Hello everyone
How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4
Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our
migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us
change our domain name from London_city to londoncity
without the underscore. This is to avoid any future
DNS problems. The
You've described a problem with Automatic replies/forwards to the internet,
not the OOA. One can allow the latter, without the former.
On 3/5/03 0:35, Patrick R. Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so here goes my OOO horror story. First off, this is not straight on
point because it involved
FAQ
On 3/5/03 5:48, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone
How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4
Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our
migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us
change our domain name from London_city to londoncity
without
Hello Everyone,
I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from
everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my
domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on
retrying and saying connection was dropped by remote host. Is there
I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from
everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my
domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on
retrying and saying connection was dropped by remote host. Is there
anything on my
OK, I'm looking for some assistance.
Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode
Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log, life
went:
45 - Scan Engine Failure.
HRESULT = 0x80004005. This error occurred while scanning the attachment
play.exe of message
Yes, here is what I get..
Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on
port 23: Connect failed
I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And
when I try to telnet I get the same error from home.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try telnetting to post 25...
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Yes, here is what I get..
Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could
Hello Everyone,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4.
We are interested in upgrading our Exchange servers from NT 4.0 to Windows
2000. What would be the best way to go about that?
Once we have done what would be the best option as to Outlook clients. We
do not plan on active directory for three
I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error
from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into
mail.xx.com 25
When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, 572 Relay not authorized
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
Try connecting on port 25 instead.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Yes, here is what I get..
Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not
See Technet article 152808 and the associated whitepaper discussed in the
article.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 15:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
FAQ
On 3/5/03
Port 23?
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, here is what I get..
Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on
port 23: Connect failed
I can email
Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up...
On 3/5/03 9:16, Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm looking for some assistance.
Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode
Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log,
singing
When I was 23, it was a very good year...
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain
Port 23?
-Original Message-
Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance
one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572,
it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is
actually the Mx record for that domain.
On 3/5/03 9:38, Gregory
Did you schedule when the warning messages are sent in the Limits
properties page for the mailbox store?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Put the two in separate routing groups and create a routing group
connector that has a message limit in its Content Restrictions
properties page.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
Right-click the parent folder, select All Tasks Propagate Settings.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso
Sent: Tuesday, March
singing
You drank Coors light beer. Got day0 once a year.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
singing
When I was 23, it was a very good year...
- Original Message -
From: Martin
The domain name is rsaarchitects.com if that will help.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Not having the actual
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world
examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the
world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a
neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up...
Sorry for not making this clear, I'm up and running now. I'm just wondering
what went wrong so I can prevent it from happening again -- problems that go
away on their own come back on their
Well, their Mx record points to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net, which seems
to accept mail for the domain in question.
Connected to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net SMTP RS ver 1.0.63s
helo foo.bar
250 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net Hello
Telnetting to rsaarchitects.com 25 resulted in a 572 Relay not authorized -
Connection to host lost message from here as well.
It's not a problem on your end, but on theirs.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:20 AM
I just added a E2K system into an existing 5.5 site. Same routing groups.
When I moved the mailboxes to the E2K system, MAC Outlook users sometimes
get this error. After a resend some of them go through, some NEVER do. None
on the MS Outlook users do get this error ever. These are to outside
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your
business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA
responses to attempt such a thing.
Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses,
especially when working with known domains. (e.g.
http://is.curtin.edu.au/help/hfiles/hfile01.htm
Conversion failure of attachment, resulting in undeliverable messages
If an Office document attached to an email message has been edited and saved
while attached to the message, the message may be returned undeliverable
when sent to a user
Some things to check.
1) Run a trace on the effected message and see what is happening.
2) What events show up in the tracking logs for these messages?
3) For grins make sure the new Exchange 2000 server is in the users hosts
file. Mac users can not use
WINS.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
How do I allow user1 to open user2's mailbox through Outlook 2k profiles
when logged in as user1? (i.e. I don't just want to open the inbox or
other folder, but the whole mailbox using Outlook profiles). I'm using
ES2k.
Giving user1 Full Mailbox Access doesn't seem to do it.
Trevor
I actually tracked a deadbeat ex-friend down once from the source IP in the
header of an email from him.
-Patrick R. Sweeney
http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Is this how you are doing it:
Go to Active Directory under user2's account and go to Exchange
Advanced. Go into the Mailbox Rights and add user1 and click the Full
Mailbox Access box and click apply.
This should work.
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that ends in msn.com. We
are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did what it said in the
257265 XCON KB. It worked fine until about a week ago. Now, I get the following
entry in the event log:
Event Type: Warning
Event
Yes, that's what I tried and it didn't work. I don't think I waited
long enough ... it works now. Sorry for wasting everyone's time.
Trevor
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Allison M. Wittstock wrote:
Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some
real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO
message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to
be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone
I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't
comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than
have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO.
Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of
Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an important point
about mail box limits
cool
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
I was
If you're using Exchange 5.5 and not upgrading that, you'll get better
advice about a W2K upgrade on an NT admin list. Athough if you're just
going to upgrade the one server from NT4 to W2K, it's not difficult,
just pop in the CD - after reading all the KB articles and doing the
obligatory
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the
internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop.
I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all
of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can
set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine
doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a group of about 25 OWA clients that we would like to send a
Contact file to. Is there a way they can import that contact file into
their contacts folder? In Outlook you can just drag and drop, but I
can't seem to figure out how to do it in OWA. We are running Windows
2000 with Exchange
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 2000
I'm still getting the following Message delivery status email almost
everyday, although there is no pattern to the frequency and the time. I have
checked my Message tracking options and they haven't been turned on. There
is no proof of any emails being sent to these
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you can
set on your Private Information store for Send and Send and Receive ? Mine
doens't allow anything above 2097151 KB. Any ideas ?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 2000
I'm still getting the following Message delivery status email almost
everyday, although there is no pattern to the frequency and the time. I have
checked my Message tracking options and they haven't been turned on. There
is no proof of any emails being sent to these
I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a limit is it?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003
Now that's funny :)
Thx for the feedback all!
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox limit you
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would
you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up
line...
--
Matt Cross, MOS+FLA
SAIC -- Orlando
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben
Hello,
I have 3 citrix servers and and every time my user logs into a the citrix
server thru terminal services, she/he gets the application that she/he
needs. When they click on the application the user gets routed to the
appropriate server. However, their profile is created on the C:\ drive under
This might help: (link might wrap)
http://hqextsrvsft01.citrix.com/cgi-bin/webcgi.exe/,/?Session=6731822,U=
1,ST=294,N=0005,K=25163,SXI=13,Case=obj(3924)
Andrew,
CCNA + MCSE ( W2K + NT4 )
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 05,
None of our e-mail mail will go to any e-mail address that
ends in msn.com. We
are able to receive mail from them but not vice versa. I did
what it said in the 257265 XCON KB. It worked fine until
about a week ago. Now, I get the following entry in the event log:
I am seeing more and
Thanks..that definitely makes more sense :-)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the
Technically, that's a problem with Rules, as opposed to Out of Office,
even if the rules are under the Out of Office Wizard. The risks with
allowing rules, i.e. automatic replies or forwards to the Internet, as
you have described are numerous and dangerous.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance
I doubt that a burglar would leave a personal message telling the victim
how he knew of the absence.
I never have claimed that this has happened. But you apply lots of
patches to close vulnerabilities that have never been exploited, no?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Possibly an offshoot of the inability to accurately report mailbox sizes
over 2GB in the UI?
On 3/5/03 14:24, Matt Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would
you
OWA is still not Outlook. Not even in Exchange 2003.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory
Householder
Sent: Wednesday,
I imagine you could use Web Folders and save the contact into those
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sending Contacts to OWA Clients
We have a group of about 25 OWA clients
Replace NAV with something else? Be sure NAV is running at the current
version with most current patches. Escalate the problem with their
support.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From:
Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone seems to be fine except me.
The problem is that it pointed my user to a different mailbox. This
mailbox is just for daily delivery of data files so no one else is
affected. But, it gave me its e-mail address and alias, everything but the
logon name. The
In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that no one could route mail
other than my internal network. But at the same time I was able to have a
computer in another state on a different network connect and send an
e-mail to everyone on our network at all was fine, everyone got the e-mail
from
Ah... Forgot to run NTDSNoMatch eh? You can disconnect a mailbox and connect
it to another. Then disconnect the disabled mailbox enabled user account
which has your mailbox and connect it to your own.
On 3/5/03 19:43, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone
This is done on the SMTP virtual server. Out of the box, only authenticated
users are allowed to relay. You can allow an IP or group of IPs to relay on
the relay restrictions button I believe.
On 3/5/03 21:20, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that
Hi all,
I am looking for a way to export Rules in Outlook.
I need to amend a rule on a particular mailbox hosted on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 Server.
When I open Rules Wizard (with Outlook 2000 SR-1), I am prompted to make a selection
between keeping the Client or Server rules on the machine
I have a client that has 1 server. It's a PDC running NT4 and exchange5.5.
They just bought a new windows 2000 server and want to migrate from the old
server to the new one(they want the old server gone).
Any ideas?
I know how to migrate a NT4 PDC to a Windows 2000 DC. And I know how to
migrate
Hi all
A couple of days ago, I set up a SMTP connector on my E2K SP3 server so
that I can block external email access for some users. I configured it
as per the MS document and all seemed to be working fine.
Today though, no-one seems to be able to send mail to one particular
domain. We have a
64 matches
Mail list logo
