Wait in line, bridge boy...
And keep in mind I'm bigger than you are, so I'll rough you up a bit if you
try to cut in line...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
It is 100% correct. I do it on a fairly regular basis, in order to keep my
near-diety status with my end users. Or to scare the bejeses out of my
desktop staff, but that's another story.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
Sure...
Just be in Orlando the first week of October.. Bridgeboy, Ice
Cream
NBTSTAT is used to examine all things NetBIOS on your machine - including
NetBIOS name cache (nbtstat -c, I believe)
NETSTAT is used to look at the TCP/IP connections.
Neither has a darn thing to do with DNS.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Nope. Still does DNS first.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday,
This is again in the FAQ. (See a trend here with your questions??)
Anyway, you need to add the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses column to your CSV
and put the additional addresses there.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Some of the over 30[1] crowd is, too...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
[1] Barely, but I am..
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry about the cross posting.
We don't have a lot of specifics on it, but there appears to be a new worm
on the loose. The payload is a typical Melissa-style worm, where its only
action is to send mail to all members of the GAL, with the following
message:
Hi, how are you ? I am fine here.
Its call admin permission, and it requires the user to have the Exchange
admin tool installed.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Hell no!
User permission would grant the same level of rights as the mailbox owner
(as defined in the PRimary Windows NT Account attribute).
You mean Admin permissions (not Permissions Admin)
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
?
Thanks
John Shi
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What Pix firewall model would you use based on your
experienc e?
We're doing LAN to LAN firewalling with a 515
I've done it more than once, too..
You have to run an IS/DS adjustment following the restore, then add
instances of the PF's in question to the recovery server, before you can
access the data, but it works.
I thought it strange that the 5.5 Disaster Recovery docs don't cover the
process.
THEE-ate-er is about as bad as DEE-troit
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox size advice
Are you referring to any manager in particular?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
--- Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PResent the facts differently. Like in a graph.
Managers are genetically
predisposed to prefer
It is nice being able to play the two of them off each other like kids do to
their parents
But Dad, Mom said I could!
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
Its hardly patently stupid when that's what you've got to play with, and it
will support a *test* environment of two adults and 2 children under the age
of 5.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
I've had it work, and I've had it fail. Seems to be some combination of
client OS and Outlook version pairings that work great, some don't.
Its safest to do it while the user is not actively logged in. Fortunately,
my experience has been that the issues will be solely on the client side,
too -
Not if the vendor prices per seat rather than per server...
Roger
Iron Chef Migration
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Ed
Without a disaster recovery, how do you *know* the software is working for
you?
By looking at ArgServe's piss poor excuse for job logging?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Read the FAQ appendix titled The Ed Crowley Never Restore Method
4 years, never had to restore an individual mailbox
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
You can, however, set the ports that the IS, DS, MTA and SA use.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier
There is no inner circle
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October
Or search restrictions
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19,
Authentica has a product that does that.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Yup... That means that the address in the To field of this message was the
return address on a message to your organization which was misaddressed. In
turn, the original message has a reply to address that you can't deliver to,
for what could be a number of reasons - DNS resolution or transient
Its by design, RFC 821 I believe. NDRs should always be generated from a
null address, which causes MTAs to not generate an NDR in the case said NDR
is not deliverable.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
Yep. That's the fact, jack.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Depending on the versions of Exchange and Outlook, yes, it can be bad.
Technet has at least one article about issues with Ol2k on Exchange 5.5
boxes
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
AFAIK, the issue is that Outlook 2k has a different MAPI version than E2k
(and most Ex5.5 versions too) and that can cause major issues.
I don't recall seeing any change to that recommendations.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
What OS is this running on?
There are some issues with that much RAM on standard NT4, and the large
memory tuning support (/3GT boot.ini swich) supposededly helps.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
There is no inner circle
What
I've got that many running quite fine on 512MB, with a 30+GB store size.
Its all in hardware tuning.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
I seem to recall that the password change requires the current password to
be entered before changing. Makes your suggestion a little hard to
implement.
Personally, I would have taken a screenshot of the desktop, as is. Set the
screenshot as the wallpaper, hide the taskbar, and move all icons
: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Inner Circle - Meeting Minutes
Of course, generally we see you long before you see us.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:38 PM
They are marked at private by User A. The only way to see them is to log in
with User rights on User A's calendar. Everyone should see the time marked
as busy (on the Free/Busy info) if the appointment is marked as busy.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
Start the Outlook executable from a command line, with /cleanfreebusy after
it.
Search technet for /cleanfreebusy and there are complete instructions
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Same sites going to pretty much kill anything easy.
You'll have to statically map the Exchange services ports, for which the FAQ
has a link to a technet article. That article doesn't, however, tell you how
to statically map the MTA, which was covered on the list a few months ago
(August,
Because in your message, you asked Kelly, a Sybari employee, for information
comparing two of her company's competitors products to each other.
