I have yet to do this but...
What do I need to do is give my assisatant access to my
bosses clendar in outlook.
What do I need to do to make it so she can view his calendar
from her desktop?
Thanks Ahead of time.
This is really an Outlook question, not Exchange, but...
(Answer based
Hello All.
Having problems with users logging into OWA/Exchange 2000. They put in their username
and password and domain name. When they click OK, the window stays and the password
box is highlighted.
I verified that the accounts are not locked out and have even reset their passwords.
There are pros cons for these 2 methods.
Rule wizard - give user's flexibility to turn on the out of office
redirect their emails to elsewhere.
Alternate recipient - user has to contact ITS all the time usually
they like to do redirection too frequently.
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks you hit the nail on the head. ISP shut down ports. Created VPN
with 2k real quick customer could login in. How do I know for sure I'm
Handling exchange traffic only?
Thanks again
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August
At least the apostrophe was in the right place. :)
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Saturday, August 09, 2003 7:19 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Subject: RE: DS/IS Consistency Adjuster
Of course I
Yep.
Step 1. Connect to internet.
Step 2. Open Outlook offline.
Step 3. Click F9 (which initiates my VPN connection)
Step 4. Get beer from fridge.
Step 5. Order Chinese food for delivery.
Step 6. Get another beer from fridge.
Step 7. Read e-mail.
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, it's certainly improved with every version of Outlook I've used I
found it quite tolerable in Outlook 2000 and later using the methodology I
described elsewhere in the thread. I also used to teach laptop users who to
best use Outlook on the road, so I have rules, sync groups and filters
Without wanting to insult you or anything, you do realise that domain admin and
exchange admin have nothing to do with each other generally speaking? If you've
changed things so this isn't the case here fine, but the two don't go together as a
matter of course.
-Original
I like Antigen
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it
Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a
compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari
Antigen implementation to coincide with our next infrastructure upgrade.
IMO FWIW YMMV
From: Scott Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange
A tale of bad programming gone awry, and a cautionary tale concerning our future
ability to push out software upgrades. I work for a company of 1,800 users and over
the past five years my work has included installing and maintaining the companiy's NT
domain and Exchange 5.5 system, automating
Are you filtering ports through your VPN?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ports over VPN
Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over
vpn?
thanks.
Probably not... Extending the schema well ahead of time is actually a good
idea as it will allow for replication to complete prior to installation. I'd
recommend going to E2K3 though at this point if at all possible.
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am new to this group but hopefully, someone can assist on this issue.
If not, perhaps direct me to another forum? We use OWA, exclusively, on
front-end servers with a clustered back-end Exchange 2000. A job
requirement is to disallow use of the Global Address List (no entries are
allowed to
I will be doing a rather complex deployment it the near future dealing with
Exchange. Can anyone recommend a good ISA list?
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
Anyone have a list of the ports used by Outlook to Exchange 5.5 over
vpn?
thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
It is 16gb, and once you have reached the limit, you have 2 options.
1) run eseutil to perform an offline defrag of the database, removing
any whitespace - cross your fingers and hope that you have enough
whitespace to get below the limit. Requires roughly 1 1/2 times the
size of the database to
I'll second that.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
I like Antigen
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
W. 864 239-1015
-Original
We are in the process of rolling out VPN (PPTP/IPSEC) to allow access to
remote access to Exchange.
But I've heard the performance is really dismal especially over dial-up.
I've also heard OL 03 with EX 03 takes care of this problem, by using RPC
over HTTP.
Should we wait and upgrade to OL/EX 03
Domain admin doesn't mean snot when it comes to Exchange 5.5. You need
to make sure that the account you are using to back up Exchange has
rights to the Org, Site and Server. Many people simply use the Exchange
Service account to back up with. Either do that, or make sure this
account has
Good Technology...Rocks!
Ive got , my sales guy's love it..like almost 100% itergration with
OL/Exchange
once the unit is setup the only time I have to recradle the unit is to do a
software upgrade to the unit..
USA Only a this time..OK it work in Sao Paulo Brazil
RIM - BB
Im also demoing the BB
Oh, I agree completely. I was simply repurposing a response I received
earlier today on another topic to see if it sounded any better applied to
another technical issue. It didn't.
