RE: errors?
These are NetIQ notification messages, indicating that the agents on the server in question have reached a threshold of some sort, or that the agents are not responding to the central NetIQ server. Regards, Paul. -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 21 September 2002 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: errors? Server has reported a Error. Reported status is: Queues - Error Drives - Unknown Services - OK Memory - Unknown CPU - Unknown Where does this originate from, and how do I fix it? Thanks... -Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
It will be my first MEC in the US! Sönke Luck KPMG Germany Exchange Messaging -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Die Information in dieser eMail ist vertraulich und kann dem Berufsgeheimnis unterliegen. Sie ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jeglicher Zugriff auf diese eMail durch andere Personen als den Adressaten ist untersagt. Sollten Sie nicht der fuer diese eMail bestimmte Adressat sein, ist Ihnen jede Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe wie auch das Ergreifen oder Unterlassen von Massnahmen im Vertrauen auf erlangte Information untersagt. In dieser eMail enthaltene Meinungen oder Empfehlungen unterliegen den Bedingungen des jeweiligen Mandatsverhaeltnisses mit dem Adressaten. The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: errors?
These are not from NetIQ, but Exchange 2000 internally. TO configure these thresholds, you need to open the Exchange System Manager, then expand Tools and then Monitoring and Status. Here you will see 2 folders. One for notification and one for status. Status is used for setting up these thresholds for monitoring specific resources and the monitoring folder is used for setting up email notifications. This is a quick and easy way to send yourself an email when your exchange services are on the fritz. Hope this helps. Mike -Original Message- From: Veld, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: errors? These are NetIQ notification messages, indicating that the agents on the server in question have reached a threshold of some sort, or that the agents are not responding to the central NetIQ server. Regards, Paul. -Original Message- From: Todd Raymond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 21 September 2002 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: errors? Server has reported a Error. Reported status is: Queues - Error Drives - Unknown Services - OK Memory - Unknown CPU - Unknown Where does this originate from, and how do I fix it? Thanks... -Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
P.S. the calendars that has been newly created is NOT the same as the original one in Outlook (you will be able to delete the new one whilst in Outlook you will NOT be able to delete the German one) , so I would keep his German Calendar/tasks and journal folders as these have 'special' connection with automated procedures in Outlook (like appointment notifications, etc;). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 11:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Hallo Paul, When the user right-clicks on the English (the newly created ones) folders, there is no option to delete. However he has the option to delete the (old) German ones... AW On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: P.S. the calendars that has been newly created is NOT the same as the original one in Outlook (you will be able to delete the new one whilst in Outlook you will NOT be able to delete the German one) , so I would keep his German Calendar/tasks and journal folders as these have 'special' connection with automated procedures in Outlook (like appointment notifications, etc;). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 11:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Hallo Paul, The 2 machines that I used Exmerge on were both German. It was the Outlook client that was in English -- I just wanted to open his mailbox to verify that #1 he could login and #2 his data was there. Allison On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Q188856 describes your situation. Q197180 has a list of all the command line switches. Hope this helps. jeff e. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Allison, Looks like you have it the other way round then he uses an English client (IE you should use the same exmerge client as the user, in this case English) and that's why you can't delete the English but you can delete the German version. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hallo Paul, The 2 machines that I used Exmerge on were both German. It was the Outlook client that was in English -- I just wanted to open his mailbox to verify that #1 he could login and #2 his data was there. Allison On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
I'm going! :) Thanks, Ryan -Original Message- From: Luck, Sönke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It will be my first MEC in the US! Sönke Luck KPMG Germany Exchange Messaging -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC OK, the time draws near. Who is going? Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 -Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Die Information in dieser eMail ist vertraulich und kann dem Berufsgeheimnis unterliegen. Sie ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt. Jeglicher Zugriff auf diese eMail durch andere Personen als den Adressaten ist untersagt. Sollten Sie nicht der fuer diese eMail bestimmte Adressat sein, ist Ihnen jede Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder Weitergabe wie auch das Ergreifen oder Unterlassen von Massnahmen im Vertrauen auf erlangte Information untersagt. In dieser eMail enthaltene Meinungen oder Empfehlungen unterliegen den Bedingungen des jeweiligen Mandatsverhaeltnisses mit dem Adressaten. The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
And they're complaining? Bloody users, they're never happy :-) The 'problem' might be because they're accessing OWA using http://[SERVERNAME]/exchange (NTLM) instead of http://server.domain.com/exchnage (by FQDN) or http://1.2.3.4/exchange (by IP), this causes IE to authenticate using the current user/pass logged on to windows... It's actually a feature... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ r�zrmyzr污vi Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows
authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain
first?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are
having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask
them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They
are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine.