I would suggest going to Norton and Trend Micro and asking them the
question.
--
Roger D. Seielstad
Yes you can.
As ICB[1] mentioned, search technet for DumpsterAlwaysOn and make sure you
have Deleted Item Retention enabled.
Scared the crap out of one of my desktop engineers who thought he could hide
something from me in email.
--
Roger D.
Depending on their client, it should be possible for them to access the GAL
via LDAP, however they will have to be online to do it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Not entirely true, at least on the SMTP (port 25) side.
You could set the IMS to only accept connections from your firewall, and
have the firewall proxy (rather than just filter) mail. Unfortunately, many
firewalls won't proxy SMTP.
--
Roger
characteristics
That's 4 syllables longer than Hanji can handle. 'salesperson', 'statement'
and 'comparing' are also probably pushing it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
checked. The appointments are
also marked as
busy. I tried setting them to free, saving, and then setting
back to busy,
but that made no difference.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
|+---
|| Roger Seielstad
I believe that hotfix -l will also show what's there.
Then there's qcheck.exe
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley
Its not exactly what you want, since Ex 5.5 can't really do what you're
looking for, but you could set a per domain size restriction of 0kb (on the
Internet Mail tab) for the domains you want to reject.
Alternately, use a third party MTA
--
Sue's might, however, since IIRC correctly the site is hosted, and most
hosting companies don't care for ICMP traffic on their networks.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Not entirely true. That was an old version that munged stuff that way.
Our P*x* d*n* d* *hat t** o*t*n, *u* h*ve *o** oth*r i*su*s.
Seriously, the newer code bases are the ones that cause dupes, because they
selectively drop packets that have ESMTP commands in them.
We are all over-worked. Just because you are the only one isnt any
excuse for failing to test and plan a roll out. You need to make the
case to your boss about help. Like they say here in the US
Ignorance of
the law is no excuse.
Personally, I like a former coworker's comment:
If we don't
You have complete control, in a fully documented way, to control whether the
Outlook Security Patch (also included in Office 2000 SP2, IIRC) 'blocks'
attachments or not.
Again, this is hardly Microsoft's fault, unless you want to blame them for
developing functionality that a lot of their
Someone else on this list used to post the peoples names on the main
Intranet page. It only took one major outbreak to fix that behavior.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
It can be done, but it can get really ugly.
I tend to prefer avoiding upgrades whenever possible. Usually that's always.
If you can get a big enough box to host Exchange temporarily, you can move
everyone to it, rebuilt the current box to how you want it, then move
everyone back. Use the move
The only reference I found was to an Exchange 5.5 whitepaper on MS's
website.
That IS the definitive resource for Exchange Backup and Restore. And the
list archives can fill in most gaps that you might have.
Not to mention the FAQ has an excellent technique to avoid doing most
restores.
You have a file system antivirus scanner hitting that directory. Stop it
from doing that and bounce the IMC and you'll be fine
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 7:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: It's not Microsoft's fault because
Who are these customers that demanded such code features that
could create
destructive payloads?
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Chris Scharff wrote:
No.. I have customers who utilize scripting
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's not Microsoft's fault because
The issue is not scripting per se, but the fact that MS
Outlook and MSIE
have a long
Sounds like there is a configuration error at one end of that x.400
connector.
My guess is that either the X.400 standards settings (version/year, two way
alternate, etc) are set wrong, or there is a name resolution issue between
the servers. Make sure the X.400's are using IP addresses, not
I'll do this one better.
Nimda would not have effected UNPATCHED servers, had proper security
techniques been followed.
Nimda required the IUSR_MachineName account to have read access into the
\WinNT tree. A properly secured server would have that directory (and ALL
directories outside
I use it on my connector and IMC servers, but only when that's all they do.
Since nothing is stored in the databases there, there is no issue with
losing one.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
I guess I don't have a shred of credibility, eh Ben..
I'll have to remember that next time you call me for help[1]
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
[1]
Images
601 N. 34th Street
Seattle, WA 98103
Tel 206-925-6617
Cell 206-255-0169
http://www.gettyimages.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I
What business goal are you actually trying to accomplish here?
Going on the assumption you want in inbound only (no outbound) or outbound
only (no inbound) connector. Technically it probably can be done, but it
isn't going to be very clean.
For inbound only, you should be able to put a
Because its obnoxious to add that, as it breaks thread sorting capabilities
of some clients.
HINT: If you're not going to follow the best method (subscribe a public
folder for the mail and your personal account with the NOMAIL option), set
the rule up to move all mail sent TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or Netscape or Mozilla on
Linux. This list and the Outlook-Dev list are the only ones out of the
30 or so I subscribe to that dont prefix the subjects.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 7:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Personally, I love the Support 10,000 users on a single server
I can do that with Exchange. Assuming everyone has a 5MB mailbox size and
uses POP3 for client access. Just like that friggin Linux on S/390 scales
better than Exchange fiasco on SlashDot a few months ago.
