all, By default, when outlook users click Address Book, the default profile will Show Names from the or Type name or Select from list Global Address List. Are there any tools/scripts that can be customised to Show Names from the...from a new place. Unfortunately, Automatic Profile Generator

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

OK, What about if you have two relays between your exchange and the internet. I currently have two systems that route incoming and outgoing email .I want to split the load up between these two relay systems. Both of these are Unix Box's. Ron -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz

RE: mail stuck in a strange way

DO they have multiple Information Services set up? Have you tried recreating their Outlook profiles then re-creating their *.ost? -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mail stuck in

RE: Split DNS

I have 2 DNS servers: - One DNS server is DC for internal use and is working - Second DNS server I intend to use for external use and this server is stand alone member server. The second server has two network adapters, on one interface I have an external address and on a second one I have a

RE: Which server in E2k typically performs this role?

GC -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:50 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Which server in E2k typically performs this role? Subject: Which server in E2k typically performs this role? Which server in E2k

Site connector

Hello all, I currently have 3 5.5 sites. Our first site has an exch2k server and 5.5 server. I am going to bring up another site, but it will only house a 2k server. What is the best way to set up a connector to our other sites? Thanks.

RE: best practice

What a fine advertisement you would make for Microsoft. Never backed up the system and it works fine - what a brave fellow you are. :=) -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best

RE: best practice

Yea, If I was renovating my entire domain I wouldnt make any backups beforehand either... -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice What a fine advertisement you would

OWA Ports

Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0. OK. We are using OWA. Apparently, each time the Exchange Server is rebooted, it randomly assigns ports for the directory and information store by default, therefore, the ports that the client will use must be statically mapped. Following the OWA instructions, I made the

RE: best practice

ROFLMAO That's great! I love it! Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best practice Yea, If I was renovating my entire domain I

RE: OWA Ports

If you are using OWA, then all you need is HTTP or HTTPS access for your clients. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Ports Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0. OK. We are using OWA.

RE: OWA Ports

Were trying to restrict access to the two ports that OWA uses, rather than keeping all traffic open. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Ports If you are using OWA, then all you

RE: OWA Ports

IS the OWA box behind your firewall? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Ports Were trying to restrict access to the two ports that OWA uses, rather than keeping all

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

It's not supposed to do that! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G CDW has the lowest

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

It worked when I did it -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It's not supposed to do that! James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems,

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

It's a beta, what did you expect? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It worked when I

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

It's not a bug, it's a feature! -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It's a beta, what did you expect? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems

Re: OWA Ports

XADM: Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls (Q148732) - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: OWA Ports Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0. OK. We are using OWA.

Re: OWA Ports

Opening a firewall for OWA to talk to the server is no different than opening the firewall for OL clients to talk to the server. - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:47 AM Subject: RE:

RE: OWA Ports

Exactly. I think this guy may have his OWA server in the DMZIf so, better to move it to the LAN and just open 443 for SSL -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Ports

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

It burns when I pee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G It worked when I did it -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Calendar cleansing

Is there any way to wipe your calendar clean using Outlook 98? Or better yet, create a second non populated calendar? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: OWA Ports

Yes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Ports IS the OWA box behind your firewall? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: OWA Ports

Ahhh. This article says I have to edit the registry for the MTA also. I did not do that. Thanks. Robert -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Ports XADM: Setting TCP/IP

Re: OWA Ports

Ah... then you're setting the wrong ports anyway. As someone else said you should open 443 on the firewall. What happens behind the firewall is irrelevant to the task at hand. - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: OWA Ports

Well, it doens't matter anway. This is for accessing an Exchange server that is behind a firewall. That's not what you're doing. - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: RE:

RE: Calendar cleansing

A. Open the mailbox with the old Exchange client, delete the calendar folder, start Outlook with the /resetfolders switch. B. Use ExMerge with the Archive option to remove everything from the calendar. C. Switch to by category view and delete everything manually. D E Serdar Soysal

Outlook Calendar Help

I have a user who cannot see dates on her calendar past 4/17. Once she clicks on any date past then Outlook hangs. This is Outlook 2000 against Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have not had any success with Q articles other than time zone issues which do not apply here. As well she has allowed free/busy time