From: Martin, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, at 10:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You do not own your ISP's network, your ISP does.
And that makes any arbitrary decision they choose to implement acceptable?
Acceptable? Perhaps not. You can always switch to another ISP. Of
course, if all ISPs are doing the same
MS Word has the Revision feature built-in
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Paperless workflow and digital signatures
With all do respect, I don't want to argue the symantics
Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you will find a
magic bullet for this.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
We are in the
Simple really, NO.
Why would you need it? All that a software inventory, management, etc. tool
is going to do is add overhead to a central resource. Have you had problems
in the past with strange software just showing up on your servers? We do an
annual inventory check of all our core systems.
Sticking with them for now.
May rethink that when we go to Exchange 2003.
- Original Message -
From: Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Is anyone out there supporting or
Oh yea. Use OST's
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
Outlook via dialup by any means is awful. I don't think you will find a
magic bullet for this.
-Original
Nope your right, I'm not.
If we ran our inventory package to only read from the add/remove program
list, then your right it has no system impact. However I really want to
know what is installed on the system, so we expand that search to look for
executables on all local hard drives. By doing
Over dialup?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
I'll second that.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)
The account you're using to run the backup has administrative rights on the
server?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Force
I am actually looking for a process for people to sign (digitally) a
document then pass it on to the next person. This will be an internal
application so the need for an actual key isn't necessary. A date/time
stamp would be nice as would some sort of historical tracking.
- Matt
Matthew
You still have to connect to the VPN to synchronize. So yes, it is
still as secure :-)
The big gain is that users do not notice the performance hit from the
VPN because they are running everything in offline mode and just
requesting updated information every 10 minutes or whatever. The only
Hello All.
Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users. When I click on the Mailbox
Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error:
The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object
ID no: c1041722
Microsoft Active
Thanks guys, I'll give them a look also. If I go the way of Antigen, are
there any undocumented features I should look out for?
Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a
compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari
Antigen
Keep us updated. I'm thinking about using SUS, and this is a good
example of where it would be useful...
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
thanks, I
I'm thinking about trying out citrix
-Original Message-
From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
So are OSX Macs therefore doomed to OWA, or is there an alternative?
-Original
Who do you trust is the question.
The first line shows that a machine calling itself 169.139.15.251 (Call
it B) connected to your mailhost (A), but your mailhost saw its IP
address was 210.91.16.8. If you own machine B, or if it's your trusted
ISP, that's fine. Otherwise it was just a spammer at
I know I can use PFINFO and PFADMIN, I am asking if you agree with the Karen's
solution and if not is there any automated ways to get rid of the invalid DNs?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:00 PM
To: Exchange
Thanks guys.
Another question tho - if mail is in the queue directory, why would it
not show in the queue under exchange system manager default smtp server
queues?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Actually you can unless you are under an open license. If you are on open, you have to
order the media kit. Here is the link for select and enterprise. Note
you will need your contract info to register for access.
Select and Enterprise licenses:
Hi All,
I'm not sure if this issue started when we moved our SMTP connector from Ex5.5 to E2K
but I have noticed that incoming SMTP email is delayed until an outgoing email is
processed. E2k queues are always 0. I'm thinking that this might be an issue with the
implementation of MailMarshall
Ok, can anyone confirm how it works with E2K?
With 5.5 you get what looks like an IMAP connection...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Entourage
Its designed for E2K or higher
If you have a Volume Licensing agreement with Microsoft you can download
it from the site as of that date.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woodruff,
Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
it's what happens when you've beer goggled too much...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
What's a google?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My recollection is that it puts a log there only if there is a problem.
Can't say for sure, though, because I'm running Outlook 2003 now. It puts
log messages for problems only in the Sync Issues folder.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century.
Hi all
I have an implementation of OWA with Exchange 2000 using ISA server as a
reverse proxy. The ISA server does not have IIS installed for security
reasons and acts as HTTPStoHTTP converter. We would like to have a
modified logon page for OWA where we can put a security notice from our
Currently 5.5 on NT in mixed mode w/4 DC's. Planning to migrate to E2K on
W2K in a couple months. Down time is hard to come by.
Question: Are there any repercussions on updating the Schema alot sooner
than migrating to E2K?