Overall, this reads like a comparison to Exchange 4.0 Beta 2 - half their
statements about Exchange are either too vague to be used as a point of
comparison, or outright lies...
Gotta love marketing departments.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Make sure you ask how much more the clustering support costs...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Um, F7 fires off the speel chuker in any version of Outlook.
Hire better educated users if you think all email has to have proper
grammer.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: System Attendant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:07 AM
To: Roger Seielstad
Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found
and action
taken.
Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content
From http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6276284.html
But after Thursday's price changes, the enterprise edition of the 9i
database will cost a uniform $40,000 per processor, while the standard
edition will cost $15,000 per processor. In the next few days, Oracle will
release to existing
They don't need to know how to spell. I don't. The Speel chuker exists in
Outlook
They do need to understand the rules of grammar, however.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and
acti on taken.
Apparently Oracle and Email in the same sentence tripped
All Outlook versions (at least =98) use the Word dictionary
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL
picture of
Larry shaking
hands with Elvis Smitticamp.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
From http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200
), where would you find that connection information
between the two
server to be able to change it?
Kevin Fletcher
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail not flowing
That's really a consulting question - much more in depth that you're going
to get out of a mailing list like this.
I can recommend some very good folks, depending on where you are located.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
price I might be
willing to rent you the tool (price includes my small
management fee of
course).
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best solution for merging EX
Need a little more information.
How EXACTLY is sendmail handling mail for synxis.com, and what are the
entries in the Routing tab of your IMC in Exchange?
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger
Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: X400 Connector (Ex 5.5)
What business
Yes, there is a registry key.
Its in the HKLM\CCS\Services\MSExchangeIS hive, but I can't remember the
specifics right now, and I can't find the article that discussed it.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best solution for merging EX servers??
We're still talking about Exchange here right?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
just fine. - RFC 1925
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best solution for merging EX servers??
Yes.
You met Jeff Mr. CSV Eskens at MEC. He was easy to find
That's like saying you're the King of uucp...
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
Ahh, the joys of Inbound Only and Outbound Only IMCs...
A few issues here. First, as you've found, the Inbound Only setting doesn't
do a whole lot of anything. Its a strange bug that never seemed to get
fixed, but the work arounds are simple.
Second, since you're dealing with site routing
Quick search returns Q183400, which shows which tests to run to try to fix
the errors (you don't have to run alltests to do it).
There is something else going on, though. My gut would be that you have a
filesystem antivirus package hitting \exchsrvr\mdbdata, which could cause
this.
Make sure
The source was generated by your server in response to a message that it
received from somwhere, with the Reply-To address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], to which your server cannot complete delivery
of the NDR.
Elementary, my dear Watson.
--
Roger D.
Doesn't indicate anything having to do with relaying.
Most likely, it was spam addressed to invalid addresses at your domain, and
the reply-to address is invalid as well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine
It all depends on what functionality you want. There are at least a few
front ends available for IMAP servers that would do basic mail handling, but
OWA is the only one that would cut the groupware features.
TWIG seems pretty cool from an IMAP viewer.
I don't think you would want (nor would it work to have) two AV products on
the Exchange servers.
The approach we use is to have a mail relay running Trend's InterScan
VirusWall scanning everything between the Internet and Exchange. Works like
a dream...
Most products like Outlook that get bashed by the media are bashed by people
who don't have experience administering them in real life.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits UDP from the current
server's IP address.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the
praise for NetScreen and Norton..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original
Doing this gives the secretary full access to the entire mailbox, as well as
the ability to Send As her boss. Doesn't sound like it meets the desired
criteria.
Jennifer Baker posted the best method for this.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Watch all sorts of hell break out after doing it too...
Been there, done that, got the T-Shirt, and I'm still finding issues a YEAR
after migrating people with that option on.
Far better is to migrate the rules to a PST from the client side, then
reimport them following migration.
the Outlook client does export
this information
correctly but according to you it fails with Exmerge?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November 2001 12:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Moving 45 users
: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ban Outlook?
Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's
pumping the
praise for NetScreen and Norton
I don't believe it can be done.
Actually, in retrospect, it could be done, but it would be ugly. Very ugly.
By default, Public Folders officially live in the default Recipients
container, but there is an option to change that (can't remember where, but
its there). Theoretically, you could make
DIsabling rerouting mail should work, unless you're doing something funky
with mail routing. With it disabled, the IMC will do a directory lookup of
all addresses that it knows, and if it doesn't find the address it will
reject it.
What entries are in your routing table in the IMS? How is the MX
Its only an open relay if reroute incoming mail is enabled. If not, I don't
believe its an open relay.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original
1 - 100 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