Thanks,
Greg Householder
Network Specialist
Bravo Development, Inc
Voice: (614) 340-9414
Fax: (614) 326-7943
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/
.rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹
vi
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
NDRs using Palm.net
We're running Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4, in case that matters. I'm starting our Exchange 2000 migration next week. Clients are various versions of Outlook, from 97 through 2002. I've got one user (a VP/lawyer) who uses a Palm device (model unknown at this time) and the Palm.net wireless service to send email to both internal and external recipients. By all accounts, his emails to external users of services like Yahoo Mail or Hotmail work perfectly. However, email to internal users, although delivered correctly, cannot be replied to - an NDR is generated. When the recipient clicks on Reply (using any version of Outlook), the To: field looks like: [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]. The address IS valid, but Outlook/Exchange is attempting use the entire string as an address (including the brackets and everything between them). Is there anything I can do in Exchange to get it to parse the address correctly, or is this strictly an issue with the configuration of his Palm? I've never worked with Palms before, and I'm trying to avoid looking like an idiot when I go up to speak with him. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they
authenticate is when they log into their email.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows
authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain
first?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are
having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask
them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They
are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine.
Thanks,
Greg Householder
Network Specialist
Bravo Development, Inc
Voice: (614) 340-9414
Fax: (614) 326-7943
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/
.rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹
vi
.+x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
Resolve hidden users
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Danke schoen! Er.. Thank you. AW On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: Q188856 describes your situation. Q197180 has a list of all the command line switches. Hope this helps. jeff e. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resolve hidden users
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
1 Are they running Windows NT/2000/XP or 9x/Me as part of the domain? 2 Are they part of the same Win2K domain/forest as the Exch 2k server? or Are their login credentials (login pass) with which they log in to the PC the same as their Exch 2k login/pass? 3 do they access the server by typing \\SERVERNAME\EXCHANGE or do they access the server by typing \\servername.domain.com\exchange and 'domain.com' is part of their Internet Explorer 'Trusted Sites' list? If you answered yes to all 3 questions, you have found your 'problem'. Although I still can't understand why they're complaining... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ r�zrmyzr⹅vi +x )r뺷Ƚ˶ zǭȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+i̞ٞG +x ꫢ)r뺷Ƚ˶ ёzǭȱr:➞˱m椠[y敤z[)r≉ vh▖+i̞ٞG Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
I guess, what probably happened then is that once upon a time, your users checked the 'Save this password in your password list' and it saved it Delete any .PWL files you find. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
If they aren't using integrated windows authentication, as their authentication method then it would appear that IE is not being shut down completely. Are the users choosing to log off of OWA when they exit or simply closing the window? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
Unhide the mailbox and then do it. Then hide it again. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
The reason that they are complaining is because there are two email account being accessed from the same PC through OWA.. Once one of them logs in the other one can't. 1. They are not part of the domain. They are just a PC on the internet access the OWA. 2. The username they use to login to the computer are not the same as there Exchange 2k login 3. They access it by going to the website. https://our-domain-name/exchange Does that answer your questions? Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 1 Are they running Windows NT/2000/XP or 9x/Me as part of the domain? 2 Are they part of the same Win2K domain/forest as the Exch 2k server? or Are their login credentials (login pass) with which they log in to the PC the same as their Exch 2k login/pass? 3 do they access the server by typing \\SERVERNAME\EXCHANGE or do they access the server by typing \\servername.domain.com\exchange and 'domain.com' is part of their Internet Explorer 'Trusted Sites' list? If you answered yes to all 3 questions, you have found your 'problem'. Although I still can't understand why they're complaining... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹ vi +x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG +x ê«¢)r뺷Ƚ˶ ÑzÇȱr:â˱mæ¤ [yæ¤z[)râ vhâ+iÙÌG Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: Resolve hidden users
Not really an option for 300 users and mandatory profiles. Thought about doing it though. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Unhide the mailbox and then do it. Then hide it again. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
We have tried both. Standard practice is to click the logoff button to logout. Even that doesn't work on their system. We all know how hard it is to get users not to just X out of everything though. I have personally tried it with the logout and it doesn't work. Even a reboot doesn't clear that information. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 If they aren't using integrated windows authentication, as their authentication method then it would appear that IE is not being shut down completely. Are the users choosing to log off of OWA when they exit or simply closing the window? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
Give them a bogus name until you can switch it, like Temp1, Temp2. Just an idea. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Not really an option for 300 users and mandatory profiles. Thought about doing it though. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Unhide the mailbox and then do it. Then hide it again. -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
