So the answer is: *insert drumroll here*
D. None of the above.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
If the log drive
I like this argument, but i'll bet, those that are in favor using SMTP for
Email and not FTP (go figure) are the old school types that believe in
Internet Standards (RFC's) and don't believe in breaking them even if the
mail system they use breaks several of them.
The other folks don't really
3
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Easybake Oven
Anyone who thinks that thinks cooking is only for girls
should watch Emeril
on FoodTV!
...Joel
--
Rate
Use outlook express, there you actually have the functionality to turn it
off. Or, turn Outlook into the Internet Only mode (IMO) and you can choose
not to send receipts. (although I know there is a reg hack mentioned in
TechNet that explains how to make the server stop sending receipts like
... can't resist a reply see below
-Original Message-
From: tech [mailto:
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Better Version?
When you talk about 5.5 vs. 2k, you have to evaluate Active Directory.
AD can become the spoke of a cross
Troll. -2 karma.
Don't need slashdot to see where this is headed. :) putting on my flame
proof penguin pants and shaking my eightball. *Outlook not good* HEY!
Nathan
-this space intentionally left blank-
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-- but don't include your current employer
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil
Hope your resume is current.
- Original
is this like ad-libs? Pick an noun?
Purple Dinosaur?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: HIJACKED THREAD: hotmail Service unavailable (WAS :
Internet Mail )
Cuz Richard is
Exchange 5.5 SP4
NT 4.0 SP6a
Outlook 2000
When reviewer permissions are set on a calendar, you can't open a private
appointment directly but you can view appointments marked private by
navigating up or down using the arrows for previous/next meetings. Is this
a feature?
Example: User A uses
-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: View all Private Meetings of other users...
Exchange 5.5 SP4
NT 4.0 SP6a
Outlook 2000
When reviewer permissions are set on a calendar, you can't
open a private
Where is your discretion? Forwarding an offline post to a public list.
WTF? ...Somebody must have forgotten to read the FAQ on posting in public
places. (or read the archives)
Regardless of how many people know that you strive to be rude, this is
ruthless and a slap in the face to every
But the Kings men are still looking for Humpty Dumpty, alhtough he was seen
being carried off my a horsemen in 5 in. heels.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing 'Shut
JavaScript is Microsoft's concoction of what they felt Java should be like.
Pure Java uses a Sun Java approved runtime (like IBM's).
JavaScript has just about the same issues as VBscript, and doesn't really
have a sandbox. Only the real Java does.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From:
in
applying fixes or
securing machines which is where this thread really began...
and should have
died. *sigh*
[1] Preaching to the choir gets a tad old.
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange
Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 November 2001 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
JavaScript is Microsoft's concoction of what they felt Java
should be like
One of those _Inner-Circle_ things, eh?
They had Exchange back then? I thought everybody just used refrigerators
and post-it notes...
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hi
I've seen this happen on some of the other lists I'm on. Thank heaven for
procmail and mutt. :)
It seems only the HTML replies from Outlook 2xxx users on Exchange 2k that
have this happening. Perhaps the IMC isn't converting something? I don't
have a 2k box to track it down on. But it
Nimda required the IUSR_MachineName account to have read
access into the
\WinNT tree. A properly secured server would have that
directory (and ALL
directories outside Inetpub\www) explicity denied permissions.
If you came from a different background, that _would_ be a flaw in the
Learned from this thread:
1. That Microsoft Security is a sensitive issue
2. There have been much longer Fish Taco threads
3. There is no spoon.
Action Items:
1. Check out that alt.advocacy.die thing
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Black, Nathan
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
Nimda required the IUSR_MachineName account to have read
access
2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
Hmmm... funny... last time I checked, neither NT nor W2k artbitrarily
changes permissions. But maybe that's just because I didn't
get infected
with Nimda.
-Original Message-
From: Black
A book by you on this would sell.
I want it to keep going. You should do weekly installments on the history
of Microsoft Messaging platforms.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Exchange
We are evaluating archive products.
Current products we are thinking about evaluating
C2C Archive One --uses Exchange public folder back-end servers for the
archive
www.c2c.com
KVS Kvault --not proprietary, uses .msg files on NTFS with the zedlib
compression library, SQL front end
I think that has 'list server' written all over it.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Bauer, Mr. Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Blast E-Mail: Best practices/product
suggestions?
Note sure
You punched a peeve.
After supporting over 100 Windows home users a weekend for the last eight
months, I can tell you, they updated from windows update or the 'update
alert' and kept up with the updates until the computer started giving
Exception OE's out the wazoo.
So then they 'rebooted'
Flame. -4 Karma. I can't resist the reply to that bit of nonsense.
No, if Microsoft made a secure OS it would be the end of the world, because
you know H.E.-double-toothpick will be frozen over.
(if the truth hurts, stop here)
Microsoft is under Anti-trust scrutiny because they made shady
Use Nmap www.insecure.org or another type of port scanner to connect to port
25 of a series of ip addresses through the network.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Wise aged Exchange Pros:
Does putting the swap file on it's own spindle, gain much in performance?
Or is it better to just split the system mirror and put the swap on the
second half?
Proposed configuration is:
1. Mirror for system
1 Mirror for swap
1 Mirror for logs
1 Raid 0+1 for database
. I'd use those two drives to add to
your R 0+1 to give more spindles for your database.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Black, Nathan
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ahem, Server
rather than
love. --Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Black, Nathan
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sending replies to Exchange List
MSHTML for email IS bad
Somebody has been reading to much BOFH lately. :)
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I prefer to be a nazi bitch and crank down mailbox
Discussions
Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I must be paranoid and ignorant. What on earth is BOFH? I
can think of
several acronyms, but I couldn't kiss my mother if I repeated them.
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January
I can't
figure out why it would work by IP Add and not FQDN or via
the Server Name.
That would be DNS.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Help
Hello,
I am
thing that I checked.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Help
I can't
figure out why it would work by IP Add and not FQDN or via
the Server Name
I found this once, but can't seem to find it again. The Oreilly book
doesn't seem to have the answer either, and I didn't write it down. :(
In Exchange 5.5, where is the Event Service object so I can lower my
diagnostic logging settings?
Nathan
nevermind. I remember now
//hklm/services/ccs/...
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event Service
I found this once, but can't seem to find it again. The Oreilly book
interesting. If you try viewing ths page with Opera Microsof says
There was a problem rendering the requested content. Please retry your
request.
URL: http://support.microsoft.com/support/misc/unsupported.asp
Too many automatic redirections attempted.
But if you set Opera to report as IE
I believe that the answer to the question about a shop's behaviour is that
it depends.
Perhaps, there could exist an assumption that there are two types of shops.
It consultant shops, and product specialist shops.
The shop that only considers one solution is a product specialist.
An
38 matches
Mail list logo
