RE: how to cut down on spam
Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders-Exchange 5.5
How access to Public Folders in different Sites, in Differents Domains?? I configure Public Folder Affinity, but nobody have access out the Site. Trust relationship?? It´s necesary?? I access to Public Folders in other Sites, without Trust, and Public folder Affinity. Thanks. Daniel Mataloni _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
owa issues
Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine. On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this winxp machine it is asking for a double login. Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login. Went to ms site and couldn't find anything I was doing wrong? Any help would be amazing. 2nd weird thing is that with the winxp machine the first login allows me to save user id and password, but the 2nd login has the box but even if I check the box and type in my user id and pass it doesn't save it. OWA is accessible though but again with 2 logins. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa issues
Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security settings for the zone (look at the bottom of the list for settings that say Log on using current password, etc.) -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa issues Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine. On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this winxp machine it is asking for a double login. Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login. Went to ms site and couldn't find anything I was doing wrong? Any help would be amazing. 2nd weird thing is that with the winxp machine the first login allows me to save user id and password, but the 2nd login has the box but even if I check the box and type in my user id and pass it doesn't save it. OWA is accessible though but again with 2 logins. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs.
You said that the user has offline folders enabled? Has synchronization finished properly? The OST file may have become corrupt which is causing background synch to hang the Outlook process. Does disabling offline folders fix the problem? If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders anyway (at least not until OL2k3's cached Exchange or Local Store mode) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Michael Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs. I know the whole setup is a nightmare. If I had my way I would slick the thing and start it from scratch. I just have my hands full with this job as it is... I will get back in touch with you guys after I look at it in a day or two. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I didn't know you could upgrade from Me to W2k. Anyhoo, Office 2000 with Outlook 2002 sounds like a bad mix to me. Have you applied all the latest office service packs? - Original Message - From: Michael Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:48 PM Subject: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I've got a client using a laptop that was upgraded to Win2K from WinME. They are using Outlook2002 and also have Office 2000 Premium installed. They are also connected to an Exchange 2000 SBS with offline folders enabled for their mailbox and calendar. When starting the system up and starting Outlook everything is fine. However if you quit Outlook and try and start it later the hourglass will run for a moment and then nothing will happen. I have discovered that after quitting Outlook the outlook.exe process stays listed in task manager's process list, and that killing this process will allow the subsequent instances of Outlook to run. I have already attempted a repair but this had no effect. I was hoping for some input from you guys and gals before I start uninstalling everything on their machine. Thanks in advance, Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: owa issues
The machine is a stand alone not on the domain. It logs in remotely. Avi -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: owa issues Is the XP machine on the domain? What are your IE security settings for the zone (look at the bottom of the list for settings that say Log on using current password, etc.) -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: owa issues Getting a double login prompt from an external XP machine. On site when you go to OWA it only asks you to login once, but off site with this winxp machine it is asking for a double login. Tested with a win2k machine off site and it seemed to work with only one login. Went to ms site and couldn't find anything I was doing wrong? Any help would be amazing. 2nd weird thing is that with the winxp machine the first login allows me to save user id and password, but the 2nd login has the box but even if I check the box and type in my user id and pass it doesn't save it. OWA is accessible though but again with 2 logins. Avi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs.
