Yeah I've got an opinion on Brightstore sure enough, but as many people
operate filters on naughty words, I'll confine myself to stating that
it does not meet my minimum quality and reliability standards for server
software.
-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
worked properly to the point where I could trust
it to work on backing things up unsupervised, and I never trusted it to
restore properly either after many bad experiences.
Robert Moir MS MVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0
0 rows returned
Hi Robert,
So then, what software are you using what is your current
software max quality relibility
can provide ?
Maybe i can apply !!
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Exchange
up Exchange 5.5
Do you still remember the difficulty that you made on ArcServe ?
Wondering ..
Thanks
Fiooon
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing up
?
Robert Moir
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0
0 rows returned
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
That reminds me, I need to reinstall my copy of that here at work.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/10/2002 13:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mail loop
Ahh but is that tolerance = Has an impact on their business process
or
tolerance = Whines to helpdesk cos the daily dilbert ain't arrived yet.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 15/10/2002 13:52
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: 04 November 2002 18:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hu you being rude to someone elseimagine that?
You saying nothing of value AGAIN... Imagine that?
Robert Moir
IT Systems
But when have facts worried a lienux zealot?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 20:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving E2k storage group to new Server
It's not open and it's certainly not Exchange.
parable
for computing issues.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: 07 November 2002 18:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Computing issues like say... an RBL?
I meant lots of other computing issues as well as...
I applaud your amazing insight.
And
to retrieve something.
Your company doesn't have the practice of cross charging internal
departments for work that's outside the normal scope of the job?
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe
I don't think he mentioned the version at all, precht. Why not get your
head out of your event ID'd ass and tell us what pearl of wisdom you
would have used to solve the problem, you shining beacon of perfection,
you.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace
My gut reaction would be to take a hit of diet pepsi and ask myself why I felt so
threatened by this newsletter. If i still felt this way after i finished the whole
can, I'd probably go and ask them why, and if it were not for work purposes I'd ask
them to consider unsubbing.
But then by
-Original Message-
From: Imran Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 January 2003 12:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP
Please help, I am trying to create a large Personnal
Distribution List on Outlook 2002 and am getting the
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 January 2003 15:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Can't create large PDL in outlook XP
He didn't look. That's what you are for.
That's ok. I'll lull 'em into a false sense of security then one
The reason I am asking is that one of Director used to work
in a company that disabled forwarding, but allow users to
send new e-mails and he is wondering why we are not doing it.
Why not tell him the reason you don't do it is because you know that
anyone who wants to share company
-- for example a user connects to it while playing and
downloads mail via pop, which deltes it from the server, and then
complains they've lost their email.
Why waste the server's resources on a process you don't expect to use.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2003 13:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
What exactly is your point in all of this? To be honest, I
can't follow any line of reasoning
If you stoppped
Are you saying that your own interpretation of your own attitude is
unbiased? Or that your own evaluation of whether or not your paranioa
about how Microsoft are out to get you is unbiased?
Rob
Also an MVP by the way.
Want to throw some mud at me too?
-Original Message-
From: Greg
sig (for the rare occasions I bother to append it):
--
Robert Moir, MSMVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer,
Luton Sixth Form College
Dogs have owners, Cats have staff
Notice it says MSMVP ?
So, that's two strikes and two misses so far. I don't get Secret
compensation and I appear to have the word MVP
Me too. Sounds like we've all been missing out.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
with MSFT on the back.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Taken from the MVP site FAQ
Do Microsoft MVPs receive any payment from Microsoft?
No. Microsoft does provide a small award of software, but MVPs do not receive any
monetary payment from Microsoft.
As its mentioned in the FAQ, I don't think the software stuff is Secret Direct
Not to mention the British Computer Society (of which I am a member) and no doubt
countless other professional bodies around the world.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 19:36
To: Exchange
Its hard to tell what you are talking about. Every time someone says something you
can't refute, you change your arguement slightly. You talk about ethics and yet you
throw around wild accusations about others while not even managing to stick to the
generally accepted ground rules for debate.
Unless they are saving their PSTs on the M:\ drive ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 21:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Gonna love this...
Robert Moir
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Nothing is impossible Erik, but like you I'm dubious. I'd certainly want to see this
claim proven over a long period of time before I'd let their BLB solution in the same
room as one of my servers let alone installed.