You could try out a third party product - SecureLogoff for OWA http://www.messageware.net -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 We have tried both. Standard practice is to click the logoff button to logout. Even that doesn't work on their system. We all know how hard it is to get users not to just X out of everything though. I have personally tried it with the logout and it doesn't work. Even a reboot doesn't clear that information. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 If they aren't using integrated windows authentication, as their authentication method then it would appear that IE is not being shut down completely. Are the users choosing to log off of OWA when they exit or simply closing the window? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
LegacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
You can find LegacyExchangeDN using the ADSI Edit from Windows 2000 Support Tools. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users LegacyExchangeDN -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now another problem? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Is the person actually closing out IE after they logoff of OWA? OWA doesn't remove the login by default until you start another IE session. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Test message Please respond to confirm I am successfully sending messages Thanks -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. I've heard nothing good about black ice. Most people I know run zone alarm. What changes when you turn black ice off? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Test - is this getting through yet Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Security Breach????
Perhaps a virus with a fake from address sent to someone else in your organization. This happens with Klez, even though I don't think that is a Klez subject line. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Security Breach Hello everyone, One of my users (unfortunately it's my Supervisor) got an alert from Group Shield saying that his attachment (.exe) was blocked. But he swears that he didn't send out any emails. Not only that, we were unable to find anything on his Sent Items folder either. Here is what he received on his inbox from Postmaster -Original Message- From: postmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] mailto:[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable mail--Helvetica The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Helvetica The attachment is the original mail * I just can't seem to find any information on this on the internet. Helvetica is a font. That's all I've got so for. Could this be a Security breach? Is someone using my exchange server? Has anyone received any messages like this before? Please help. Any input is welcome! Thanks everyone! rama Rama Arumugam Network Administrator Wire DynamiX.com (253) 395-4527 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help pls, exchange Virtual Directory
Hi guys ! By default, Excahnge 2000 will generate virtual directory for use with OWA. But by accident we deleted it (the virtual directory) When i try to build it again, it doesn't work. My OWA has passed away, the only things that my browser show is directory browse. Am i miss something ? help for anybody that ever have done it before. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Is this from internal or external Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Test- is this getting through -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yup! -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
test
Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 ssl accelerator
Anyone ever been successful deploying E2k in a front end/back end scenario with the front end box in a DMZ along with a hardware ssl accelerator? Can't get OWA to work correctly. You get prompted for authentication twice and then you can get into OWA, but Exchange automatically redirects it to a http vice an https connection. It's the exact same problem that is outlined in the below Q article. The only problem is that we aren't running a proxy server and there is no way on the h/w accelerator box to add the header. OWA will be the primary means of accessing corporate email and we need the functionality provided by the hardware SSL accelerator to handle all the SSL encryption/decryption with as many connections as possible vice limiting the number of connections using traditional IIS SSL. E2k Enterprise svc pk 3 Win2k Svc Pk 3 Intel Netstructure 7110 hardware accelerators PSS ID Number: Q260772 Article last modified on 09-18-2000 winnt: winnt == --- The information in this article applies to: - Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server --- SYMPTOMS When you use Microsoft Outlook Web Access (OWA) with Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) enabled to connect to a front-end Exchange 2000 Server computer that is running behind a proxy server, the SSL connection may not be successful. This problem may also occur when you are using only a back-end Exchange 2000 Server computer. CAUSE = This problem can occur because SSL or HTTPS requests arrive at the back-end Exchange 2000 Server computer on port 80 instead of arriving at the front-end Exchange 2000 Server computer. Redirects are returned as http://; instead of https://;. RESOLUTION == To resolve this problem, configure the proxy server to add the following header on upstream requests when OWA SSL requests are on port 443: FrontendHTTPS:ON STATUS == Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server. Additional query words: xmrp == Keywords : Component : WebClient Version : winnt: Platform : winnt Issue type: kbbug Solution Type : kbnofix = Copyright Microsoft Corporation 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Oh,no, not another test!!! -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test - is this getting through yet Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Yes, IE is being completely shut down. Even a reboot of the system has the same issue. The only way to confuse the system is by going to a different domain name and letting the other domain name timeout. We have two internet domain names both pointing to the same place. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Is the person actually closing out IE after they logoff of OWA? OWA doesn't remove the login by default until you start another IE session. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 It would be working fine except that we are a restaurant company and we have a Computer in the Manager's office. We have two email accounts for each store. I have a shortcut to the OWA login https://server/exchange . I have 20 plus stores running the exact same config and none of them are having problems. Somewhere in Windows or IE it is keeping tabs on the last person that logged in so when you click on the shortcut it automatically logs them in. Right now I have two shortcuts pointing to the mailbox directly via https://server/exchange/mailbox. This makes it so they can get into both boxes but the last user that logged in still doesn't have to enter a username or password. I hope this enlightens you or maybe someone has seen this before. The client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0 Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