If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders anyway Disagree. All of my power users where I am now, and every other customer job I've worked on, has OST's setup for desktops. Allows a server to be pulled with less impact on them (it does happen from time to time...). Hell, I have one guy that's still running Exchange 5.0, with circular logging enabled - full OST's on five clients, and a static backup of the server. He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece of data. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions You said that the user has offline folders enabled? Has synchronization finished properly? The OST file may have become corrupt which is causing background synch to hang the Outlook process. Does disabling offline folders fix the problem? If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders anyway (at least not until OL2k3's cached Exchange or Local Store mode) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Michael Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs. I know the whole setup is a nightmare. If I had my way I would slick the thing and start it from scratch. I just have my hands full with this job as it is... I will get back in touch with you guys after I look at it in a day or two. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I didn't know you could upgrade from Me to W2k. Anyhoo, Office 2000 with Outlook 2002 sounds like a bad mix to me. Have you applied all the latest office service packs? - Original Message - From: Michael Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:48 PM Subject: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I've got a client using a laptop that was upgraded to Win2K from WinME. They are using Outlook2002 and also have Office 2000 Premium installed. They are also connected to an Exchange 2000 SBS with offline folders enabled for their mailbox and calendar. When starting the system up and starting Outlook everything is fine. However if you quit Outlook and try and start it later the hourglass will run for a moment and then nothing will happen. I have discovered that after quitting Outlook the outlook.exe process stays listed in task manager's process list, and that killing this process will allow the subsequent instances of Outlook to run. I have already attempted a repair but this had no effect. I was hoping for some input from you guys and gals before I start uninstalling everything on their machine. Thanks in advance, Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, at 3:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece of data. ... and I know people who don't ware their seatbelts because they've never been in an accident. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Recipient Policy
Rgearding the fax proxy address: We had similar problems, but you don't have to remove the custom addresses. If you look in the event log, an error is generated by ExchangeSA which states that a dll couldn't be found in the appropriate directory (path is given in the event). That means that RUS isn't running. If you just copy that dll from your fax software into that directory the RUS on this server will run again. Alas, you have to do that for every RUS and every fax software installed in the forrest even if the fax software is only installed in one domain. After that RUS started to stamp new mailuser again. See also: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;283134 Additionally to the question wether RUS runs or not, have a look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;246127. That info may help. Hope that helps, Till -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 16:41 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: Recipient Policy You didn't happen to install any fax software lately on your exchange server have you? I had the exact same problem where I had to remove the Fax custom address type. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks everyone. Looks like I have a phone call to make. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy You can turn up diagnostic logging on the MSExchangeAL service and it might reveal some problems. The RUS is so secretive that you might just want to call PSS and get them to step you through stuff. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy We have a TON of disabled user accounts out there with mailboxes.!! I bet that is the issue! Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a disabled user account object... Is that the case here? -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Recipient Policy Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs.
Let me think of an appropriate response: get stuffed. Your analogy is inane and irrelevant. I'm describing a real-world situation - he's lost the server a couple of times; he's never lost data. Why should he spend the extra cash for a backup solution that he wouldn't use? [1] [1] Disclaimer: He burns data files to CD-R CD-RW at appropriate intervals. Mail that is contractual in nature tends to end up in paper files; he uses Exchange as an MTA and a calendar tool, not as a document and data repository. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, at 3:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece of data. ... and I know people who don't ware their seatbelts because they've never been in an accident. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs.
Does he have ActiveSync installed? I've had this problem before but I never had offline folders enabled, the only thing that solved it was a complete reinstall of the system -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs. If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders anyway Disagree. All of my power users where I am now, and every other customer job I've worked on, has OST's setup for desktops. Allows a server to be pulled with less impact on them (it does happen from time to time...). Hell, I have one guy that's still running Exchange 5.0, with circular logging enabled - full OST's on five clients, and a static backup of the server. He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single piece of data. -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions You said that the user has offline folders enabled? Has synchronization finished properly? The OST file may have become corrupt which is causing background synch to hang the Outlook process. Does disabling offline folders fix the problem? If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders anyway (at least not until OL2k3's cached Exchange or Local Store mode) Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. -Original Message- From: Michael Wade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process - no pocket pc and will go back and apply service packs. I know the whole setup is a nightmare. If I had my way I would slick the thing and start it from scratch. I just have my hands full with this job as it is... I will get back in touch with you guys after I look at it in a day or two. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I didn't know you could upgrade from Me to W2k. Anyhoo, Office 2000 with Outlook 2002 sounds like a bad mix to me. Have you applied all the latest office service packs? - Original Message - From: Michael Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:48 PM Subject: Closing Outlook doesn't kill process I've got a client using a laptop that was upgraded to Win2K from WinME. They are using Outlook2002 and also have Office 2000 Premium installed. They are also connected to an Exchange 2000 SBS with offline folders enabled for their mailbox and calendar. When starting the system up and starting Outlook everything is fine. However if you quit Outlook and try and start it later the hourglass will run for a moment and then nothing will happen. I have discovered that after quitting Outlook the outlook.exe process stays listed in task manager's process list, and that killing this process will allow the subsequent instances of Outlook to run. I have already attempted a repair but this had no effect. I was hoping for some input from you guys and gals before I start uninstalling everything on their machine. Thanks in advance, Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 Michael Wade ICQ: 4927289 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Recipient Policy
Patrick, If you have not done so already, I would restart the SA on the box that is hosting the RUS. Typically this is where you will see any errors that my relate to your problem (when the RUS is initialized), but only when the SA starts (even with the default logging). Turning up the MSExchangeAL logging will (should) spit out a TON of events in the app log, so be ready to do some filtering and even change the size of you app log to a larger size (as not to miss any errors). -Steve -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy No but we did install Symantic Antivirus/filter for Exchange on the box about a month ago and just noticed this happening a couple weeks ago. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy You didn't happen to install any fax software lately on your exchange server have you? I had the exact same problem where I had to remove the Fax custom address type. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks everyone. Looks like I have a phone call to make. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy You can turn up diagnostic logging on the MSExchangeAL service and it might reveal some problems. The RUS is so secretive that you might just want to call PSS and get them to step you through stuff. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy We have a TON of disabled user accounts out there with mailboxes.!! I bet that is the issue! Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a disabled user account object... Is that the case here? -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Recipient Policy Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: how to cut down on spam
There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash Outlook -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Spammunition filters very well, though you have to maintain a good collection of spam for it to use in building its rules. It just pops up error screens every once in a while. It also doesn't deal well with Inboxes containing lots of unread messages, as it rescans all of them whenever something new comes in, increasing the frequency of the aforementioned error screens. -Peter -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash Outlook -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: how to cut down on spam
We use the Surf Control product and have great success with it. It (along with a lot of other products) allows us to use Reverse DNS lookups and RBL lookups against incomming e-mail to block a lot of spam before it even gets through the door. After it makes it through those checks they have a nice Anti-Spam agent that is updated nightly. In addition, you can do dictionary checks to further eliminate spam and unwanted content. It also gives you the flexibility to setup allow rules to prevent known good domains from being submitted against the anti-spam filters. It took a few weeks to tune all the filters but since then it runs very well. - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 IMS vs. Windows 2000 SMTP
Hello I have an Exchange 5.5 server configured to send internet messages using DNS, except for a couple of domains, that are configured to be forwarded to a relay host instead (the configuration is done in Exchange 5.5 IMS). Now, I have put my Exchange server behind a firewall and configured it to forward all messages to a mail relay host in the DMZ. The mail relay is using the simple Windows 2000 SMTP service. Is it possible to do the same configuration for the Windows 2000 SMTP service (i.e. use DNS to deliver messages except for some domains)? If not, is it possible for Windows 2000 SMTP to forward all mail to a relay server instead of using DNS to deliver them? Thank you for the precious help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