And lets face it, if you run with the latest and greatest versions of
I just can't imagine switching to ArcServe because something else needed too much
maintenance. I've never ever had so much trouble with a bit of software as I have had
with Arcserve. I think it must just be that all backup software sux.
-Original Message-
From:
So if i sum up the usual reasons given here, post them on my website etc then they'll
accept it but not if i cut and paste the exact same text and mail it?
Oh wait.. .gov.. the uk govt don't make sense so why should anyone else's ;-)
-Original Message-
From:
versions of exchange there is less reason to
choose BLBs but... I suppose for those that want the option its good to know its
there.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench
Best part of luton is it in your rear view mirror every night at
hometime.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
What makes sending these backups over your T1 line instead of working it all locally
so attractive to you that you are prepared to do an offline backup just to get that?
-Original Message-
From: HOLLIDAY, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 12/02/2003
seen any
Q article for this problem?
We also have another server that runs in tandem with the
problem server and this does not seem to leak memory (two
connector servers)
Why do you feel this is a memory leak rather than normal behaviour?
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 February 2003 15:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe
Robert
1 We are getting alerts from our TNG alerting system to say
that the server is low on physical memory.
a piece of software disinfect and or quarantine your
mail database or transaction logs when it thinks its found a virus is a
very reliable method of corrupting your database.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps
No-one has every hacked my employer's website either. I think this
demonstrates patching the web server is a waste of time, so I shall stop
doing that.
Robert Moir MSMVP
IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps.
Ciderspace Cafe
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 March 2003 12:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
But in that case, it is well known that thousand and
thousands of websites
have been hacked in the past, so it
If its a backbone switch hopefully its new enough and had enough money spent on it
that it is also a managed switch. If you telnet / web-browse into it and check the
error logging and suchlike on the port the bad exchange server is on, is the switch
whining about anything on that port?
Are
be the
original email but the damage would be done because I presume what you
really want to protect is the content of these emails, not the random
collection of bits and bytes that were scraped together to take the
content out of the author's mind and put it on screen.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
*sigh* 2 minutes searching the microsoft website.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;272290
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once
I don't think its a case of Fixing anything as much as Exchange server being a
scenario where clustering generally offers a very poor return on the investment in
time and money you spend setting one up and tweaking it. Quite a lot of errors I've
seen with exchange relate to people doing stupid
You could present the various exact scenarios you hoped clustering exchange would help
with and let the group kick around a discussion over if it would actually help and by
how much.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2003 21:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product
called SpamSucks!? Especially spam trying to sell me a
product called SpamSucks! And sent with a
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 02/06/2003 18:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Backing up the M Drive
Ahh right, so brick level backups albeit by Veritas
We're here to help, but a lot of people on this list do tease people a
little - don't take it personally.
And most of us do expect people to make some kind of effort to figure
things out themselves and read the help guides, etc, before expecting us
to help. It's one thing to be stuck on a
Hey I'm helpful. On tuesdays.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 04/06/2003 17:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants
to know why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange
2003/Outlook 2003. I
I thought he nailed the answer pretty well: White Space and the reported mailbox sizes
are often inaccurate.If thats not it you'll prolly need to give us a bit more info.
Have you recently made a big change to the load on the server, e.g. deleted a lot of
mailboxes?
-Original
Isn't this all just another re-hash of the line in the SMTP rfc about being liberal
about what you accept but strict about what you send?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/06/2003 21:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Really? I'd just delete their account from the network if it was
internal email, or I'd block their whole domain if it was external. We
have rules here against that kind of abuse.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:32
To: Exchange
for the first
time, and so on, so its not like its going to get worse.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
print chr(66) chr(79) chr(70) chr(72)
_
List posting FAQ: http
I get that a lot too
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 12/06/2003 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Yes a duck is pecking my
Well I work at an educational institution myself which may be bigger or smaller than
yours, I don't know and I don't think it matters. We dealt with the problem by
upgrading to Exchange 2000. Exchange 5.5 is what, six years old now, and hasn't seen a
lot of new development work since Exchange
that all of the remote users
were in effect blocked from using email till the server came back up.
john
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Without wanting to insult you or anything, you do realise that domain admin and
exchange admin have nothing to do with each other generally speaking? If you've
changed things so this isn't the case here fine, but the two don't go together as a
matter of course.