This is from an external internet client Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Is this from internal or external Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that they get in just fine. Color me confused. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Do you have VPN? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ .rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹ vi .+x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG .+x ç³)r뺷Ƚ˶ à°zÇȱr:é˱mä¾[yæµ²z[)rå¬vhà +iÙÌG â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
No Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Do you have VPN? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ .rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹ vi .+x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG .+x ç³)r뺷Ƚ˶ à°zÇȱr:é˱mä¾[yæµ²z[)rå¬ vhà +iÙÌG .rí½¶à³zrmyzr vi .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Sorry every one I have been trying since last wed to post
I guess they are all getting through now
Again, I apologize
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Do you have VPN?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they
authenticate is when they log into their email.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows
authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain
first?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are
having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask
them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They
are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine.
Thanks,
Greg Householder
Network Specialist
Bravo Development, Inc
Voice: (614) 340-9414
Fax: (614) 326-7943
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/
.rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹
vi
.+x
)r뺷Ƚ˶
ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG
.+x
ç³)r뺷Ƚ˶
à°zÇȱr:é˱mä¾[yæµ²z[)rå¬
vhà +iÙÌG
.rí½¶à³zrmyzrã°µvi
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: test
It came.. I saw.. I deleted it -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
Are you using Proxy? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 No Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Do you have VPN? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ .rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹ vi .+x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG .+x ç³)r뺷Ƚ˶ à°zÇȱr:é˱mä¾[yæµ²z[)rå¬ vhà +iÙÌG .rí½¶à³zrmyzr vi .+--xm ,)æ½r(⺷ \bì ½!嬶 0 é§zÇí±r夬:.Ë mé[hy潦\z[,㩹)râZ Zvh墧+-iÙ¢2åG( .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
RE: Resolve hidden users
You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a hidden user during the profile set up. All other users resolve just fine. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now another problem? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Test received. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Test message Please respond to confirm I am successfully sending messages Thanks -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. I've heard nothing good about black ice. Most people I know run zone alarm. What changes when you turn black ice off? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Loud and clear. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test - is this getting through yet Rob Weatherly Handleman Company (248) 362-4400 x122 -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Test TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test
Received again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Yet again. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 14:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Test- is this getting through -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yup! -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Exchange 2000
No Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Are you using Proxy? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 No Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Do you have VPN? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 Both of these PCs access the Email from the internet only and the only time they authenticate is when they log into their email. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000 'cause you have the OWA website security set up to use integrated Windows authentication and these couple of users happen to have logged on the Windows domain first? -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Exchange 2000 Hello Everyone. I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3 running on Windows 2000 SP3. I have two people that are having problems getting into OWA. When they go to the website to login it doesn't ask them for a username or password. It just goes strait into the inbox. Any ideas? They are running IE 6.0 and I have 20 other locations working just fine. Thanks, Greg Householder Network Specialist Bravo Development, Inc Voice: (614) 340-9414 Fax: (614) 326-7943 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bestitalianusa.com http://www.bestitalianusa.com/ .rí½¶à³zrmyzrâ¹ vi .+x )r뺷Ƚ˶ ï¬zÇȱr: ˱m[yz[)r vhV+iÙÌG .+x ç³)r뺷Ƚ˶ à°zÇȱr:é˱mä¾[yæµ²z[)rå¬ vhà +iÙÌG .rí½¶à³zrmyzr vi .+--xm ,)æ½r(⺷ \bì ½!嬶 0 é§zÇí±r夬:.Ë mé[hy潦\z[,㩹)râZ Zvh墧+-iÙ¢2åG( .+--xm ,)r(ື \b=!6 0 à§zÇ1r,:.Ë mé[hy\z[,)rÉZ Zvh'+-iÙ¢2 G( â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
RE: test
Rather than continue to send test messages to the list check your list prefs. When was the last time you reviewd your settings. If infact your settings are cowrrect perhaps an unsub / resub would work. --steve -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test