I have a small (very small) test lab and have noticed the time length
Remeber with the Pocket PC devices..battery life bites..
with the 957 I can get a solid 5 day of heavy usage without recharge
for the G100..they said a day or maybe two less.
with the my BES demo server and 6710 (GSM and phone) I get about 2 maybe 3
day's minimal phone usage..mainly stand by
Looking up c1041722 in Technet yields a number of hits.
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM
Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Hello All.
Still having a problem viewing
My point is that you're spending money on an internal AV product for mail
(i.e. ScanMail or Antigen) plus the second layer at the gateway - either
internal or external. My caution is geared towards those who think that they
ONLY need the outsourcer for AV.
I must say I agree. Our organization does not allow POP3 or IMAP4 access
currently hence Entourage is useless for MS Exchange access.
I am sticking with Outlook for Mac 2001 until they fix this or until my
company allows IMAP access.
--
From: Erik Sojka
Reply To: Exchange
Well it hit last Friday if you haven't been hit your AV vendor is doing
their job
From: Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MIMAIL virus
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:28:29 -0500
Was wondering how many
Hello Samantha:
In my opinion, BLBs are not worth 2 cents!
NTBackup doesn't do BLBs, as Chris said, however, you could use ExMerge to
export VIP mailboxes (as someone else posted earlier).
We use W2k NTBackup to disk then another scheduler to write that E2k data
to tape and it works very well.
All I see are the messages that another attachment has been blocked.
I hear them knocking, but they ain't getting' in.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
We use Netbackup, thankfully it's not my responsibility, so the backup team
do BLB's for their sins to our masters.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003
If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported. That's no.3 in the list here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 06
The plot thickens. I have surrounded the path in quotes, resulting in a
request like the one below:
C:\cscript regevent.vbs add onSyncDelete OfficeCalendar.SyncEvents
file://./backofficestorage/exchangedemo.local/mbx/Berry/calendar
Now i get this result:
Error Opening Record : -2147024891
Hi,
I accidentally deleted some public folders on exchange 2000. Is there a
way to undelete them? Any help will be appreciated!
Thanks and have a great day!
Vivek Singh
_
List posting FAQ:
Clear your browser cache.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alex Alborzfard
Posted At: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:48 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: OWA Viewing Error
Subject: OWA Viewing Error
When I try to
Does anyone know of a way to query the exchange server or get some kind of report of
mailboxes that are full or approaching full? Aside from going into system manager and
manually viewing the mailbox sizes?
Thanks,
Patrick Scribner, MCSE
DBA
Westwood College
303-464-2381
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange does not reserve a large file initially.
Each evening when store maintenance runs it logs an event in the application
log that tells you the amount of that database file size that is free space.
Exchange will reuse the free space before expanding the file.
The database file will never
I'm just a non-developer whose only claim to fame is knowing the difference
between your and you're, but I believe that your registration syntax is
incorrect. The URL you are using refers to an item which already exists..
The calendar folder of the mailbox Berry (i.e. Your scope is incorrect). I
Search on Google. I have seen products like that before.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got
Unlikely your Exchange server is generating this error. More likely it's
whatever is answering at exchange.satake-usa.com.
From: Don Bruess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:43:15 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is anyone else getting the update source not found error?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Watch Out - New Virus
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_MSB
Exchange, then the OS.
If you upgrade the OS first, E2k will crap out.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003
What? I thought it was the other way
It wraps add LAST.A to the end
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:40:50 -0700
Aye
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff
Try connecting your clients to the IP Address and see if they hold their
connectivity.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original
Bingo, I found on the hardware fire wall an icon I did not recognize, I
researched it and found it set the size limits to 3meg. Thanks to all who
helped or tried to help.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:11 PM
To:
I believe they must be mail-enabled.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:29 AM
To:
Add yourself to all of the DLs and see how often you get mail.
From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:39:43 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Monitoring DL Usage
Hello,
I would like to
Hmmm. No, it won't work if they're not in the same ORG. I'd follow Chris's
link from before regarding some of the command line utilities from
Slipstick. Use one of those to generate/modify the profile during login.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key
Ah thanks Miles...well then that would leave me out as I am Open...
Oh well just have to wait for the media.