RE: OWA Ports

OK, the OWA server IS in the DMZ, sorry about that. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Ports Well, it doens't matter anway. This is for accessing an Exchange server that

RE: OWA Ports

ugh. Why? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Ports OK, the OWA server IS in the DMZ, sorry about that. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Outlook Calendar Help

What happens when she tries using another machine to access her mailbox? -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar Help I have a user who cannot see dates on her calendar past

RE: RAID 5 setup

If you're really looking to save money, don't forget about IDE RAID controllers, we've had good luck with the Adaptec variety for small branch-office servers. You can even get hot-swappable IDE controllers and drive trays from 3ware and Promise. -Original Message- From: Horst Hinz

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

tastes like . . . Burning - courtesy of Ralph on the Simpsons (Lord of the Flies spoofing episode) And one of my favorites: I want to go to Bovine University - also courtesy of Ralph. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message-

RE: Calendar cleansing

How about deleting the Calendar folder with the old Exchange client, then starting Outlook with the /resetfolders switch? There's probably an easier way, though. Neil -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 April 2002 15:52 Posted To: Swynk

Re: Outlook Calendar Help

Same exact behaviour - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:06 AM Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Help What happens when she tries using another machine to access her mailbox? -Original

RE: OWA Ports

I'm guessing that he's looking at locking down the ports on which the OWA server can connect out. That way, in the event that the box does get hacked, it can only access certain ports on certain parts of the network. Its actually solid theory - but it is a bear to pull off.

RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?

That's why we suggested exmerge. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? I went with the

Getting error message no transport provider

Sometime My user send message and getting error message no transport provider. i dont know why. i am using ex5.5 and its also not a continues errors and after sometime, its resolves automaticaly. But still sometime they are getting again this error. any1 has anyidea?

Free/busy error

Hello everyone, We are currently running Exchange 5.5 with SP4. One of my user who is running outlook 2000 has a problem retreiving her free/busy information. To be specific, when she looks for other users availability on the meeting calendar, everything seems to be fine. But if sometimes is

Free/busy error.

Hello everyone, We are currently running Exchange 5.5 with SP4. One of my user who is running outlook 2000 has a problem retreiving her free/busy information. To be specific, when she looks for other users availability on the meeting calendar, everything seems to be fine. But if sometimes is

Getting error message no transport provider

Sometime My user send message and getting error message no transport provider. i dont know why. i am using ex5.5 and its also not a continues errors and after sometime, its resolves automaticaly. But still sometime they are getting again this error. any1 has anyidea?

Free/busy error

Hello everyone, We are currently running Exchange 5.5 with SP4. One of my user who is running outlook 2000 has a problem retreiving her free/busy information. To be specific, when she looks for other users availability on the meeting calendar, everything seems to be fine. But if sometimes is

OWA Question

NT4 domain, Exchange 5.5 I've just created a new user and new mailbox for that user within the last 15 minutes. In OWA, however, I get the message OWA was unable get to your inbox. Is this because I need to wait and if so, why the delay? TIA. Bill Lambert Network Consultant Endoxy

NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange 2000. I have name resolution for both WINS and DNS and even got so desperate as to put entries in the LMHOSTS and HOSTS files! Win2k Machines connect no problem. I am in native mode. Any help would be greatly

Can I delay sending messages

I am running Exchange 5.5 and would like the ability to have the server delay messages over a certian size. I don't want to do this at the client level.. Can this be done?...Is there a 3rd party utility? Thanks Dave Buck _ List

Re: Calendar cleansing

Yes to both questions From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/18 Thu AM 10:52:01 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Calendar cleansing Is there any way to wipe your calendar clean using Outlook 98? Or better yet, create a second non populated

Outlook free/busy error

Has anyone seen this error No information. No free/busy information could be retrieved. I get this when I try to view a particular user's calendar. Please help. Thanks! rama _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Getting error message no transport provider

Unfortunately, it could be a zillion reasons. Damaged pst, multiple information services, screwy email address. etc... -Original Message- From: Mohiudden Aurangzaib [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Getting error message

RE: Free/busy error

What is her free/busy info set to? Tools/Options/Calendar Options/FreeBusy -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/busy error Hello everyone, We are currently running Exchange 5.5

Virus Question

This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found

RE: OWA Question

Q173470 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Question NT4 domain, Exchange 5.5 I've just created a new user and new mailbox for that user within the last 15 minutes. In