I did all of that And still had problems I also e-mailed the list admin Apparently it has been fixed Again I apologize for the overload of e-mails -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test Rather than continue to send test messages to the list check your list prefs. When was the last time you reviewd your settings. If infact your settings are cowrrect perhaps an unsub / resub would work. --steve -Original Message- From: Weatherly, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: test Test Please reply if this anyone sees this _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opening other user's mailboxes
Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDRs using Palm.net
I didn't see you get any replies. Let me add a couple things, but I can't claim to have THE answer. First, I suspect that your address resolution description is not quite right. Client user interface do frequently display extraneous characters as though the MTA was trying to parse them in error, but I think that if you look at your server logs that you will see that Exchange did not make the implied error when formulating an SMTP string either for passing to a relay host or for use in DNS queries. But check that - there is a first time for everything. Next, I suspect that the real problem is a domain error. Also, you say Outlook/Exchange is attempting . . . That is not a fine enough description of what is going on. Generally, Outlook does not even try to parse an address, unless it is an item from either the Outlook Contacts or a PAB entry. This should not be the case. But, the next part of your description does look like it is starting to get at the problem. You say that the reply string looks like [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] and not [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]!!! Is that right? If so, then I think you are onto your answer. At this point, yes it does matter whether or not you are on E2k+AD or a non-AD previous version. The common practice is for UPN names to be SMTP strings that follow the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to make certain that either your Exchange systems native SMTP addresses, or an internal relay host (sometimes called a resolver) can perform a delivery using the UPN. Prior to E2K+AD, it was very common for the situation to arise in which a person's display name in Exchange looked nothing like a valid SMTP string. You will have to sort this out, but if your note is accurate, then I think you have assembled most of the critical data required to solved your problem. -Original Message- From: Mike Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NDRs using Palm.net We're running Exchange 5.5 w/ SP4, in case that matters. I'm starting our Exchange 2000 migration next week. Clients are various versions of Outlook, from 97 through 2002. I've got one user (a VP/lawyer) who uses a Palm device (model unknown at this time) and the Palm.net wireless service to send email to both internal and external recipients. By all accounts, his emails to external users of services like Yahoo Mail or Hotmail work perfectly. However, email to internal users, although delivered correctly, cannot be replied to - an NDR is generated. When the recipient clicks on Reply (using any version of Outlook), the To: field looks like: [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]. The address IS valid, but Outlook/Exchange is attempting use the entire string as an address (including the brackets and everything between them). Is there anything I can do in Exchange to get it to parse the address correctly, or is this strictly an issue with the configuration of his Palm? I've never worked with Palms before, and I'm trying to avoid looking like an idiot when I go up to speak with him. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
Hi, If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members of some distribution lists I setup. But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ - DOMAIN - MBX - UserName - Inbox has the group everybody with full rights (!) I am not sure how this happened but I'd like to know how to change it. On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
NEVER TOUCH the M: drive.. Support.micrisoft.com search for see all mailboxes. Pretty simple to find Admin Rights to mail boxes http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q184573 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262054 --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes Hi, If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members of some distribution lists I setup. But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ - DOMAIN - MBX - UserName - Inbox has the group everybody with full rights (!) I am not sure how this happened but I'd like to know how to change it. On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spell check in OWA
Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell check in OWA
yes --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spell check in OWA Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell check in OWA
Sorry.. Exchange 2000 SP3 / Windows 2000 SP3 Thanks, Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spell check in OWA yes --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spell check in OWA Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell check in OWA
third party...here is one.. http://www.spellchecker.com/corporate/default.asp?page=OWA_Corp.htm Dave Stevens IT Network Support- Mail Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 865-576-8898 -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spell check in OWA Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Organizing Public Folders
NetIQ has a product that will monitor Public Folder usage. AppAnalyzer. -Original Message- From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Organizing Public Folders Kelley, Jason said : We are planning to deploy public folders in our local site but we also want to expand to our remote sites which include users who are overseas. I'm curious as to how people organize their public folder hierarchy and how they determine where a public folder is homed.On Fri September 20 2002 07:23, Ed Crowley replied: It would really depend on your organization. Also, it doesn't make sense to replicate content to remote sites that won't use it. Mark idly wondered: is there any way to tell how often particular public folders are accessed and from where in order to assist with this decision making process? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