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 5:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Running Exchange 2000
Hi all
Apologies if this is sent twice but my first post seems to have gone
missing. We have an OWA implementation using ISA server as a reverse proxy
(HTTPS to HTTP converter). The ISA server is in a DMZ and communicates
with an EX2K front end server on the corporate LAN. IIS is not installed
on
Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or is there
a easy way of doing it.
Thanks Regards,
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
You can see where the Exchange Org inherits some of the permissions
from.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange permissions
What about it?
If I use ADSIEdit to view the
How do I get the AGENT tab to show up on my Outlook? I can see some on the
resources I have working, but not on those that are not working.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Trend has been blocking it nicely since last Friday.
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIMAIL virus
Was wondering how many people are getting hit with this at the moment.
Thanks!
Mine were sounding real loud too. But to my surprise everything went beautifully.
Hope yours goes just as well.
Good Luck!
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade from
Also, running smtpreinstall.exe as appropriate for your service pack ,
fixes this issue. (sometimes) YMMV.
There isn't very good info on this utility. This is the article I
followed: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=319885
I only did this part though:
For Exchange 2000 SP2 or later you can
[1] I hate grammar Nazi's. This is email, not English class. G37 0V3R 17!!
[2] I did RTFM. I guess I just didn't get to the part about Public Folders
not showing up correctly. I figured since I was browsing through the recent
posts, I would just ask a simple question and see what others results
MSDN and the Exchange SDK are places to start if you'd like to do it
yourself. Sure there are plenty of developers out there who'd be happy to
take on such a project.
From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:15:12 +0500
Yes.
W2K's will as well.
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 9:28 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W2K3 and E2K3 and NTBackup
I'm starting to plan for my 5.5/W2K to E2K3/W2K3 migration. We currently use
NTBackup to
Thanks guys ...
This is really interesting
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Header Question
Actually, the spam originated from 210.91.16.8 - the other
That is exactly what he's saying. Do you have a SMTP Gateway setup to
stop spam, or a virus filter, or both?
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
Hi,
Management is looking at placing LanDesk software inventory/metering on
all production clusters, Exchange servers, SQL DBs, etc. across our
company.
I have worked in companies that implement software inventory solutions
targeting desktops/clients but not to core service IT systems.
My
I'm a non-developer too, that's the problem ;-)
First let's mention that the permission problem was fixed by adding the
account executing regevent.vbs has been added as an owner for the Calendar
folder in Outlook.
Next, maybee i don't quite get that scoping stuff. I want the events i
want to
Scott,
What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield
versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to
GroupShield to save money since we have a site license for the campus that
includes Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force
Hi Brett:
Hummm, where to I start
I have never seen this problem. What is the error message? Is
it a MAPI error? I'm betting it is. I doubt it is really Exchange 2003
related, but more related to the fact that you have Outlook installed on
the Exchange server.
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per
messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has
no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this
started
I am trying to run it on an AD domain. I am trying to extend the schema
in perpetration for the first Exchange 2K server in the site. The
Exchange 5.5 server is in a trusted NT 4 domain. I have checked the
site and org names and they appear to be fine. I am now on the phone
with MS tech
I just did one this morning.no problem here.
s.
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rebuild RUS
Can do a rebuild of RUS online, does it affect exchange at all?
I have to support a temp server for 2 more weeks running win2k sp4 and
exchange 2k sp3. No firewall ( I know) All users are remote. OWA does
work.
Outlook worked yesterday not today. All of the sudden no one remotely
can login. I can login the server is my network. This server has been
running
CSVDE or LDIFDE to a text file. Massage the text file with your choice
of word processing tools so that it could be imported into a Contacts
type folder. Import the resulting text file into the Contacts type
folder of your choice.
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL
You changed over how?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 5.5 mapping error
Have just
Thanks Neil,
Harriet
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2003 11:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Secondary smtp addresses in exchange 5.5
Ah, that old chestnut! Use a column 'secondary-proxy-addresses'. See
Yep!
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: RE: Problems with forwarding attachments received from the internet
Andy, I take it then, that it does not come with the
The DAT from Trend just came out. 604.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Watch Out - New Virus
Aye
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11,
Is the IMC configured to not allow automatic forwards to the Internet now?
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 464 matches
Mail list logo