-Original
Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having
trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit
exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be
having problems with it.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
: pipe dream or possible
But I have a firewall! :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=booksfield-ke
ywords=Exchange%202000%20serversearch-type=ssbq=1/103-9450502-5588605
Buy some.
Read the ones you buy.
Two best Exchange support resources you will ever need
Http://support.microsoft.com
Http://www.google.com
We're all
marvin the martian
Wheres the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!
/marvin the martian
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 18/08/2003 20:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Well you certainly are persuasive.
*plonk*
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2003 14:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
What an asshole
Thank you,
Mitchell D. Lawrence
Network
-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Well you certainly are persuasive.
*plonk*
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Its probably worth noting that installing the same scanner in 3 places is not 3 layers
of protection, its the same layer of protection 3 times. Not quite the same thing.
If your vendor's scanner engine has a problem picking up a certain type of malware, or
their dat files are slow in coming,
That's why we suggest a VPN.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2003 23:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
FYI,
I've seen instances where it was required to open up port TCP
135 in
That always catches me out when I set up and then lock down a new front
end server. Always good for a chuckle that one.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 August 2003 15:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Owa Not displaying mails with . in
That or refuse SMTP connections from their IP address.
Or better still do that and THEN kill the user. Seriously, this is a
behavioural problem is it not? Isn't this a matter for whatever passes
for a discipline process at 'ubl.com.pk'?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
that it will.
As someone wise on this list has mentioned, technology is
not a cure
for bad behavior. A 2x4, however, is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
Why does the idea of a security product that does stuff without telling you what
worry me?
I've been using GFI languard. I like it but don't have a big baseline of similar
things to compare it with.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support team.
4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what you
have.
5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to happen. You'd
see this if they'd deleted the
to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't
have to compete with every one else's traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
yes. What was the problem again?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 18:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
The one about hijacking threads and thinking the world revolves around you?
Try googling on Net etiquette or Netiquette.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 15/09/2003 21:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Isn't the best brick level backup software like try to see the funny side of your
compound leg fracture
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 16/09/2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject:
know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The one
being 200% better than ArcServe 7 is like being taller than the dwarf from the austin
powers films.
-Original Message-
From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/09/2003 13:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
My biggest problem is the amount of jerk-off sellers.
We asked for
i) a san
ii) some direct-attatched external storage
The amount of vendors who took those comments on board, asked what we wanted them for,
and then promptly quoted for a NAS device was quite depressing. Idiots.
Have you read the description of how the virus works?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2003 13:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is
up to date
?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 4:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
to a luxury car.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 December 2003 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Good
on what you
said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy of his
altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quite so, thanks for the clarification Roger.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 12:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
to remember when dealing with
multiple servers.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15
I'd say that's spam. There is a lot of argument about what exactly spam is, and I
would say this falls under the definition I use - unsolicited, commercial, bulk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 12:54
To: Exchange
Would you like a free pen, and some notepaper?
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 22:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources
*drinks beer*
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2003 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no
backups. What should I do now?
-Original Message-
So Microsoft are unethical because they accepted payments from you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: 17 December 2003 20:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Yes, we pay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: 17 December 2003 21:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
And, in the interest of full disclosure, two of the three
accolades in
my signature
6.5
I thought Hawaii banned unions?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4
at the crossroads at midnight.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
Would you like a free pen, and some notepaper?
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior
Perhaps you should get a refund on your list subscription fees.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 December 2003 15:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
I disagree. I
Yes of course it can.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
it confirmed ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
Yes of course it can.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior
!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
Shhh don't worry about him. He's just jealous that Windows Server MVPs
I don't know about that...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto
as you are confusing the issue.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees
Sent: 06 January 2004 10:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: getting heaps
Amen brother. Testify. That's why I don't use it. Would love to though.
I know that businesses are not charities, I'm not asking them to give us everything
for free because we are an educational establishment, but based on the licence models
that are presented to us, I can only conclude that
If my users needed to access mail that was older than 2 years I'd design an Exchange
setup that gave them the space they needed to store this stuff.
PSTs are unreliable
PSTs are expensive (e.g. cost of supporting them, disk and backup tape space as they
break SIS)
I think this is all covered
There are unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of the list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reasoner, Bob (PHES)
Sent: 08 January 2004 22:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want to sound like a
101 - 200 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