What? Do it in AD. Besides what does right clicking on Calendar have to do with Mailbox access? -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes Hi, If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members of some distribution lists I setup. But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ - DOMAIN - MBX - UserName - Inbox has the group everybody with full rights (!) I am not sure how this happened but I'd like to know how to change it. On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spell check in OWA
www.spellchecker.com I believe that is the link. Also www.messageware.com has a product. -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spell check in OWA Is there a way to do a spell check in OWA? Thanks Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
Oh, that was a random Usenet poster telling another random Usenet poster that they should modify Mailbox permissions from the folders under the M:\ drive. They needed calendar permissions changed, so I assumed (very wrongly) that it could work also for the inbox permissions. However, because of this list, I am afraid to even look at the M:\ icon in Explorer so I thought I'd ask. By the way, no one responded to that random Usenet person telling them they are wrong. AW On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: What? Do it in AD. Besides what does right clicking on Calendar have to do with Mailbox access? -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes Hi, If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members of some distribution lists I setup. But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ - DOMAIN - MBX - UserName - Inbox has the group everybody with full rights (!) I am not sure how this happened but I'd like to know how to change it. On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying. As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I get about 15 per day, which I check to make sure they are not misaddressed. Most of them (~75%) are to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (neither of which mailboxes exist). I don't think this is abnormal, what is weird is that ~ 2 - 3 per day make it appear as if we are still relaying. The message in question is always a duplicate of one that I received as in inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example at 5:06am I get an inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following message from our server: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The message that caused this notification was: The attachment is the email it self, and in this case says get your license At 5:07am I get a second inbound failure with the following server message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 3550 (000B09B6) 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown The message that caused this notification was: Again the attachment is the email and it is identical to the one at 5:06am Other oddities to note: The person listed in the from address field of both messages is always the name that is listed in the delivery failure notification of the second inbound failure. My guess to what is happening is that the original mail coming in has the flag set for received receipt, and it is our server sending out confirmation to a fake address and then that server saying that user does not exist. I would really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help pls, exchange Virtual Directory
Is it named correctly? -Original Message- From: Topayung, Amdys Max [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help pls, exchange Virtual Directory Hi guys ! By default, Excahnge 2000 will generate virtual directory for use with OWA. But by accident we deleted it (the virtual directory) When i try to build it again, it doesn't work. My OWA has passed away, the only things that my browser show is directory browse. Am i miss something ? help for anybody that ever have done it before. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
This is completely UN-automated. I manually get the foreign addresses by having a logon onto the parent company exchange network and using a shareware thing called GAL-Exporter (I think it was about $40). GAL exporter can either export individual containers (of which there are way too many to consider doing separately) or the Global list. The exported mailbox info is saved into an Access database file. From Access, I then export the file to a CSV (comma separated variable) file. Before reading this into EXCEL, I first had to split it into two parts because EXCEL can only handle 64000 rows. After reading it into excel, I deleted the columns I did not need, and put the appropriate header line at the top and re-saved it to CSV. I also had to add the string SMTP: to the beginning of each email address (or Target-Address in header-speak). After adding a column of SMTP:'s, I then used a text editor to replace SMTP:, with SMTP: which merged this to the address column. I then used the exchange administrator to import all of these into a single container that I had just created on the server. Tom -Original Message- From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? I'm interested in hearing what tool you're using to keep the external org addresses in sync -- is the the InterOrg tool? We're in discussions with our parent company about this very task. Thanks! Jon -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:39 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying. As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I get about 15 per day, which I check to make sure they are not misaddressed. Most of them (~75%) are to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (neither of which mailboxes exist). I don't think this is abnormal, what is weird is that ~ 2 - 3 per day make it appear as if we are still relaying. The message in question is always a duplicate of one that I received as in inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example at 5:06am I get an inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following message from our server: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The message that caused this notification was: The attachment is the email it self, and in this case says get your license At 5:07am I get a second inbound failure with the following server message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 3550 (000B09B6) 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown The message that caused this notification was: Again the attachment is the email and it is identical to the one at 5:06am Other oddities to note: The person listed in the from address field of both messages is always the name that is listed in the delivery failure notification of the second inbound failure. My guess to what is happening is that the original mail coming in has the flag set for received receipt, and it is our server sending out confirmation to a fake address and then that server saying that user does not exist. I would really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Yea it can. I almost got caught in that once. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying. As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I get about 15 per day, which I check to make sure they are not misaddressed. Most of them (~75%) are to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (neither of which mailboxes exist). I don't think this is abnormal, what is weird is that ~ 2 - 3 per day make it appear as if we are still relaying. The message in question is always a duplicate of one that I received as in inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example at 5:06am I get an inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following message from our server: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The message that caused this notification was: The attachment is the email it self, and in this case says get your license At 5:07am I get a second inbound failure with the following server message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 3550 (000B09B6) 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown The message that caused this notification was: Again the attachment is the email and it is identical to the one at 5:06am Other oddities to note: The person listed in the from address field of both messages is always the name that is listed in the delivery failure notification of the second inbound failure. My guess to what is happening is that the original mail coming in has the flag set for received receipt, and it is our server sending out confirmation to a fake address and then that server saying that user does not exist. I would really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
You're a better man than I am. After three days, being on almost every blacklist out there, and then finally cornering NAI, I found out that Webshield will successfully relay. Boy, was I annoyed!! HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Yea it can. I almost got caught in that once. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying. As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I get about 15 per day, which I check to make sure they are not misaddressed. Most of them (~75%) are to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (neither of which mailboxes exist). I don't think this is abnormal, what is weird is that ~ 2 - 3 per day make it appear as if we are still relaying. The message in question is always a duplicate of one that I received as in inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example at 5:06am I get an inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following message from our server: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The message that caused this notification was: The attachment is the email it self, and in this case says get your license At 5:07am I get a second inbound failure with the following server message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 3550 (000B09B6) 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown The message that caused this notification was: Again the attachment is the email and it is identical to the one at 5:06am Other oddities to note: The person listed in the from address field of both messages is always the name that is listed in the delivery failure notification of the second inbound failure. My guess to what is happening is that the original mail coming in has the flag set for received receipt, and it is our server sending out confirmation to a fake address and then that server saying that user does not exist. I would really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
Not aware of any limit or recommendation for one. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container?? On an Exchange 5.5 server, what is the maximum number of addresses that can be placed (or are recommended) in a single container? I have set up a single container to put all of the external addresses of our parent company in (whose exchange servers are a separate organinization). Everything seems to be working fine (and pretty fast) with about 75,000 addresses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)
Now if only it could be used as anti-virus software. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing) Exchange 5.5 with latest SP (4 I think). I read and implemented all of MS articles that relate to relaying and think I have eliminated 99%. At one point we were getting flooded with ~ 1,000 messages per minute for relaying. As the exchange administrator, I have all inbound failure come to me. I get about 15 per day, which I check to make sure they are not misaddressed. Most of them (~75%) are to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (neither of which mailboxes exist). I don't think this is abnormal, what is weird is that ~ 2 - 3 per day make it appear as if we are still relaying. The message in question is always a duplicate of one that I received as in inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example at 5:06am I get an inbound failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following message from our server: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The message that caused this notification was: The attachment is the email it self, and in this case says get your license At 5:07am I get a second inbound failure with the following server message: The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Keystone Petroleum:OCTANE:KPPSVR01 3550 (000B09B6) 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown The message that caused this notification was: Again the attachment is the email and it is identical to the one at 5:06am Other oddities to note: The person listed in the from address field of both messages is always the name that is listed in the delivery failure notification of the second inbound failure. My guess to what is happening is that the original mail coming in has the flag set for received receipt, and it is our server sending out confirmation to a fake address and then that server saying that user does not exist. I would really appreciate any help on this matter as it has me quite stumped. Thanks ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a hidden user during the profile set up. All other users resolve just fine. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now another problem? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resolve hidden users