CloudMark's SpamNet is another good client-side filter. http://www.cloudmark.com/products/spamnet/ Of course, having all of your users' e-mail addresses posted on your web site doesn't help matters. ;o) -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how to cut down on spam Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Seriously, Siegfried, Andy, at least half the time I access the PFs (of which I am owner) using OL2002 I get a logon prompt box in which I enter my same logon credentials (THREE times because it rejects them each time) and then goes ahead and let's me in the PF with appropriate access. Yes, I know the scripts should be rewritten. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Jeez, how is that an upside? After we spent the resources to develop this stuff to make it work right during the 5.5 era, now we're told to rewrite everything. So where does this leave us? In another 2 years, given Microsoft's penchant for change, none of it will work with Yukon and here we are again. Yes this is great for system integrators, consultants, etc. but we can't just charge our customers (students) more money to cover all these redevelopment costs. I won't argue about the fact that maybe the scripts should be updated. But that would be a lot of work. And in these times of tight budgets and layoffs (my team has less than HALF the staff we had this time last year but several new major development projects), it doesn't get a chance to boil up in the priority lists and instead becomes a major pain in the derriere and another reason for people to question Microsoft's customer/developer commitment. This is a major problem in an environment (academic) where you have to sell Microsoft to management and users as a server environment (as you know, the sun never stops shining in academia, if you know what I mean) I know, not your problem. We have the same issue with Peoplesoft (at least their backward compatibility is somewhat better, though) and who knows what oracle will do with that. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Well, then at least there's some room for improvement with the server side code. That's an upside I suppose. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 IMS vs. Windows 2000 SMTP
Yes. All you need to do is to set different remote domains under the SMTP virtual server. Be careful, though, do NOT check the allow incoming mail to be relayed to this domain for domains that you are not receiving mail for. Andrew MCSE (w2k/nt4) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:04 AM Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion Conversation: Exchange 5.5 IMS vs. Windows 2000 SMTP Subject: Exchange 5.5 IMS vs. Windows 2000 SMTP Hello I have an Exchange 5.5 server configured to send internet messages using DNS, except for a couple of domains, that are configured to be forwarded to a relay host instead (the configuration is done in Exchange 5.5 IMS). Now, I have put my Exchange server behind a firewall and configured it to forward all messages to a mail relay host in the DMZ. The mail relay is using the simple Windows 2000 SMTP service. Is it possible to do the same configuration for the Windows 2000 SMTP service (i.e. use DNS to deliver messages except for some domains)? If not, is it possible for Windows 2000 SMTP to forward all mail to a relay server instead of using DNS to deliver them? Thank you for the precious help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the recipient. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. All messages are processed to reduce SPAM and Viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AutoDL Upgrade
Ok, so I am a little confused now... In the AutoDL 2.1 upgrade it says: Next, run the install program that came with this readme file. This will install the files needed to create the website, COM+ application, and services. It will also have the scripts needed to upgrade the existing AutoDL 2.0 database Yet, there isn't an install program. Any thoughts? Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Spamassassin is an open source solution that works very well in front of your Exchange Server. Runs best on RH7.3. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tigue Williams Sent: June 24, 2003 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how to cut down on spam Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Synchronizing Public Folders between organizations
Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello List Gurus, I'm having the following problem, We've got two AD structures completely independent (2 Forests). Each of them has an Exchange server with mailboxes and Public Folders. Just now the Administrators decided they wanted the Public Folders synchronized between the servers. Is there any way to do this? If so, how? Thanks in advance, Filipe Joel de Almeida _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Synchronizing Public Folders between organizations
Check out the Interorg Replication Utility. I believe it ships with the Resource Kit, but it could be on the CD. Don't remember. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP One man's Spam is another man's UCE. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello List Gurus, I'm having the following problem, We've got two AD structures completely independent (2 Forests). Each of them has an Exchange server with mailboxes and Public Folders. Just now the Administrators decided they wanted the Public Folders synchronized between the servers. Is there any way to do this? If so, how? Thanks in advance, Filipe Joel de Almeida _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Runs VERY well on OpenBSD 3.3 with sendmail using mimedefang for its milter. -ME -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Spamassassin is an open source solution that works very well in front of your Exchange Server. Runs best on RH7.3. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tigue Williams Sent: June 24, 2003 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how to cut down on spam Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Enabling LDAP in Exchange 5.5
Change the application so that it authenticates or enable anonymous authentication for LDAP. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks Ed, Here is what we are trying to achieve. We are implementing a customized application developed by a third party which has some Exchange integration feature that uses LDAP protocol to retrieve user information through GAL. We are running Exchange 5.5 at our site and we have LDAP enabled with the default settings. To find out if an email client can talk to the server using LDAP, I have created a new mailbox on Exchange server and gave ADMIN permissions under Configuration-Protocol-LDAP-Permissions and try to connect to it via Outlook client using LDAP but I get the following error message Failed to connect to 'Name of our Exchange server' due to invalid authentication. Ensure a valid user name and password has been entered on the Microsoft LDAP configuration page for the Name of the Exchange server account. Additionally If I go to the Protocols tab of the new mailbox I just created, I see that the Recipient Server enabled for LDAP but the settings options are NONE whereas it is defaults for IMAP4 POP3. How can I make the LDAP to work for this new application on Exchange 5.5? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5 LDAP should be enabled in Exchange 5.5 by default. Someone might be able to help you further if you explain what you've tried to do and the results you've gotten. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Enabling LDAP for Exchange 5.5 Can I enable LDAP on Exchange 5.5? How can I go about it implementing it? I would greatly appreciate any help. Thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade
How long have you waited? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John [JM1] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm trying to rehome my public folders from 5.5 to 2k. I've changed the home site and added the 2000 server to the replication list, and also have a ADC for public folders. I can see the folders on the 2000 server, the folders are in AD, but they don't have anything in them. In ESM the folder size and item list is 0, and they are not accessible from Outlook. I've checked the public store has an proxyaddress listed in adsiedit. The servers are in the same site both in exchange and physically, and the folders are less than a meg. How do I get this moved over? Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade
days -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade How long have you waited? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John [JM1] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm trying to rehome my public folders from 5.5 to 2k. I've changed the home site and added the 2000 server to the replication list, and also have a ADC for public folders. I can see the folders on the 2000 server, the folders are in AD, but they don't have anything in them. In ESM the folder size and item list is 0, and they are not accessible from Outlook. I've checked the public store has an proxyaddress listed in adsiedit. The servers are in the same site both in exchange and physically, and the folders are less than a meg. How do I get this moved over? Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Terry, I feel for you. I really do. The lighthearted upside I meant was that rather than sorry, you're screwed, there's no possible way to improve the situation, you at least have an option available to you, however unpalatable it might be. Public Folders are very likely to change again sometime in the future. The Yukon implications are a complete unknown right now, but I'd gamble that things from a development standpoint will not look the same. At TechEd, the Yukon version of Exchange was placed at 2006 at the soonest. Given the conservative nature you folks have expressed about hotfixes, I'm led to believe 2007+ might be the soonest you would go to that platform. Given a 4+ year window, getting your rules/event script stuff changed to event sinks that can fire more reliably on all items does seem like a possible path that makes financial sense. Microsoft did end up leaving the 5.5 Event Script capability in Exchange 2003, which they had said at one point they would not do, so at least some scant attention has been paid to backward compatibility. In this case, though it's healthy to be wary of hotfixes, I'd sure try it in the lab and look to implement it if it helps the rules work better. One of the problems I see is that while everyone I know says they have public folder problems, few have actually made the necessary PSS calls to make them get the right amount of attention from the Exchange team. With the release of the hotfix that changes the default to IPM.Note, it's obvious that some threshold of documented pain was reached. I filed a bug on this during the Exchange 2000 JDP during Beta 2. I filed it again on Exchange 2003. And I will keep telling Microsoft what I need and what I perceive others need from Public Folders. It's obvious what influence I carry though. :) I think the permissions problems are worthy of further discussion. It sounds to me like there is more than one issue. Is that correct? Do you have problems both simply accessing the public folders and also accessing the public folder rights? Cheers, Andy ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:59 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Jeez, how is that an upside? After we spent the resources to develop this stuff to make it work right during the 5.5 era, now we're told to rewrite everything. So where does this leave us? In another 2 years, given Microsoft's penchant for change, none of it will work with Yukon and here we are again. Yes this is great for system integrators, consultants, etc. but we can't just charge our customers (students) more money to cover all these redevelopment costs. I won't argue about the fact that maybe the scripts should be updated. But that would be a lot of work. And in these times of tight budgets and layoffs (my team has less than HALF the staff we had this time last year but several new major development projects), it doesn't get a chance to boil up in the priority lists and instead becomes a major pain in the derriere and another reason for people to question Microsoft's customer/developer commitment. This is a major problem in an environment (academic) where you have to sell Microsoft to management and users as a server environment (as you know, the sun never stops shining in academia, if you know what I mean) I know, not your problem. We have the same issue with Peoplesoft (at least their backward compatibility is somewhat better, though) and who knows what oracle will do with that. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Well, then at least there's some room for improvement with the server side code. That's an upside I suppose. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Three times? That reminds me... If you have the Exchange Server scripting add-on enabled in Outlook, MAPI Outlook will open three connections to the Exchange server (without the Exchange scraping add-on, only two). One for each store (mailbox and public) and one to the scripting system folder. I wonder if that is related to the general problem. I also saw similar issues back in 1998 when we had a network issue and the RPC/NETBIOS calls failed. Changing the RPC binding order helped these days but since the Outlook 2002 process to connect to an Exchange server has changed I am not sure if the former issue might happen here too. -Original Message- From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Seriously, Siegfried, Andy, at least half the time I access the PFs (of which I am owner) using OL2002 I get a logon prompt box in which I enter my same logon credentials (THREE times because it rejects them each time) and then goes ahead and let's me in the PF with appropriate access. Yes, I know the scripts should be rewritten. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to cut down on spam