RE: Virus Question

I got several of those, but I'm quite convinced I didn't distribute any of the mentionned files... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following

RE: Free/busy error

It is set to 15 minutes. I tried changing it to 5 minutes but no luck. Rama Arumugam Network Administrator (253) 395-4527 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/busy error What

public folder replication

We have two domains here that we would like to share info between domains. We have two way trust and the site replication set to replicate info between the domains, one being the legal domain, and the other is the Corp domain. But Legal still can't see the public folders, and when meeting

RE: Free/busy error

How many months are published? -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/busy error It is set to 15 minutes. I tried changing it to 5 minutes but no luck. Rama Arumugam Network

RE: Virus Question

PINK, Nathaniel has the CA virus. The CA virus decided to share the news with us all. The symptoms are dumb email messages, an inability to restore backups, and blue screens of death. Pity poor PINK, Nathaniel. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange

RE: Virus Question

I got them from my sql2K list as well. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I got several of those, but I'm quite convinced I didn't distribute any of the

RE: Virus Question

You only got one? I got 20 all telling me I had sent them different virus's. They have a fsked up Antigen setup or something. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question

RE: Getting error message no transport provider

what do u mean by multiple information services ? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Getting error message no transport provider Unfortunately, it could be a zillion reasons.

RE: Virus Question

Good thank god. I've been going crazy over here trying to find a virus. My first reaction was that it was bogus because I'm always making sure that we have the latest virus updates and protection after we got hit with the love virus. I was 99% certain that I wasn't infected. But now that you got

RE: Virus Question

List member with wacky antivirus situation from what I can tell. I've got 4 of them from this morning. It does confirm that CA Inoculate IT itself is really a virus though. Much as I've suspected in the past. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Getting error message no transport provider

Exchange Server + Internet E-Mail etc... Tools/Services -Original Message- From: Mohiudden Aurangzaib [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Getting error message no transport provider what do u mean by multiple

RE: Virus Question

He's pretty badly infected, I got one for every post I've made in the past month. I can only imagine how many some of you got. -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question

RE: Virus Question

I got four this morning. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question You only got one? I got 20 all telling me I had

RE: Virus Question

PINK is feeling BLUE. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question PINK, Nathaniel has the CA virus. The CA virus decided to share the news with us all. The symptoms are

Re(2): NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

I know what native mode means...that does not effect outlook. You can use outlook 2000 on a non domain resourcethat's been going on for years. Not ever Exchange Client is a member of that domain.. I know what NATIVE MODE meansI didn't ask for an arrogant response. [EMAIL

Re(2): NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

I know what native mode means...that does not effect outlook. You can use outlook 2000 on a non domain resourcethat's been going on for years. Not ever Exchange Client is a member of that domain.. I know what NATIVE MODE meansI didn't ask for an arrogant response. [EMAIL

RE: Virus Question

M pink -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question PINK is feeling BLUE. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April

RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

Hope you're not trying to imply that an NT 4.0 client can't be part of a native mode domain . . . Pardon me if I misread your comment. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Virus Question

I want one too.. I feel left out... --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:56 AM To:

RE: Free/busy error

2 months. Rama Arumugam Network Administrator (253) 395-4527 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/busy error How many months are published? -Original Message- From:

Re: RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

My bad, I take it back and apologize for my arrogant and stupid comment. VERY SORRY From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/18 Thu PM 12:02:56 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Hope you're not trying to imply that an

RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000

Yeah. I suggest you DO read what it means. If you had, you would know that it has no bearing on the issue at hand. The fix is going to be dependent on client type. If its an older client, it's probably the DS proxy process giving issues. IF it's a newer client, it's probably DNS

Accounts not being created

For some reason, all of sudden, when I try to create a new account on my Exchange 2000 SP2 computer they never get access. I create an account through AD Users and Computers, but an email address is never put in the field, even if I do an Update now on the Recipient policy. I can't think of

RE: Virus Question

You can have some of mine -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Question I want one too.. I feel left out... --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond

Having problems with accounts.

Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 sp4. When looking at our Mailbox Resources list, we have several users that show up. They have no Windows NT account associated with these accounts. We receive the following errors: The object cannot be found in the directory. This may be because

  1   2   >