That doesn't seem to work either. According to Q253828, the Recipient Update Service uses the msExchHideFromAddressLists attribute to build address lists and if this is set to TRUE, then it's not in an address book and then it can't be resolved. Ah well, I may just have to accept defeat on this one. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a hidden user during the profile set up. All other users resolve just fine. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now another problem? -Original Message- From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook. In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile. Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox. Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this. -Pete -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie comes up with who it is for? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resolve hidden users In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL. So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name based on the GAL. If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or suggestions, I'm all ears. - Thank you, Pete Kretche MCP, A+ Network Systems Administrator University of Wisconsin - Green Bay (920) 465-5014 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC
I hear conflicting information from Dell support on how to configure logical drives. Like to hear from fields... Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable space and using the OS to partition it? Is there a preference? Running AMI version of PERC3/DC in PowerEdge 2500 in a W2K cluster environment. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELL PowerVault 220S (RAID) configuration and PERC3/DC
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, at 2:19pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you create the logical partitions with hardware (selection drives for the array and partition size) OR you create a RAID with the total usable space and using the OS to partition it? Is there a preference? Myself, I would make the RAID volume (AKA logical drive AKA container) as big as it can be (within performance and reliability parameters), and use software to divide it up as needed. Software is typically more flexible than hardware. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Archival tools
I have a user asking me if there is a group archival tool that they can use to help store thier departments old emails. Basically what they do now is each of them have a PST that they archive emails too. This means lots of large PST files full of dublicate messages. They are looking for a way to archive all thier emails but minimize the duplicates. I suggested a public folder but they are not the brightest of users and don't want to have to have someone manage the folder to keep out duplicates. They want software that will do it for them. I dont mind telling them that they will have to use the PF I just wanted to check with the list first for any other ideas. Thanks -Peter O. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Archival tools
www.mail-resources.com web links | server | archival -Original Message- From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Archival tools I have a user asking me if there is a group archival tool that they can use to help store thier departments old emails. Basically what they do now is each of them have a PST that they archive emails too. This means lots of large PST files full of dublicate messages. They are looking for a way to archive all thier emails but minimize the duplicates. I suggested a public folder but they are not the brightest of users and don't want to have to have someone manage the folder to keep out duplicates. They want software that will do it for them. I dont mind telling them that they will have to use the PF I just wanted to check with the list first for any other ideas. Thanks -Peter O. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rare IMC problem
Hello all Recently I notice my Exchange servers are not resolving smtp addresses to display name when it receive mail from Internet. This happened after I replaced the old IMC server with a newer server and a different OS, but the IMC configuration is exactly the same. Old IMC server: Winnt 4.0 with sp4 exchange 5.5 with sp4 New IMC server: W2k with sp2, Ex5.5 with sp4 When I switch back to the Old IMC server, the display name got resolved. Thank you all Wrick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Archival tools
Increase mailbox quotas. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Orlowski Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Archival tools I have a user asking me if there is a group archival tool that they can use to help store thier departments old emails. Basically what they do now is each of them have a PST that they archive emails too. This means lots of large PST files full of dublicate messages. They are looking for a way to archive all thier emails but minimize the duplicates. I suggested a public folder but they are not the brightest of users and don't want to have to have someone manage the folder to keep out duplicates. They want software that will do it for them. I dont mind telling them that they will have to use the PF I just wanted to check with the list first for any other ideas. Thanks -Peter O. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rare IMC problem
Search TechNet for ResolveP2. By the way, most people like it the way you see it because it's harder for someone from the Internet to impersonate one of your internal users. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wrick Xian Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rare IMC problem Hello all Recently I notice my Exchange servers are not resolving smtp addresses to display name when it receive mail from Internet. This happened after I replaced the old IMC server with a newer server and a different OS, but the IMC configuration is exactly the same. Old IMC server: Winnt 4.0 with sp4 exchange 5.5 with sp4 New IMC server: W2k with sp2, Ex5.5 with sp4 When I switch back to the Old IMC server, the display name got resolved. Thank you all Wrick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