Peter, That said, the latest on the Spammunition website is to suggest he is changing the logic so that there is no need to manually rescan. I agree the errors are frustrating - but the product is not bad for free for a client. themolk. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2003 3:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Spammunition filters very well, though you have to maintain a good collection of spam for it to use in building its rules. It just pops up error screens every once in a while. It also doesn't deal well with Inboxes containing lots of unread messages, as it rescans all of them whenever something new comes in, increasing the frequency of the aforementioned error screens. -Peter -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Can you elaborate flakey? They are hit or miss on filtering or the crash Outlook -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam There are a couple of free Bayesian spam filters that work with Outlook in an Exchange environment, Spammunition and SpamBayes. They're both beta at this point so they're kind of flakey, but Spammunition, the one I'm using right now, is quite effective. If you have individuals who are really getting hammered and need immediate relief, one or the other may help. -Peter -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam Has anyone heard or used the surf control product. It seems much more expensive than logstat ISP or XWALL. Can anyone mention any differences? We definitely don't want to block real customers from sending us email--just the spam. --- Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you want to take a look at this : http://www.logsat.com/SpamFilter/default.asp It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 23:38 To: Exchange Discussions Hi all... We are running Exchange 5.5 and as most of you we receive a lot of spam in the company. My company does not want to buy any spam sofware as it cost a lot of money. Is there anything built into exchange that will help reduce the spam? Is there anything that could be done on the Outlook Client that will reduce the spam? We are also running GroupShield. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
See also Andy's comments. I really don't think it's in a 2 year timeframe. I saw the first Yukon demo 2 years ago and the beta just started now... As for anything will change in the next version of Exchange Server: yes, no doubts. Same happened in Windows 2003 IIS6 and Sharepoint Portal Server 2003 already and other products will follow. SPS2003 is actually a pretty good example to see which architecture we can except in Exchange 2005 (or whatever it'll be named). This is from a developer point of view the same hassle as from a customer who is using that stuff, I agree completely with you on that. However, I dare to ask myself if it is worth to stick with the old technology and just live with restarting a hanging service (or to make it worse: reboot the server) every now and then or probably jump into the cold water and rewrite the stuff to finally get a more stable system at all. I do understand that nowadays everyone (including my company) has small budgets (can you say no budget?) and less resources to work with. But as Andy said, if you plan to stick with the currently existing technology (which makes totally sense from a business point of view and I would do the same if working in your environment with that amount of customers/students) I'd really consider to iron out one of the potential showstoppers by migration the code base. I was really scared when I red that you guys need to start the Exchange 2000 Event Service every now and then. I know that it was never 100% reliable to use Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent technology (as you know too, I'm sure), hence now with Windows 2000 SP4 and Exchange 2000 SP4 around the corner I'd say it is safe to move forward and stick with it for the next 3-4 years as you did with the Exchange 5.5 scripting stuff (I remember our first e-mail contact back in 1999 and when we met at TechEd 2001). It seems to have done it work for almost 6 years fairly well. So, it doesn't hurt to retire it, or? BTW, If you need any particular help I'd be happy to do so. I've a gazillion of code snippets around I'd share with you guys to get you started. -Original Message- From: Beavers, Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Jeez, how is that an upside? After we spent the resources to develop this stuff to make it work right during the 5.5 era, now we're told to rewrite everything. So where does this leave us? In another 2 years, given Microsoft's penchant for change, none of it will work with Yukon and here we are again. Yes this is great for system integrators, consultants, etc. but we can't just charge our customers (students) more money to cover all these redevelopment costs. I won't argue about the fact that maybe the scripts should be updated. But that would be a lot of work. And in these times of tight budgets and layoffs (my team has less than HALF the staff we had this time last year but several new major development projects), it doesn't get a chance to boil up in the priority lists and instead becomes a major pain in the derriere and another reason for people to question Microsoft's customer/developer commitment. This is a major problem in an environment (academic) where you have to sell Microsoft to management and users as a server environment (as you know, the sun never stops shining in academia, if you know what I mean) I know, not your problem. We have the same issue with Peoplesoft (at least their backward compatibility is somewhat better, though) and who knows what oracle will do with that. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Well, then at least there's some room for improvement with the server side code. That's an upside I suppose. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not Open Relay, but...
Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IQLinkXS vs AlarmPoint vs TelAlert
We use IQLinkXS with NetIQ AppManager and have been happy. But I do know there have been lots of cuts and tech support has gone down hill. Ryan -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: IQLinkXS vs AlarmPoint vs TelAlert Hi all, I was just wondering if anyone here had experience with these products. I am looking for opinions. I am currently testing IQLinkXS - it seems to be a nice product. It integrates with NetIQ and can have all kinds of on-call, rotation, escalation paths and supports a variety of protocols _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not Open Relay, but...
NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Not Open Relay, but... Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not Open Relay, but...
Hi John, Is this in response to my question #3? If so, does everyone receive over 2000 messages every hour in the 'Admin' mailbox with a subject line of 'Notification: Inbound Mail Failure? I understand getting some but over 2000 an hour? Each of these messages is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. It's just random letters in front of the domain name @dfg.com and there's just a ton of them. Thanks for any ideas, all. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Not Open Relay, but... Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not Open Relay, but...
For #3, what you are seeing is spammer trying to find valid addresses @dfg.com by simply guessing addresses and trying them, your best bet would be to turn off the notification on your IMS for E-mail address could not be found. For #2, yes they will sit in the queue until they are delivered or just time out. For #1, are you sure you're not an open relay? See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Preventing_Third_Party_Relaying_In_MS_Exchange_Server_55.html. - Dave - Original Message - From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... Hi John, Is this in response to my question #3? If so, does everyone receive over 2000 messages every hour in the 'Admin' mailbox with a subject line of 'Notification: Inbound Mail Failure? I understand getting some but over 2000 an hour? Each of these messages is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever. It's just random letters in front of the domain name @dfg.com and there's just a ton of them. Thanks for any ideas, all. Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... NDR's (non-delivery reports) from spammer's probably. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Not Open Relay, but... Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade
Then something is keeping replication from happening. How is public folder replication schedule configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John [JM1] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions days -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folders problem with 5.5 upgrade How long have you waited? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits, John [JM1] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm trying to rehome my public folders from 5.5 to 2k. I've changed the home site and added the 2000 server to the replication list, and also have a ADC for public folders. I can see the folders on the 2000 server, the folders are in AD, but they don't have anything in them. In ESM the folder size and item list is 0, and they are not accessible from Outlook. I've checked the public store has an proxyaddress listed in adsiedit. The servers are in the same site both in exchange and physically, and the folders are less than a meg. How do I get this moved over? Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not Open Relay, but...
1. Probably not. If your Exchange faces the Internet, it should reject the relay attempt during the RCPT TO: command, so the messages won't be accepted for delivery and therefore they won't be NDRed. 2. Yes. 3. If dfg.com is your domain then it's normal spam to automatically generated addresses. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, NT 4 SP6a and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Domain in question is DFG.com I've just taken over a site's Exchange server and have noticed something strange. It's been sometime since I had to play with Exchange this deep but the Queues on my IMS keep filling up with 1000's of emails. We're not an Open Relay that I can tell (I've tested) but there's just a ton of 'Outbound Message Awaiting Delivery' with originator and Destination Host of different .com's. There is a ton of Inbound Mail Failures in the 'Admin' mailbox for delivery failures as well. My three questions are: 1) Are these messages that are trying to relay but failing? 2) If so, are they just going to sit in the Queue for the default time? 3) For the Inbound Mail Failures, a lot of them are going to bogus addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are these all coming from? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
